BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    housing expert witness Maximo Ohio parking structure expert witness Maximo Ohio high-rise construction expert witness Maximo Ohio retail construction expert witness Maximo Ohio landscaping construction expert witness Maximo Ohio concrete tilt-up expert witness Maximo Ohio Subterranean parking expert witness Maximo Ohio condominium expert witness Maximo Ohio custom homes expert witness Maximo Ohio institutional building expert witness Maximo Ohio hospital construction expert witness Maximo Ohio office building expert witness Maximo Ohio townhome construction expert witness Maximo Ohio industrial building expert witness Maximo Ohio structural steel construction expert witness Maximo Ohio condominiums expert witness Maximo Ohio Medical building expert witness Maximo Ohio production housing expert witness Maximo Ohio custom home expert witness Maximo Ohio mid-rise construction expert witness Maximo Ohio tract home expert witness Maximo Ohio casino resort expert witness Maximo Ohio
    Maximo Ohio construction expert witnessesMaximo Ohio construction expertsMaximo Ohio slope failure expert witnessMaximo Ohio engineering consultantMaximo Ohio expert witness concrete failureMaximo Ohio construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessMaximo Ohio concrete expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Maximo, Ohio

    Ohio Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to HB 175, Chptr 1312, for a homebuilder to qualify for right to repair protection, the contractor must notify consumers (in writing) of NOR laws at the time of sale; The law stipulates written notice of defects required itemizing and describing and including documentation prepared by inspector. A contractor has 21 days to respond in writing.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Maximo Ohio

    Licensing is done at the local level. Licenses required for plumbing, electrical, HVAC, heating, and hydronics trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association of Stark County
    Local # 3615
    4344 Metro Cir NW
    North Canton, OH 44720

    Maximo Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Wayne and Holmes Cos
    Local # 3690
    4973 Cleveland Rd Suite A
    Wooster, OH 44691

    Maximo Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    West Central Buckeye Builders Association
    Local # 3648
    1520 Allentown Rd
    Lima, OH 45805

    Maximo Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Hancock County
    Local # 3639
    9811 Smokies Way
    Findlay, OH 45840

    Maximo Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association of North Central OH
    Local # 3651
    1183 Lexington Avenue
    Mansfield, OH 44907

    Maximo Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Mercer Co Builders Association
    Local # 3656
    PO Box 363
    Rockford, OH 45882
    Maximo Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Portage & Summit Counties
    Local # 3603
    799 White Pond Drive
    Akron, OH 44320

    Maximo Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Maximo Ohio


    Limitations on the Ability to Withdraw and De-Annex Property from a Common Interest Community

    Framework, Tallest Mass Timber Project in the U.S., Is On Hold

    Mediation Success – Strategies for Avoiding Prolonged Litigation and Getting To “Settled”

    New Highway for Olympics Cuts off Village near Sochi, Russia

    The Leaning Tower of San Francisco

    EPA Expands PFAS Reporting Requirements with Addition of New Chemical to Toxics Release Inventory, Published by Law360

    Time is Money: Escalating Stalled Termination Cost Negotiations

    Going Digital in 2019: The Latest Technology for a Bright Future in Construction

    Thank You for Seven Years of Election to Super Lawyers

    New York Court Permits Asbestos Claimants to Proceed Against Insurers with Buyout Agreements

    Los Angeles Warehousing Mecca Halts Expansion Just as Needs Soar

    Potential Coverage Issues Implicated by the Champlain Towers Collapse

    Construction Law- Where Pragmatism and Law Collide

    Haight Attorneys Selected to 2018 Southern California Rising Stars List

    Statute of Limitations Bars Lender’s Subsequent Action to Quiet Title Against Junior Lienholder Mistakenly Omitted from Initial Judicial Foreclosure Action

    Recent Bribery and Anti-Corruption Enforcement Trends in Global Construction Industry

    RDU Terminal 1: Going Green

    Substitute Materials — What Are Your Duties? What Are Your Risks? (Law Note)

    Christopher Leise Recognized by US News – Best Lawyers 2022 "Lawyer of the Year"

    Court Finds No Occurrence for Installation of Defective flooring and Explains Coverage for Attorney Fee Awards

    California Plant Would Convert Wood Waste Into Hydrogen Fuel

    Renovate or Demolish Milwaukee’s Historic City Hall?

    Don’t Ignore Prejudgment Interest

    California Contractor Spills Coffee on Himself by Failing to Stay Mechanics Lien Action While Pursuing Arbitration

    Insurer Must Produce Documents After Failing To Show They Are Confidential

    Judge Who Oversees Mass. Asbestos Docket Takes New Role As Chief Justice of Superior Court

    Nuclear Energy Gets a Much-Needed Boost

    The Show Must Go On: Navigating Arbitration in the Wake of the COVID-19 Outbreak

    Landmark Montana Supreme Court Decision Series: The Duty to Defend

    Motion to Strike Insureds' Experts Denied, Claims under Fair Claims Settlement Act Survives Summary Judgment

    Mind The Gap!

    Co-Housing Startups Fly in the Face of Old-School NYC Housing Law

    Waiver of Subrogation and Lack of Contractual Privity Bars Commercial Tenants’ Claims

    Congratulations to Nicole Whyte, Keith Bremer, John Toohey, and Tyler Offenhauser for Being Recognized as 2022 Super Lawyers!

    Condo Collapse Spurs Hometown House Member to Demand U.S. Rules

    Summary Judgment for Insurer Reversed Based on Expert Opinion

    Washington Court of Appeals Upholds Standard of Repose in Fruit Warehouse Case

    Florida Representative Wants to Change Statute of Repose

    Don MacGregor of Bert L. Howe & Associates Awarded Silver Star Award at WCC Construction Defect Seminar

    Location, Location, Location—Even in Construction Liens

    Nation’s Top Court Limits EPA's Authority in Clean Air Case

    Report to Congress Calls for Framework to Cut Post-Quake Recovery Time

    Techniques for Resolving Construction Disputes

    Defining Catastrophic Injury Claims

    Developer Boymelgreen Forced to Hand Over Financial Records for 15 Broad Street

    CGL Insurer’s Duty to Defend Insured During Pre-Suit 558 Process: Maybe?

    Drafting the Bond Form, Particularly Performance Bond Form

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Adopts New Rule in Breach-of-the-Consent-to-Settle-Clause Cases

    The Devil is in the Details: The Texas Construction Trust Fund Pitfalls Residential Remodelers (and General Contractors) Should Avoid

    Rachel Reynolds Selected as Prime Member of ADTA
    Corporate Profile

    MAXIMO OHIO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Maximo, Ohio Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Maximo's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Maximo, Ohio

    Celebrating BWB&O’s 2026 Super Lawyers Rising Stars in San Diego!

    March 31, 2026 —
    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP is proud to announce that Partners Jocelyn Russo, Christina Matian, and Associate Angelo Perillo have been named to the Super Lawyers 2026 San Diego Rising Stars list. This recognition highlights their outstanding dedication and distinguished service in Family Law, Civil Litigation, and Personal Injury Litigation.
    SUPER LAWYERS Jocelyn Russo: 2023-2026 Christina Matian: 2024-2026 Angelo Perillo: 2024-2026
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP

    PSA: Be Sure to Document (Even When Time is Short)

    April 14, 2026 —
    Written change orders are a big deal. Almost all construction contracts (at least the well drafted ones) require written contracts. Written change orders are even important enough that Virginia law requires these provisions in residential construction contracts. Why are they so important? Because they are a “mini-contract” of sorts. They set the expectations, price, time, and work to be performed; work that was not included in the original price or scope for the project. Without this in writing, there will be no record of what the parties agreed to do. Does this sound familiar? Sound like its own contract? It should. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    HHMR and Every One of its Partners Recognized by Legal 500 in Denver Elite – Real Estate

    April 20, 2026 —
    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC is pleased to announce its recognition as a Tier 1 firm in the Denver Elite rankings for Real Estate, a category that includes construction law and construction litigation, by The Legal 500. In addition, each of the firm’s partners has been individually recognized in the same rankings. The firm’s individual recognitions include: Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    Supreme Court Strikes Down IEEPA Tariffs: The Refund Process Will Be Messy

    March 10, 2026 —
    On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, and the consolidated case Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc., that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs unilaterally.1 The decision invalidates both the “reciprocal” tariffs and the drug-trafficking tariffs imposed under IEEPA. For importers, the immediate question is whether, how, and when refunds can actually be obtained. On that issue, the U.S. Supreme Court provided no roadmap. To the contrary, the dissent warned that the United States “may be required to refund billions of dollars,” that the process is likely to be a “mess,” and that the majority opinion “says nothing today about whether, and if so how, the Government should go about returning the billions of dollars that it has collected from importers.” Reprinted courtesy of Brett W. Johnson, Snell & Wilmer, Derek Flint, Snell & Wilmer, T. Troy Galan, Snell & Wilmer and Thomas Williams, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Johnson may be contacted at bwjohnson@swlaw.com Mr. Flint may be contacted at dflint@swlaw.com Mr. Galan may be contacted at tgalan@swlaw.com Mr. Williams may be contacted at twilliams@swlaw.com> Read the full story...

    Appraisal Award Upheld Despite Insurer’s Contention that Causation was Considered

    February 23, 2026 —
    The federal district court in Tennessee granted the insured’s motion for summary judgment finding the appraisal award was properly determined despite the insurer’s argument that the appraisal panel considered causation of the loss. Nashville Communications, Inc. v. Auto-Owners (Mutual) Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 223455 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 13, 2025) A windstorm struck and damaged the building owned and insured by Nashville Communications (NashComm). A claim was submitted to the insurer, Auto-Owners, for damage to the roof and interior water leakage. Auto-Owners acknowledged that there was some amount of wind damage to the building from the wind event. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Buffalo, NY Stadium Work Resumes After Suspects ID'ed in $150K Graffiti Vandalism

    March 17, 2026 —
    Construction work is back on track at Highmark Stadium in Orchard Park, N.Y., after police identifed, but did not arrest two suspects in connection with $150,000 in property damage that paused work for nearly one week at the $2.1 billion stadium project, said the Gilbane Building Cos. and Turner Construction joint venture building it for the National Football League’s Buffalo Bills. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Emell D. Adolphus, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Adolphus may be contacted at adolphuse@enr.com

    Colorado Court Affirms Attorneys’ Fee Award Against Plaintiff’s Counsel for Pursuing Unsupported CCPA Claims

    August 03, 2026 —
    The Colorado Court of Appeals recently affirmed a trial court’s award of more than $241,000 in attorney fees against a plaintiffs’ attorney who continued to pursue unsupported claims arising out of a residential construction dispute. Although the opinion was not selected for official publication under C.A.R. 35(e) and therefore has no precedential value, it nevertheless provides an instructive reminder that Colorado courts are willing to impose significant financial consequences when claims lack substantial justification. For builders, developers, contractors, insurers, and defense counsel, the case is worth reading, not because it announces new law, but because it demonstrates that Colorado’s fee-shifting statute remains a meaningful tool when unsupported claims continue long after they should have been abandoned. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    Nevada’s Mandatory Nonbinding Arbitration Law for Civil Cases is Going Through Changes

    May 14, 2026 —
    Nevada currently operates an expedited litigation program designed to resolve civil disputes with a value up to $50,000 without incurring the “usual” expense of litigating these disputes. Over time, however, the number of civil cases that have been “exempted” from this program based on the claimed damages exceeding $50,000 has grown dramatically. In response, the Nevada Legislature recently enacted a number of rule changes designed to streamline Nevada’s arbitration process and include more cases. Among these changes are increasing the arbitration “cap” from $50,000 to $100,000. By way of background, the Nevada’s Court Annexed Arbitration program is a mandatory, non-binding program for civil cases in judicial districts that have county populations of 100,000 or more [1]. Nevada’s Court Annexed Arbitration was born out of NRS 38.250, which was enacted in 1991 and went into effect in the summer of 1992. The newly enacted NRS 38.250 was regarded as a way to address the problem of increased court caseloads while promoting judicial economy and efficiency in civil cases having a probable jury award of less than $25,000 [2]. Initially, cases that were automatically exempt from the program included class actions, medical malpractice disputes, divorce proceedings, and other domestic relations matters [3]. Reprinted courtesy of Brandon Wright, Lewis Brisbois and Manuel Gurule, Lewis Brisbois Mr. Wright may be contacted at Brandon.Wright@lewisbrisbois.com Mr. Gurule may be contacted at Manuel.Gurule@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...