BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    structural steel construction expert witness Bidwell Ohio condominium expert witness Bidwell Ohio housing expert witness Bidwell Ohio industrial building expert witness Bidwell Ohio custom homes expert witness Bidwell Ohio institutional building expert witness Bidwell Ohio hospital construction expert witness Bidwell Ohio townhome construction expert witness Bidwell Ohio multi family housing expert witness Bidwell Ohio Medical building expert witness Bidwell Ohio Subterranean parking expert witness Bidwell Ohio office building expert witness Bidwell Ohio concrete tilt-up expert witness Bidwell Ohio tract home expert witness Bidwell Ohio condominiums expert witness Bidwell Ohio high-rise construction expert witness Bidwell Ohio custom home expert witness Bidwell Ohio retail construction expert witness Bidwell Ohio parking structure expert witness Bidwell Ohio low-income housing expert witness Bidwell Ohio casino resort expert witness Bidwell Ohio landscaping construction expert witness Bidwell Ohio
    Bidwell Ohio structural concrete expertBidwell Ohio construction expert witnessesBidwell Ohio consulting engineersBidwell Ohio contractor expert witnessBidwell Ohio defective construction expertBidwell Ohio expert witness roofingBidwell Ohio construction expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Bidwell, Ohio

    Ohio Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to HB 175, Chptr 1312, for a homebuilder to qualify for right to repair protection, the contractor must notify consumers (in writing) of NOR laws at the time of sale; The law stipulates written notice of defects required itemizing and describing and including documentation prepared by inspector. A contractor has 21 days to respond in writing.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Bidwell Ohio

    Licensing is done at the local level. Licenses required for plumbing, electrical, HVAC, heating, and hydronics trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Greater Cincinnati
    Local # 3621
    415 Glensprings Dr Ste 100
    Cincinnati, OH 45246

    Bidwell Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Athens Building Industries Association
    Local # 3646
    9344 Bassett Rd
    Athens, OH 45701
    Bidwell Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association of South Central OH
    Local # 3618
    545 Vine Street
    Chillicothe, OH 45601
    Bidwell Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Washington County
    Local # 3657
    PO Box 1048
    Marietta, OH 45750
    Bidwell Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Tri-County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3645
    PO Box 643
    Lancaster, OH 43130

    Bidwell Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Dayton
    Local # 3630
    One Chamber Plaza Ste 100 B
    Dayton, OH 45402

    Bidwell Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Clark County Chapter
    Local # 3673
    PO Box 1047
    Springfield, OH 45501

    Bidwell Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Bidwell Ohio


    Sixth Circuit Holds that Some Official Actions Taken in the “Flint Water Crisis” Could Be Constitutional Due Process Violations

    Construction Job Opening Rise in October

    Beware: Hyper-Technical Labor Code Violations May Expose Employers to Significant Claims for Penalties under the Labor Code California Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA)

    TRI Pointe Merges with Weyerhaeuser’s Real Estate Company

    Is Modular Construction Destined to Fail?

    Utah’s Highest Court Holds That Plaintiffs Must Properly Commence an Action to Rely on the Relation-Back Doctrine to Overcome the Statute of Repose

    Motion to Strike Insureds' Experts Denied, Unfair Claim Settlement Claims Survive Summary Judgment

    Colorado Court of Appeals Finds Damages to Non-Defective Property Arising From Defective Construction Covered Under Commercial General Liability Policy

    Courthouse Reporter Series: The Travails of Statutory Construction...Defining “Labor” under the Miller Act

    Federal Court Ruling Bolsters the “Your Work” Exclusion in Standard CGL Policies

    How To Fix Oroville Dam

    No Bad Faith in Insurer's Denial of Collapse Claim

    Putting 3D First, a Model Bridge Rises in Norway

    Sales of New U.S. Homes Slump to Lowest Level Since November

    New Addition to the ASCE/SEI 7-22 Standard Protects Buildings from a 500-year Flood Event

    Safe Commercial Asbestos-Removal Practices

    The Future Has Arrived: New Technologies in Construction

    "Repair Work" Endorsements and Punch List Work

    Weyerhaeuser Leaving Home Building Business

    The Great Skyscraper Comeback Skips North America

    2018 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!

    West Coast Casualty’s Quarter Century of Service

    Texas covered versus uncovered allocation and “legally obligated to pay.”

    Just Because You Caused it, Doesn’t Mean You Own It: The Hooker Exception to the Privette Doctrine

    Policy Lanuage Expressly Prohibits Replacement of Undamaged Material to Match Damaged Material

    Construction Defects through the Years

    Construction defect firm Angius & Terry moves office to Roseville

    Force Majeure Under the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic

    Long-Planned Miami Mega Mixed-Use Development Nears Initial Debut

    Back Posting with Thoughts on Lien Waivers

    New ConsensusDocs 242 Design Professional Change Order Form Helps Facilitate Compensation for Changes in Design Services

    Climate Disasters Are an Affordable Housing Problem

    Insurer Not Entitled to Summary Judgment on Construction Defect, Bad Faith Claims

    Suppliers of Inherently Dangerous Raw Materials Remain Excluded from the Protections of the Component Parts Doctrine

    Colorado Homes Approved Despite being Too Close Together

    US Court Disputes $1.8B AECOM Damage Award in ‘Remarkable Fraud’ Suit

    Deadline for Hurricane Ian Disaster Recovery Applications Announced

    eRent: Construction Efficiency Using Principles of the Sharing Economy

    Construction Industry Outlook: Building a Better Tomorrow

    Trump Order Waives Project Environment Rules to Push COVID-19 Recovery

    Preventing Costly Litigation Through Your Construction Contract

    At Least 32 Dead in Massive US Storm, Extreme Risks Remain

    El Paso Increases Surety Bond Requirement on Contractors

    The U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals Rules on Greystone

    Point Taken: The UK Supreme Court Finally Confirms the General Law of Liquidated Damages (LDs)

    Is Your Website Accessible And Are You Liable If It Isn't?

    Federal Judge Vacates CDC Eviction Moratorium Nationwide

    Two Architecturally Prized Buildings May be Demolished

    Congratulations to Karen Baytosh and August Hotchkin on Their Recognition as 2021 Nevada Legal Elites!

    Groundbreaking New York Law Regulates Third-Party Litigation Funding for the First Time
    Corporate Profile

    BIDWELL OHIO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Bidwell, Ohio Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Bidwell, Ohio

    Doctrine of Substantial Performance When It Comes to Payment

    July 27, 2026 —
    A recent non-construction case touches upon the doctrine of substantial performance when it comes to payment. In this case, a club was to make two payments to secure a rapper’s attendance. The first payment was made. The second payment was made but was a few hundred dollars short of the agreed amount. The rapper did not show up. The club claimed it substantially performed its obligations. At first glance, the argument makes sense because the second payment fell only a few hundred dollars short. But that wasn’t the case when it comes to pre-commencement payment obligations:
    Substantial performance applies only when the variance from the contract terms “is inadvertent or unintentional and unimportant so that the work actually performed is substantially what was called for in the contract.” However, when one party agrees to pay the other on or before a specific date, time is of the essence, and the payor is required to pay the payee on or before that date. “There is almost always no such thing as ‘substantial performance’ of payment between commercial parties when the duty is simply the general one to pay. Payment is either made in the amount and on the date due, or it is not.”
    Big Gate Records, LLC v. Washington, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D1281a (Fla. 2nd DCA 2026) (internal citations omitted).
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    We’re Burning Tokens to Clean Up Bad PDFs

    August 24, 2026 —
    Last Thursday, researchers from Tampere and Aalto universities reported on preliminary results of two AI- and digitalization-related projects. One project demonstrated how AI can automate the Bill of Materials process; the other tried to quantify the impact of data-driven construction and AI. The conclusion was that AI-powered automation can dramatically increase productivity, but unevenly. However, the substantial benefits may come from better outcomes rather than project efficiency. Various standards, company-specific practices, project-specific schemas, and traditions are designed for humans to comprehend. 2D drawings and text documents as PDF files, Excel sheets, and design and planning software have the information, but not the data in ideal form for automation. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    D.C. Circuit Upholds EPA’s CERCLA Hazardous-Substance Designations for PFAS as State-Law Settlements Highlight Expanding Liability Landscape

    September 15, 2026 —
    On August 18, 2026, a unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld the 2024 designation by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund). (See Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. EPA, No. 24-1193 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 18, 2026).) The decision leaves EPA’s PFOA and PFOS hazardous substance designations in place and provides guidance on the scope of EPA’s authority to make future hazardous substances designations under CERCLA Section 102(a). The decision also likely resolves a challenge to the rule that has spanned two presidential administrations. After taking office, the Trump administration had obtained an abeyance of the litigation challenging the Biden-era rule while EPA reconsidered its position. In September 2025, EPA informed the court that it had decided to retain the designations, while signaling that it would work with Congress and industry to address CERCLA liability concerns for “passive receivers.” The litigation then resumed, with the current Administration defending the rule. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury, Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury, Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury and Anthony B. Cavender, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Cavender may be contacted at anthony.cavender@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Federal Bid Protest Standard of Review and Disparate Treatment with Ratings

    August 16, 2026 —
    A recent decision out of the Federal Claims Court explains the post-award bid protest standard of review. In Massman Construction Co. v. U.S., 2026 WL 1971985 (Fed.Cl. 2026), a protestor brought a post-award bid protest after the Army Corps of Engineers awarded the contract to another contractor. The protestor argued that the Army Corps (government) acted irrational in its evaluation through disparate treatment. The Court of Federal Claims agreed and remanded for the Army Corps to “either justify this disparity or explain why [awardee’s] lower-priced, but technically inferior proposal provides the best value to the government.” Massman Construction, supra at *1. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    GRSM Ranked Among Texas’ 50 Largest Law Firms by Texas Lawyer

    August 03, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani has been recognized byTexas Lawyer in its 2026 Texas 100 ranking, earning the No. 49 spot among the state’s largest law firms by attorney headcount. The annual report spotlights the continued strength of Texas’ legal market, with firms across the state collectively increasing lawyer headcount by 2% in 2025. “Texas continues to be one of the country’s most thriving legal and business markets, and we are proud to be recognized among the state’s largest law firms,” said Laura De Santos, Regional Oversight Partner for Texas. “Our continued growth shows the confidence our clients place in us, the exceptional talent of our attorneys, and our commitment to delivering seamless, high-quality legal services throughout Texas and across our 50-state platform.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Andrew Gendron Authors D.C., Maryland Damages Compendium Articles for Defense Counsel Journal’s “Damages Compendium – East of the Mississippi”

    August 24, 2026 —
    Baltimore Partner Andrew Gendron recently penned the District of Columbia (D.C.) and Maryland damages compendium articles for the Defense Counsel Journal’s “Damages Compendium – East of the Mississippi,” which appears in the publication’s June 2026 issue. Mr. Gendron’s articles discuss evolving standards governing various types of damages in commercial litigation across jurisdictions in D.C. and Maryland. In the compendium articles, Mr. Gendron describes the circumstances under which parties may recover various types of damages, citing to the relevant portions of the D.C. Code and Annotated Code of Maryland, as well as to applicable case law. Specifically, he discusses compensatory, consequential, incidental, punitive, liquidated, reliance, and unjust enrichment damages. In doing so, Mr. Gendron details the types of cases in which parties may recover these damages and under what circumstances. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Integration Can Inoculate in Utah

    July 20, 2026 —
    The Utah Court of Appeals recently reaffirmed, in the construction context, Utah’s strict approach to enforcing integration clauses to preclude parol evidence and other legal theories that would vary the written terms of a contract. In Reid v. All Surface LC, 2025 UT App 134, decided last September, the court affirmed in all respects the trial court’s grant of summary judgment based on the strength of an integration clause against a homeowner who sued a contractor for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, civil conspiracy, negligence, and breach of the implied warranty of habitability. More recently, however, the same court rejected those same arguments in Tidwell v. Jensen, 2026 UT App 13 as to tort claims arising from a used car sale. The facts in Reid were sympathetic to the plaintiff. After being told she had a mold issue near a defective basement shower, the plaintiff solicited bids. A remediation contractor advised that while it could address the mold, the shower replacement should be handled by someone else. The plaintiff contacted All Surface LC, a shower replacement contractor. During an interview, the sales representative stated that All Surface could “do full mold remediation, tear everything out, and reframe the shower.” The plaintiff ultimately retained All Surface, expecting it would both resolve the mold issues and replace the shower. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Mark O. Morris, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Morris may be contacted at mmorris@swlaw.com

    Travelers Injury Impact Report Highlights Longer Recovery Times Amid Declining Injury Rates

    May 05, 2026 —
    HARTFORD, Conn.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Travelers Companies, Inc. (NYSE: TRV) today released its 2026 Injury Impact Report, an analysis of more than 1.2 million workers compensation claims received by the company from 2021 through 2025. The report finds that even as workplace injury rates decline, the injuries that do occur are growing more complex and taking longer to heal – a trend driven by an aging workforce and the disproportionate vulnerability of first-year employees. “The decrease in workplace injuries is a positive story, yet injured workers are still missing an average of 80 workdays,” said Claude Howard, Vice President of Workers Compensation Claim at Travelers. “This report is a reminder that progress doesn’t mean the risk environment requires any less attention, and an employer’s commitment to safety must keep pace with an ever-evolving workforce and injury landscape.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Travelers Companies, Inc.