BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    office building expert witness Moffit North Dakota structural steel construction expert witness Moffit North Dakota concrete tilt-up expert witness Moffit North Dakota tract home expert witness Moffit North Dakota condominium expert witness Moffit North Dakota low-income housing expert witness Moffit North Dakota Subterranean parking expert witness Moffit North Dakota production housing expert witness Moffit North Dakota casino resort expert witness Moffit North Dakota multi family housing expert witness Moffit North Dakota custom homes expert witness Moffit North Dakota mid-rise construction expert witness Moffit North Dakota parking structure expert witness Moffit North Dakota institutional building expert witness Moffit North Dakota condominiums expert witness Moffit North Dakota hospital construction expert witness Moffit North Dakota custom home expert witness Moffit North Dakota industrial building expert witness Moffit North Dakota retail construction expert witness Moffit North Dakota landscaping construction expert witness Moffit North Dakota townhome construction expert witness Moffit North Dakota high-rise construction expert witness Moffit North Dakota
    Moffit North Dakota building envelope expert witnessMoffit North Dakota construction code expert witnessMoffit North Dakota OSHA expert witness constructionMoffit North Dakota reconstruction expert witnessMoffit North Dakota expert witness structural engineerMoffit North Dakota construction defect expert witnessMoffit North Dakota expert witnesses fenestration
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Moffit, North Dakota

    North Dakota Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB1437) Notice required six months prior to undertaking any repair other than emergency repair, or instituting action for breach of warranty of one or two-family dwelling; response time 30 days.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Moffit North Dakota

    A contractor's license is required for all jobs over $2,000.00. Separate boards license plumbing and electrical trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Fargo-Moorhead
    Local # 3545
    1802 32nd Ave S
    Fargo, ND 58103

    Moffit North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Dickinson Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 3512
    PO Box 1697
    Dickinson, ND 58602
    Moffit North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    North Dakota AB
    Local # 3500
    1720 Burnt Boat Dr Ste 207
    Bismarck, ND 58503

    Moffit North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Bismarck-Mandan Home Builders Association
    Local # 3510
    2600 Gateway Ave Ste 1
    Bismarck, ND 58503

    Moffit North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Forx Builders Association
    Local # 3515
    519 DeMers Ave
    Grand Forks, ND 58201

    Moffit North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Williston Area Builders Association
    Local # 3520
    PO Box 1825
    Williston, ND 58802
    Moffit North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Minot Association of Bldrs
    Local # 3565
    PO Box 1851
    Minot, ND 58702

    Moffit North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Moffit North Dakota


    Tesla’s Solar Roof Pricing Is Cheap Enough to Catch Fire

    Forget Fifth Graders - Are You Smarter Than a CEO?

    The “Your Work” Exclusion—Is there a Trend against Coverage?

    Newmeyer & Dillion Announces Three New Partners

    Commercial Construction in the Golden State is Looking Pretty Golden

    Just Because You Record a Mechanic’s Lien Doesn’t Mean You Get Notice of Foreclosure

    Court Strikes Down Reasonable Construction Defect Settlement

    Privity Problems Continue for Additional Insureds in the Second Circuit

    Construction Materials Company CEO Sees Upturn in Building, Leading to Jobs

    Mandatory Energy Benchmarking is On Its Way

    Duty to Defend Affirmed in Connecticut Construction Defect Case

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “It’s One, Two… Eight Strikes: You’re Out!”

    Lessee Deemed Statutory Employer, Immune from Tort Liability by Pennsylvania Court

    California Department of Corrections Gets Hit With the Prison Bid Protest Blues

    Tennessee Court of Appeals Holds Defendant Has the Burden of Offering Alternative Measure of Damages to Prove that Plaintiff’s Measure of Damages is Unreasonable

    Judge's Order Halts Google Data Center Project in Minnesota

    While Construction Permits Slowly Rise, Construction Starts and Completions in California Are Stagnant

    Property Owner Found Liable for Injuries to Worker of Unlicensed Contractor, Again

    Scott Saylin Expands Employment Litigation and Insurance Litigation Team at Payne & Fears

    Pennsylvania Mechanics’ Lien “Waivers” and “Releases”: What’s the Difference?

    Green Home Predictions That Are Best Poised to Come True in 2014 and Beyond (guest post)

    Wildfire Smoke Threatens to Wipe Out Decades of Air Pollution Progress

    “For What It’s Worth”

    Va. Contractor Fined for Alleged DC Wage and Classification Violations

    Maria Latest Threat to Puerto Rico After $1 Billion Irma Hit

    Nevada Provides Independant Counsel When Conflict Arises Between Insurer and Insured

    Close Enough Only Counts in Horseshoes and Hand Grenades

    Salt Lake City Turns Winter Olympic Bid Into Statewide Bond Boom

    U.K. Construction Growth Unexpectedly Accelerated in January

    90 and 150: Two Numbers You Must Know

    Homeowner Allowed to Amend Complaint to Demonstrate Third-Party Beneficiary Status Under Lender-Placed Policy

    Damp Weather Not Good for Wood

    Proposed Law Protecting Tenants Amended: AB 828 Updated

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized in the 2024 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America®

    Is Ohio’s Buckeye Lake Dam Safe?

    Illinois Appellate Court Finds Insurer Estopped From Denying Coverage Where Declaratory Judgment Suit Filed Too Late

    Oregon Duty to Defend Triggered by Potential Timing of Damage

    Paris ‘Locks of Love’ Overload Bridges, Threatening Structures

    Is it the Dawning of the Age of Strict Products Liability for Contractors in California?

    Recording “Un-Neighborly” Documents

    Congress Addresses Homebuilding Credit Crunch

    Court Denies Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment on Breach of Contract Claim and Further Denies Motion to Exclude Insured's Expert

    Client Alert: Naming of Known and Unknown Defendants in Initial Complaints: A Cautionary Tale

    No Coverage Under Installation Policy When Read Together with Insurance Application

    Congratulations to BWB&O for Ranking #4 in Orange County Business Journal’s 2023 Book of Lists for Law Firms!

    Substantial Evidence Standard Upholds Trial Court Findings When There is Documentary Evidence and Testimony, Even if “Thin.”

    BHA at The Basic Course in Texas Construction Law

    DC Circuit Upholds EPA’s Latest RCRA Recycling Rule

    Insurer’s “Failure to Cooperate” Defense

    Expert's Opinions On Causation Leads Way To Summary Judgment For Insurer
    Corporate Profile

    MOFFIT NORTH DAKOTA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Moffit, North Dakota Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Moffit, North Dakota

    On Checks and Balances

    March 03, 2026 —
    It’s called “checks and balances” for a reason. And, generally, it works well so long as there are clear boundaries between the “co-equal” branches of government. In Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations, 108 Cal.App.5th 243 (2025), the 3rd District Court of Appeals upheld a set of regulations issued by the California Apprenticeship Council that contradicted an earlier 2015 ruling of the Court of Appeals. The Associated General Contractors of California Case At issue in the case was California’s Prevailing Wage Law which requires public works contractors to hire a certain ratio of apprentices. The purpose of the apprenticeship requirements is to maintain the pipeline of skilled tradespeople on taxpayer-funded projects. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    2026 Southern California Super Lawyers Recognizes 14 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys

    March 03, 2026 —
    LOS ANGELES AND ORANGE COUNTY – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that 14 attorneys in its Los Angeles and Orange County offices have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers publication. Of those 15, six were recognized as Rising Stars. Super Lawyers is a listing of lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The selection process is multi-phased and includes independent research, peer nominations, and peer evaluations. The final published list represents no more than 5 percent of the lawyers in the state. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    My Current Love-Hate Relationship with AI

    June 08, 2026 —
    It’s early in the relationship, I know. But still, there are some things that bug me. Yet, I also know that it’s a relationship in which leaving is not an option, and even if I could, it’s not to the point where it’s so bad that I would do so. So, if you would, let me gripe a bit. While there’s been much discussion about AI and, at least in my neck of the woods, a fair amount of discussion about how lawyers can, should, and must use AI or risk becoming discarded into the dustbin of history, much less has been written about clients’ use of AI. Increasingly, I’ve gotten the sense that my clients are using AI. For example, I had a client ask for confirmation that if he disagreed with an administrative decision that he could file a writ of mandate, and if so, whether that deadline was 30, 60 or 90 days after the administrative decision. The answer to the first question was yes, and as to the second question, the answer was 90 days. This was from a client who, smart as he is, probably didn’t know this off the top of his head. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    GRSM Partner Debra Ellwood Meppen Recognized as 2026 Legal Visionary by Los Angeles Times

    June 02, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani proudly congratulates Partner Debra Ellwood Meppen on being named a 2026 Legal Visionary by the Los Angeles Times. The LA Times Studios 2026 Legal Visionaries List recognizes lawyers in Southern California who “exemplify a forward-thinking approach to the law, elevating both their profession and the people who depend on it.” Meppen is recognized for helping shape the future of the legal profession through her leadership, professionalism, and integrity. Published as part of the May 2026 issue highlighting Southern California’s leading law firms and attorneys, the Legal Visionaries section honors attorneys making a significant impact on the legal industry and the broader business community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    What Massachusetts Contractors and Developers Can Learn from Cannistraro v. Columbia Construction

    July 13, 2026 —
    Introduction On June 26, 2026 the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued its decision in J.C. Cannistraro, LLC v. Columbia Construction Co.—a holding that sits at the intersection of Prompt Pay Act compliance and the Massachusetts Arbitration Act.[1] Most already know that the Massachusetts Prompt Pay Act (PPA) imposes strict timing and certification requirements for rejecting payment applications and proposed change orders on projects valued at $3 million or more. Most notably, the PPA requires the paying party to give the payee written notice of its approval or rejection of progress applications and proposed changes within 15 days of receipt, which notice must include a “factual and contractual basis for the rejection” and must be “certified as made in good faith.”[2] In the absence of a timely certified notice, payment is “deemed to be approved” unless the payor properly rejects payment before it comes due.[3] Reprinted courtesy of Anthony LaPlaca, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Luke Marston, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Mr. LaPlaca may be contacted at alaplaca@seyfarth.com Mr. Marston may be contacted at lmarston@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    Preventing Common and Costly Water Intrusion Events in Construction

    July 13, 2026 —
    Water leaking into a building is a leading cause of damage and loss in the construction industry. On one jobsite, heavy rains flooded a sub-basement, damaging a new electrical transformer—all because a roof drain was not property connected. On another jobsite, a drinking-fountain supply line broke in a multistory building that was undergoing renovation, causing water to run—undetected—for an entire weekend, resulting in water damage to all lower floors, where construction had been finished. Those loss scenarios could have been prevented with a comprehensive and effective water damage prevention plan (WDPP). This includes routine site inspections to identify uncontrolled water damage exposures and basic maintenance to make sure drains are clean of debris and divert them to a catch basin or low point away from the building. An effective WDPP plan also incorporates technology such as backflow preventers on sewer connections and water sensing technology to monitor the most vulnerable exposures. Reprinted courtesy of Andrew Swift, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Defend Now, Allocate Later? An Unresolved Tension in Colorado Construction Law

    August 16, 2026 —
    For decades, Colorado law has recognized an important distinction between the duty to defend and the duty to indemnify. The former ordinarily arises at the beginning of litigation; the latter generally cannot be determined until the underlying liability is known. That distinction makes intuitive sense. A defense that becomes due only after litigation concludes is not much of a defense. But Colorado’s construction anti-indemnity statute, C.R.S. § 13-21-111.5(6), raises an interesting question about how that familiar rule operates in construction disputes. The statute expressly regulates contractual obligations not only to indemnify, but also to insure and defend, and it reflects a legislative policy that construction businesses should bear financial responsibility for their own negligence. Those principles have developed along separate tracks. At some point, a Colorado appellate court may have to decide precisely how they fit together. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    Chambers USA Recognizes Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Practice in 2026 Guide

    June 29, 2026 —
    Hunton is pleased to announce that its insurance coverage practice was recognized nationally for Insurance: Dispute Resolution – Policyholder in the recently released 2026 Chambers USA guide. The team also received state rankings in Florida (Insurance: Dispute Resolution), Georgia (Insurance), the District of Columbia (Insurance: Policyholder), and Massachusetts (Insurance). In addition to the insurance team’s group recognition across multiple states, the 2026 guide included individual rankings for Lorelie “Lorie” S. Masters (USA Nationwide and District of Columbia), Latosha M. Ellis (District of Columbia), Michael S. Levine (District of Columbia), Koorosh “KT” Talieh (District of Columbia), Walter J. Andrews (Florida), Andrea DeField (Florida), Cary D. Steklof (Florida), Lawrence J. Bracken II (Georgia), and Geoffrey B. Fehling (Massachusetts). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP