BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    mid-rise construction expert witness Mcclusky North Dakota Subterranean parking expert witness Mcclusky North Dakota multi family housing expert witness Mcclusky North Dakota retail construction expert witness Mcclusky North Dakota housing expert witness Mcclusky North Dakota condominium expert witness Mcclusky North Dakota production housing expert witness Mcclusky North Dakota condominiums expert witness Mcclusky North Dakota casino resort expert witness Mcclusky North Dakota townhome construction expert witness Mcclusky North Dakota industrial building expert witness Mcclusky North Dakota structural steel construction expert witness Mcclusky North Dakota hospital construction expert witness Mcclusky North Dakota tract home expert witness Mcclusky North Dakota concrete tilt-up expert witness Mcclusky North Dakota institutional building expert witness Mcclusky North Dakota high-rise construction expert witness Mcclusky North Dakota parking structure expert witness Mcclusky North Dakota custom homes expert witness Mcclusky North Dakota low-income housing expert witness Mcclusky North Dakota landscaping construction expert witness Mcclusky North Dakota office building expert witness Mcclusky North Dakota
    Mcclusky North Dakota construction expert witnessMcclusky North Dakota expert witness structural engineerMcclusky North Dakota engineering consultantMcclusky North Dakota stucco expert witnessMcclusky North Dakota building code compliance expert witnessMcclusky North Dakota construction code expert witnessMcclusky North Dakota roofing construction expert
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Mcclusky, North Dakota

    North Dakota Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB1437) Notice required six months prior to undertaking any repair other than emergency repair, or instituting action for breach of warranty of one or two-family dwelling; response time 30 days.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Mcclusky North Dakota

    A contractor's license is required for all jobs over $2,000.00. Separate boards license plumbing and electrical trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Forx Builders Association
    Local # 3515
    519 DeMers Ave
    Grand Forks, ND 58201

    Mcclusky North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    North Dakota AB
    Local # 3500
    1720 Burnt Boat Dr Ste 207
    Bismarck, ND 58503

    Mcclusky North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Bismarck-Mandan Home Builders Association
    Local # 3510
    2600 Gateway Ave Ste 1
    Bismarck, ND 58503

    Mcclusky North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Dickinson Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 3512
    PO Box 1697
    Dickinson, ND 58602
    Mcclusky North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Williston Area Builders Association
    Local # 3520
    PO Box 1825
    Williston, ND 58802
    Mcclusky North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Fargo-Moorhead
    Local # 3545
    1802 32nd Ave S
    Fargo, ND 58103

    Mcclusky North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Minot Association of Bldrs
    Local # 3565
    PO Box 1851
    Minot, ND 58702

    Mcclusky North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Mcclusky North Dakota


    Arizona Court of Appeals Awards Attorneys’ Fees in Quiet-Title Action

    Burlingame Construction Defect Case Heading to Trial

    City Development with Interactive 3D Models

    Top Developments March 2024

    A New AAA Study Confirms that Arbitration is Faster to Resolution Than Court – And the Difference Can be Assessed Monetarily

    Illinois Couple Files Suit Against Home Builder

    How the California and Maui Wildfires Will Affect Future Construction Projects

    Excessive Corrosion Cause of Ohio State Fair Ride Accident

    FEMA Offers Recovery Tips for California Wildfire Survivors

    A Closer Look at an HOA Board Member’s Duty to Homeowners

    The Need to Be Specific and Precise in Drafting Settling Agreements

    Is Modular Construction Destined to Fail?

    Insured's Jury Verdict Reversed After Improper Trial Tactics

    Where Do We Go From Here?

    Hunton Insurance Partner Among Top 250 Women in Litigation

    Samuel Alhadeff Represents LGI Homes in Acquisition and Re-Entitlement of Maravilla Estates

    Why’d You Have To Say That?

    Genuine Dispute Over Cause of Damage and Insureds’ Demolition Before Inspection Negate Bad Faith and Elder Abuse Claims

    “Bound by the Bond”

    Collapse Claim Denied After Insured's Failure to Meet Suit Limitation Deadline

    Actual Cost Value Includes Depreciation of Repair Labor Costs

    The Leaning Tower of San Francisco

    The Sensible Resurgence of the Multigenerational Home

    High Attendance Predicted for West Coast Casualty Seminar

    Court Rules Planned Development of Banning Ranch May Proceed

    Emotional Distress Damages Not Distinct from “Annoyance and Discomfort” Damages in Case Arising from 2007 California Wildfires

    Be Strategic When Suing a Manufacturer Under a Warranty with an Arbitration Provision

    California Supreme Court Rights the “Occurrence” Ship: Unintended Harm Resulting from Intentional Conduct Triggers Coverage Under Liability Insurance Policy

    Project Team Upgrades Va. General Assembly

    Helsinki Stream City: A Re-imagining Outside the System

    Balfour in Talks With Carillion About $5 Billion Merger

    Last Parcel of Rancho del Oro Masterplan Purchased by Cornerstone Communties

    Summarizing Changes to NEPA in the Fiscal Responsibility Act (P.L. 118-5)

    5 Ways Equipment Financing is Empowering Small Construction Businesses

    Seyfarth’s Brenda Radmacher Presents at Construction Defect and Insurance Conference

    Contract Change #1- Insurance in the A201 (law note)

    Boston Catwalk Collapse Injures Three Workers

    At Lake Powell, Engineering Is Outpacing Colorado River Policy

    Leaning San Francisco Tower Seen Sinking From Space

    Address 'Your Work' Exposure Within CPrL Policies With Faulty Workmanship Coverage

    In Pennsylvania, Contractors Can Be Liable to Third Parties for Obvious Defects in Completed Work

    Don’t Conspire to Build a Home…Wait…What?

    Traub Lieberman Partner Colleen Hastie and Associate Jeffrey George Successfully Oppose Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate Dismissal

    Emerging World Needs $1.5 Trillion for Green Buildings, IFC Says

    Construction Materials Company CEO Sees Upturn in Building, Leading to Jobs

    Your Construction Contract

    When Cyber Crooks Steal Payments, Think Insurance Makes Up The Loss? Think Again.

    Texas Federal Court Delivers Another Big Win for Policyholders on CGL Coverage for Construction-Defect Claims and “Rip-and-Tear” Damages

    Connecticut Federal District Court Again Finds "Collapse" Provisions Ambiguous

    New York Court Rules on Architect's Duty Under Contract and Tort Principles
    Corporate Profile

    MCCLUSKY NORTH DAKOTA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Mcclusky, North Dakota Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Mcclusky's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Mcclusky, North Dakota

    Insurer Granted Summary Judgment on Claim for Roof Damage Caused by Windstorm

    May 26, 2026 —
    The insurer successfully moved for summary judgment, eliminating the insured’s claim for roof damage due to windstorm. Mulas v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20537 (Jan. 30, 2026). The insureds’ commercial property sustained windstorm damage during Hurricane Ian. Westchester denied the claim. The insureds believed Westchester wrongfully denied coverage for roof damage and various interior damage to property. The insureds also argued that Westchester’s actual cash value (ACV) payment did not reflect the fully insured loss. The insureds sued and Westchester moved for summary judgment. Westchester argued the roof damage was not covered because Hurricane Ian did not cause the damage. Westchester hired an engineer who determined the roof damage was not caused by wind from Hurricane Ian. Westchester pointed out that the insureds’ expert also found no wind damage on the roof. The insureds offered no other evidence suggesting the hurricane caused roof damage. Therefore, the insureds could not show that Westchester breached the policy by denying coverage. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    White and Williams LLP Secures $42.4 Million Award for Ventana DBS LLC in Philadelphia Marriott Construction Litigation

    July 27, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP's Construction and Surety Practice attorneys secured a significant victory for client Ventana DBS LLC in a complex commercial construction dispute before the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, Commerce Division. The trial team, led by Bill Taylor, retired Partner, and Craig O'Neill, Co-Chair of the Construction and Surety Practice Group, with support from Lindsay Liebman, Counsel, Zachary Roth, Partner, Kristen Nichols Wright, Associate, and Sue Ferrante, Legal Secretary, obtained a $42.4 million award on Ventana's claims for unpaid work, delay costs, CASPA penalties and interest, attorneys’ fees and other project-related costs arising from the construction of the Marriott W/Element Hotel Project in Philadelphia. To achieve this result, the White and Williams team managed an extensive discovery period over the course of four-years of litigation, conducted over sixty depositions, participated in court-ordered mediation and arbitration proceedings, and successfully represented Ventana during a bifurcated trial that spanned over the course of a year. Reprinted courtesy of Craig O'Neill, White and Williams, Lindsay Liebman, White and Williams, Kristen Nichols Wright, White and Williams, Zachary Roth, White and Williams and William Taylor, White and Williams Mr. O'Neill may be contacted at oneillc@whiteandwilliams.com Ms. Liebman may be contacted at liebmanl@whiteandwilliams.com Ms. Wright may be contacted at wrightk@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Roth may be contacted at rothz@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Taylor may be contacted at taylorw@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    Insurer’s Federal Suit Dismissed in Favor of Insured’s State Suit

    April 14, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insured’s motion to dismiss the insurer’s federal suit for declaratory judgment because the insured filed a more complete action in state court. Church Mut. Ins. Co. v. Elmwood Baptist Church, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 259762 (S.D. W.V. Dec. 16, 2025). Elmwood purchased a property policy from Church Mutual Insurance Company. After the roof of Elmwood’s property collapsed, the parties disputed the amount Church Mutual owed to Elmwood. Church Mutual filed suit in federal district court asking for a declaration that the policy was “void ab initio,’ or, alternatively, that Church had fully compensated Elmwood for its loss. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Kamran Salour Named to Los Angeles Times' 2026 Legal Visionaries List

    June 02, 2026 —
    Orange County Partner and Data Privacy & Cybersecurity Practice Co-Chair Kamran Salour was named to the Los Angeles Times' 2026 Legal Visionaries list, which honors the most innovative attorneys in Southern California. In announcing this year's Legal Visionaries, the Times said that Mr. Salour and his co-honorees "distinguish themselves not only through skilleand results but through an unwavering commitment to their clients, their craft and the communities they serve." "Their paths – shaped by rigorous education, defining cases and purposeful leadership – offer a deeper perspective on what sets true standouts apart," the Times' announcement stated. "Together, these visionaries exemplify a forward-thinking approach to the law, elevating both their profession and the people who depend on it." Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    California Enacts Change Order Fair Payment Act

    March 24, 2026 —
    For private works construction contracts entered on or after January 1, 2026, recent legislation establishes a claims and dispute resolution process for change orders. The law is codified at Civil Code § 8850. A synopsis of the pertinent provisions includes the following:
    1. Submitting a Claim. Contractors or subcontractors must submit a detailed, documented claim when requesting additional time or payment.
    2. Owner’s Response Time. The owner must meet and confer within thirty (30) days after receiving the claim. Within ten (10) days of meeting, the owner must provide a written statement identifying which portions of the claim are undisputed and which are disputed. An owner’s failure to respond is treated as disputing the entire claim.
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael J. Baker, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Baker may be contacted at mjbaker@swlaw.com

    GRSM Partner Debra Ellwood Meppen Recognized as 2026 Legal Visionary by Los Angeles Times

    June 02, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani proudly congratulates Partner Debra Ellwood Meppen on being named a 2026 Legal Visionary by the Los Angeles Times. The LA Times Studios 2026 Legal Visionaries List recognizes lawyers in Southern California who “exemplify a forward-thinking approach to the law, elevating both their profession and the people who depend on it.” Meppen is recognized for helping shape the future of the legal profession through her leadership, professionalism, and integrity. Published as part of the May 2026 issue highlighting Southern California’s leading law firms and attorneys, the Legal Visionaries section honors attorneys making a significant impact on the legal industry and the broader business community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Insured’s Failure to Determine Depreciation When Presenting Claim for Replacement Cost Value

    August 16, 2026 —
    The Third Circuit affirmed the district court’s granting of summary judgment to the insurer when the insured submitted replacement cost value of the loss but did not include a determination of depreciation. Kimmel v. Massachusetts Bay Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 16569 (3d Cir. June 9, 2026). A lightning strike downed a tree on the insured’s property, causing extensive damage to the home. The insured had a homeowner’s policy with Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company (MBIC). MBIC denied the claim, determining that much of the claimed damage already existed and that several policy exclusions otherwise barred coverage. The insured filed suit for breach of contract and bad faith. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    IEEPA Tariff Refunds: CBP Launches CAPE Process

    April 27, 2026 —
    On April 20, 2026, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) launched the first phase of the Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) tool in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) portal to administer refunds of duties imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) through a streamlined electronic filing process. Background In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held that certain tariffs imposed under IEEPA were unlawful. Subsequent proceedings before the U.S. Court of International Trade required CBP to develop a scalable refund process applicable not only to litigants but also to non-plaintiffs. According to CBP and court filings, approximately 330,000 importers paid or deposited an estimated $166 billion in IEEPA duties across more than 53 million entries. In response, CBP developed CAPE as an electronic, consolidated refund mechanism within ACE. Reprinted courtesy of David J. Creagan, White and Williams LLP, Guido Antolini, White and Williams LLP, Bruce W. MacLennan, White and Williams LLP and Gary P. Biehn, White and Williams LLP Mr. Creagan may be contacted at creagand@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Antolini may be contacted at antolinig@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. MacLennan may be contacted at maclennanb@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Biehn may be contacted at biehng@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...