BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    parking structure expert witness Burke County North Dakota casino resort expert witness Burke County North Dakota industrial building expert witness Burke County North Dakota low-income housing expert witness Burke County North Dakota structural steel construction expert witness Burke County North Dakota multi family housing expert witness Burke County North Dakota institutional building expert witness Burke County North Dakota landscaping construction expert witness Burke County North Dakota custom homes expert witness Burke County North Dakota high-rise construction expert witness Burke County North Dakota custom home expert witness Burke County North Dakota Medical building expert witness Burke County North Dakota office building expert witness Burke County North Dakota production housing expert witness Burke County North Dakota mid-rise construction expert witness Burke County North Dakota Subterranean parking expert witness Burke County North Dakota condominiums expert witness Burke County North Dakota retail construction expert witness Burke County North Dakota concrete tilt-up expert witness Burke County North Dakota condominium expert witness Burke County North Dakota townhome construction expert witness Burke County North Dakota tract home expert witness Burke County North Dakota
    Burke County North Dakota construction claims expert witnessBurke County North Dakota slope failure expert witnessBurke County North Dakota construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessBurke County North Dakota fenestration expert witnessBurke County North Dakota engineering expert witnessBurke County North Dakota expert witnesses fenestrationBurke County North Dakota consulting architect expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Burke County, North Dakota

    North Dakota Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB1437) Notice required six months prior to undertaking any repair other than emergency repair, or instituting action for breach of warranty of one or two-family dwelling; response time 30 days.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Burke County North Dakota

    A contractor's license is required for all jobs over $2,000.00. Separate boards license plumbing and electrical trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Minot Association of Bldrs
    Local # 3565
    PO Box 1851
    Minot, ND 58702

    Burke County North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Williston Area Builders Association
    Local # 3520
    PO Box 1825
    Williston, ND 58802
    Burke County North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Forx Builders Association
    Local # 3515
    519 DeMers Ave
    Grand Forks, ND 58201

    Burke County North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    North Dakota AB
    Local # 3500
    1720 Burnt Boat Dr Ste 207
    Bismarck, ND 58503

    Burke County North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Bismarck-Mandan Home Builders Association
    Local # 3510
    2600 Gateway Ave Ste 1
    Bismarck, ND 58503

    Burke County North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Dickinson Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 3512
    PO Box 1697
    Dickinson, ND 58602
    Burke County North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Fargo-Moorhead
    Local # 3545
    1802 32nd Ave S
    Fargo, ND 58103

    Burke County North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Burke County North Dakota


    California Supreme Court Shifts Gears on “Reverse CEQA”

    Alabama Supreme Court Reverses Determination of Coverage for Faulty Workmanship

    California Supreme Court Holds “Notice-Prejudice” Rule is “Fundamental Public Policy” of California, May Override Choice of Law Provisions in Policies

    Prevent Costly Curb Box Damage Due on New Construction Projects

    Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP Expands into Georgia

    GRSM Named to 2025 “Best Companies to Work For” List by U.S. News & World Report

    Tidal Lagoon Plans Marine Project to Power Every Home in Wales

    Insurance Company Prevails in “Chinese Drywall” Case

    Representation and Warranties Claims Reach Record Payouts in 2024

    Homeowners Associations Must Prepare for Cold Season Maintenance and Repairs in Western Washington

    Leonard Fadeeff v. State Farm General Insurance Company

    California Builders’ Right To Repair Is Alive

    Michigan Court of Appeals Remands Construction Defect Case

    Is A Miller Act Payment Bond Surety Bound by A Default or Default Judgment Against Its Principal?

    Defining Constructive Acceleration

    Lack of Flood Insurance for New York’s Poorest Residents

    Construction Law- Where Pragmatism and Law Collide

    D.R. Horton Earnings Rise as Sales and Order Volume Increase

    How AB5 has Changed the Employment Landscape

    OSHA Issues New Rules on Injury Record Keeping

    Your AEC Firm Has a Memory Problem. Here Is How to Fix It

    New Change Order Bill Becomes Law: RCW 39.04.360

    The BUILDCHAIN Project Enhances Data Exchange and Transparency in the EU Construction Industry

    EPA Grants Arizona Lead Over Underground Injection Control Program

    Las Vegas Partner Sarah Odia Named a 2023 Mountain States Super Lawyer Rising Star

    What Construction Contractors Should Know About the California Government Claims Act

    Beyond Inverse Condemnation in Wildfire Litigation: An Oregon Jury Finds Utility Liable for Negligence, Trespass and Nuisance

    Flushing Away Liability: What the Aqua Engineering Case Means for Contractors and Subcontractors

    Colorado’s Three-Bill Approach to Alleged Construction Defect Issues

    The Fifth Circuit, Applying Texas Law, Strikes Down Auto Exclusion

    Navigating the Diverging Landscape of Climate Disclosure Laws

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (1/28/25) – FTC Suing Greystar, DOJ Investigating Top Residential Landlords and Trump Facing Housing Conundrum

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (10/1/24) – Hybrid Work Technologies, AI in Construction and the Market for Office Buildings

    FEMA Fire Management Assistance Granted for the French Fire

    Construction on the Rise in Washington Town

    A Homeowner’s Subsequent Action is Barred as a Matter of Law by way of a Prior “Right to Repair Act” Claim Resolved by Cash Settlement for Waiver of all Known or Unknown Claims

    Court Resolves Carriers' Dispute Over Which Must Defend

    Virtual Jury Trials of Construction Disputes: The Necessary Union of Both Sides of the Brain

    Asserting Non-Disclosure Claim Involving Residential Real Property and Whether Facts Are “Readily Observable”

    2013 May Be Bay Area’s Best Year for Commercial Building

    Framework, Tallest Mass Timber Project in the U.S., Is On Hold

    Insured's Failure to Prove Entire Collapse of Building Leads to Dismissal

    Mediation is (Almost) Always Worth a Shot

    “Unwinnable”: Newark Trial Team Obtains Unanimous “No Cause” Verdict in Challenging Matter on Behalf of NYC Mutual Housing Association

    The Year 2010 In Review: Design And Construction Defects Litigation

    When Must a New York Insurer Turn Over a Copy of the Policy?

    Caltrans Reviewing Airspace Program in Aftermath of I-10 Fire

    Forget Palm Springs—Santa Fe Is the New Mecca for Modern Architecture

    Former SNC-Lavalin CEO Now Set for Trial in Bribe Case

    Beyond the Storm: How Non-Hurricane Catastrophes Expose Florida’s Construction Defect Blind Spot
    Corporate Profile

    BURKE COUNTY NORTH DAKOTA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Burke County, North Dakota Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Burke County, North Dakota

    David Samani Joins BHBA Podcast on Mediation Best Practices

    May 05, 2026 —
    Los Angeles Partner David Samani recently joined a Beverly Hills Bar Association (BHBA) podcast titled, “Mediation 360: Preparation from the Defense, Plaintiff, and Mediator Perspectives,” during which he shared his insights on various aspects of the mediation process. Mr. Samani, along with a plaintiff’s attorney and a mediator, presented their thoughts on topics including how to determine whether a case is appropriate for mediation, preparing to mediate a case, communicating with clients, and handling the mediation itself. Mr. Samani explained that early communication with clients is critical so that attorneys may learn what a client’s objectives are and develop an assessment of the case. He described that “from an early stage,” attorneys should determine the cost of litigation and ensure that the client understands “what an aggressive defense might entail.” As the matter progresses, attorneys and clients should “continue the dialogue” regarding costs as well as the strengths and weaknesses of the case, “making sure the client is apprised of the various alternatives that exist.” In addition, Mr. Samani discussed factors to consider when choosing a mediator, noting, “All mediators have their own styles and backgrounds.” He explained that some cases may call for a mediator with specialized knowledge in a particular area such as bankruptcy or securities, while other mediations may benefit from a mediator who understands the realities of private practice. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Kahana Feld Announces Key Partner Additions Coast to Coast

    June 22, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – June 10, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce Yvette Davis, Evan Kalooky, Beth Obra-White, Sean Paden, Michael Parme, Jeffrey Schmid, and Julieanne Yanez have joined the firm as partners. Four of these partners are joining the San Diego office, which further strengthens the firm’s General Liability and Construction Litigation practices and enhances Kahana Feld’s ability to serve clients across a broad range of complex matters in the region. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    Brandy Price, Dean Pillarella Named to Lawdragon's "Next Generation" List

    June 22, 2026 —
    Charlotte/North Charleston Partner Brandy G. Price and New York Partner Dean Pillarella have been selected to "The 2026 Lawdragon 500 X – The Next Generation," which recognizes emerging leaders in law. Lawdragon's annual Next Generation listing highlights up-and-coming attorneys with fewer than 15 years in practice. The legal media company selected these honorees through a combination of peer nominations, extensive journalistic research by Lawdragon editors, and independent vetting. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Prefatory Contract Language Cannot Be Used to Create an Ambiguity with Operative Provisions

    May 12, 2026 —
    Contract drafting and interpretation matters. A case dealt with the potential conflict with prefatory language in an agreement compared with operative provisions in the agreement. The trial court held that the operative provisions control. I discussed this case here where the appellate court reversed based on the prefatory language. But, through a motion for rehearing, the appellate court reconsidered its position and affirmed the trial court based on the operative provisions, mainly that the prefatory language cannot be used to create an ambiguity with operative provisions. Consider this explanation in affirming the trial court:
    Because the trial court correctly found that the initial language in the contract was prefatory and could not be used to create an ambiguity in the remainder of the contract, we affirm the final judgment.
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Balancing the Right to Repair With Evidence Preservation in Construction Defect Litigation

    April 20, 2026 —
    Every major construction project comes with risk, whether it’s a warehouse build, a multifamily development or a major renovation. Parties tend to be aligned when things are proceeding as planned. But when something goes wrong—cracked concrete, water intrusion, systems that don’t perform as expected—those interests can quickly diverge. Property owners are often caught in the middle when construction defects surface. They’re expected to act quickly to limit damage and costs. But they also have legal obligations to preserve evidence and allow potentially responsible parties, such as contractors or designers, to observe testing, demolition and repairs. Additionally, owners often have duties to lenders and investors to fix problems promptly and pursue claims against those responsible. Meanwhile, contractors and other parties have obligations of their own—not to interfere with repairs and not to delay mitigation efforts while investigations are underway. What follows will examine how those competing responsibilities play out in construction defect disputes. Reprinted courtesy of Benton Wheatley & Anna Spicer, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Samuel Alhadeff Represents LGI Homes in Acquisition and Re-Entitlement of Maravilla Estates

    July 06, 2026 —
    Temecula Partner Samuel Alhadeff recently represented LGI Homes in its acquisition and re-entitlement of Maravilla Estates, a 169-lot active adult community located in San Jacinto, California. The acquisition and re-entitlement of the project provide LGI Homes with the opportunity to deliver much-needed age-qualified housing in one of Riverside County's growing residential markets. The community includes a recorded final map and finished lots, as well as future development inventory and planned amenities, positioning the project for continued development and completion. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Global Insights Center: Monthly Newsletter

    June 15, 2026 —
    May in Review Last month, inflation moved higher, with Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation rising to 3.8% year over year, up from 3.3% the prior month. The increase was driven primarily by energy prices, particularly gasoline, reflecting ongoing disruptions tied to the Middle East conflict. Labor market data were broadly stable. The unemployment rate remained unchanged at 4.3%, wage growth increased modestly to 3.6%, while job growth continued to be geographically concentrated in the Southern states, particularly cities in Texas. On an occupational basis, healthcare once again led job gains, especially in home health services, a trend we have consistently highlighted. Business formations increased during the month, with notable strength in e commerce and digital services firms. Manufacturing activity also improved, particularly in semiconductors, IT equipment, and natural gas–related energy infrastructure. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Global Insights Center Staff, The Hartford

    Substantial Evidence of Flood Loss is Not a Substitute for Required Proof of Loss

    April 20, 2026 —
    The court found that the insurer properly denied the insured’s claim for loss due to flood because a proof of loss was never submitted. Bay Haven at Coco Bay Condominium Association, Inc. v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6847 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 14, 2026). Bay Haven managed several condo buildings. When Hurricane Ian hit, it caused significant flood damage to these properties. Bay Haven held federal flood insurance policies through Hartford under “Write-Your-Own” policies. This meant Hartford was essentially a fiscal agent that managed policies and handled claims but paid them using federal funds. Following the storm, FEMA extended the usual 60-day deadline for filing a proof of loss to one year, or until September 28, 2023. Bay Haven did not submit its proofs of loss until November 2023. FEMA granted an extension but only for the specific amounts in the November requests. Hartford did not waive the 60-day proof of loss requirement for any other proof of loss. Hartford paid the amounts reflected in the November submissions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com