BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom home expert witness Woodleaf North Carolina tract home expert witness Woodleaf North Carolina hospital construction expert witness Woodleaf North Carolina landscaping construction expert witness Woodleaf North Carolina townhome construction expert witness Woodleaf North Carolina condominiums expert witness Woodleaf North Carolina high-rise construction expert witness Woodleaf North Carolina Medical building expert witness Woodleaf North Carolina industrial building expert witness Woodleaf North Carolina custom homes expert witness Woodleaf North Carolina condominium expert witness Woodleaf North Carolina retail construction expert witness Woodleaf North Carolina mid-rise construction expert witness Woodleaf North Carolina housing expert witness Woodleaf North Carolina parking structure expert witness Woodleaf North Carolina production housing expert witness Woodleaf North Carolina structural steel construction expert witness Woodleaf North Carolina institutional building expert witness Woodleaf North Carolina office building expert witness Woodleaf North Carolina low-income housing expert witness Woodleaf North Carolina casino resort expert witness Woodleaf North Carolina Subterranean parking expert witness Woodleaf North Carolina
    Woodleaf North Carolina window expert witnessWoodleaf North Carolina forensic architectWoodleaf North Carolina eifs expert witnessWoodleaf North Carolina roofing construction expertWoodleaf North Carolina ada design expert witnessWoodleaf North Carolina architect expert witnessWoodleaf North Carolina construction cost estimating expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Woodleaf, North Carolina

    North Carolina Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Woodleaf North Carolina

    A contractor's license is required for all jobs over $30,000.00. Separate boards license plumbing and electrical trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of North Carolina
    Local # 3400
    PO Box 99090
    Raleigh, NC 27624

    Woodleaf North Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Martin Co Home Builders Association
    Local # 3465
    14698 US Hwy 64
    Williamston, NC 27892

    Woodleaf North Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Western Piedmont Home Builders Association
    Local # 3470
    PO Box 14
    Morganton, NC 28680
    Woodleaf North Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Davidson County
    Local # 3427
    PO Box 498
    Lexington, NC 27293
    Woodleaf North Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of McDowell County
    Local # 3431
    PO Box 507
    Marion, NC 28752
    Woodleaf North Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Raleigh & Wake County
    Local # 3455
    5580 Centerview Dr Ste 155
    Raleigh, NC 27606

    Woodleaf North Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Asheboro-Randolph Cty
    Local # 3407
    1037 Hammer Ave
    Asheboro, NC 27203
    Woodleaf North Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Woodleaf North Carolina


    Wall Street Is Buying Starter Homes to Quietly Become America’s Landlord

    Always Keep Your Time Limits in Mind—to Know When You Can Sue, and When You Can No Longer Be Sued (Law Note)

    Hudson Tunnel Plan Shows Sign of Life as U.S. Speeds Review

    How Your Disgruntled Client Can Turn Into Your Very Own Car Crash! (and How to Avoid It) (Law Tips)

    Four Key Steps for a Successful Construction Audit Process

    KY Mining Accident Not a Covered Occurrence Under Commercial General Liability Policy

    Not Our Territory: 11th Circuit Dismisses Hurricane Damage Appraisal Order for Lack of Jurisdiction

    Prior Occurrence Exclusion Bars Coverage for Construction Defects

    ICE Said to Seek Mortgage Role Through Talks With Data Service

    Crime Policy Insurance Quotes Falsely Represented the Scope of its Coverage

    You Cannot Always Contract Your Way Out of a Problem (The Case for Dispute Resolution in Mega and Large Complex Construction Projects)

    The Age of Uncertainty: Monitoring Construction Policy Shifts

    CISA Clarifies – Construction is Part of Critical Infrastructure Activities

    Replacement of Defective Gym Construction Exceeds Original Cost

    The Right to Repair Act Means What it Says and Says What it Means

    Ball Janik LLP Welcomes Construction Defect Associate Miguel Bonnelly as Orlando Office Continues to Grow

    Athens, Ohio, Sues to Recover Nearly $722,000 After Cyber Attack

    Prefatory Contract Language Cannot Be Used to Create an Ambiguity with Operative Provisions

    Project Team Battles Elements to Complete Buffalo Football Stadium for Next Season

    The Golden State Commits to Going Green – Why Contractors Will be in High Demand to Build the State’s Infrastructure

    BOO! Running From Chainsaw Wielding Actor then Falling is an Inherent Risk of a Haunted Attraction

    Las Vegas Sphere Lawsuits Roll On in Nevada Courtrooms

    The Impact of the Russia-Ukraine Conflict on the Insurance Industry, Part One: Coverage, Exposure, and Losses

    Allegations of Actual Property Damage Necessary to Invoke Duty to Defend

    When Must a New York Insurer Turn Over a Copy of the Policy?

    Boston Tower Project to Create 450 Jobs

    AB5 Construction Exemption – A Checklist to Avoid Application of AB5’s Three-Part Test

    Harmon Towers Duty to Defend Question Must Wait, Says Court

    Repair of Part May Necessitate Replacement of Whole

    Paris ‘Locks of Love’ Overload Bridges, Threatening Structures

    Design Professional Needs a License to be Sued for Professional Negligence

    Meet the Forum's ADR Neutrals: LISA D. LOVE

    New Jersey Law Firm Sued for Malpractice in Construction Defect Litigation

    Federal Circuit Clarifies Limits of Design Liability in GSA Contract Dispute

    Intricacies of Business Interruption Claim Considered

    Bad Faith Jury Verdict Upheld After Insurer's Failure to Settle Within Policy Limits

    Arbitration: For Whom the Statute of Limitations Does Not Toll in Pennsylvania

    The Show Must Go On: Navigating Arbitration in the Wake of the COVID-19 Outbreak

    Property Damage to Non-Defective Work Is Covered

    Substitutions On a Construction Project — A Specification Writer Responds

    Schools Remain Top Priority in Carolinas as Cleanup From Storms Continues

    Builder Exposes 7 Myths regarding Millennials and Housing

    South Carolina “occurrence” and allocation

    Meet the Forum's ADR Neutrals: TOM NOCAR

    California Court Affirms $1.8 Million Judgment Against HOA for Failing to Investigate and Remediate Water Intrusion

    Buy American Under President Trump: What to Know and Where We’re Heading

    NY Pay-to-Play Charges Dropped Against LPCiminelli Executive As Another Pleads Guilty

    Will On-Site Robotics Become Feasible in Construction?

    Chambers USA 2022 Ranks White and Williams as a Leading Law Firm

    Coverage Under Builder's Risk Policy Properly Excluded for Damage to Existing Structure Only
    Corporate Profile

    WOODLEAF NORTH CAROLINA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Woodleaf, North Carolina Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Woodleaf's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Woodleaf, North Carolina

    Building in Arizona’s Data Center Boom: How Federal Executive Orders, State Regulation, and National-Security Policy Are Reshaping the Rules for Developers

    June 02, 2026 —
    Developers and practitioners evaluating data center projects in Arizona face a regulatory environment shifting on three fronts simultaneously. Federal executive orders are opening new land, streamlining permitting, and channeling financial incentives toward qualifying projects — but they are not preempting the state and local rules that most directly affect project economics. A carve-out in the December 2025 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Framework Executive Order preserves Arizona’s authority over data center infrastructure, meaning the Arizona Corporation Commission’s (ACC) rate-classification docket, municipal zoning restrictions, water-use ordinances, and pending grid cost-allocation legislation remain the binding constraints on project feasibility. Understanding where federal tailwinds end and state and local headwinds begin is essential for any developer sizing risk or selecting sites in the state. The Federal Landscape: An Interlocking Framework of Executive Orders Five interlocking executive orders are accelerating data center development nationally, but none overrides Arizona’s authority over siting energy, or infrastructure. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ryan J. Regula, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Regula may be contacted at rregula@swlaw.com

    Fatalities Edge Down: New Data Reveals a Promising Decline

    April 27, 2026 —
    Construction fatalities in the United States declined slightly in 2024, according to new data released from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The sector recorded just over 1,000 worker deaths last year—a modest decrease from the previous year but still among the highest totals of any industry. Falls remained the leading cause of death, accounting for roughly one-third of all construction fatalities. Transportation incidents—including workers struck by vehicles or equipment—ranked second, followed by contact with objects or equipment and electrocutions. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Chambers USA 2026 Recognizes Multiple Snell & Wilmer Attorneys and Practices

    August 11, 2026 —
    PHOENIX – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that its attorneys have received 57 individual recognitions in their respective fields, by Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business 2026. These prestigious rankings are driven by independent interviews with clients of the firm and members of the legal community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    GRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior Court

    July 20, 2026 —
    A Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani multi-state team, including Partners Christine Barker, Sean Ferron, and Keith Cramer, obtained a defense verdict on behalf of a homeowners’ association (HOA) in an Orange County Superior Court bench trial spanning two months. The case began in 2022 when a homeowner sued after the Architectural Review Committee and HOA Board of Directors declined his teardown-and-rebuild plans due to view and aesthetic concerns. After a motion for summary judgment ruling in which the court found that the existing covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) did not protect views, the HOA held a special election to add explicit view protections to the CC&Rs. At the February 2025 trial call, the plaintiff sought leave to file a third amended complaint challenging the validity of that vote, drastically reframing the case from CC&R enforcement to one of election validity. A second plaintiff then filed a parallel action toward the end of the limitations period, and the two cases were consolidated. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    The Race to Reengineer Cybersecurity

    October 06, 2026 —
    It took six days for Colonial Pipeline Co.'s 5,500-plus miles of connected refined petroleum supply infrastructure from Houston to New York City, to come back on line after a May 7, 2021 ransomware cyberattack forced the company to shut down operations and pay $4.4 million for restoration. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Emell D. Adolphus, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Adolphus may be contacted at adolphuse@enr.com

    Federal Bid Protest Standard of Review and Disparate Treatment with Ratings

    August 16, 2026 —
    A recent decision out of the Federal Claims Court explains the post-award bid protest standard of review. In Massman Construction Co. v. U.S., 2026 WL 1971985 (Fed.Cl. 2026), a protestor brought a post-award bid protest after the Army Corps of Engineers awarded the contract to another contractor. The protestor argued that the Army Corps (government) acted irrational in its evaluation through disparate treatment. The Court of Federal Claims agreed and remanded for the Army Corps to “either justify this disparity or explain why [awardee’s] lower-priced, but technically inferior proposal provides the best value to the government.” Massman Construction, supra at *1. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Consider The Limited Warranty from Your Homebuilder

    July 06, 2026 —
    When purchasing a home from a homebuilder, there is an important consideration when it comes to the limited warranty you receive around the time you close on the home. That limited warranty likely includes an arbitration provision requiring you to arbitrate your disputes, such as construction defect claims, against the homebuilder. That arbitration provision will most likely include all claims, including statutory claims (such as a statutory violation of a building code claim), requiring you to arbitrate, as opposed to litigate, your disputes against the homebuilder. This is an important consideration. If the arbitration provision does not allow you to arbitrate all of your claims, and eliminates your rights to legitimate statutory claims, the arbitration provision could be unenforceable. By way of example, in a residential construction defect dispute, Anderson v. Taylor Morrison of Florida, Inc., 223 So.3d 1088 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017), the appeal turned on whether the arbitration provision in the homebuilder’s limited warranty was valid. The homeowners took possession of their home in 2009. In 2015, the homeowners served a Florida Statutes Chapter 558 notice of construction defects that included a statutory violation of a building code claim under Florida Statute §553.84. The limited warranty included an arbitration provision that specified it was the “exclusive remedy” for all disputes arising out of or related to the warranty or issues with the home and property. When read together with the warranty’s disclaimer that precluded claims not covered by the warranty “whether in contract, tort, or otherwise,” the statutory building code violation claim could not be remedied through arbitration because it fell outside the warranty’s coverage. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Construction Attorneys: Contract Negotiation Strategy

    September 01, 2026 —
    Contract negotiation is where project expectations become enforceable business obligations. A reasonable bid can become a high-risk agreement when the final contract expands the scope, shortens notice periods, limits payment rights or transfers liability that was never included in the price. Construction attorneys help project leaders identify those consequences before execution. Their role is not to eliminate every risk or prolong negotiations. It is to determine which risks can be controlled, insured, priced, shared or rejected while preserving a workable deal. The financial stakes can be substantial. HKA's 2025 analysis of more than 2,200 distressed construction and engineering projects found that disputed costs averaged 33.4% of contract budgets. Scope changes affected more than 28% of the projects studied and remained the most common cause of conflict. In North America, the average dispute studied by Arcadis in 2024 had a value of $60.1 million and took 12.5 months to resolve. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...