BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominium expert witness Purdys New York custom home expert witness Purdys New York townhome construction expert witness Purdys New York housing expert witness Purdys New York concrete tilt-up expert witness Purdys New York Subterranean parking expert witness Purdys New York low-income housing expert witness Purdys New York Medical building expert witness Purdys New York hospital construction expert witness Purdys New York condominiums expert witness Purdys New York institutional building expert witness Purdys New York mid-rise construction expert witness Purdys New York tract home expert witness Purdys New York multi family housing expert witness Purdys New York landscaping construction expert witness Purdys New York industrial building expert witness Purdys New York retail construction expert witness Purdys New York casino resort expert witness Purdys New York high-rise construction expert witness Purdys New York structural steel construction expert witness Purdys New York custom homes expert witness Purdys New York parking structure expert witness Purdys New York
    Purdys New York construction forensic expert witnessPurdys New York building consultant expertPurdys New York civil engineering expert witnessPurdys New York structural engineering expert witnessesPurdys New York construction project management expert witnessesPurdys New York construction defect expert witnessPurdys New York window expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Purdys, New York

    New York Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Purdys New York

    State license is required for Asbestos Abatement. All other licensing is done at the local level. Businesses must register with the Secretary of State.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders Association of the Hudson Valley
    Local # 3348
    1161 Little Britain Rd
    New Windsor, NY 12553

    Purdys New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Rockland County Bldrs & Remodelers
    Local # 3342
    8 College Ave
    Nanuet, NY 10954

    Purdys New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Long Island Builders Institute
    Local # 3324
    1757-8 Veterans Memorial Highway
    Islandia, NY 11749

    Purdys New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Queens & Bronx Building Association
    Local # 3365
    16-66 Bell Blvd #745
    Bayside, NY 11360

    Purdys New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Associated Builders & Owners
    Local # 3392
    80 Maiden Lane Ste 1503
    New York, NY 10038

    Purdys New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    New York City Builders Association
    Local # 3354
    3225 Victory Blvd
    Staten Island, NY 10314

    Purdys New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Southern Tier Home Builders & Rem Assoc
    Local # 3330
    2807 North St
    Endwell, NY 13760

    Purdys New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Purdys New York


    Court of Appeal: Privette Doctrine Does Not Apply to Landlord-Tenant Relationships

    Texas Restricts Foreign Ownership of Real Property

    Licensing Reciprocity Comes to Virginia

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Tear Down This Wall!”

    Maryland Contractor Documents its Illegal Deal and Pays $2.15 Million to Settle Fraud Claims

    Self-Healing Infrastructure Could Pave the Road to the Future

    London Shard Developer Wins Approval for Tower Nearby

    Proving Impacts to Critical Path to Defeat Liquidated Damages Assessment

    Scotiabank Is Cautious on Canada Housing as RBC, BMO Seek Action

    It Was a Wild Week for Just About Everyone. Ok, Make that Everyone.

    Insurer Granted Summary Judgment on Denial of Construction Defect Claim

    Alexander Moore Promoted to Managing Partner of Kahana Feld’s Oakland Office

    Insurer Disposes of Bad Faith Claim on Summary Judgment

    Reasonable Expectations – Pennsylvania’s Case by Case Approach to the Sutton Rule

    Elon Musk’s Proposed Vegas Strip Transit System Advanced by City Council Vote

    Dispute Review Boards for Real-Time Dispute Avoidance and Resolution

    Quick Note: Expert Testimony – Back to the Frye Test in Florida

    Insurance Policy Language Really Does Matter

    Massachusetts Judge Holds That Insurer Breached Its Duty To Defend Lawsuit After Chemical Spill

    Indicted Union Representatives Try Again to Revive Enmons

    Increasing Use of Construction Job Cameras

    Resilience: Transforming the Energy Sector – Navigating Land Issues in Solar and Storage Projects | Episode 3 (11.14.24)

    Second Circuit Upholds Constitutionality of NY’s Zero Emissions Credit Program

    In Florida, Exculpatory Clauses Do Not Need Express Language Referring to the Exculpated Party's Negligence

    Florida's Third DCA Reasserts the Teeth of Chapter 558 and the Future of Construction Defect Litigation

    Southern California Super Lawyers Recognizes Four Snell & Wilmer Attorneys As Rising Stars

    Appeals Court Overruled Insured as Additional Insured on Subcontractor’s Commercial General Liability Policy

    Changing Your Mind, for Whatever Reason – Terminating a Construction Contract for Convenience in Florida

    Feds OK $9B Houston Highway Project After Two-Year Pause

    How Mobile Tools Are Capturing Safety Data on Jobsites

    Late Notice Kills Insured's Claim for Damage Due to Hurricane

    Traub Lieberman Partner Jonathan Harwood Wins Motion for Summary Judgment in Favor of Insurer

    Construction Defect Claim Did Not Harm Homeowner, Court Rules

    Release Language Extended To Successor Entity But Only Covered “Known” Claims

    White and Williams Celebrates Chambers 2024 Rankings

    California Court of Appeal Provides Clarity On What Triggers Supplemental Analysis Under California Environmental Quality Act

    Landlord Duties of Repair and Covenant of Quiet Enjoyment

    That’s not the way we’ve always done it! (Why you should update your office practices)

    Pennsylvania Homeowner Blames Cracks on Chipolte Construction

    Insurers Can Sue One Another for Defense Costs on Equitable Indemnity and Equitable Contribution Basis

    Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series, Part 4: Coverage for Supply Chain Related Losses

    The Secret to Success Is Doing Things a Little Bit Differently

    Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Rise Most Since February 2006

    Seven Kahana Feld Attorneys Selected to 2025 New York Metro Super Lawyers Lists

    Utah’s Highest Court Holds That Plaintiffs Must Properly Commence an Action to Rely on the Relation-Back Doctrine to Overcome the Statute of Repose

    Collaborating or Competing with Construction Tech Startups

    Arizona Court of Appeals Rules Issues Were Not Covered in Construction Defect Suit

    Construction Problem Halts Wind Power Park

    Few Homes Available to Reno Buyers, Plenty of Commercial Properties

    PSA: Be Sure to Document (Even When Time is Short)
    Corporate Profile

    PURDYS NEW YORK CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Purdys, New York Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Purdys' most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Purdys, New York

    Jonathan Aihie Named to The National Bar Association’s “Top 40 Under 40” List

    August 03, 2026 —
    Fort Lauderdale Partner Jonathan Aihie was recently named to The National Bar Association (NBA) “Top 40 Under 40” list. The NBA “Top 40 Under 40” recognizes the nation's top lawyers under the age of 40 who demonstrate professional excellence, leadership, and commitment to the community. Recipients represent a broad cross-section of the legal profession, including private practice, government, academia, the judiciary, corporate counsel, and public service. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    New York Team Secures Dismissal of Premises Liability Action Against Client

    May 26, 2026 —
    New York Associate Nicole Koch and Partner Jennine Gerrard recently secured a complete dismissal of a plaintiff’s claims for injuries following a fall in front of a client’s business at an outdoor mall. The plaintiff alleged that she was walking on the sidewalk outside of the client's hair care supply store in the Bronx in May 2024 when she tripped and fell on a broken/defective portion of the sidewalk. As a result of the accident, the plaintiff suffered injuries to her spine, hip, wrist, and both knees. She proceeded to file suit in New York County Supreme Court against Lewis Brisbois’ client and the landlord for the property. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    2026 Top Business Risks for Construction and Engineering Companies

    May 26, 2026 —
    The 2026 Allianz Risk Barometer revealed some surprising findings for construction and engineering businesses. Now in its fifteenth year, this annual business risk ranking by corporate insurer Allianz Commercial incorporates the views of 3,338 global risk management professionals on the main perils on their radar for the year. Survey respondents included construction and engineering risk experts who identified the threats keeping them up at night. Here is how they ranked the top industry risks for 2026: Natural Catastrophes Natural catastrophe risk retains the top spot, with 38% of construction and engineering respondents citing this risk as their leading concern for 2026. From the insurance perspective, economic and insured losses remained high, albeit lower than the 10-year average. The evolving nature of natural catastrophes continues to pose significant challenges to businesses and the (re)insurance industry. Insured losses from natural catastrophes are set to reach $107 billion for 2025, according to Swiss Re—the sixth year in a row they have exceeded $100 billion, while economic losses are well in excess of $200 billion. Reprinted courtesy of Darren Tasker, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Supreme Court Strikes Down IEEPA Tariffs: The Refund Process Will Be Messy

    March 10, 2026 —
    On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, and the consolidated case Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc., that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs unilaterally.1 The decision invalidates both the “reciprocal” tariffs and the drug-trafficking tariffs imposed under IEEPA. For importers, the immediate question is whether, how, and when refunds can actually be obtained. On that issue, the U.S. Supreme Court provided no roadmap. To the contrary, the dissent warned that the United States “may be required to refund billions of dollars,” that the process is likely to be a “mess,” and that the majority opinion “says nothing today about whether, and if so how, the Government should go about returning the billions of dollars that it has collected from importers.” Reprinted courtesy of Brett W. Johnson, Snell & Wilmer, Derek Flint, Snell & Wilmer, T. Troy Galan, Snell & Wilmer and Thomas Williams, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Johnson may be contacted at bwjohnson@swlaw.com Mr. Flint may be contacted at dflint@swlaw.com Mr. Galan may be contacted at tgalan@swlaw.com Mr. Williams may be contacted at twilliams@swlaw.com> Read the full story...

    Nevada’s Mandatory Nonbinding Arbitration Law for Civil Cases is Going Through Changes

    May 14, 2026 —
    Nevada currently operates an expedited litigation program designed to resolve civil disputes with a value up to $50,000 without incurring the “usual” expense of litigating these disputes. Over time, however, the number of civil cases that have been “exempted” from this program based on the claimed damages exceeding $50,000 has grown dramatically. In response, the Nevada Legislature recently enacted a number of rule changes designed to streamline Nevada’s arbitration process and include more cases. Among these changes are increasing the arbitration “cap” from $50,000 to $100,000. By way of background, the Nevada’s Court Annexed Arbitration program is a mandatory, non-binding program for civil cases in judicial districts that have county populations of 100,000 or more [1]. Nevada’s Court Annexed Arbitration was born out of NRS 38.250, which was enacted in 1991 and went into effect in the summer of 1992. The newly enacted NRS 38.250 was regarded as a way to address the problem of increased court caseloads while promoting judicial economy and efficiency in civil cases having a probable jury award of less than $25,000 [2]. Initially, cases that were automatically exempt from the program included class actions, medical malpractice disputes, divorce proceedings, and other domestic relations matters [3]. Reprinted courtesy of Brandon Wright, Lewis Brisbois and Manuel Gurule, Lewis Brisbois Mr. Wright may be contacted at Brandon.Wright@lewisbrisbois.com Mr. Gurule may be contacted at Manuel.Gurule@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

    Arizona Court Enters $323 Million Judgment Against ZOM Living Following Unanimous Jury Verdict

    May 26, 2026 —
    PHOENIX, May 19, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- A Maricopa County court has entered a $323 million compensatory damages judgment in favor of Gray Development Group against ZOM Holding Inc., doing business as ZOM Living, following a 12-day trial, a unanimous jury verdict and post-trial proceedings related to a proposed business transaction. The jury found ZOM liable on claims of breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing stemming from a proposed joint venture tied to a planned pipeline of luxury multifamily and commercial projects in Phoenix and Scottsdale. The lawsuit centered on a 13-project, $1.4 billion development pipeline originated and planned by Gray Development Group over more than a decade. In 2019, Gray invited Florida-based ZOM to participate in a joint venture involving the completion of five projects, which would have marked ZOM's entry into the Arizona market. According to court findings presented at trial, the companies entered into a mutual confidentiality and non-circumvention agreement before Gray shared extensive sensitive and proprietary information related to the projects, including planning, market analysis, costs, financial data, local business relationships and operational strategies developed by Gray over decades in Arizona. Evidence presented during trial showed that over a 10-month period while under contract, ZOM made hundreds of requests for confidential project and market information before circumventing Gray and pursuing the projects independently, ultimately displacing Gray from projects it spent years planning and developing. ZOM Living, headquartered in Orlando, develops multifamily and senior housing communities across the United States and operates regional offices in Boston, Dallas, Fort Lauderdale, Nashville, Phoenix, and Raleigh. ZOM is owned by Timeless Investments, the Amsterdam-based family office of Dutch businessman Hans van Veggel, which acquired the company in 1997. About Gray Development Group Gray Development Group was founded by architect Bruce Gray in 1991. The Phoenix-based company was the top-ranked multifamily developer in Arizona for more than a decade. The company designed and developed more than 15,000 apartment and condominium units throughout metropolitan Phoenix. Two Gray-designed developments — a Tempe midrise and a San Diego high-rise — received National Apartment Community of the Year awards.

    We Won’t Permit That Excuse!

    June 23, 2026 —
    A Texas appellate court recently ruled that a building permit wasn’t a condition precedent for a construction project. That caught our attention. Can you build a commercial project without a permit? But as we read the case, we see the court’s reasoning. And it reminds us of an important legal principle that should inform our contract drafting and negotiation. The case was a civil suit brought by the project owner against its tenant improvement contractor for work on a medical spa. The owner claimed that the contractor didn’t perform the work properly and didn’t finish construction. The contractor argued that delays and problems were caused by the owner, alleging numerous failures, including the owner’s failure to secure a building permit. Reprinted courtesy of Curt Martin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Richard Eiszner, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Martin may be contacted at cmartin@pecklaw.com Mr. Eiszner may be contacted at reiszner@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    EPA, Maryland Sue DC Water Over Massive Potomac River Sewage Spill

    May 14, 2026 —
    The state of Maryland and the federal government have filed separate lawsuits against the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water), both alleging that the agency’s failure to address longstanding deterioration in the Potomac Interceptor contributed to a weeklong release of more than 240 million gallons of raw sewage into the Potomac River this past January. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com