BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    low-income housing expert witness Olivebridge New York housing expert witness Olivebridge New York multi family housing expert witness Olivebridge New York parking structure expert witness Olivebridge New York custom homes expert witness Olivebridge New York Medical building expert witness Olivebridge New York mid-rise construction expert witness Olivebridge New York condominiums expert witness Olivebridge New York townhome construction expert witness Olivebridge New York retail construction expert witness Olivebridge New York custom home expert witness Olivebridge New York condominium expert witness Olivebridge New York industrial building expert witness Olivebridge New York high-rise construction expert witness Olivebridge New York Subterranean parking expert witness Olivebridge New York casino resort expert witness Olivebridge New York concrete tilt-up expert witness Olivebridge New York office building expert witness Olivebridge New York tract home expert witness Olivebridge New York institutional building expert witness Olivebridge New York hospital construction expert witness Olivebridge New York landscaping construction expert witness Olivebridge New York
    Olivebridge New York construction scheduling expert witnessOlivebridge New York architect expert witnessOlivebridge New York expert witness windowsOlivebridge New York construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessOlivebridge New York construction defect expert witnessOlivebridge New York construction forensic expert witnessOlivebridge New York multi family design expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Olivebridge, New York

    New York Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Olivebridge New York

    State license is required for Asbestos Abatement. All other licensing is done at the local level. Businesses must register with the Secretary of State.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Southern Tier Home Builders & Rem Assoc
    Local # 3330
    2807 North St
    Endwell, NY 13760

    Olivebridge New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Finger Lakes Home Builders & Remodelers Association
    Local # 3312
    PO Box 421
    Big Flats, NY 14814

    Olivebridge New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of the Hudson Valley
    Local # 3348
    1161 Little Britain Rd
    New Windsor, NY 12553

    Olivebridge New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Tompkins/Cortland Bldrs&Remo
    Local # 3382
    PO Box 202
    Cortland, NY 13045

    Olivebridge New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    New York State Bldrs Assn
    Local # 3300
    1 Commerce Plz Ste 704
    Albany, NY 12210

    Olivebridge New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Rockland County Bldrs & Remodelers
    Local # 3342
    8 College Ave
    Nanuet, NY 10954

    Olivebridge New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Capital Region B & R Assoc
    Local # 3305
    1202 Troy-Schenectady Road Ste 7
    Latham, NY 12110

    Olivebridge New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Olivebridge New York


    The ARC and The Covenants

    Keeping Your Workers Safe When Air Quality Isn't

    Brian Newberry Accepted into ABOTA

    Plaza Construction Negotiating Pay Settlement for Florida Ritz-Carlton Renovation

    What Should Business Owners Do If a Customer Won’t Pay

    Retired Judge Claims Asbestos in Courthouse gave him Cancer

    Colorado’s Housing Crisis: How S.B. 25-131 Could Be a Step in the Right Direction

    The Federal Freeze Playbook: Key Steps for Government Contractors Amid a Potential Federal Funding Freeze

    Condo Collapse Spurs Hometown House Member to Demand U.S. Rules

    Texas Supreme Court Rules on Contractual Liability Exclusion in Construction Cases

    My Current Love-Hate Relationship with AI

    Withdrawal of an Admission in California May Shift Costs—Including Attorneys’ Fees—Incurred in Connection with the Withdrawal

    Los Angeles Wildfires Rage on, Destroying Structures and Displacing Residents

    Couple Gets $79,000 on $10 Million Construction Defect Claim

    Reservation of Rights Letter Merely Citing Policy Provisions Inadequate

    Contractors Can No Longer Make Roof Repairs Following Their Own Inspections

    2013 May Be Bay Area’s Best Year for Commercial Building

    Congratulations to all of our 2023 Attorneys Named as Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

    Crews Tested By Rocky Ground, Utility Challenges

    Congratulations to Haight Attorneys Selected to the 2025 Southern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists

    Sewage Flowing in London’s River Thames Draws Green Bond Demand

    Insured’s Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    Land Use Team Wins Appeal for Affordable Senior Housing Development in San Francisco

    Key Economic & Geopolitical Themes To Monitor In 2024

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (02/15/23) – Proptech Solutions, Supply Chain Pivots, and the Inflation Reduction Act

    No Coverage For Construction Defects When Complaint Alleges Contractual Damages

    Congratulations to Haight Attorneys Selected to the 2020 Southern California Super Lawyers List

    Federal Judge Refuses to Limit Coverage and Moves Forward with Policyholder’s Claims Against Insurer and Broker

    EEOC Suit Alleges Site Managers Bullied Black Workers on NY Project

    Five Years of Great Legal Blogging at Insurance Law Hawaii

    Environmental and Regulatory Law Update: New Federal and State Rulings

    Federal District Court Continues to Find Construction Defects do Not Arise From An Occurrence

    Big League Dreams a Nightmare for Town

    Remote Depositions in the Post-Covid-19 World

    After Elections, Infrastructure Talk Stirs Again

    The Secret to Success Is Doing Things a Little Bit Differently

    5 Questions about New York's Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act

    Nevada’s Construction Defect Law

    Construction Firm Sues Town over Claims of Building Code Violations

    Court of Appeals Confirms that King County Superior Court’s Jury Selection Process Satisfies Due Process Requirements

    Happenings in and around the 2016 West Coast Casualty Seminar

    Brazil Congress Chiefs Deny Wrongdoing in Petrobras Scandal

    Defense Owed to Directors and Officers Despite Insured vs. Insured Exclusion

    Water Leak Covered for First Thirteen Days

    Michigan Finds Coverage for Subcontractor's Faulty Work

    Housing Woes Worse in L.A. Than New York, San Francisco

    Palm Beach Billionaires’ Fix for Sinking Megamansions: Build Bigger

    A Tuesday With Lisa Colon

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized as 2023 New York – Metro Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars

    Plaintiffs In Construction Defect Cases to Recover For Emotional Damages?
    prop="name">Florida Issues Emergency Fraud Prevention Rule to Protect Policyholders in Wake of Catastrophic Storms

    Sanibel Causeway Repair: Contractors Flooded Site With Crews, Resources

    Insured’s Bad Faith Insurance Claim Evaporates Before its Eyes

    Foundation Differences Across the U.S.

    The Single Source of Truth in Construction Projects: Reality or Myth?

    Meet Daniel Hall, Assistant Professor at TU Delft

    Three Reasons Late Payments Persist in the Construction Industry

    Industrialized Construction News 7/2022

    Sometimes a Reminder is in Order. . .

    Wildfire Risk Scores and Insurance Placement: What You Should Know

    Important Insurance Alert for Out-of-State Contractors Assisting in Florida Recovery Efforts!

    Contractor Sentenced to Seven Years for Embezzling $3 Million

    Apartment Building Damaged by Cable Installer’s Cherry Picker

    Rights Afforded to Employees and Employers During Strikes

    Acquisition, Development, and Construction Lending Conditions Ease

    Kushners Abandon Property Bid as Pressures Mount Over Conflicts

    Narrow House Has Wide Opposition

    Manhattan Home Sales Rise at Slower Pace as Prices Jump

    Providing Notice of Claims Under Your Construction Contract

    Florida Construction Defect Decision Part of Lengthy Evolution

    Coverage Established for Property Damage Caused by Added Product

    Supreme Court of New York Denies Motion in all but One Cause of Action in Kikirov v. 355 Realty Assoc., et al.

    Connecticut Court Holds Unresolved Coverage Issues Makes Appraisal Premature

    Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Increase at Slower Pace

    The “Up” House is “Up” for Sale

    Emotional Distress Damages Not Distinct from “Annoyance and Discomfort” Damages in Case Arising from 2007 California Wildfires

    California Beach Hotel to Get $185 Million Luxury Rebuild

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized in the 2027 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America®
    Corporate Profile

    OLIVEBRIDGE NEW YORK CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Olivebridge, New York Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Olivebridge's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Olivebridge, New York

    Denis Serkin and Michael S. Zicherman Co-Edit/Author Lexology Panoramic: Construction 2027

    August 03, 2026 —
    P&A partners Denis Serkin and Michael S. Zicherman served as co-editors and authors of Lexology’s Panoramic: Construction 2027 – US and Global guide. Formerly Getting the Deal Through, Lexology Panoramic provides members of the construction industry and construction-related legal and business providers with side-by-side comparison of key industry issues in 19 jurisdictions worldwide. Reprinted courtesy of Denis Serkin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Michael S. Zicherman, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Serkin may be contacted at dserkin@pecklaw.com Mr. Zicherman may be contacted at mzicherman@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Differing Site Conditions Claim Requires a Misrepresentation

    May 14, 2026 —
    If you are entertaining a differing site conditions claim, consider this Third District Court of Appeals case from the mid-90s. In Hendry Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 648 So.2d 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), a contractor was hired by Dade County to demolish the old Rickenbacker Causeway in Miami. The original 1941 plans of the causeway were made available to contractors. The lowest bidding contractor that was awarded the project based its bid “on its conclusion that the pilings supporting the old bridge were made of concrete.” Hendry, supra at 141. The contractor based this conclusion on the original plans, its visual observation, and experience. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Best Lawyers in America

    September 08, 2026 —
    Nomos LLP partner Garret Murai has been recognized in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® in the area of Construction Law. Only about 5% of lawyers in the United States are recognized by Best Lawyers in America®. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Late Notice Bars Insured’s Claim for Wind Damage

    June 29, 2026 —
    The court found that a six-month delay in reporting damage from wind did not comply with the policy’s notice requirements. Touchmark Hotel Group, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61910 (S.D. N. Y. March 24, 2026). A storm caused damage to Touchstone’s hotel on January 4, 2023. Touchstone’s corporate representative, Rohit Patel, testified that he was not at the property on the day of the storm. In a telephone call the next day, the manager of the property reported to Patel that he observed detached shingles from the roof the hotel in the parking lot. Patel testified that he did not file a claim at that time because Touchmark’s employees did not detect any water leakage in the building and because he did not believe that the cost of the damage from the storm would exceed the policy’s deductible. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Suit Limitation Provision Eliminates Wind Loss Claim

    July 27, 2026 —
    The insurer’s motion for judgment on the pleadings was granted after the insured failed to file suit against the insurer within the policy’s two-year suit limitation provision. Interstate Investments, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Ins Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98108 (S.D. N. Y. May 4, 2026). On or before June 27, 2023, a wind, hail and rainstorm damaged Interstate’s property in Oklahoma. Interstate filed a claim under its policy with Mt. Hawley. The policy provided that New York law applied and contained a two- year suit limitation provision. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    The Deadline to File Suit on a Public Works Payment Payment Bond is Triggered by a Claimant’s Work on a Project Not by a Claimant’s Work Under a Contract

    June 02, 2026 —
    California law requires that prime contractors furnish a payment bond – providing for payment to lower-tiered subcontractors and suppliers – on state and local public works projects with a value in excess of $25,000. There are three conditions that must be satisfied when a claimant makes a claim against a payment bond on a public works project in California:
    1. First, generally, the claimant must have served a preliminary notice, unless the claimant is a first-tier subcontractor or supplier;
    2. The claimant must have “ceased to provide work” on the project; and
    3. The claimant must file suit against the payment bond no later than six (6) months after the period in which a stop payment notice must be given or, in other words, the earlier of 270 days after completion of the public works project or 210 days after a notice of completion or cessation was recorded on a public works project.
    In Tarlton & Sons, Inc. v. Great American Insurance Company, 111 Cal.App.5th 376 (2025), the 2nd District Court of Appeal examined whether a subcontractor timely filed a claim against a payment bond when a prime contractor was terminated and replaced by another prime contractor who the subcontractor continued to perform work for. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Seattle’s Residential Zoning Transformation: What Property Owners, Buyers, and Investors Should Understand

    May 14, 2026 —
    Seattle is in the midst of a significant transformation in residential land use policy. Longstanding neighborhood zoning patterns that historically favored detached single-family development are being reexamined in response to housing supply pressures, affordability concerns, and evolving state mandates. For homeowners, purchasers, investors, and builders, these changes may create substantial new opportunities. They also create a heightened need for careful legal and practical due diligence. While zoning reform can expand potential uses of property, it does not eliminate the many other constraints that may still govern what can actually be built. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lawrence S. Glosser, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC
    Mr. Glosser may be contacted at larry.glosser@acslawyers.com

    Building in Arizona’s Data Center Boom: How Federal Executive Orders, State Regulation, and National-Security Policy Are Reshaping the Rules for Developers

    June 02, 2026 —
    Developers and practitioners evaluating data center projects in Arizona face a regulatory environment shifting on three fronts simultaneously. Federal executive orders are opening new land, streamlining permitting, and channeling financial incentives toward qualifying projects — but they are not preempting the state and local rules that most directly affect project economics. A carve-out in the December 2025 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Framework Executive Order preserves Arizona’s authority over data center infrastructure, meaning the Arizona Corporation Commission’s (ACC) rate-classification docket, municipal zoning restrictions, water-use ordinances, and pending grid cost-allocation legislation remain the binding constraints on project feasibility. Understanding where federal tailwinds end and state and local headwinds begin is essential for any developer sizing risk or selecting sites in the state. The Federal Landscape: An Interlocking Framework of Executive Orders Five interlocking executive orders are accelerating data center development nationally, but none overrides Arizona’s authority over siting energy, or infrastructure. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ryan J. Regula, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Regula may be contacted at rregula@swlaw.com