BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    hospital construction expert witness El Prado New Mexico parking structure expert witness El Prado New Mexico tract home expert witness El Prado New Mexico production housing expert witness El Prado New Mexico Subterranean parking expert witness El Prado New Mexico housing expert witness El Prado New Mexico condominiums expert witness El Prado New Mexico casino resort expert witness El Prado New Mexico retail construction expert witness El Prado New Mexico townhome construction expert witness El Prado New Mexico multi family housing expert witness El Prado New Mexico industrial building expert witness El Prado New Mexico landscaping construction expert witness El Prado New Mexico mid-rise construction expert witness El Prado New Mexico concrete tilt-up expert witness El Prado New Mexico condominium expert witness El Prado New Mexico office building expert witness El Prado New Mexico institutional building expert witness El Prado New Mexico low-income housing expert witness El Prado New Mexico structural steel construction expert witness El Prado New Mexico Medical building expert witness El Prado New Mexico high-rise construction expert witness El Prado New Mexico
    El Prado New Mexico architectural expert witnessEl Prado New Mexico construction safety expertEl Prado New Mexico slope failure expert witnessEl Prado New Mexico fenestration expert witnessEl Prado New Mexico construction claims expert witnessEl Prado New Mexico building code compliance expert witnessEl Prado New Mexico defective construction expert
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    El Prado, New Mexico

    New Mexico Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines El Prado New Mexico

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    San Juan Co Home Builders Association Affil w/ National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 3275
    PO Box 5565
    Farmington, NM 87499
    El Prado New Mexico Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Santa Fe Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 3278
    1409 Luisa Street Suite A
    Santa Fe, NM 87505

    El Prado New Mexico Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of New Mexico
    Local # 3200
    5931 Office Blvd NE Ste 1
    Albuquerque, NM 87109

    El Prado New Mexico Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Central New Mexico
    Local # 3218
    4100 Wolcott Ave NE Ste B
    Albuquerque, NM 87109

    El Prado New Mexico Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Eastern New Mexico
    Local # 3230
    PO Box 953
    Clovis, NM 88102
    El Prado New Mexico Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    South Eastern NM Home Builders Association
    Local # 3240
    PO Box 1132
    Roswell, NM 88202
    El Prado New Mexico Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lincoln County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3252
    PO Box 2769
    Ruidoso, NM 88355

    El Prado New Mexico Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For El Prado New Mexico


    Don’t Get Caught Holding the Bag: Hold the State Liable When General Contractor Fails to Pay on a Public Project.

    Confidence Among U.S. Homebuilders Declines to Eight-Month Low

    Florida Extends Filing Time for Claims Subject to the Statute of Repose

    "Multiple Claims" Provisions on Contractor's Professional Liability Policy Creates a Trap for Policyholders

    Can Your Industry Benefit From Metaverse Technology?

    Water Alone is Not Property Damage under a CGL policy in Connecticut

    Environmental Roundup – May 2019

    The “Colorado American Dream Act:” H.B. 25-1272’s Construction Defect Reforms

    Hunton’s Alice Weeks Selected to the Miami Dade Bar’s Circle of Excellence for Insurance Litigation

    Condominium Exclusion Bars Coverage for Construction Defect

    Haight Attorneys Selected to 2018 Southern California Rising Stars List

    U.K. Construction Unexpectedly Strengthens for a Second Month

    Defective Sprinklers Not Cause of Library Flooding

    A Court-Side Seat: Coal-Fired Limitations, the Search for a Venue Climate Change and New Agency Rules that May or May Not Stick Around

    Are Robotic Coworkers Soon a Reality in Construction?

    Worker’s Compensation Exclusivity Rule Gets “Trumped” by Indemnity Provision

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Burks Smith and Katie Keller Win Daubert Motion Excluding Plaintiff’s Expert’s Testimony in the Middle District of Florida

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Stuck on You”

    Planned Everglades Reservoir at Center of Spat Between Fla.'s Gov.-Elect, Water Management District

    President Trump Announces New Steel Tariffs

    New Jersey Supreme Court Ruled Condo Association Can’t Reset Clock on Construction Defect Claim

    Venue for Miller Act Payment Bond When Project is Outside of Us

    Lewis Brisbois Ranked Tier 1 Nationally for Insurance Law, Mass Tort/Class Actions Defense, Labor & Employment Litigation, and Environmental Law in 2024 Best Law Firms®

    At the Intersection of Indemnity and Prevailing Wages

    Nevada Construction Defect Lawyers Dead in Possible Suicides

    After Breaching its Duty to Defend, Insurer Must Indemnify

    A General Contractors Guide to Bond Thresholds by State

    N.J. Voters Approve $116 Million in School Construction

    Greg Katz Quoted in Insurance Journal Article About How Big Data & AI Are Driving Up Verdicts, Settlements

    Insurer’s Duty to Defend: When is it Triggered? When is it Not?

    Landmark Montana Supreme Court Decision Series: The Duty to Defend

    Policing Those Subcontractors: It Might Take Extra Effort To Be An Additional Insured

    Five "Boilerplate" Terms to Negotiate in Your Next Subcontract

    Candace Dickson Recognized as “Up & Coming Lawyer” by The Indiana Lawyer

    Does a Broker Forfeit His or Her Commission for Technical Non-Compliance with Department of Real Estate Statutory Requirements?

    Texas City Pulls Plug on Fossil Fuels With Shift to Solar

    When Construction Defects Appear, Don’t Choose Between Rebuilding and Building Your Case

    Sales of Existing U.S. Homes Decrease on Fewer Investors

    9 Positive Housing Statistics by Builder

    New Strategy for Deterring Intracorporate Litigation?: Delaware Supreme Court Supports Fee-Shifting Bylaws

    Back Posting with Thoughts on Lien Waivers

    South Carolina Contractors Regain General Liability Coverage

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Hold the Pickles, Hold the Lettuce?”

    Meet BWB&O’s 2026 Best Lawyers in America!

    Hunton Insurance Partner Syed Ahmad Named to Benchmark Litigation’s 2019 40 & Under Hot List

    Why Financial Advisers Still Hate Reverse Mortgages

    Why Do Construction Companies Fail?

    Snell & Wilmer’s San Diego Office Recognized as One of the “Best Places to Work” by the San Diego Business Journal

    Ohio Does Not Permit Retroactive Application of Statute of Repose

    Blindly Relying on Public Adjuster or Loss Consultant’s False Estimate Can Play Out Badly
    Corporate Profile

    EL PRADO NEW MEXICO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The El Prado, New Mexico Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to El Prado's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    El Prado, New Mexico

    Appeals Court Upholds Skanska, Granite Win in ‘I-4 Ultimate’ JV Dispute

    June 15, 2026 —
    A federal appeals court has upheld a lower court’s decision requiring The Lane Construction Corp. to pay roughly $79 million in damages, plus interest, to joint venture partners Skanska USA Civil Southeast and Granite Construction for work on Florida’s I-4 Ultimate highway megaproject in Orlando, which was completed in 2022. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    D.C. Circuit Upholds EPA’s CERCLA Hazardous-Substance Designations for PFAS as State-Law Settlements Highlight Expanding Liability Landscape

    September 15, 2026 —
    On August 18, 2026, a unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld the 2024 designation by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund). (See Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. EPA, No. 24-1193 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 18, 2026).) The decision leaves EPA’s PFOA and PFOS hazardous substance designations in place and provides guidance on the scope of EPA’s authority to make future hazardous substances designations under CERCLA Section 102(a). The decision also likely resolves a challenge to the rule that has spanned two presidential administrations. After taking office, the Trump administration had obtained an abeyance of the litigation challenging the Biden-era rule while EPA reconsidered its position. In September 2025, EPA informed the court that it had decided to retain the designations, while signaling that it would work with Congress and industry to address CERCLA liability concerns for “passive receivers.” The litigation then resumed, with the current Administration defending the rule. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury, Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury, Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury and Anthony B. Cavender, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Cavender may be contacted at anthony.cavender@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Celebrating 29 Years – Thank You for Your Continued Trust!

    April 20, 2026 —
    For 29 years, Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP has grown alongside the clients and communities we proudly serve. What began as a single office in Orange County has evolved into a multi-state firm with 11 locations across five states. Today, we are proud to be supported by a dedicated team of more than 200 attorneys and over 400 employees who work every day to deliver exceptional service and results. This milestone is not just about where we started; it’s about the people who have helped shape who we are today. Our continued growth reflects the strength of our relationships, the trust of our clients and partners, and the commitment of our team. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Denis Serkin and Michael S. Zicherman Co-Edit/Author Lexology Panoramic: Construction 2027

    August 03, 2026 —
    P&A partners Denis Serkin and Michael S. Zicherman served as co-editors and authors of Lexology’s Panoramic: Construction 2027 – US and Global guide. Formerly Getting the Deal Through, Lexology Panoramic provides members of the construction industry and construction-related legal and business providers with side-by-side comparison of key industry issues in 19 jurisdictions worldwide. Reprinted courtesy of Denis Serkin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Michael S. Zicherman, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Serkin may be contacted at dserkin@pecklaw.com Mr. Zicherman may be contacted at mzicherman@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Mandatory Arbitration Isn’t All Bad, if. . .

    July 13, 2026 —
    In the past week or so mandatory arbitration has been all the rage. From those that argue that arbitration is becoming more burdensome than litigation, to my friend and fellow construction attorney Scott Wolfe who gives great advice on how to make arbitration worth it again. You can place me in the camp of those that think that mandatory arbitration clauses of the type typically found in contracts can add a layer of expense that can be unnecessary. However, if an arbitration clause is carefully drafted, and properly used, these clauses an be helpful in assuring that the streamlining effect for which arbitration was created actually occurs. Because the contract is king in Virginia, these provisions can essentially create the rule of civil procedure used to resolve any dispute relating to the project. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    Project Labor Agreements: A New Bid Protest Forum Split

    May 14, 2026 —
    Advertisements often include a disclaimer: “individual results may vary.” Similarly, lawyers are notorious for saying “it depends.” The mandatory Project Labor Agreement (“PLA”) regulations have recently placed into context this adage as it applies to federal contract bid protests, with very different results depending on which forum – the Court of Federal Claims (“COFC”) versus the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) – different contractors have selected to bring PLA bid protests. Over the last two years, over 30 protesters have successfully achieved removal of mandatory PLAs from large-scale federal construction contracts based on two landmark bid protest decisions issued by the COFC. Similar challenges to PLAs at the GAO, however, have not been successful in removing PLAs, highlighting an emerging trend that the COFC is often a more effective relief forum than GAO for government construction contractors. Reprinted courtesy of Dirk D. Haire, Burr & Forman LLP, David P.J. Timm, Burr & Forman LLP and Michael J. Brewer, Burr & Forman LLP Mr. Haire may be contacted at dhaire@burr.com Mr. Timm may be contacted at dtimm@burr.com Mr. Brewer may be contacted at mbrewer@burr.com Read the full story...

    Achieving Sustainability Through Design-Build Delivery: Part I – An Overview

    September 21, 2026 —
    This article was written for the AGC’s Law in Brief and first appeared here. Sustainability is no longer optional. What was once a matter of public policy or corporate preference has become a regulatory mandate and is reshaping how construction projects are designed, built, and operated. This mandate is not solely figurative. Rather, states have started to follow Europe’s lead by beginning to codify sustainability requirements into regulations and law. California led the charge by adding mandatory embodied-carbon emissions regulations into CALGreen, and other states, such as New York, have introduced bills to implement similar requirements. Owners, designers, and builders must now treat sustainability not as aspirational, but as a clearly defined contract issue from the outset, particularly where the project is expected to achieve a third-party rating, meet energy or resiliency targets, qualify for incentives, or comply with evolving green building codes. In the federal public sector, construction contracts include a layered compliance framework—executive order-inspired policy, FAR-mandated clauses, and enduring statutory requirements—requiring contractors to integrate sustainability into design, material selection, and lifecycle management. Staying ahead means aligning with regulatory standards, conducting life-cycle cost analyses, and embedding sustainability into every procurement and construction decision. Reprinted courtesy of Joshua M. Pruett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C., Jennifer L. Harris, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Tiffany A. Harrod, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Pruett may be contacted at jpruett@pecklaw.com Ms. Harris may be contacted at jharris@pecklaw.com Ms. Harrod may be contacted at tharrod@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Snell & Wilmer Recognized With Top Honor in Ranking Arizona: Top Law Firms for 2026

    June 22, 2026 —
    PHOENIX – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that the firm has been voted as the top law firm in Arizona for the 17th consecutive year in the 2026 edition of AZ Big Media’s Ranking Arizona: The Best of Arizona Business. The firm was again recognized in the category of “Top 10 large law firms in Arizona” which looked at firms with 39 attorneys or more. “We are honored to receive this award recognizing our team’s ongoing commitment to excellence in service of our clients, our community, and each other,” said Firm Chair Barbara J. Dawson. “We are proud to play a meaningful role in supporting the strength and growth of Arizona’s vibrant business environment amid a rapidly changing global economy.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer