BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominium expert witness Caballo New Mexico Subterranean parking expert witness Caballo New Mexico structural steel construction expert witness Caballo New Mexico custom home expert witness Caballo New Mexico high-rise construction expert witness Caballo New Mexico institutional building expert witness Caballo New Mexico tract home expert witness Caballo New Mexico multi family housing expert witness Caballo New Mexico mid-rise construction expert witness Caballo New Mexico office building expert witness Caballo New Mexico hospital construction expert witness Caballo New Mexico casino resort expert witness Caballo New Mexico landscaping construction expert witness Caballo New Mexico retail construction expert witness Caballo New Mexico production housing expert witness Caballo New Mexico low-income housing expert witness Caballo New Mexico parking structure expert witness Caballo New Mexico custom homes expert witness Caballo New Mexico housing expert witness Caballo New Mexico townhome construction expert witness Caballo New Mexico condominiums expert witness Caballo New Mexico Medical building expert witness Caballo New Mexico
    Caballo New Mexico delay claim expert witnessCaballo New Mexico forensic architectCaballo New Mexico construction expert witnessesCaballo New Mexico roofing construction expertCaballo New Mexico construction defect expert witnessCaballo New Mexico construction code expert witnessCaballo New Mexico reconstruction expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Caballo, New Mexico

    New Mexico Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Caballo New Mexico

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    SW New Mexico Home Builders Association
    Local # 3270
    PO Box 1962
    Silver City, NM 88062

    Caballo New Mexico Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Contractors Association of Otero County
    Local # 3283
    PO Box 4382
    Alamogordo, NM 88310
    Caballo New Mexico Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lincoln County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3252
    PO Box 2769
    Ruidoso, NM 88355

    Caballo New Mexico Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    South Eastern NM Home Builders Association
    Local # 3240
    PO Box 1132
    Roswell, NM 88202
    Caballo New Mexico Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association of Southern New Mexico
    Local # 3254
    PO Box 2608
    Las Cruces, NM 88004

    Caballo New Mexico Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Eastern New Mexico
    Local # 3230
    PO Box 953
    Clovis, NM 88102
    Caballo New Mexico Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of New Mexico
    Local # 3200
    5931 Office Blvd NE Ste 1
    Albuquerque, NM 87109

    Caballo New Mexico Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Caballo New Mexico


    Coping with Labor & Install Issues in Green Building

    To Catch a Thief

    Poor Record Keeping = Going to the Poor House (or, why project documentation matters)

    Louisiana Couple Claims Hurricane Revealed Construction Defects

    Five Kahana Feld Attorneys Recognized in 2025 Upstate New York Super Lawyers®

    The Show Must Go On: Shuttered Venues Operators Grant Provides Lifeline for Live Music and Theater Venues

    Renters Who Bought Cannot Sue for Construction Defects

    Hawaii Federal District Court Denies Motion for Remand

    Second Circuit Certifies Question Impacting "Bellefonte Rule"

    First Suit to Enforce Business-Interruption Coverage Filed

    Illinois Supreme Court Announces Time Standards for Closing Out Cases

    Update Regarding McMillin Albany LLC v. Super Ct.

    Hawaii Appellate Court Finds Duty to Defend Group Builders Case

    Courts Are Ordering Remote Depositions as the COVID-19 Pandemic Continues

    HHMR Lawyers Recognized by Best Lawyers

    Snell & Wilmer Recognized With Top Honor in Ranking Arizona: Top Law Firms for 2026

    Coverage Issues: When You Need Your Own Lawyer in a Construction Defect Suit

    Connecticut Supreme Court to Review Several Issues in Asbestos Coverage Case

    Smart Construction and the Future of the Construction Industry

    The Modern Nuclear Renaissance Reaches New England

    Wildfire Is Efficient Proximate Cause of Moisture Reaching Expansive Soils Under Residence

    Seven Trends That Impact Commercial Construction Litigation in 2021

    Panthers Withdraw City, County Deal Over Abandoned Facility

    Drones Give Inspectors a Closer Look at Bridges

    Contract’s Definition of “Substantial Completion” Does Not Apply to Third Party for Purposes of SOL, Holds Court of Appeal

    New Mexico Holds One-Sided Dispute Resolution Provisions Are Unenforceable

    Home Sales Topping $100 Million Smash U.S. Price Records

    Yellen Has Scant Power to Relieve U.S. Housing Slowdown

    Colorado Finally Corrects Thirty-Year Old Flaw in Construction Defect Statute of Repose

    Climate Disasters Are an Affordable Housing Problem

    Parties Can Agree to Anything In A Settlement Agreement………Or Can They?

    Insurer’s Duty to Defend: When is it Triggered? When is it Not?

    Despite Increased Presence in Construction, Women Lack Size-Appropriate PPE

    Question of Parties' Intent Prevents Summary Judgment for Insurer

    Cybersecurity In Construction: How To Effectively Mitigate Cyber Risk

    Illinois Non-Profit Sues over Defective Roof

    Court Upholds Plan to Eliminate Vehicles from Balboa Park Complex

    Los Angeles Team Obtains Favorable Verdict for Client in High-Stakes Slip-and-Fall Case

    Application of Frye Test to Determine Admissibility of Expert

    Loss of Use From Allegedly Improper Drainage System Triggers Defense Under CGL Policy

    Texas exclusions j(5) and j(6).

    The OFCCP’s November 2019 Updated Technical Assistance Guide: What Every Federal Construction Contractor Should Know

    Eastern District of Pennsylvania Clarifies Standard for Imposing Spoliation Sanctions

    California Rejects Judgments By Confession Pursuant to Civil Code Section 1132

    No Duty to Defend Faulty Workmanship Under Hawaii Law, but All is not Lost for Insured Contractor

    Robinson+Cole’s Amicus Brief Adopted and Cited by Massachusetts’s High Court

    No Duty to Defend Under Renter's Policy

    Why Biden’s Infrastructure Plan Is a Green Jobs Plan

    Court Finds That Limitation on Conditional Use Permit Results in Covered Property Damage Due to Loss of Use

    Professional Services Exclusion Bars Coverage Where Ordinary Negligence is Inseparably Intertwined With Professional Service
    Corporate Profile

    CABALLO NEW MEXICO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Caballo, New Mexico Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Caballo's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Caballo, New Mexico

    Communication Gaps Can Cost Construction Firms in the Data Center Boom

    June 02, 2026 —
    The data center construction boom is transforming the construction industry at a historic pace. Fueled by cloud computing, artificial intelligence and relentless demand for digital infrastructure, data centers have become one of the fastest-growing project types in the built environment. Billions of dollars are flowing into new facilities and expansions, creating unprecedented opportunities for construction firms positioned to deliver reliably. But opportunity alone does not guarantee success. As competition intensifies, communication failures and poor information management are emerging as some of the most common (and costly) reasons firms lose margins, miss deadlines or fail to secure repeat work. In data center construction, where schedules are compressed and tolerance for error is minimal, even small breakdowns in communication can have outsized consequences. Reprinted courtesy of Mike Lewis, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Fourth Circuit Extends Coverage to Contractor

    May 14, 2026 —
    The Fourth Circuit in APAC-Atlantic, Inc. v. Owners Insurance Co., No. 24-1969, 2026 WL 458402 (4th Cir. Feb. 18, 2026) recently endorsed broad coverage for additional insureds, interpreting “arising out of” broadly under North Carolina law to extend coverage to a repaving company under its subcontractor’s liability insurance policy. The court held that an additional insured’s liability “arising out of” a named insured’s work in an additional-insured endorsement means liability “relating to” or “causally connected to” the named insured’s operations, rather than liability defined more narrowly as “caused by” or “the fault of” the named insured. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    GRSM Secures Illinois Appellate Victory for Architectural Firm in Implied Warranty Dispute

    May 14, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Partner Jonathan Federman, Partner Thomas Cronin, and Senior Counsel Garrett Lee recently secured a victory in the Illinois Appellate Court, Fifth District, on behalf of the firm’s client, an architectural firm, in a liability dispute. The case arose following an entity’s purchase of a 111-unit building for use as an investment or rental property. The plaintiff made claims against the architect of the building, alleging that there were design defects that breached an implied warranty, as well as a negligence claim. GRSM argued that an architect could not be liable for implied warranties, particularly for an implied warranty which no Illinois court has ever recognized. GRSM further argued that Illinois law bars an architect from liability for negligence arising from a duty pursuant to contract under the economic loss doctrine. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    How Engineers Will Determine Why NYC's Pfizer HQ Conversion Buckled

    July 13, 2026 —
    Construction crews have stabilized the former Pfizer headquarters redevelopment in Midtown Manhattan after two load-bearing structural columns buckled on the 21st floor July 7. The focus has now shifted from emergency response to determining what caused the office-to-residential conversion to suffer a major structural failure. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    New York Enacts First-in-the-Nation Statewide Data Center Moratorium

    August 03, 2026 —
    As of May 2026, nearly 12 gigawatts of data center load requests were in the New York Independent System Operator interconnection queue, with more than two-thirds of capacity requests entering the queue in 2025 alone. On July 14, 2026, in response to concerns over this rapid growth, Governor Kathy Hochul issued Executive Order No. 62 (the “Order”) imposing a temporary moratorium on data centers in New York State. Among the concerns cited in the Order are the cost burden on ratepayers associated with transmission upgrades required to accommodate large loads, potential environmental impacts, and large-scale water use. The moratorium is intended to halt activities while the state government develops a comprehensive legal framework for data center development. While dozens of municipal and county-level moratoriums are in place throughout the U.S., and while the legislatures of several states, including Maine, have proposed moratoriums, the Order is the first statewide moratorium to be enacted nationally. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Joshua L. Sturtevant, Sheppard
    Mr. Sturtevant may be contacted at jsturtevant@sheppard.com

    In the Eye of the Beholder: Court of Appeal Finds Duty of Care Owed by Owner and Contractors for Death of Minors Caused by Independent Truck Driver

    May 05, 2026 —
    I was a T.A. for my high school history teacher, a really smart and nice guy, Mr. Reynolds. In the room at the back of the classroom which served as his office he had the picture above. It’s called “My Wife and My Mother-in-Law” and is taken from a German postcard from 1888. Depending on how you look it, you might see fashionable young lady, or an old lady. Cases can sometimes be like that: You see what you want to see. The next case is also like that. In Lorenzo v. Calex Engineering, Inc., 110 Cal.App.5th 49 (2025), the 2nd District Court of Appeals reversed a motion for summary judgment granted in favor of an owner and its contractors in a case involving the death of two minors struck by a dump truck enroute to a non-permitted off-site staging area. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Insurer Dispenses with Bad Faith Claim on Summary Judgment

    June 22, 2026 —
    The court granted the insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment because the insured failed to present evidence that the insurer failed to conduct a reasonable investigation. PSY Burger, LLC v. State Farm General Insurance Company, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66991(C.D. Cal. March 20, 2026). The insured’s commercial property suffered heavy damage from tropical storm Hilary. State Farm denied coverage to repair the damage. The insured sued State Farm alleging breach of contract and bad faith due to an inadequate investigation. Apparently, the insured did not retain an expert to opine on claims handling. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Construction Liens and the “Substantial Performance” Doctrine

    April 08, 2026 —
    In a recent case dealing with a construction lien, the driving issue was whether the air conditioning contractor “substantially performed” before recording its construction lien against residential property. The importance here pertains to the substantial performance doctrine with respect to construction liens. The Third District Court of Appeal explained, with relevant citations, this doctrine as follows: Under Florida law, a contractor is entitled to a mechanic’s lien if he complies with all provisions of Chapter 713, governing construction liens, and “has substantially performed the contract.” Grant v. Wester, 679 So. 2d 1301, 1307 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (quotation omitted); Langley v. Knowles, 958 So. 2d 1149, 1151 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (“The substantial performance doctrine recognizes that a contactor who complies with all of the provisions of the contactor’s lien statute is entitled to enforce a lien if he has substantially, but not completely, performed his contractual obligations.”). Substantial performance is performance “so nearly equivalent to what was bargained for that it would be unreasonable to deny the promisee the full contract price subject to the promisor’s right to recover whatever damages may have been occasioned him by the promisee’s failure to render full performance.” Ocean Ridge Dev. Corp. v. Quality Plastering, Inc., 247 So. 2d 72, 75 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com