BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Subterranean parking expert witness Tenafly New Jersey low-income housing expert witness Tenafly New Jersey casino resort expert witness Tenafly New Jersey housing expert witness Tenafly New Jersey multi family housing expert witness Tenafly New Jersey landscaping construction expert witness Tenafly New Jersey structural steel construction expert witness Tenafly New Jersey Medical building expert witness Tenafly New Jersey mid-rise construction expert witness Tenafly New Jersey production housing expert witness Tenafly New Jersey parking structure expert witness Tenafly New Jersey high-rise construction expert witness Tenafly New Jersey condominium expert witness Tenafly New Jersey custom homes expert witness Tenafly New Jersey industrial building expert witness Tenafly New Jersey tract home expert witness Tenafly New Jersey office building expert witness Tenafly New Jersey custom home expert witness Tenafly New Jersey townhome construction expert witness Tenafly New Jersey condominiums expert witness Tenafly New Jersey hospital construction expert witness Tenafly New Jersey institutional building expert witness Tenafly New Jersey
    Tenafly New Jersey forensic architectTenafly New Jersey construction expert testimonyTenafly New Jersey construction project management expert witnessTenafly New Jersey architectural engineering expert witnessTenafly New Jersey roofing construction expertTenafly New Jersey civil engineering expert witnessTenafly New Jersey structural concrete expert
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Tenafly, New Jersey

    New Jersey Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Title 46:3B-3 covers new home warranties, requiring "standards for construction and of quality for the structural elements and components of a new home with an indication, where appropriate, of what degree of noncompliance with such standards shall constitute a defect."; warranty periods and components are established; describes new home warranty security funds; limits builder liability to purchase price of home


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Tenafly New Jersey

    No state license is required for general contracting. Licensure is required for plumbing and electrical contractors. New homebuilders must register their business.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders and Remodelers Assn of Northern NJ
    Local # 3172
    PO BOX 1236
    Maywood, NJ 07607

    Tenafly New Jersey Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    New Jersey Builders Association
    Local # 3100
    200 American Metro Boulevard Ste 123
    Hamilton, NJ 08619

    Tenafly New Jersey Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Shore Builders Association of Central New Jersey
    Local # 3164
    190 Oberlin Ave N
    Lakewood, NJ 08701

    Tenafly New Jersey Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders League of S Jersey
    Local # 3124
    114 Haddontowne Court
    Cherry Hill, NJ 08034

    Tenafly New Jersey Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Tenafly New Jersey


    Construction Defects Lead to “A Pretty Shocking Sight”

    $48 Million Award and Successful Defense of $135 Million Claim

    Affirmed: Nationwide Acted in Bad Faith by Failing to Settle Within Limits

    California Supreme Court Finds Negligent Supervision Claim Alleges An Occurrence

    Consumer Confidence in U.S. Increases More Than Forecast

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up 04/13/22

    Defect Claims Called “Witch Hunt”

    Five-Year Statute of Limitations on Performance-Type Surety Bonds

    That’s not the way we’ve always done it! (Why you should update your office practices)

    LA Metro To Pay Kiewit $297.8M Settlement on Freeway Job

    Boston Construction Bands With Health Care to Fight COVID-19

    Where There’s Smoke, Is There Coverage? A Closer Look at Bottega, LLC v. National Surety and Gharibian v. Wawanesa

    White and Williams Celebrates Chambers 2024 Rankings

    London Penthouse Will Offer Chance to Look Down at Royalty

    Industry Groups Decry Jan. 6 Riot; DOT Chief Chao Steps Down in Protest

    Building a Strong ESG Program Can Fuel Growth and Reduce Company Risk

    Contractor Not Liable for Flooding House

    Congratulations to San Diego Partner Alex Giannetto and Senior Associate Michael Ibach on Settling a Case 3 Weeks Into a 5-Week Trial!

    No Coverage Under Exclusions For Wind and Water Damage

    Recent Developments in Legislative Efforts To Combat Climate Change

    Tutor Perini Damages Trial Is Set Over Costly Philadelphia Hotel Floor Slab Problems

    Trump, Infrastructure and the Construction Industry

    SIG Earnings Advance 21% as U.K. Construction Strengthens

    Indiana Court Enforces Contract Provisions rather than Construction Drawing Markings

    Depreciating Labor Costs May be Factor in Actual Cash Value

    Ethical Limits on Preparing a Witness for Deposition or Trial

    How a Robot-Built Habitat on Mars Could Change Construction on Earth

    Development in CBF Green Building Case in Maryland

    The “Climate 21 Project” Prepared for the New Administration

    The EPA and the Corps of Engineers Propose Another Revised Definition of “Waters of the United States”

    Idaho Federal Court Rules Against Sacketts After SCOTUS Decided Judicial Review of an EPA Compliance Order was Permissible

    Sellers of South Florida Mansion Failed to Disclose Construction Defects

    More Reminders that the Specific Contract Terms Matter

    Recommendations for Property Owners After A Hurricane: Submit a Claim

    Housing Starts Plunge by the Most in Four Years

    Retrofitting Buildings Is the Unsexy Climate Fix the World Needs

    Homeowner Protection Act of 2007 Not Just for Individual Homeowners Anymore?

    'You're Talking About Lives': The New Nissan Stadium

    West Virginia Wild: Crews Carve Out Corridor H Through the Appalachian Mountains

    Home Prices Beat Estimates With 0.8% Gain in November

    Rio Olympic Infrastructure Costs of $2.3 Billion Are Set to Rise

    Ahead of the Storm: Preparing for Dorian

    Subcontractors Essential to Home Building Industry

    eRent: Construction Efficiency Using Principles of the Sharing Economy

    4 Ways the PRO Act Would Impact the Construction Industry

    Why Metro Atlanta Is the Poster Child for the US Housing Crisis

    Exclusion Does Not Bar Coverage for Injury To Subcontractor's Employee

    School Board Sues Multiple Firms over Site Excavation Problem

    The Long Road to Change: Understanding Resistance to Innovation

    Reminder: In Court (as in life) the Worst Thing You Can Do Is Not Show Up
    Corporate Profile

    TENAFLY NEW JERSEY CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Tenafly, New Jersey Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Tenafly's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Tenafly, New Jersey

    Conditional Payment Bond Consideration-Make Sure There Is Pay-If-Paid Provision

    June 29, 2026 —
    If a general contractor is going to have a conditional payment bond, it needs to ensure it subcontracts contain pay-if-paid or pay-when-paid provisions. This conditional payment language in subcontracts is the general contractor’s defense that it doesn’t have to pay a subcontractor UNTIL owner has paid the general contractor for the subcontractor’s work. The general contractor (and the surety) can look at the conditional payment bond with the s. 713.245 legend stamped on its face designating the conditional nature of the bond, and assume the conditional structure is locked in against the bond: no payment from the owner, no obligation to the subcontractors under the bond. But what happens when the subcontracts contain no express conditional payment language despite having a valid conditional payment bond? Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    New Year’s Resolution: Engineering the “Tee-Up Day” for Complex Construction Mediations

    February 17, 2026 —
    The construction industry is defined by its commitment to "Critical Path" scheduling. From the moment a project breaks ground, every stakeholder—from the MEP sub to the owner’s rep—is focused on sequencing. We know that you cannot hang drywall before the rough-in is inspected, and you cannot pour a slab-on-grade until the vapor barrier is verified. Yet, when these projects devolve into litigation, the legal community often abandons the logic of sequencing. We rush headlong into "The Mediation Day"—a high-stakes, expensive, one-day marathon where we expect dozens of parties, hundreds of insurance layers, and thousands of pages of expert reports to magically align into a settlement by 6:00 PM. As we open our calendars for the new year, it is time for a professional resolution. We must stop treating mediation as a single-day event and start treating it as a managed, sequenced process. The centerpiece of this resolution is the “Tee-Up Day.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Joël Bertet, ResolveBertet
    Mr. Bertet may be contacted at joel@resolvebertet.com

    Labor Shortages in Construction: Managing Legal and Operational Risks

    April 14, 2026 —
    Labor shortages in the construction industry have become more than a scheduling headache—they are a legal and financial risk multiplier. As contractors scramble to meet deadlines with limited manpower, shortcuts in compliance, safety and subcontractor oversight become more likely. These gaps can expose companies to regulatory penalties, contractual disputes and reputational damage. Understanding how workforce constraints intersect with labor laws and contractual obligations is critical to mitigating the risks and navigating these challenges without compromising compliance or project integrity. The construction industry has faced persistent workforce challenges for years, but recent trends have intensified the problem. Factors such as an aging workforce, reduced immigration and post-pandemic recovery pressures have left contractors struggling to find skilled labor. According to Associated Builders and Contractors, the construction workforce shortage surpassed half a million workers in 2024; in the same year, Associated General Contractors reported 88% of construction companies had difficulty finding qualified workers. Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Exclusion Bars Coverage For Cosmetic Hail Damage to Roof

    January 13, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment, finding there was no coverage for hail damage due to an exclusion for cosmetic hail damage. Cannon Falls Area Schools v Hanover Am. Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206792 (D. Minn. Oct. 21, 2025). On April 22, 2022, a hailstorm and high winds damaged the insured School’s buildings. The School’s buildings had metal roofs. The parties agreed that the hailstorm caused indentations to the roofs, but did not puncture the metal on the roofs. Since the storm, the roofs had not leaked. The School submitted a claim for property damage to its insurer, Hanover. A portion of the claim for damage to the HVAC equipment was paid. The remainder of the claim was denied based on the policy’s Cosmetic Damage Exclusion which excluded coverage for cosmetic damage to roof surfacing caused by wind or hail. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Arizona Court of Appeals Clarifies Homeowners Association Open Meeting Requirements

    June 29, 2026 —
    A Z N H Revocable Trust v. Sunland Springs Village Homeowners Association, No. 1 CA-CV 25-0424 (Ariz. Ct. App. Apr. 28, 2026) OVERVIEW The Arizona Court of Appeals issued an opinion clarifying how homeowners associations must conduct meetings under A.R.S. § 33-1804. The decision reinforces the legislative policy favoring transparency in association governance, bringing association meeting requirements more in line with the open meeting standards applicable to public bodies under A.R.S. § 38-431 et seq. (Arizona’s Open Meeting Law). KEY HOLDINGS 1. All Voting and Formal Actions Must Occur in Open Meetings The Court affirmed that association boards cannot vote or take formal action during closed (executive) sessions. Under A.R.S. § 33-1804(A), associations may close portions of meetings only for “consideration” of certain enumerated topics, such as legal advice, pending litigation, or personal/financial information about individual members. The Court interpreted “consideration” to mean discussion and deliberation, not voting. The Court noted that dictionaries define “consider” as “spending time thinking about a possibility” and “formulating an opinion,” which are processes that precede formal action. This interpretation mirrors how Arizona’s Open Meeting Law (A.R.S. § 38-431.03(D)) prohibits public bodies from voting in executive session. Reprinted courtesy of Jill Casson Owen, Snell & Wilmer, Benjamin J. Hawkins, Snell & Wilmer and Stephen Wright, Snell & Wilmer Ms. Owen may be contacted at jowen@swlaw.com Mr. Hawkins may be contacted at bhawkins@swlaw.com Mr. Wright may be contacted at swright@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause Prevents Coverage for Collapse

    April 27, 2026 —
    The appellate court affirmed the decision of the trial court granting summary judgment to the insurer after agreeing that the policy’s anti-concurrent causation clause barred coverage. Lido Hospitality, Inc. v. AIX Specialty Ins. Co., 2026 Iii. App. Unpub. LEXIS 133 (Ill. Ct. App. Jan. 27, 2026). One of the brick veneer walls of the Lido Motel collapsed during a windstorm. Lido reported the loss it its insurer, AIX. AIX investigated and determined that the brick veneer collapsed due to pervasive wear and tear and corrosion of the underlying infrastructure that secured the veneer- specifically the components that anchored or tied the masonry veneer to the underlying wooden substrate. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    PJM’s Reliability Backstop Procurement Proposal—Fast-Track Capacity to Meet Rising Large-Load Demand

    May 12, 2026 —
    In January, we discussed the Statement of Principles jointly signed by the National Energy Dominance Council and governors across the mid-Atlantic region—framing accelerating demand (especially from large-scale data centers) as an emergency reliability issue for PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM), the nation’s largest power grid operator. That policy signal is now becoming a near-term, accelerated procurement and contracting exercise. On April 8, 2026, PJM notified stakeholders of a critical issue fast path reliability backstop procurement process. PJM subsequently released a request for information (RFI) with respect to a proposed Reliability Backstop Procurement (RBP)—a one-time mechanism intended to attract significant new capacity to address projected reliability shortfalls driven by large-load growth. RBP compresses what is often a multiyear market and regulatory conversation into a fast-moving set of commercial choices. Developers, large loads, utilities and capital providers should be preparing now for (i) an accelerated bilateral contracting window and (ii) a standardized PJM-led backstop procurement if bilateral deals do not clear enough capacity. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury, Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury and Andrew H. Jacobs, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Jacobs may be contacted at andrew.jacobs@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    A Customized Approach to Data Center Construction

    June 29, 2026 —
    Data center construction projects are, to put it mildly, distinct. They differ from traditional construction in a host of manners, and are particularly distinctive because the value of the facility depends on unique measures of performance. A center that cannot meet uptime, cooling, redundancy or connectivity standards will not achieve its mission, whether or not the structure itself meets standard industry contract-form “substantial completion” or “mechanical completion” definitions. Owners, developers, lenders, operators and hyperscalers—especially hyperscalers!—want it all. They seek favorable and stable pricing, accelerated delivery and sophisticated components, all of which are evolving in “real project time.” Standard construction contract forms deserve extensive modifications to align clauses with expectations, with a heightened focus on systems integration, commissioning, and allocation of special risks. This article details customized considerations for drafting, negotiating and administering data center design and construction agreements. Reprinted courtesy of James P. Bobotek, Pillsbury, Arielle L. Murphy, Pillsbury and Robert A. James, Pillsbury Mr. Bobotek may be contacted at james.bobotek@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Murphy may be contacted at arielle.murphy@pillsburylaw.com Mr. James may be contacted at rob.james@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...