BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    concrete tilt-up expert witness Stanton New Jersey production housing expert witness Stanton New Jersey parking structure expert witness Stanton New Jersey industrial building expert witness Stanton New Jersey low-income housing expert witness Stanton New Jersey housing expert witness Stanton New Jersey custom homes expert witness Stanton New Jersey landscaping construction expert witness Stanton New Jersey mid-rise construction expert witness Stanton New Jersey multi family housing expert witness Stanton New Jersey Medical building expert witness Stanton New Jersey condominiums expert witness Stanton New Jersey high-rise construction expert witness Stanton New Jersey custom home expert witness Stanton New Jersey hospital construction expert witness Stanton New Jersey condominium expert witness Stanton New Jersey casino resort expert witness Stanton New Jersey structural steel construction expert witness Stanton New Jersey Subterranean parking expert witness Stanton New Jersey tract home expert witness Stanton New Jersey retail construction expert witness Stanton New Jersey office building expert witness Stanton New Jersey
    Stanton New Jersey roofing and waterproofing expert witnessStanton New Jersey consulting architect expert witnessStanton New Jersey construction defect expert witnessStanton New Jersey window expert witnessStanton New Jersey expert witness roofingStanton New Jersey architecture expert witnessStanton New Jersey structural engineering expert witnesses
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Stanton, New Jersey

    New Jersey Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Title 46:3B-3 covers new home warranties, requiring "standards for construction and of quality for the structural elements and components of a new home with an indication, where appropriate, of what degree of noncompliance with such standards shall constitute a defect."; warranty periods and components are established; describes new home warranty security funds; limits builder liability to purchase price of home


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Stanton New Jersey

    No state license is required for general contracting. Licensure is required for plumbing and electrical contractors. New homebuilders must register their business.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders and Remodelers Assn of Northern NJ
    Local # 3172
    PO BOX 1236
    Maywood, NJ 07607

    Stanton New Jersey Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    New Jersey Builders Association
    Local # 3100
    200 American Metro Boulevard Ste 123
    Hamilton, NJ 08619

    Stanton New Jersey Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Shore Builders Association of Central New Jersey
    Local # 3164
    190 Oberlin Ave N
    Lakewood, NJ 08701

    Stanton New Jersey Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders League of S Jersey
    Local # 3124
    114 Haddontowne Court
    Cherry Hill, NJ 08034

    Stanton New Jersey Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Stanton New Jersey


    Working Safely With Silica: Health Hazards and OSHA Compliance

    Court of Appeals Confirms that King County Superior Court’s Jury Selection Process Satisfies Due Process Requirements

    What Makes a Great Lawyer?

    Real-Estate Pros Fight NYC Tax on Wealthy Absentee Owners

    $109-Million Renovation Begins on LA's Willowbrook/Rosa Parks Station

    Who Is To Blame For Defective — And Still LEED Certified — Courthouse Square?

    The Relevance and Reasonableness of Destructive Testing

    The “Colorado American Dream Act:” H.B. 25-1272’s Construction Defect Reforms

    No Coverage for Installation of Defective Steel Framing

    Insurer’s Broad Duty to Defend in Oregon, and the Recent Ruling in State of Oregon v. Pacific Indemnity Company

    Triple Points to the English Court of Appeal for Clarifying the Law on LDs

    Blackstone to Buy Cosmopolitan Resort for $1.73 Billion

    Insurer's Bad Faith is Actionable Tort for Purposes of Choice of Law Analysis

    Difference Between a Novation And A Modification to a Contract

    Meet the Forum's Neutrals: TOM DUNN

    Insurer’s Duty to Indemnify Not Ripe Until Underlying Lawsuit Against Insured Resolved

    Should a Subcontractor provide bonds to a GC who is not himself bonded? (Bonding Agent Perspective)

    Sanctions Issued for Frivolous Hurricane Sandy Complaint Filed Against Insurer

    Business and Professions Code Section 7031, Demurrers, and Just How Much You Can Dance

    Contractors Pay Heed: The Federal Circuit Clarifies Two Important Issues For Bid Protestors

    Client Alert: Expert Testimony in Indemnity Action Not Limited to Opinions Presented in Underlying Matter

    Insurer Not Responsible for Insured's Assignment of Policy Benefits

    How Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court Decision Affects Coverage of Faulty Workmanship Claims

    Insurer Prohibited from Bringing Separate Contribution Action in Subrogation to Rights of Suspended Insured

    Changes to Pennsylvania Mechanic’s Lien Code

    Microsoft Urges the Construction Industry to Deliver Lifecycle Value

    Last Call: Tokyo Iconic Okura Hotel Meets the Wrecking Ball

    New York Team’s Win Limits Scope of Property Owners’ Duties to Workers for Hazards Inherent in Their Work

    Spain’s Sagrada Familia: Contemporary Construction Methods Speed Iconic Basilica to Completion

    California Supreme Court Declares that Exclusionary Rule for Failing to Comply with Expert Witness Disclosures Applies at the Summary Judgment Stage

    Georgia House Bill Addresses Construction Statute of Repose

    Skipping Depositions does not Constitute Failure to Cooperate in New York

    After Breaching its Duty to Defend, Insurer Must Indemnify

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (05/10/23) – Wobbling Real Estate, Booming (and Busting) Construction, and Eye-Watering Insurance Premiums

    Home Buyer May Be Third Party Beneficiary of Property Policy

    The Importance of Preliminary Notices on Private Works Projects

    Lead Paint: The EPA’s Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule

    No Coverage Where Cracks in Basement Walls Do Not Amount to Sudden Collapse

    “Pay When Paid” Provisions May Not Be Dead, at Least Not Yet

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “How Bad Is It?”

    NJ Court Reaffirms Rule Against Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Claims and Finds Fraud Claims Inherently Intentional

    West Virginia Wild: Crews Carve Out Corridor H Through the Appalachian Mountains

    Don’t Ignore a Notice of Contest of Lien

    Construction Defects through the Years

    The AVOID Act: A New Timeline for Liability in New York Construction Projects

    Newport Beach Attorneys John Toohey and Nick Rodriguez Receive Full Defense Verdict

    Different AI Uses Present Similar Benefits for Large and Small Construction Firms

    Statute of Frauds Applies to Sale of Real Property

    Lewis Brisbois Ranks Among Top 25 Firms on NLJ’s 2021 Women in Law Scorecard

    Florida Court of Appeals Holds Underlying Tort Case Must Resolve Before Third-Party Spoliation Action Can Be Litigated
    Corporate Profile

    STANTON NEW JERSEY CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Stanton, New Jersey Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Stanton's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Stanton, New Jersey

    Differing Site Conditions Claim Requires a Misrepresentation

    May 14, 2026 —
    If you are entertaining a differing site conditions claim, consider this Third District Court of Appeals case from the mid-90s. In Hendry Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 648 So.2d 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), a contractor was hired by Dade County to demolish the old Rickenbacker Causeway in Miami. The original 1941 plans of the causeway were made available to contractors. The lowest bidding contractor that was awarded the project based its bid “on its conclusion that the pilings supporting the old bridge were made of concrete.” Hendry, supra at 141. The contractor based this conclusion on the original plans, its visual observation, and experience. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    The Firm Turns 16!

    July 20, 2026 —
    I have always found it appropriate that my jump to solo practice and Independence Day are so close in time. Today marks the 16th anniversary of my first day as a solo practitioner of construction law at The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill, PC. Time sure has flown by thanks to the great clients and friends who followed me to solo practice and whom I have met since the firm’s founding on July 1, 2010. I also could not have made the transition and had the fun and success I have enjoyed over the past 16 years without the support of the best wife and family that any construction lawyer could want. Since the firm’s last anniversary, my youngest child (who was 7 when this journey began!) has graduated from N. C. State University with a fisheries and wildlife biology degree and is currently in Casper, Wyoming working for Wyoming Game & Fish, my second oldest is an assistant director of admissions at Appalachian State University in Boone, NC, and has celebrated his second wedding anniversary, and my oldest has celebrated her fifth marriage anniversary. Our home in Captiva, Florida continues its recovery from from Hurricane Ian and subsequent hurricanes. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill

    Tariffs As Taxes — What Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump Means for Contractors and the WSDOT Specifications

    March 17, 2026 —
    In October 2025, we explored a pressing question for public works contractors: should post-contract award tariffs be reimbursable? The crux of that analysis was whether tariffs imposed after contract award constitute a tax under the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Standard Specifications, triggering reimbursement under Section 1-07.1(5)B (“tax changes”). Since then, a landmark Supreme Court ruling in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump has clarified the legal nature of tariffs in a way that could significantly affect this debate. In Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, 607 U.S. (2026), the U.S. Supreme Court addressed whether the President had the authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to unilaterally impose broad tariffs on imports. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brett M. Hill, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at brett.hill@acslawyers.com

    Daily Journal Publishes Article by Brenda Radmacher on Proposed Overhaul of California Construction Defect Law

    June 29, 2026 —
    Daily Journal (California) featured an article by Construction Law partner Brenda Radmacher, “A new path for construction defects in California.” The piece, published on June 15, 2026, examines Assembly Bill 1903 and its potential to significantly reshape California’s construction defect framework, particularly for common interest properties. The article highlights how AB 1903 would overhaul the state’s current right-to-repair system by mandating completion of prelitigation procedures, raising requirements for defect claims, strengthening developers’/builders’ rights to repair, and introducing a voluntary “certified building” program. The legislation aims to rebalance competing interests by reducing litigation-driven costs while preserving protections for homeowners. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brenda Radmacher, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Ms. Radmacher may be contacted at bradmacher@seyfarth.com

    The Modern Nuclear Renaissance Reaches New England

    April 14, 2026 —
    On March 31, 2026, the governors of all six New England states issued a joint, bipartisan statement committing the region to explore deployment of advanced nuclear energy technologies while supporting the continued safe, affordable and reliable operation of New England’s existing nuclear generation facilities. This coordinated regional initiative follows a major policy announcement in June 2025 by New York Governor Kathy Hochul directing the New York Power Authority to pursue development of at least 1,000 MW of advanced nuclear generation to support statewide reliability needs and New York’s zero‑carbon mission. Less than one year after New York formally embraced a modern nuclear renaissance, that renaissance has now expanded across the New England states—signaling a broader Northeast regional pivot toward nuclear as a core element of long‑term reliability, affordability and decarbonization strategies. For utilities and power generators, this shift creates both opportunities and planning imperatives that warrant immediate attention. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury
    Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com

    Four Kahana Feld Attorneys Selected to 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers List

    March 03, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – Feb. 20, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce that partners Jason Feld, Amir Kahana, Sharon Oh-Kubisch, and Manuel Ugarte were selected to the 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers® list. Jason Feld is a founding partner of Kahana Feld. He focuses his practice on the defense of homebuilders, contractors, developers, and real estate professionals primarily in construction defect, general liability, insurance defense, construction accident, and real estate matters. He also represents government entities handling construction, premises liability, general liability, and environmental claims. He serves as panel counsel for many prominent insurance carriers, as well as personal counsel to several national and regional homebuilders, developers, and general contractors. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    Structuring Water Resilience for Data Center Development: Water Rights, Reuse Incentives, and Emerging Disclosure Risk

    March 10, 2026 —
    As AI-driven data center development accelerates, developers, communities and regulators are increasingly focused on water demand—both the volume required and the sources from which that water will be drawn. While industry attention has largely centered on electricity procurement and grid impacts, the availability and legal entitlement to a firm water supply has become equally material to siting, permitting and community acceptance. Particularly as surface and groundwater supplies become increasingly constrained and new projects are sited in regions experiencing tighter hydrologic conditions or growth-related supply constraints, project teams are increasingly integrating water supply analysis into early-stage development to address issues that can materially affect schedule, financing and long-term operations. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh Myers, Pillsbury, Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury and Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Only A Contractor Can Appeal a Contracting Officer’s Final Decision

    April 20, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals confirms that “only a ‘contractor’ may file an appeal of a contracting officer’s final decision.” Wattiker v. General Services Administration, 2026 WL 846001 (CBCA 2026) (citation omitted). The term “contractor is not an ambiguous term. A ‘contractor’ refers to a party to a federal government contract. Wattiker (citing the Contract Disputes Act). This is why the Contract Disputes Act does not apply to parties that are NOT in contract with the federal government. Id. In Wattiker, an appellant (appealing party) challenged the dismissal of a co-appellant. The co-appellant was dismissed because he was not a contractor, i.e., a party in contract with the federal government. In other words, the co-appellant had no privity of contract with the federal government. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com