BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    retail construction expert witness Rosebud County Montana high-rise construction expert witness Rosebud County Montana office building expert witness Rosebud County Montana Subterranean parking expert witness Rosebud County Montana low-income housing expert witness Rosebud County Montana Medical building expert witness Rosebud County Montana mid-rise construction expert witness Rosebud County Montana housing expert witness Rosebud County Montana custom homes expert witness Rosebud County Montana townhome construction expert witness Rosebud County Montana multi family housing expert witness Rosebud County Montana concrete tilt-up expert witness Rosebud County Montana tract home expert witness Rosebud County Montana custom home expert witness Rosebud County Montana production housing expert witness Rosebud County Montana structural steel construction expert witness Rosebud County Montana hospital construction expert witness Rosebud County Montana condominiums expert witness Rosebud County Montana industrial building expert witness Rosebud County Montana condominium expert witness Rosebud County Montana institutional building expert witness Rosebud County Montana landscaping construction expert witness Rosebud County Montana
    Rosebud County Montana consulting general contractorRosebud County Montana expert witness structural engineerRosebud County Montana construction forensic expert witnessRosebud County Montana expert witness windowsRosebud County Montana architectural engineering expert witnessRosebud County Montana window expert witnessRosebud County Montana soil failure expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Rosebud County, Montana

    Montana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB 389; Code Section 70-19-427 requires homeowners to provide notice of an alleged construction defect before filing a lawsuit. The contractor has the option to offer to inspect the defect, repair the defect, offer a settlement or dispute the claim. After being served with written notice, the contractor has 21 days to respond: offer to inspect the defect, repair the defect, offer a settlement or dispute the claim.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Rosebud County Montana

    Businesses must register with the Secretary of State. No state license is required for general contracting. Licensure is required for plumbing, electrical, and crane operating trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Upper Yellowstone Chapter
    Local # 2795
    PO Box 927
    Livingston, MT 59047

    Rosebud County Montana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    SW Montana Building Industry Association
    Local # 2755
    1716 W Main St Ste 8 G
    Bozeman, MT 59715

    Rosebud County Montana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Billings
    Local # 2722
    PO Box 875
    Billings, MT 59103

    Rosebud County Montana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Rocky Mountain Chapter
    Local # 2750
    PO Box 154
    Anaconda, MT 59711
    Rosebud County Montana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Bitterroot Building Industry Association
    Local # 2729
    PO Box 1299
    Hamilton, MT 59840

    Rosebud County Montana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Montana Home Builders Association
    Local # 2700
    1717 11th Ave
    Helena, MT 59601

    Rosebud County Montana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Helena Building Industry Association
    Local # 2766
    3180 Dredge Dr Ste B
    Helena, MT 59602

    Rosebud County Montana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Rosebud County Montana


    A Green Light for Housing? What Executive Order 14394 Means for Your Next Project

    The Legal 500 U.S. 2024 Guide Names Peckar & Abramson a Top Tier Firm in Construction Law and Recognizes Nine Attorneys

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules that Insurance Salesman had No Fiduciary Duty to Policyholders

    Expanded Virginia Court of Appeals Leads to Policyholder Relief

    The Construction Industry's Health Kick

    No Signature? Potentially No Problem for Sureties Enforcing a Bond’s Forum Selection Clause

    Statute of Limitations and Bad Faith Claims: Factors to Consider

    Guilty Pleas Draw Renewed Interest In Nevada’s Construction Defect Laws

    Texas Supreme Court Cements Exception to “Eight-Corners” Rule Through Two Recent Rulings

    Points on Negotiating Construction Claims

    HOA Coalition Statement on Construction-Defects Transparency Legislation

    Narberth Mayor Urges Dubious Legal Action

    Insured's Testimony On Expectation of Coverage Deemed Harmless

    First Lumber, Now Drywall as Canada-U.S. Trade Tensions Escalate

    Civility Is Key in Construction Defect Mediation

    CGL Insurer’s Duty to Defend Insured During Pre-Suit 558 Process: Maybe?

    Specified Or Designated Operations Endorsement – Limitation of Insurance Coverage

    New Executive Order: Revitalizing Our Nation’s Commitment to Environmental Justice for All

    Presidential Executive Order 14008: The Climate Crisis Order

    Update Relating to SB891 and Bond Claim Waivers

    Ruling Closes the Loop on Restrictive Additional Insured Endorsement – Reasonable Expectations of Insured Builder Prevails Over Intent of Insurer

    The Double-Breasted Dilemma

    Crane Firm Pulled Off NYC Projects Following Multiple Incidents

    Condemnation Actions: How Valuable Is Your Evidence of Property Value?

    No Coverage for Home Damaged by Falling Boulders

    Don’t Ignore the Dispute Resolution Provisions in Your Construction Contract

    Public Law Center Honors Snell & Wilmer Partner Sean M. Sherlock As Volunteers For Justice Attorney Of The Year

    Shane Singh Named One of Los Angeles Business Journal's 'Top 100 Lawyers of Los Angeles' for 2026

    No Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Based Upon Exclusion for Contractual Assumption of Liability

    Allegations of Actual Property Damage Necessary to Invoke Duty to Defend

    Arizona Court Determines Statute of Limitations Applicable to a Claim for Reformation of a Deed of Trust (and a Related Claim for Declaratory Judgment)

    A Look at Trending Legislative Changes Impacting Workers' Comp

    Stick to Your Guns on Price and Pricing with Construction Contracts

    An Uncharted Frontier: Nevada First State to Prohibit Defense-Within-Limits Provisions

    Flag on the Play! Expired Contractor’s License!

    Self-Healing Infrastructure Could Pave the Road to the Future

    Georgia Court Rules that Separate Settlements Are Not the End of the Matter

    CA Supreme Court Set to Rule on Important Occurrence Issue Certified by Ninth Circuit

    How Does Weather Impact a Foundation?

    Yet ANOTHER Reason not to Contract without a License

    The Need for Situational Awareness in Construction

    Pay-If-Paid: What You Need to Know Before Signing on the Dotted Line

    Appetite for Deconstruction

    Official Tried to Influence Judge against Shortchanged Subcontractor

    Another Defect Found on the Bay Bridge: Water Leakage

    One Colorado Court Allows Negligence Claim by General Contractor Against Subcontractor

    Appraisal Award for Damaged Roof Tiles Challenged

    Effects of Amendment to Florida's Statute of Repose on the Products Completed Operations Hazard

    The Importance of Indemnification Clauses in Managing Post-Completion Project Risk

    Snooze You Lose? Enforcement of Notice and Timing Provisions
    Corporate Profile

    ROSEBUD COUNTY MONTANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Rosebud County, Montana Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Rosebud County's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Rosebud County, Montana

    Sixth Circuit Revives Builder’s Risk Coverage, Refusing to Let Insurer Escape on a Technicality

    July 27, 2026 —
    In 3371 Reading, LLC v. Liberty Mutual Group, the Sixth Circuit did something courts do not always do in coverage disputes: it refused to let an insurer avoid liability based on a technical policy condition that could never actually be satisfied. The decision is a straightforward reminder of two core principles. First, policies must be interpreted from the standpoint of a reasonably prudent insured. Second, hyper-technical conditions cannot be used to deny coverage where compliance is never possible. Reprinted courtesy of Kevin V. Small, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Adriana A. Perez, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Mr. Small may be contacted at ksmall@hunton.com Ms. Perez may be contacted at pereza@hunton.com Read the full story...

    HDR Agreed to $12M Settlement With Miami Bridge Design-Build Team

    May 12, 2026 —
    HDR last year agreed to pay $12 million to the design-build construction contractor Archer Western-de Moya Group to settle its claims that the engineer had incompletely designed and under-designed Miami's new Signature Bridge when the joint venture committed to a fixed price prior to construction in 2018. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Doctrine of Substantial Performance When It Comes to Payment

    July 27, 2026 —
    A recent non-construction case touches upon the doctrine of substantial performance when it comes to payment. In this case, a club was to make two payments to secure a rapper’s attendance. The first payment was made. The second payment was made but was a few hundred dollars short of the agreed amount. The rapper did not show up. The club claimed it substantially performed its obligations. At first glance, the argument makes sense because the second payment fell only a few hundred dollars short. But that wasn’t the case when it comes to pre-commencement payment obligations:
    Substantial performance applies only when the variance from the contract terms “is inadvertent or unintentional and unimportant so that the work actually performed is substantially what was called for in the contract.” However, when one party agrees to pay the other on or before a specific date, time is of the essence, and the payor is required to pay the payee on or before that date. “There is almost always no such thing as ‘substantial performance’ of payment between commercial parties when the duty is simply the general one to pay. Payment is either made in the amount and on the date due, or it is not.”
    Big Gate Records, LLC v. Washington, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D1281a (Fla. 2nd DCA 2026) (internal citations omitted).
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Best Lawyers in America

    September 08, 2026 —
    Nomos LLP partner Garret Murai has been recognized in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® in the area of Construction Law. Only about 5% of lawyers in the United States are recognized by Best Lawyers in America®. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    What Construction Attorneys Do and When Contractors Need Them

    August 11, 2026 —
    Direct Answer A construction attorney advises contractors on contracts, payment rights, mechanic's liens, payment bond claims, change orders, delay claims, OSHA matters, defect claims, terminations and dispute resolution. The work covers far more than lawsuits—much of its value comes before a dispute ever becomes formal. Construction attorneys help contractors protect payment rights, manage project risk, resolve disputes and avoid contract terms that can turn a profitable job into a financial loss. Their work covers more than lawsuits. A construction attorney may review a contract before bid day, help preserve lien rights, respond to a defective work claim, prepare for mediation or defend a contractor after a safety citation. For contractors, legal counsel is often most valuable before a dispute becomes formal. A missed notice deadline, vague scope clause, unsigned change order or broad indemnity provision can create problems long before a claim is filed. Construction attorneys help identify those risks while there is still time to negotiate, document the issue or preserve leverage. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    EPA, Maryland Sue DC Water Over Massive Potomac River Sewage Spill

    May 14, 2026 —
    The state of Maryland and the federal government have filed separate lawsuits against the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water), both alleging that the agency’s failure to address longstanding deterioration in the Potomac Interceptor contributed to a weeklong release of more than 240 million gallons of raw sewage into the Potomac River this past January. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Texas Adopts New Procedural Rules for Summary Judgment Motions: What You Need To Know

    July 13, 2026 —
    On March 1, 2026, sweeping amendments to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 166a took effect, fundamentally changing how Texas courts handle summary judgment motions — from filing and briefing through disposition. Whether representing a plaintiff or defendant, Texas litigants and attorneys must understand these new rules and their impact on case strategy and timelines. These procedural changes carry particular significance for construction litigants. Background: The Prior Rule Texas summary judgment practice has long diverged from the federal model. The Texas Rules of Civil Procedure recognize two types of summary judgment motions: (1) the traditional motion for summary judgment, and (2) the “no-evidence” motion for summary judgment. The no-evidence motion — unique to Texas — may be filed only after adequate time for discovery has passed. No bright-line rule governs that determination; it depends on the unique circumstances of each case. Reprinted courtesy of Conor G. Bateman, Snell & Wilmer and Marsha Cotton, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Bateman may be contacted at cbateman@swlaw.com Ms. Cotton may be contacted at mcotton@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    “The Superintendent Told Us to Do It:” Why Verbal Approval May Not Be Enough

    June 02, 2026 —
    In construction defect litigation, one scenario appears repeatedly: a subcontractor installs work in a manner that differs from the plans, specifications, manufacturer instructions, or industry standards after being verbally directed to do so by the general contractor, superintendent, architect, or owner’s representative. At the time, the decision may seem minor. The project is moving quickly, the field team wants to maintain progress, and nobody wants to stop working over what appears to be a small issue. The subcontractor may trust the superintendent or project manager and assume the conversation will be remembered later if questions arise. Years later, however, when the project experiences problems, the people involved may deny the conversation occurred, remember it differently, or simply no longer remember the project. Without written documentation, the subcontractor can find itself defending claims for defective work, even though it performed the installation exactly as directed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Andrew Lintner, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. Lintner may be contacted at alintner@hhmrlaw.com