BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom homes expert witness Lavina Montana housing expert witness Lavina Montana concrete tilt-up expert witness Lavina Montana Subterranean parking expert witness Lavina Montana casino resort expert witness Lavina Montana industrial building expert witness Lavina Montana landscaping construction expert witness Lavina Montana condominium expert witness Lavina Montana condominiums expert witness Lavina Montana structural steel construction expert witness Lavina Montana institutional building expert witness Lavina Montana hospital construction expert witness Lavina Montana tract home expert witness Lavina Montana mid-rise construction expert witness Lavina Montana high-rise construction expert witness Lavina Montana parking structure expert witness Lavina Montana Medical building expert witness Lavina Montana custom home expert witness Lavina Montana production housing expert witness Lavina Montana low-income housing expert witness Lavina Montana retail construction expert witness Lavina Montana multi family housing expert witness Lavina Montana
    Lavina Montana construction expert witness consultantLavina Montana construction scheduling expert witnessLavina Montana architect expert witnessLavina Montana expert witness roofingLavina Montana eifs expert witnessLavina Montana consulting engineersLavina Montana engineering expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Lavina, Montana

    Montana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB 389; Code Section 70-19-427 requires homeowners to provide notice of an alleged construction defect before filing a lawsuit. The contractor has the option to offer to inspect the defect, repair the defect, offer a settlement or dispute the claim. After being served with written notice, the contractor has 21 days to respond: offer to inspect the defect, repair the defect, offer a settlement or dispute the claim.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Lavina Montana

    Businesses must register with the Secretary of State. No state license is required for general contracting. Licensure is required for plumbing, electrical, and crane operating trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Montana Home Builders Association
    Local # 2700
    1717 11th Ave
    Helena, MT 59601

    Lavina Montana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Helena Building Industry Association
    Local # 2766
    3180 Dredge Dr Ste B
    Helena, MT 59602

    Lavina Montana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Bitterroot Building Industry Association
    Local # 2729
    PO Box 1299
    Hamilton, MT 59840

    Lavina Montana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Rocky Mountain Chapter
    Local # 2750
    PO Box 154
    Anaconda, MT 59711
    Lavina Montana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Missoula Building Industry Association
    Local # 2788
    1840 S Ave W
    Missoula, MT 59801

    Lavina Montana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Billings
    Local # 2722
    PO Box 875
    Billings, MT 59103

    Lavina Montana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    SW Montana Building Industry Association
    Local # 2755
    1716 W Main St Ste 8 G
    Bozeman, MT 59715

    Lavina Montana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Lavina Montana


    Sales of New U.S. Homes Rose More Than Forecast to End 2014

    The Prolonged Effects on Commercial Property From Extreme Weather

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s 2026 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Honorees!

    Did You Really Accept That Bid? – How Contractors Can Avoid Post-Acceptance Bid Disputes Over Contract Terms

    Subcontractors Eye 2022 with Guarded Optimism

    "On Second Thought"

    Heat Exposure Safety and Risk Factors

    Punchlist: The News We Didn’t Quite Get To – May 2016

    Construction Defect Claim over LAX Runways

    Hold on Just One Second: Texas Clarifies Starting Point for Negligence Statute of Limitations

    One More Mechanic’s Lien Number- the Number 30

    Toll Brothers Honored at the Shore Builders Association of Central New Jersey Awards

    Skilled Labor Shortage Implications for Construction Companies

    Construction-Industry Clients Need Well-Reasoned and Clear Policies on Recording Zoom and Teams Meetings

    Client Alert: Catch Me If You Can – Giorgio Is No Gingerbread Man

    Duty to Defend Construction Defect Case Triggered by Complaint's Allegations

    CCPA Class Action Lawsuits Are Coming. Are You Ready?

    How Slow and Steady Can Lose the Race - Pacing and Delay Claims

    Round and Round: Inside the Las Vegas Sphere

    FERC’s New Order on Data Center Co-Location: What Utilities Need to Know

    President Trump’s Infrastructure Plan Requires a Viable Statutory Framework (PPP Statutes)[i]

    Factor the Factor in Factoring

    Port Authority Revises Plans for $10B Midtown NYC Bus Terminal Replacement

    Industry Standard and Sole Negligence Defenses Can’t Fix a Defect

    Portion of Washington State’s Prevailing Wage Statute Struck Down … Again

    The Advantages of Virtual Reality in Construction

    Showdown Over Landmark Housing Law Looms at U.S. Supreme Court

    Reminder: The Devil is in the Mechanic’s Lien Details

    The Activist Group Suing the Suburbs for Bigger Buildings

    Contractual Fee-Shifting in Litigation: Who Pays the Price?

    Tishman Construction Admits Cheating Trade Center Clients

    Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Honors Construction Attorney

    Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine Bars Coverage for Collapse of Building

    Enforceability Of Subcontract “Pay-When-Paid” Provisions – An Important Update

    Traub Lieberman Partner Lisa M. Rolle Wins Summary Judgment in Favor of Third-Party Defendant

    The Final Nail: Ongoing Repairs Do Not Toll the Statute of Repose

    For Breach of Contract Claim, There Needs to be a Breach of a Contractual Duty

    The Law Clinic Paves Way to the Digitalization of Built Environment Processes

    As Recovery Continues, Home Improvement Stores Make Sales

    New ANSI Requirements for Fireplace Screens

    County Officials Refute Resident’s Statement that Defect Repairs Improper

    Affirmed

    Motion to Dismiss Insureds' Counterclaim on the Basis of Prior Knowledge Denied

    Contracts and Fraud Don’t Mix (Even for Lawyers!)

    ISO’s Flood Exclusion Amendments and Hurricane Ian Claims

    Five Reasons to Hire Older Workers—and How to Keep Them

    2024 Update to CEB’s Mechanics Liens Now Available

    Is the Removal and Replacement of Nonconforming Work Economically Wasteful?

    CSLB Reminds California Public Works Contractors to Renew Their Public Works Registration

    A Lack of Sophistication With the Construction Contract Can Play Out In an Ugly Dispute
    Corporate Profile

    LAVINA MONTANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Lavina, Montana Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Lavina, Montana

    Texas Adopts New Procedural Rules for Summary Judgment Motions: What You Need To Know

    July 13, 2026 —
    On March 1, 2026, sweeping amendments to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 166a took effect, fundamentally changing how Texas courts handle summary judgment motions — from filing and briefing through disposition. Whether representing a plaintiff or defendant, Texas litigants and attorneys must understand these new rules and their impact on case strategy and timelines. These procedural changes carry particular significance for construction litigants. Background: The Prior Rule Texas summary judgment practice has long diverged from the federal model. The Texas Rules of Civil Procedure recognize two types of summary judgment motions: (1) the traditional motion for summary judgment, and (2) the “no-evidence” motion for summary judgment. The no-evidence motion — unique to Texas — may be filed only after adequate time for discovery has passed. No bright-line rule governs that determination; it depends on the unique circumstances of each case. Reprinted courtesy of Conor G. Bateman, Snell & Wilmer and Marsha Cotton, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Bateman may be contacted at cbateman@swlaw.com Ms. Cotton may be contacted at mcotton@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Four Kahana Feld Attorneys Selected to 2027 Southern California Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars Lists

    August 16, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – Aug. 3, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce that partners Jason Feld, Amir Kahana, and Sharon Oh-Kubisch were selected to the 2027 Southern California Super Lawyers list, and attorney Hannah Ellenhorn Bloom was selected to the 2027 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars list. Jason Feld was recognized in the area of Construction Litigation. He is a founding partner of Kahana Feld and focuses his practice on the defense of homebuilders, contractors, developers, and real estate professionals primarily in construction defect, general liability, insurance defense, construction accident, and real estate matters. He also represents government entities handling construction, premises liability, general liability, and environmental claims. He serves as panel counsel for many prominent insurance carriers, as well as personal counsel to several national and regional homebuilders, developers, and general contractors. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    Moving in Before Substantial Completion? The Risks of Early Owner Occupancy

    March 24, 2026 —
    Introduction On many construction projects, particularly large projects facing schedule pressure, owners may begin occupying or using portions of the project before the work reaches substantial completion. This is often due to operational needs, phased turnover, or market demands that drive owners to take possession of all or part of a project while construction activities are ongoing. While early occupancy may seem practical, it can blur the lines of responsibility between owner and contractor and can create significant legal and practical complications. These disputes are especially common on large, complex projects where punch list work, system commissioning, and closeout activities overlap with owner use. Without clear documentation and carefully drafted contract provisions, early occupancy can undermine an owner’s ability to enforce completion requirements while simultaneously exposing the contractor to claims of delay, inefficiency, or interference. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sydney Koby, Jones Walker
    Ms. Koby may be contacted at skoby@joneswalker.com

    The Single Source of Truth in Construction Projects: Reality or Myth?

    March 24, 2026 —
    The idea of a single source of truth has been a fundamental part of the digital vision in the AEC industry for many years. From centralized CAD storage to BIM collaboration platforms and, more recently, Common Data Environments, the goal stays the same. Project teams want a reliable place where everyone can access the latest information. The phrase “single source of truth” comes from database and information management practices in the IT world, where the goal was to maintain one authoritative record of data and eliminate data redundancy. As the AEC industry began adopting digital tools, the same idea was applied to project information and workflows. Despite decades of technological progress, the question remains whether “one ring that rules them all” can actually be implemented in real construction projects. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Ninth Circuit Holds That Policies Covering Environmental Claims Do Not Have Aggregate Limits

    May 12, 2026 —
    In the case of County of San Bernardino v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, the Ninth Circuit recently addressed the issue of whether general liability policies issued in the 1960s and 1970s included aggregate limits for claims arising under the premises-operations coverage in CGL policies. The difference between the policyholder’s interpretation of the policies’ limits clauses and the insurer’s interpretation was worth hundreds of millions of dollars in exposure for the insurer. The Court closely examined the policy language and extrinsic evidence from both the insurance industry’s drafting history and the parties before concluding that the policies were ambiguous. The Court construed that ambiguity in favor of the policyholder and ruled that aggregate limits did not apply to the claims at issue. The Court’s decision underscores the importance of carefully examining a policy’s limits, especially for older policies written before 1986 when the insurance industry revised the standard-form CGL policy to state the aggregate limits apply not only to products liability claims but to premises-operations claims as well. Decades of insurance industry drafting history confirms, as the policyholder’s submissions in this case indicate, that the industry well understood that operations claims like the environmental waste-disposal claims at issue here typically were not subject to aggregate limits. Reprinted courtesy of Lorelie S. Masters, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Joseph T. Niczky, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Ms. Masters may be contacted at lmasters@hunton.com Mr. Niczky may be contacted at jniczky@hunton.com Read the full story...

    World's Longest Immersed Tunnel Passes Milestone, But Faces Delays

    August 03, 2026 —
    Work on the $8-billion Fehmarnbelt Tunnel, which is planned to link Germany and Denmark as the world’s longest immersed tunnel, is progressing as crews achieved a milestone last month with the successful immersion of its first precast concrete element. But Danish state-owned project owner Femern A/S says the plan is now running at least two years behind schedule and the tunnel’s road and rail portions will open in two separate stages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of James Leggate, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Leggate may be contacted at leggatej@enr.com

    Why Construction Tendering Needs Specialized Intelligence

    March 31, 2026 —
    The construction industry has never lacked data; it lacks usable intelligence at the moments that matter most. In the high-stakes phases of tendering and pre-construction, the industry still relies on manual “Control-F” searches through thousands of pages of unstructured documents. I recently spoke with Herman Smith, a civil engineer and former Chief Digital Officer at Multiconsult, who left the corporate world to solve this specific bottleneck. His startup, Volve, isn’t just another AI wrapper; it is a specialized “drill” designed to penetrate the complexity of construction documentation. The Paradox of Digitalization without a Productivity Boost For years, the AEC industry has faced a frustrating paradox: we have more digital tools than ever, yet productivity has not improved. Herman observed this from the inside, managing hundreds of unique software licenses while seeing companies struggle to adapt to new workflows. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Super Lawyers

    July 13, 2026 —
    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai has been recognized as a 2026 Northern California Super Lawyer honoree in the area of Construction Litigation. This is the thirteenth consecutive year he has been recognized by Super Lawyers. Super Lawyers, an annual listing of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and personal achievement, is limited to no more than five percent (5%) of lawyers in a state who are selected through a multiphase process that includes a statewide survey of lawyers, independent research evaluation and peer reviews by practice area. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com