BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominium expert witness Jordan Montana landscaping construction expert witness Jordan Montana mid-rise construction expert witness Jordan Montana custom homes expert witness Jordan Montana townhome construction expert witness Jordan Montana institutional building expert witness Jordan Montana multi family housing expert witness Jordan Montana industrial building expert witness Jordan Montana housing expert witness Jordan Montana concrete tilt-up expert witness Jordan Montana custom home expert witness Jordan Montana high-rise construction expert witness Jordan Montana retail construction expert witness Jordan Montana parking structure expert witness Jordan Montana low-income housing expert witness Jordan Montana structural steel construction expert witness Jordan Montana Medical building expert witness Jordan Montana production housing expert witness Jordan Montana casino resort expert witness Jordan Montana tract home expert witness Jordan Montana Subterranean parking expert witness Jordan Montana hospital construction expert witness Jordan Montana
    Jordan Montana slope failure expert witnessJordan Montana construction scheduling expert witnessJordan Montana building code compliance expert witnessJordan Montana construction expert witness public projectsJordan Montana forensic architectJordan Montana construction expert witness consultantJordan Montana stucco expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Jordan, Montana

    Montana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB 389; Code Section 70-19-427 requires homeowners to provide notice of an alleged construction defect before filing a lawsuit. The contractor has the option to offer to inspect the defect, repair the defect, offer a settlement or dispute the claim. After being served with written notice, the contractor has 21 days to respond: offer to inspect the defect, repair the defect, offer a settlement or dispute the claim.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Jordan Montana

    Businesses must register with the Secretary of State. No state license is required for general contracting. Licensure is required for plumbing, electrical, and crane operating trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Great Falls
    Local # 2744
    600 6th St NW Ste 5
    Great Falls, MT 59404
    Jordan Montana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Flathead Building Assoc.
    Local # 2790
    21 W Reserve Dr
    Kalispell, MT 59901

    Jordan Montana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Missoula Building Industry Association
    Local # 2788
    1840 S Ave W
    Missoula, MT 59801

    Jordan Montana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Helena Building Industry Association
    Local # 2766
    3180 Dredge Dr Ste B
    Helena, MT 59602

    Jordan Montana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Montana Home Builders Association
    Local # 2700
    1717 11th Ave
    Helena, MT 59601

    Jordan Montana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Bitterroot Building Industry Association
    Local # 2729
    PO Box 1299
    Hamilton, MT 59840

    Jordan Montana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Rocky Mountain Chapter
    Local # 2750
    PO Box 154
    Anaconda, MT 59711
    Jordan Montana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Jordan Montana


    California’s Right to Repair Act not an Exclusive Remedy

    Is Equipment Installed as Part of Building Renovations a “Product” or “Construction”?

    Nebraska Court Ruling Backs Latest Keystone XL Pipeline Route

    Hawaii Supreme Court Construes Designated Premises Endorsement In Insured's Favor

    Veolia Agrees to $25M Settlement in Flint Water Crisis Case

    I-35W Bridge Collapse may be Due to “Inadequate Load Capacity”

    Tax Increase Pumps $52 Billion Into California Construction

    The Future of High-Rise is Localized and Responsive

    Anchoring Abuse: Evolution & Eradication

    New Jersey Condominium Owners Sue FEMA

    Pollution Exclusion Does Not Apply To Concrete Settling Dust

    Solar Energy Isn’t Always Green

    Excess-Escape Other Insurance Provision Unenforceable to Avoid Defense Cost Contribution Despite Placement in Policy’s Coverage Grant

    Five Snell & Wilmer Partners Named to Utah Business’ 2026 Legal Elite

    The Credibility of Your Expert (Including Your Delay Expert) Matters in Construction Disputes

    Cost of Materials Holding Back Housing Industry

    Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Earns Prestigious Band One Ranking in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide

    Cincinnati Team Secures Summary Judgment for Paving Company in Trip-and-Fall Case

    Colorado Introduces Construction Defect Bill for Commuter Communities

    Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine Bars Coverage for Collapse of Building

    Language California Construction Direct Contractors Must Add to Subcontracts Beginning on January 1, 2022, Per Senate Bill 727

    New Spending Measure Has Big Potential Infrastructure Boost

    Fixing the Problem – Not the Blame

    Substantial Evidence of Flood Loss is Not a Substitute for Required Proof of Loss

    Can I Be Required to Mediate, Arbitrate or Litigate a California Construction Dispute in Some Other State?

    Construction Defect Litigation at San Diego’s Alicante Condominiums?

    New Index Tracking Mortgages for New Homes

    Cybersecurity on Your Project: Why Not Follow National Security Strategy?

    Texas Legislature Puts a Spear in Doctrine Making Contractor Warrantor of Owner Furnished Plans and Specifications

    Partners Patti Santelle and Gale White honored by as "Top Women in Law" The Legal Intelligencer

    Voluntary Payments Affirmative Defense Does Not Apply in Contract Cases

    Are COVID-19 Claims Covered by Builders Risk Insurance Policies?

    Construction Law Alert: Appellate Court Rules General Contractors Can Contractually Subordinate Mechanics Lien Rights

    How to Prevent Forest Fires by Building Cities With More Wood

    Why You May Not Want a Mandatory Mediation Clause in Your Construction Contract

    BIM Legal Liabilities: Not That Different

    OIRA Best Practices for Administrative Enforcement and Adjudicative Actions

    Insurer Granted Summary Judgment on Denial of Construction Defect Claim

    Congratulations to Associate Madeline Arcellana on Her Selection as a Top Rank Attorney in Southern Nevada!

    The “Pay When Paid” Clause in California Construction—Strategies as the Battle Continues

    A Survey of New Texas Environmental and Regulatory Laws Enacted in the 88th Session (Updated)

    Amazon Hits Pause on $2.5B HQ2 Project in Arlington, Va.

    Homeowner may pursue negligence claim for construction defect, Oregon Supreme Court holds

    Firm Pays $8.4M to Settle Hurricane Restoration Contract Case

    AMLO Hits Back at Vulcan, Threatens to Use Environmental Decree

    BP Is Not an Additional Insured Under Transocean's Policy

    Read Carefully. The Insurance Coverage You Thought You Were Getting May Not Be The Coverage You Got

    Wilke Fleury is proud to congratulate attorneys recognized in the 2027 editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America.

    Candis Jones Named to Atlanta Magazine’s 2025 “Atlanta 500” List

    The EEOC Targets Construction Industry For Heightened Enforcement
    Corporate Profile

    JORDAN MONTANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Jordan, Montana Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Jordan's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Jordan, Montana

    Tony Sonnett Secures Highly Favorable Verdict for Client in Admitted Liability Case in Which Plaintiff Sought $34.5M

    September 29, 2026 —
    Los Angeles Partner Tony Sonnett recently obtained a highly favorable verdict for his property owner client in an admitted liability case in which the plaintiff had asked for $34.5 million, with a jury awarding just $75,000. The plaintiff, who was a tenant at one of the client’s rental properties, was injured in October 2020 as he was attempting to close the heavy metal blinds that were affixed to the 12-foot floor-to-ceiling windows of the property. The blinds and their heavy metal covering detached from the wall and fell on the plaintiff’s head, causing him to suffer a scalp laceration that required stitches. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    $356 Million Judgement Against Developer for Defective Construction of DC Condominium

    August 16, 2026 —
    On July 31, 2026, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia entered a $356,085,513.00 judgment against developers JBG Smith for defective construction and renovation of the Wardman Tower Residential Condominium in Washington, D.C. The case is Wardman Tower Residential Condominium Unit Owners Association v. JBG Smith Properties, et al., No. 2020 CA 004807 B (D.C. Super. Ct.). In a 148-page Trial Order, the D.C. Superior Court awarded $118,695,171.00 in damages in favor of the condominium association and against the condominium developers, including JBG Smith. The Court trebled those damages pursuant to the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“CPPA”) to reach an ultimate judgment of $356,085,513.00. See Cowie Law Group: DC Condominium Construction Defects: Recovering Attorney’s Fees, Litigation Expenses & Treble Damages Under the Consumer Protection Procedures Act. Cowie Law Group, P.C. filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Association in 2020. The firm represented the Association throughout years of pretrial discovery and ultimately served as trial counsel with Williams & Connolly LLP during a lengthy bench trial before the Honorable Yvonne Williams. The Cowie Law Group team included attorneys, George A. Bealefeld, III, Albert G. McCarraher, Stanford L. Kimmel, III and Nicholas D. Cowie. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Nicholas D. Cowie, Cowie Law Group
    Mr. Cowie may be contacted at ndc@cowielawgroup.com

    Insurer Granted Summary Judgment on Claim for Roof Damage Caused by Windstorm

    May 26, 2026 —
    The insurer successfully moved for summary judgment, eliminating the insured’s claim for roof damage due to windstorm. Mulas v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20537 (Jan. 30, 2026). The insureds’ commercial property sustained windstorm damage during Hurricane Ian. Westchester denied the claim. The insureds believed Westchester wrongfully denied coverage for roof damage and various interior damage to property. The insureds also argued that Westchester’s actual cash value (ACV) payment did not reflect the fully insured loss. The insureds sued and Westchester moved for summary judgment. Westchester argued the roof damage was not covered because Hurricane Ian did not cause the damage. Westchester hired an engineer who determined the roof damage was not caused by wind from Hurricane Ian. Westchester pointed out that the insureds’ expert also found no wind damage on the roof. The insureds offered no other evidence suggesting the hurricane caused roof damage. Therefore, the insureds could not show that Westchester breached the policy by denying coverage. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Congratulations to Reno Partner Karen Baytosh for Securing a Complete Dismissal via a Motion for Summary Judgment

    July 13, 2026 —
    BWB&O is proud to announce that Reno Partner Karen Baytosh received a significant victory on behalf of the firm’s Developer Client in a high-exposure personal injury matter. Plaintiff, a teenager, was struck by an intoxicated driver while walking her dog at night, sustaining catastrophic injuries requiring 24-hour critical care for the remainder of her life. Plaintiff’s Guardian brought suit against the drunk driver and her husband, the City, and BWB&O’s Developer Clients, alleging that the City and Developers failed to improve street lighting and install a sidewalk that would have prevented the accident. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Seventh Circuit, With an Assist From the Illinois Supreme Court, Finds That “Pollution Exclusion” Bars Coverage For Emissions Allowed Under Regulatory Permit

    April 20, 2026 —
    In Griffith Foods Int’l Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA, 24-1217 & 24-1223 (7th Cir. Mar. 13, 2026), the Seventh Circuit addressed the meaning and scope of a pollution exclusion in a standard-form commercial general liability insurance policy for underlying injuries caused by ethylene oxide (EtO) emissions. The insurance dispute arose out of underlying tort litigation involving bodily injury claims, including cancer, allegedly caused by emissions of ethylene oxide over a 35-year period from 1984 through 2019 by Griffith Foods International and later Sterigenics U.S. The pollution exclusion at issue generally barred coverage for “bodily injury” arising out of the discharge, dispersal, release or escape of smoke, vapors, soot, fumes, acids, alkalis, toxic chemicals, or other irritants, contaminants or pollutants. Interpreting similar exclusions, the Illinois Supreme Court has previously held that the standard CGL pollution exclusion bars coverage for bodily injuries caused by traditional environmental pollution (essentially industrial emissions of pollutants), but not by more commonplace emissions (such as carbon monoxide from a residential furnace or excess chlorine in a backyard swimming pool). See American States Insurance Co. v. Koloms, 177 Ill. 2d 473 (Ill. 1997). In Griffith Foods, the District Court initially concluded that the pollution exclusion did not apply because the companies emitted EtO pursuant to a permit issued by the IEPA. The District Court reached this latter conclusion by applying Erie Insurance Exchange v. Imperial Marble Corp., 957 N.E.2d 1214 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011), an Illinois intermediate appellate court decision finding it ambiguous whether a CGL policy’s pollution exclusion barred coverage for emissions authorized by regulatory permit. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jason Taylor, Traub Lieberman
    Mr. Taylor may be contacted at jtaylor@tlsslaw.com

    Risk Reset: Concerns Top of Mind for Top Construction Law Firms

    September 28, 2026 —
    In the summer of 2025, contractors were consumed by one major issue: tariffs. Owners, builders and suppliers were trying to understand how shifting trade policy would affect bid pricing and ongoing projects. While those concerns have eased after a Supreme Court ruling, some of the industry’s top legal experts—all of whom practice at some of CE’s Top 50 Construction Law Firms—point to a different set of worries that are keeping their clients up at night and keeping their offices busy. Inflation is not fading away, creating continued price challenges. Artificial intelligence is moving at a breakneck pace, offering potential time-saving benefits paired with major liability concerns. The federal government continues to make surprising policy changes, and contractors remain focused on managing financial risk across increasingly complex projects. Reprinted courtesy of David McMillin, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Fatalities Edge Down: New Data Reveals a Promising Decline

    April 27, 2026 —
    Construction fatalities in the United States declined slightly in 2024, according to new data released from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The sector recorded just over 1,000 worker deaths last year—a modest decrease from the previous year but still among the highest totals of any industry. Falls remained the leading cause of death, accounting for roughly one-third of all construction fatalities. Transportation incidents—including workers struck by vehicles or equipment—ranked second, followed by contact with objects or equipment and electrocutions. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Best Lawyers in America

    September 08, 2026 —
    Nomos LLP partner Garret Murai has been recognized in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® in the area of Construction Law. Only about 5% of lawyers in the United States are recognized by Best Lawyers in America®. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com