BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    industrial building expert witness Ozark County Missouri condominium expert witness Ozark County Missouri custom homes expert witness Ozark County Missouri hospital construction expert witness Ozark County Missouri condominiums expert witness Ozark County Missouri tract home expert witness Ozark County Missouri high-rise construction expert witness Ozark County Missouri Subterranean parking expert witness Ozark County Missouri housing expert witness Ozark County Missouri office building expert witness Ozark County Missouri townhome construction expert witness Ozark County Missouri institutional building expert witness Ozark County Missouri concrete tilt-up expert witness Ozark County Missouri parking structure expert witness Ozark County Missouri low-income housing expert witness Ozark County Missouri custom home expert witness Ozark County Missouri structural steel construction expert witness Ozark County Missouri retail construction expert witness Ozark County Missouri mid-rise construction expert witness Ozark County Missouri Medical building expert witness Ozark County Missouri production housing expert witness Ozark County Missouri casino resort expert witness Ozark County Missouri
    Ozark County Missouri architectural expert witnessOzark County Missouri expert witness roofingOzark County Missouri structural concrete expertOzark County Missouri consulting architect expert witnessOzark County Missouri architect expert witnessOzark County Missouri construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessOzark County Missouri expert witness commercial buildings
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Ozark County, Missouri

    Missouri Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (SB168/HB573) Missouri’s NOR law requires homeowners to provide notice of an alleged construction defect before filing a lawsuit. The contractor has the option to offer to inspect the defect, repair the defect, offer a settlement or dispute the claim. The law places deadlines on the contractor to serve notice on each subcontractor (14 days) and provide a written response to the claimant (14 days). HB1166 is a similar law that addresses Notice of Repair for Homeowner Associations.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Ozark County Missouri

    Licensing is done at the city level. Contractors must register to do business with the Secretary of State.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of SW Missouri
    Local # 2642
    PO Box 2532
    Joplin, MO 64803

    Ozark County Missouri Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Greater Springfield
    Local # 2654
    636 W Republic Rd Ste D 108
    Springfield, MO 65807

    Ozark County Missouri Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    SE Missouri Home Builders Association
    Local # 2691
    3667 County Road 222
    Cape Girardeau, MO 63701
    Ozark County Missouri Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Central Missouri
    Local # 2605
    1420 Creek Trail Dr
    Jefferson City, MO 65109

    Ozark County Missouri Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of St. Louis and Eastern Missouri
    Local # 2690
    10104 Old Olive Street Rd
    Saint Louis, MO 63141

    Ozark County Missouri Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Columbia
    Local # 2618
    204 Peach Way Suite B
    Columbia, MO 65203

    Ozark County Missouri Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Greater Kansas City
    Local # 2636
    600 E 103rd St
    Kansas City, MO 64131

    Ozark County Missouri Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Ozark County Missouri


    Keeping Your Workers Safe When Air Quality Isn't

    Additional Insured Secures Defense Under Subcontractor's Policy

    Charles Eppolito Appointed Vice-Chair of the PBA Judicial Evaluation Commission and Receives Prestigious “President’s Award”

    On to Year Thirteen for Blog

    To Bee or Not to Bee - CA Court Finds Denial of Coverage Based on Exclusion was Premature Where Facts had not been Judicially Determined

    Endorsement Excludes Replacement of Undamaged Property with Matching Materials

    More In-Depth Details on the Davis-Bacon Act Overhaul

    How Mobile Tools Are Capturing Safety Data on Jobsites

    Motion to Dismiss COVID Claim Granted in Part, Denied in Part

    Question of Parties' Intent Prevents Summary Judgment for Insurer

    Lack of Flood Insurance for New York’s Poorest Residents

    Indemnity: What You Don’t Know Can Hurt You!

    Seyfarth’s Construction and Government Contracts Teams Named 2024 Practice Groups of the Year by Law360

    Construction Injuries Under the Privette Doctrine. An Electrifying, but Perhaps Not Particularly Shocking, Story . . .

    Are Construction Defect Claims Covered Under CGL Policies?

    Appeals Court Upholds Decision by Referee in Trial Court for Antagan v Shea Homes

    Recommencing Construction on a Project due to a Cessation or Abandonment

    Appetite for Deconstruction

    Priority of Liability Insurance Coverage and Horizontal and Vertical Exhaustion

    Beyond the Flow-Down Clause: Subcontract Provisions That Can Expose General Contractors to Increased Liability and Inconsistent Outcomes

    Nomos LLP Partners Recognized in Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists

    Biden Administration Issues Buy America Guidance for Federal Infrastructure Funds

    ACS Obtains Overwhelming Jury Trial Victory for General Contractor Client

    Construction Defects Up Price and Raise Conflict over Water Treatment Expansion

    A Vision and Strategy for the Adoption of Open International Standards

    Prior Occurrence Exclusion Bars Coverage for Construction Defects

    Los Angeles Warehousing Mecca Halts Expansion Just as Needs Soar

    BHA Has a Nice Swing

    Summary Judgment Granted to Insurer for Hurricane Damage

    "Multiple Claims" Provisions on Contractor's Professional Liability Policy Creates a Trap for Policyholders

    Florida Court Puts the Claim of Landlord’s Insurer In The No-Fly Zone

    Freddie Mac Eases Mortgage Rules to Limit Putbacks

    R-E-C-I-P-R-O-C-I-T-Y ~ Find Out What It Means to You (Updated August 2025)

    Summarizing Changes to NEPA in the Fiscal Responsibility Act (P.L. 118-5)

    Court Dismisses Coverage Action In Lieu of Pending State Case

    California’s Fifth Appellate District Declares the “Right to Repair Act” the Exclusive Remedy for Construction Defect Claims

    Duty To Defend Construction Defect Case Affirmed, Duty to Indemnify Reversed In Part

    Pa. Contractor Pleads No Contest to Prevailing-Wage Charges, Pays Workers $20.7M

    Immigrants' Legal Status Eyed Over Roles in New York Fake Injury Lawsuits

    California Court Invokes Equity to Stretch Anti-Subrogation Rule Principles

    The “Ugly” Property Next Door is Ruining My Property Value

    The Trend in the Economic Loss Rule in Construction Defect Litigation

    Battle Looms as Feds Order Washington State Coal Plant to Stay Open

    Additional Insured Not Entitled to Coverage for Post-Completion Defects

    White and Williams Selected in the 2024 Best Law Firms ranked by Best Lawyers®

    A Performance-Based Energy Code in Seattle: Will It Save Existing Buildings?

    FirstEnergy Fined $3.9M in Scandal Involving Nuke Plants

    Antidiscrimination Clause Required in Public Works and Goods and Services Contracts­ –Effective January 1, 2024

    Traub Lieberman Partner Jessica Kull and Associate Jonathan Powell Win Motion to Dismiss in Favor of General Contractor

    Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series, Part 7: How to Successfully Prepare, Submit and Negotiate the Claim
    Corporate Profile

    OZARK COUNTY MISSOURI CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Ozark County, Missouri Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Ozark County's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Ozark County, Missouri

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized in the 2027 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America®

    September 08, 2026 —
    Traub Lieberman is pleased to announce that four Partners have been selected by their peers for inclusion in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America®. In addition, six attorneys have been included in the 2027 Best Lawyers®: Ones to Watch list. These recognitions include attorneys from the firm’s White Plains, NY; Chicago, IL; Palm Beach Gardens, FL; and St. Petersburg, FL offices. 2027 Best Lawyers® White Plains, NY
    • Lisa L. Shrewsberry – Commercial Litigation
    Chicago, IL
    • Brian C. Bassett – Insurance Law
    Palm Beach Gardens, FL
    • Rina Clemens – Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants, Product Liability Litigation – Defendants
    St. Petersburg, FL
    • Lauren S. Curtis – Insurance Law
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Traub Lieberman

    A Customized Approach to Data Center Construction

    June 29, 2026 —
    Data center construction projects are, to put it mildly, distinct. They differ from traditional construction in a host of manners, and are particularly distinctive because the value of the facility depends on unique measures of performance. A center that cannot meet uptime, cooling, redundancy or connectivity standards will not achieve its mission, whether or not the structure itself meets standard industry contract-form “substantial completion” or “mechanical completion” definitions. Owners, developers, lenders, operators and hyperscalers—especially hyperscalers!—want it all. They seek favorable and stable pricing, accelerated delivery and sophisticated components, all of which are evolving in “real project time.” Standard construction contract forms deserve extensive modifications to align clauses with expectations, with a heightened focus on systems integration, commissioning, and allocation of special risks. This article details customized considerations for drafting, negotiating and administering data center design and construction agreements. Reprinted courtesy of James P. Bobotek, Pillsbury, Arielle L. Murphy, Pillsbury and Robert A. James, Pillsbury Mr. Bobotek may be contacted at james.bobotek@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Murphy may be contacted at arielle.murphy@pillsburylaw.com Mr. James may be contacted at rob.james@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Conditional Payment Bond Consideration-Make Sure There Is Pay-If-Paid Provision

    June 29, 2026 —
    If a general contractor is going to have a conditional payment bond, it needs to ensure it subcontracts contain pay-if-paid or pay-when-paid provisions. This conditional payment language in subcontracts is the general contractor’s defense that it doesn’t have to pay a subcontractor UNTIL owner has paid the general contractor for the subcontractor’s work. The general contractor (and the surety) can look at the conditional payment bond with the s. 713.245 legend stamped on its face designating the conditional nature of the bond, and assume the conditional structure is locked in against the bond: no payment from the owner, no obligation to the subcontractors under the bond. But what happens when the subcontracts contain no express conditional payment language despite having a valid conditional payment bond? Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    From CERCLA to Drinking Water: D.C. Circuit’s PFAS Ruling Enters a Second Regulatory Fight

    October 06, 2026 —
    On August 18, 2026, a unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld EPA’s designation of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund). In Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. EPA, the court rejected challenges to EPA’s interpretation of CERCLA Section 102(a), the adequacy of its notice and comment process, its analysis of costs and benefits, and its decision to proceed despite uncertainty about future response actions and costs. This decision is already being invoked in a separate D.C. Circuit challenge to EPA’s 2024 PFAS drinking water rule promulgated under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). Six days after the CERCLA decision, respondent intervenors cited it as supplemental authority in American Water Works Association v. EPA, No. 24-1188, ahead of oral argument scheduled for September 18, 2026. The Chamber of Commerce decision may assist the respondent intervenors on certain notice and comment and economic analysis arguments, but its significance should not be overstated. The principal challenges to the standards for the four PFAS subject to EPA’s Hazard Index-based maximum contaminant level (MCL) turn on requirements specific to the SDWA, and EPA itself now agrees that those provisions were promulgated through an unlawful process. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury, Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury and Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Court Denies Cross Summary Judgment Motions on Coverage for Odors in Newly Purchased Home

    October 06, 2026 —
    The federal district court denied cross motions seeking to establish whether the policy covered damage due to smells in the insureds’ newly purchased home. Akina v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co., 2026 U.S Dist. LEXIS 162817 (W. D. Wash. July 22, 2026). Plaintiffs bought a home in May 2024 but never conducted an inspection before purchasing the property. Before moving in, plaintiffs secured a homeowners’ polilcy from State Farm. After moving in, plaintiffs began noticing smells in the house and started suffering from health symptoms. Plaintiffs learned from neighbors that the prior occupants had been witnessed in “drug activity.” Plaintiffs moved out of the house and had testing done. The home tested positive for methamphetamine pollution. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    GRSM Marks Seventh Anniversary as First and Only Full-Service Law Firm in All 50 States, Climbs to #70 on Am Law 100

    April 20, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani proudly celebrates the seventh anniversary of its becoming the first and only full-service law firm with offices and attorneys in all 50 states. Since launching its innovative 50-state platform in April 2019, GRSM has experienced extraordinary growth across markets, practices, and client relationships. In the past seven years, GRSM has expanded its footprint with 20 new offices in both major and secondary markets and doubled its attorney headcount, growing from 940 to more than 2000 lawyers. This growth has propelled GRSM from the 40th to the 11th largest law firm in the United States, according to Law360, while also driving a significant rise on the Am Law 100 rankings, from #103 in 2019 to #70 in 2026. GRSM has served nearly half of the Fortune 500, a testament to its deep bench of lawyers and national capabilities. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    'Drywall Isn't Light': Peter Lupo on Safety Management at Standard Drywall

    May 26, 2026 —
    Peter Lupo has been safety director since 2019 at San Diego-based Standard Drywall Inc., a major wall and ceiling contractor. He draws on over two decades of safety experience across a wide range of commercial construction work, having previously served as safety director for general contractor T.B. Penick & Sons. He has also previously operated Peter Lupo Consulting, where he reviewed legal cases and provided expert testimony, and blogged on safety for ENR.com. Lupo recently spoke to ENR Correspondent Elaine Silver about the weight of drywall, heat hazard control, bilingual crews and how he supports safety creativity and learning on the Standard Drywall staff. The conversation has been edited. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Insufficient Notice of Commencement and Construction Lien Rights

    August 03, 2026 —
    When a party is preserving their construction lien rights, the party will look to the recorded Notice of Commencement. This is the recorded document that provides the lienor with the information for purposes of preserving construction lien rights. A Notice to Owner company will typically rely on the Notice of Commencement to serve Notices to Owners from lower tiers not in contract with the owner. However, when it comes to preparing the lien, a lienor should look beyond just the Notice of Commencement and also look to the property appraiser’s website as a backstop. In a recent case, a window company had the homeowner sign the Notice of Commencement and then filled in the information. The company naturally did this for the convenience of the homeowner that probably was unfamiliar with the Notice of Commencement process. Regardless, information in the Notice of Commencement was inaccurate. It failed to include all the real property owners. Thus, when a payment dispute arose and a construction lien was prepared, it did not identify all of the real property owners. All of the real property owners were added later during the pendency of a lien foreclosure lawsuit. The trial court denied the lien because of the defective / insufficient Notice of Commencement — the lienor assumed the risk of error by filling out the information in the Notice of Commencement. The trial court further denied the lien holding that because the work did not commence within 90 days of the Notice of Commencement, the Notice of Commencement is void. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com