BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom homes expert witness Fayette Mississippi landscaping construction expert witness Fayette Mississippi high-rise construction expert witness Fayette Mississippi low-income housing expert witness Fayette Mississippi mid-rise construction expert witness Fayette Mississippi condominium expert witness Fayette Mississippi production housing expert witness Fayette Mississippi multi family housing expert witness Fayette Mississippi tract home expert witness Fayette Mississippi townhome construction expert witness Fayette Mississippi concrete tilt-up expert witness Fayette Mississippi condominiums expert witness Fayette Mississippi casino resort expert witness Fayette Mississippi office building expert witness Fayette Mississippi structural steel construction expert witness Fayette Mississippi institutional building expert witness Fayette Mississippi hospital construction expert witness Fayette Mississippi housing expert witness Fayette Mississippi Medical building expert witness Fayette Mississippi industrial building expert witness Fayette Mississippi parking structure expert witness Fayette Mississippi retail construction expert witness Fayette Mississippi
    Fayette Mississippi architect expert witnessFayette Mississippi hospital construction expert witnessFayette Mississippi consulting engineersFayette Mississippi construction expertsFayette Mississippi civil engineering expert witnessFayette Mississippi roofing construction expertFayette Mississippi expert witness commercial buildings
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Fayette, Mississippi

    Mississippi Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB1166/SB1081, HB722/SB2368) The New Home Warranty Act stipulates warranties for one-year and six-year periods limits types of defects; defines specific defects and exclusions such as outbuildings, detached garages, detached carports, swimming pools, recreational facilities, driveways, walkways, patios, boundary walls, retaining walls, bulkheads, fences, landscaping, off-site improvements, drainage, utilities, etc.; additional exclusions are negligence, improper maintenance, or improper operation, failure to comply with warranty requirements of manufacturer, inadequate ventilation, lack of mitigation, normal wear and tear, insect damage or "rotting of any kind", mold or mold damage, consequential damages, and defects in electrical, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, or similar fixture not manufactured by builder


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Fayette Mississippi

    State license required for commercial jobs over $100,000, city or county jobs over $50,000.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of East Central Mississippi
    Local # 2516
    PO Box 1551
    Laurel, MS 39441
    Fayette Mississippi Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Natchez
    Local # 2563
    PO Box 1351
    Natchez, MS 39120
    Fayette Mississippi Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Greater Hattiesburg Home Builders Association
    Local # 2527
    629 North Main St
    Hattiesburg, MS 39401

    Fayette Mississippi Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    SW Mississippi Home Builders Association
    Local # 2573
    P O Box 1426
    McComb, MS 39649
    Fayette Mississippi Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Mississippi
    Local # 2500
    PO Box 3556
    Jackson, MS 39207

    Fayette Mississippi Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Vicksburg
    Local # 2581
    PO Box 821035
    Vicksburg, MS 39182
    Fayette Mississippi Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Jackson
    Local # 2554
    PO Box 1860
    Ridgeland, MS 39158

    Fayette Mississippi Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Fayette Mississippi


    No Coverage for Repairs Made Before Suit Filed

    The Activist Group Suing the Suburbs for Bigger Buildings

    Potential Gap in Workers Compensation Immunity Statutory Framework

    Data Center Construction and the AEC Partner of the Future

    Recommencing Construction on a Project due to a Cessation or Abandonment

    Does Your U.S. Company Pull Data From European Citizens? Fall In Line With GDPR by May 2018 or Suffer Substantial Fines

    Project-Specific Commercial General Liability Insurance

    Traub Lieberman Partner Michael K. Kiernan and Associate Brandon Christian Obtain Dismissal with Prejudice in Favor of Defendant

    As Natural Gas Expands in Gulf, Residents Fear Rising Damage

    Tort Claims Against an Alter Ego May Be Considered an Action “On a Contract” for the Purposes of an Attorneys’ Fees Award under California Civil Code section 1717

    Floating Cities May Be One Answer to Rising Sea Levels

    Virtual Jury Trials: The Next Wave of Remote Legal Practice

    Massachusetts Couple Seek to Recuse Judge in Construction Defect Case

    Avoid the Headache – Submit the Sworn Proof of Loss to Property Insurer

    Nevada Supreme Court to Decide Fate of Harmon Towers

    Colorado Homes Approved Despite being Too Close Together

    Big Policyholder Win in Michigan

    The Treasures Inside Notre Dame Cathedral

    As of July 1, 2024, California Will Require Most Employers to Have a Written Workplace Violence Prevention Program (WVPP) and Training. Is Your Company Compliant?

    Courts Are Ordering Remote Depositions as the COVID-19 Pandemic Continues

    Why Being Climate ‘Positive’ Is the Buzzy New Goal of Green Building

    Feds OK $9B Houston Highway Project After Two-Year Pause

    Increase in Single-Family New Home Sales Year-Over-Year in January

    No Coverage for Roof Collapse During Hurricane

    Thirteen Payne & Fears Attorneys Honored by Best Lawyers

    Defense Victory in Breach of Fiduciary Action

    Los Angeles Is Building a Future Where Water Won’t Run Out

    Analysis of the “owned property exclusion” under Panico v. State Farm

    Musk Says ‘Chicago Express’ Tunnel Project Could Start Work in Months

    Surfside Condo Collapse Investigators Have Nearly Finished Technical Work

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC Recognized Among The Top 50 Construction Law Firms by Construction Executive

    Cyber Security Insurance and Design Professionals

    Los Angeles Considering Census of Seismically Unstable Buildings

    China Bans Tallest Skyscrapers Following Safety Concerns

    Claim for Collapse After Demolition of Building Fails

    EPA Threatens Cut in California's Federal Highway Funds

    Breaking the Impasse by Understanding Blame

    Elizabeth Lofts Condo Owners Settle with Plumbing Supplier

    White and Williams Recognized by BTI Consulting Group for Client Service

    Bert L. Howe & Associates Brings Professional Development Series to Their San Antonio Office

    Disputes Over Arbitrator Qualifications: The Northern District of California Offers Some Guidance

    As Florence Eyes East Coast, Are You Looking At Your Insurance?

    Sometimes You Get Away with Default (but don’t count on it)

    Construction Defect Claim Survives Insurer's Summary Judgment Motion Due to Lack of Evidence

    Subsequent Purchaser Can Assert Claims for Construction Defects

    Risk Reset: Concerns Top of Mind for Top Construction Law Firms

    Do Change Orders Need to be in Writing and Other Things That Might Surprise You

    2026 Southern California Super Lawyers Recognizes 14 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys

    “Wait! Do You Have All Your Ducks in a Row?” Filing of a Certificate of Merit in Conjunction With a Complaint

    Editorial: Qatar Is Champion of Safety Hypocrisy in Migrant Worker Deaths
    Corporate Profile

    FAYETTE MISSISSIPPI CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Fayette, Mississippi Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Fayette's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Fayette, Mississippi

    Balancing the Right to Repair With Evidence Preservation in Construction Defect Litigation

    April 20, 2026 —
    Every major construction project comes with risk, whether it’s a warehouse build, a multifamily development or a major renovation. Parties tend to be aligned when things are proceeding as planned. But when something goes wrong—cracked concrete, water intrusion, systems that don’t perform as expected—those interests can quickly diverge. Property owners are often caught in the middle when construction defects surface. They’re expected to act quickly to limit damage and costs. But they also have legal obligations to preserve evidence and allow potentially responsible parties, such as contractors or designers, to observe testing, demolition and repairs. Additionally, owners often have duties to lenders and investors to fix problems promptly and pursue claims against those responsible. Meanwhile, contractors and other parties have obligations of their own—not to interfere with repairs and not to delay mitigation efforts while investigations are underway. What follows will examine how those competing responsibilities play out in construction defect disputes. Reprinted courtesy of Benton Wheatley & Anna Spicer, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    ACEC Research Institute Report: Real Risk of AI Isn’t Technology. It’s the Org Chart.

    September 01, 2026 —
    WASHINGTON (August 19, 2026) – The ACEC Research Institute today released Leading Through AI Risk: The Enterprise Framework for Engineering Firm Leaders, a new study finding that the most significant risks artificial intelligence poses to engineering firms are organizational rather than technological, and that firms treating AI as an IT initiative are managing the wrong issue. The report, part of the Institute’s yearslong Firm of the Future initiative, combines an extensive literature review with in-depth interviews of 21 leaders drawn from engineering firms, public infrastructure owners, technology vendors, insurance and legal professionals, licensing and regulatory agencies, and AI consultants. The report groups AI risk into eight interconnected domains:
    • technical reliability and model risk
    • professional liability and standard of care risk
    • data governance, privacy, and intellectual property risk
    • organizational and workforce risk
    • ethical, regulatory, and reputational risk
    • operational and cybersecurity risk
    • financial and business model risk
    • strategic leadership and enterprise governance risk
    The last serves as the integrating domain through which firms coordinate responsible AI adoption enterprise wide. The report stresses that firms do not experience these risks one at a time. Weak oversight may create legal liability. Workforce gaps may affect quality assurance. “Understanding these interactions,” the study notes, “is often more important than understanding individual risks independently.” About the ACEC Research Institute The ACEC Research Institute is the independent research arm of the American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC). Its mission is to fund and deliver research to equip the engineering industry with actionable intelligence on the issues critical to its success. Learn more at www.acecresearchinstitute.org.

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight named one of the Top 50 Construction Law Firms

    August 11, 2026 —
    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC is pleased to announce its fifth consecutive year of recognition by Construction Executive as one of The Top 50 Construction Law Firms. Since its first publication in 2003, Construction Executive magazine has served as the leading source for news, market developments, and business issues impacting the construction industry. Construction Executive established the rankings by asking over 600 U.S. construction law firms to complete a survey. Constructive Executive’s data collection includes: 2025 revenues from the firm’s construction practice; the number of attorneys in the firm’s construction practice; the percentage of the firm’s total revenues derived from its construction practice; the number of states in which the firm is licensed to practice; the year in which the construction practice was established; and the number of construction industry clients served during the fiscal year 2025. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC

    Traub Lieberman Wins Affirmation of Judgment on Pleadings Before the Seventh Circuit

    August 16, 2026 —
    Traub Lieberman Partners Dana Rice and Adam Joffe obtained affirmation of judgment from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in favor of an Insurance Company. The Insurance Company filed suit seeking a declaration that it had no duty to defend or indemnify its Insured, a Roofing Contractor, in an underlying lawsuit. The Insurance Company issued a commercial general liability policy with a one-year policy term. The policy included an exclusion that barred coverage for any losses arising out of work the insured completed before the date the policy incepted. Reprinted courtesy of Dana A. Rice, Traub Lieberman and Adam P. Joffe, Traub Lieberman Mr. Rice may be contacted at drice@tlsslaw.com Mr. Joffe may be contacted at ajoffe@tlsslaw.com Read the full story...

    Cuomo Bridge Lawsuit Adversaries Weigh Mediated Settlement

    July 06, 2026 —
    Rival legal teams have reached a critical juncture as they consider a mediated settlement in one of two major payment lawsuits pending between a design-build contracting team and the New York State Thruway Authority over construction of the more than $3-billion Mario M. Cuomo Bridge north of New York City. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    The Deadline to File Suit on a Public Works Payment Payment Bond is Triggered by a Claimant’s Work on a Project Not by a Claimant’s Work Under a Contract

    June 02, 2026 —
    California law requires that prime contractors furnish a payment bond – providing for payment to lower-tiered subcontractors and suppliers – on state and local public works projects with a value in excess of $25,000. There are three conditions that must be satisfied when a claimant makes a claim against a payment bond on a public works project in California:
    1. First, generally, the claimant must have served a preliminary notice, unless the claimant is a first-tier subcontractor or supplier;
    2. The claimant must have “ceased to provide work” on the project; and
    3. The claimant must file suit against the payment bond no later than six (6) months after the period in which a stop payment notice must be given or, in other words, the earlier of 270 days after completion of the public works project or 210 days after a notice of completion or cessation was recorded on a public works project.
    In Tarlton & Sons, Inc. v. Great American Insurance Company, 111 Cal.App.5th 376 (2025), the 2nd District Court of Appeal examined whether a subcontractor timely filed a claim against a payment bond when a prime contractor was terminated and replaced by another prime contractor who the subcontractor continued to perform work for. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    White and Williams LLP Secures a Clean Sweep Dismissal of Architect's Professional Liability Coverage Lawsuit

    August 16, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP achieved a complete dismissal of professional liability coverage claims through a strategic defense led by Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Group attorneys Daniel E. Bryer, Partner and Brendaliz Minaya Ruiz, Associate. In a nuanced action styled, Vincent Cusumano Architect P.C., et al. v. Berkshire Hathaway Direct Insurance Company, et al., decided in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, plaintiffs asserted twelve pre-contractual and contractual-based causes of action against their liability insurer, Berkshire Hathaway Direct Insurance Company, and its insurance agent (collectively, “Defendants”) for denying a professional liability claim arising from plaintiffs’ prior work. Reprinted courtesy of Daniel E. Bryer, White and Williams LLP and Brendaliz Minaya Ruiz, White and Williams LLP Mr. Bryer may be contacted at bryerd@whiteandwilliams.com Ms. Ruiz may be contacted at minayaruizb@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    GRSM Defeats Class Certification in Precedent-Setting HOA Management Case

    September 15, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Partners Fletcher Alford and Kevin Liu and Associate Jigar Desai secured a favorable outcome on behalf of an HOA management company in a precedent-setting class action before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, obtaining denial of the plaintiff’s motion for class certification and dismissal without prejudice of the three claims at issue. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant received earnings credit payments from a bank in exchange for maintaining HOA deposit accounts and failed to disclose the arrangement to its HOA clients. The plaintiff sought more than $40 million in damages, asserting five claims: (1) breach of contract for failing to act in class members’ best interests by not disclosing the alleged earnings credit arrangement; (2) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) based on alleged violations of California Civil Code §§ 5375, 5375.5, and 5380; (3) breach of fiduciary duty based on the alleged undisclosed arrangement; (4) violation of the UCL for unfair business practices arising from the alleged nondisclosure; and (5) unjust enrichment. The plaintiff sought class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) and 23(b)(3) only as to its second, third, and fourth causes of action. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani