BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    hospital construction expert witness Revere Minnesota landscaping construction expert witness Revere Minnesota townhome construction expert witness Revere Minnesota structural steel construction expert witness Revere Minnesota concrete tilt-up expert witness Revere Minnesota condominiums expert witness Revere Minnesota casino resort expert witness Revere Minnesota tract home expert witness Revere Minnesota Subterranean parking expert witness Revere Minnesota low-income housing expert witness Revere Minnesota multi family housing expert witness Revere Minnesota custom home expert witness Revere Minnesota office building expert witness Revere Minnesota industrial building expert witness Revere Minnesota housing expert witness Revere Minnesota retail construction expert witness Revere Minnesota parking structure expert witness Revere Minnesota Medical building expert witness Revere Minnesota high-rise construction expert witness Revere Minnesota production housing expert witness Revere Minnesota institutional building expert witness Revere Minnesota condominium expert witness Revere Minnesota
    Revere Minnesota architectural engineering expert witnessRevere Minnesota expert witness windowsRevere Minnesota slope failure expert witnessRevere Minnesota consulting engineersRevere Minnesota construction forensic expert witnessRevere Minnesota stucco expert witnessRevere Minnesota construction defect expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Revere, Minnesota

    Minnesota Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Statutory warranties for one-year, two-year and ten-year periods limits types of construction defects actionable under warranty law; This statute (Chapter 327A) limits liability and excludes normal wear and tear, normal shrinkage caused by drying of the dwelling, loss due to insufficient ventilation, loss or damage from negligence, improper maintenance, or alteration to dwelling, loss or damage from failure to maintain or failure to mitigate


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Revere Minnesota

    Residential contractors need to be licensed. If you work in two or more trades, certain trades will require a license. Call the state for details.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Minnesota River Builders Association
    Local # 2487
    443 Belgrade Avenue
    North Mankato, MN 56003

    Revere Minnesota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Rochester Area Builders Inc
    Local # 2465
    108 Elton Hills Lane NW
    Rochester, MN 55901

    Revere Minnesota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    South Central Builders Association
    Local # 2412
    575 Havana Rd
    Owatonna, MN 55060
    Revere Minnesota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Crow River Builders Association Affil w/National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 2424
    PO Box 656
    Hutchinson, MN 55350

    Revere Minnesota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Minnesota
    Local # 2400
    525 Park St Ste 150
    Saint Paul, MN 55103

    Revere Minnesota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of the Twin Cities
    Local # 2433
    2960 Centre Pointe Drive
    Roseville, MN 55113

    Revere Minnesota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    West Central Builders Assoc
    Local # 2432
    PO Box 447
    New London, MN 56273

    Revere Minnesota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Revere Minnesota


    Nebraska Court Ruling Backs Latest Keystone XL Pipeline Route

    Fannie-Freddie Elimination Model in Apartments: Mortgages

    Generic Complaint Alleging Bad Faith is Insufficient

    Cal/OSHA ETS: Newest Version Effective Today

    Fannie Mae Says Millennials Are Finally Leaving Their Parents' Basements

    The Economic Loss Rule and Tort Claims by Owners against Design Professionals

    General Contractor’s Intentionally False Certifications Bar It From Any Recovery From Owner

    Supreme Court Declines to Address CDC Eviction Moratorium

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized as 2021 New York – Metro Super Lawyers®

    Renters Who Bought Cannot Sue for Construction Defects

    Best Practices for Installing Networks in New Buildings

    Almost Nothing Is Impossible

    Randy Okland Honored as 2019 Intermountain Legacy Award Winner

    Mich. AG Says Straits of Mackinac Tunnel Deal Unconstitutional

    Chicago’s Bungalows Are Where the City Comes Together

    The Salt Lake Tribune Names Snell & Wilmer a Winner of the Top Workplaces 2025 Award

    Federal Judge Refuses to Limit Coverage and Moves Forward with Policyholder’s Claims Against Insurer and Broker

    Traub Lieberman Chair Emeritus Awarded the 2022 Vince Donohue Award by the International Association of Claim Professionals

    Effective Allocation of Damages for Federal Contract Claims

    Fixing the Problem – Not the Blame

    When Is a Project Delay Material and Actionable?

    New Tariffs Could Shorten Construction Expansion Cycle

    Why Being Climate ‘Positive’ Is the Buzzy New Goal of Green Building

    Communication Gaps Can Cost Construction Firms in the Data Center Boom

    Construction Insurance Costs for New York Schools is Going Up

    Case Alert Update: SDV Case Tabbed as One of New York’s Top Three Cases to Watch

    NYC’s Developers Plow Ahead With Ambitious Plans to Reshape City

    Consumer Protection Act Whacks Seattle Roofing Contractor

    Florida Contractor Says City Must Negotiate Rejected Bid

    Nine Firm Members Recognized as Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

    Insurer Disposes of Bad Faith Claim on Summary Judgment

    Law Firm's Business Income, Civil Authority Claim Due to Hurricanes Survives Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment

    Indiana Court of Appeals Rules Against Contractor and Performance Bond Surety on Contractor's Differing Site Conditions Claim

    Signed, Sealed and (Almost) Delivered: EU Council Authorizes Signing of U.S. – EU Bilateral Insurance Agreement

    Second Circuit Clarifies What Must Be Alleged to Establish “Joint Employer” Liability in the Context of Federal Employment Discrimination Claims

    Disruption: When Did It Start and Where Will It End?

    WARN Act Exceptions in Response to COVID-19

    GOP, States, Industry Challenge EPA Project Water Impact Rule

    No Coverage Under Exclusions For Wind and Water Damage

    Recent Third Circuit OSHA Decision Sounds Alarm for Employers and Their Officers

    What a Difference a Day Makes: Mississippi’s Discovery Rule

    Hunton Insurance Coverage Group Ranked in National Tier 1 by US News & World Report

    Maine Court Allows $1B Hydropower Transmission Project to Proceed

    Court finds subcontractor responsible for defending claim

    Insurers' Motion to Determine Lack of Occurrence Fails

    New York Court Permits Asbestos Claimants to Proceed Against Insurers with Buyout Agreements

    Rulemaking to Modernize, Expand DOI’s “Type A” Natural Resource Damage Assessment Rules Expected Fall 2023

    Georgia Court Clarifies Landlord Liability for Construction Defects

    New York Court Rules on Architect's Duty Under Contract and Tort Principles

    Former Zurich Executive to Head Willis North America Construction Insurance Group
    Corporate Profile

    REVERE MINNESOTA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Revere, Minnesota Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Revere's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Revere, Minnesota

    Ninth Circuit Holds That Policies Covering Environmental Claims Do Not Have Aggregate Limits

    May 12, 2026 —
    In the case of County of San Bernardino v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, the Ninth Circuit recently addressed the issue of whether general liability policies issued in the 1960s and 1970s included aggregate limits for claims arising under the premises-operations coverage in CGL policies. The difference between the policyholder’s interpretation of the policies’ limits clauses and the insurer’s interpretation was worth hundreds of millions of dollars in exposure for the insurer. The Court closely examined the policy language and extrinsic evidence from both the insurance industry’s drafting history and the parties before concluding that the policies were ambiguous. The Court construed that ambiguity in favor of the policyholder and ruled that aggregate limits did not apply to the claims at issue. The Court’s decision underscores the importance of carefully examining a policy’s limits, especially for older policies written before 1986 when the insurance industry revised the standard-form CGL policy to state the aggregate limits apply not only to products liability claims but to premises-operations claims as well. Decades of insurance industry drafting history confirms, as the policyholder’s submissions in this case indicate, that the industry well understood that operations claims like the environmental waste-disposal claims at issue here typically were not subject to aggregate limits. Reprinted courtesy of Lorelie S. Masters, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Joseph T. Niczky, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Ms. Masters may be contacted at lmasters@hunton.com Mr. Niczky may be contacted at jniczky@hunton.com Read the full story...

    White and Williams LLP Attorneys Recognized as PA and DE Super Lawyers

    July 06, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP is proud to announce that eight attorneys in the firm’s Philadelphia office and one attorney in the firm's Delaware Office have been recognized on the 2026 Super Lawyers® and Rising Star lists. This recognition highlights our attorney's exceptional legal acumen and their commitment to client service excellence. Lawyers are selected for inclusion in Pennsylvania and Delaware Area Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars through a process that considers independent research, peer recognition and the professional achievements of attorneys from more than 70 practice areas. Approximately 2.5% of lawyers in each state are selected by the research team at Super Lawyers® to receive this honor. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    AI Can Now Train the Soft Skills Construction Ignored

    August 03, 2026 —
    Most AEC professionals learn to work in teams and across teams through trial and error. There are, however, opportunities to better prepare for the real world with formal training. Until now, it has required human facilitators. Now, generative AI is emerging as a scalable alternative, which I’m also exploring. A Gap in Curricula When I studied architecture, most of the teamwork happened with co-students in the same department. However, one course focused on industrial projects where future architects and engineers collaborated on a simulated project. I’m not sure if a similar course is still in the curriculum, but it was certainly worthwhile and should have been much more extensive. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Trial-Tested Property Litigator Kimberlee Martin Joins Ball Janik LLP's Orlando Construction Defect Team

    October 06, 2026 —
    ORLANDO, FL, September 30, 2026 — Ball Janik LLP has added Kimberlee A. Martin to its Construction Defect Practice Group as an associate in the firm's Orlando office. For more than a decade, she has litigated matters in the fields of criminal defense, first-party property, and insurance disputes, taking cases and claims from inception through jury trial. It's the same path many of Ball Janik's clients face when construction goes wrong, and her arrival deepens the firm's trial bench in Central Florida. "Florida property owners are dealing with complex building problems and less time to act on them. That puts a premium on attorneys who can take a case the distance," said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner of Ball Janik LLP. "Kimberlee has carried property and insurance claims from pre-suit all the way through trial, working hand in hand with experts along the way. Community associations and commercial property owners need exactly that combination, and she brings it to our team on day one." Most recently, Kimberlee served as Litigation Director, where she oversaw homeowners' property claims in pre-suit and litigation, managed a substantial caseload, and guided associate attorneys on litigation strategy. Her civil work includes jury trials, summary judgment and dismissal motions, expert and witness depositions, mediations, and site inspections, along with close coordination with contractors, consultants, and other experts. That skill set maps directly onto construction defect and insurance recovery litigation, where cases often turn on site evidence, expert testimony, and a credible readiness to go to trial. "I've seen firsthand how much is at stake when a building has problems: owners' investments, residents' homes, and everyone's peace of mind," said Kimberlee. "Ball Janik is focused on exactly those clients, which made this a natural next step for my practice. I'm excited to join this team and help property owners hold the responsible parties accountable and get their buildings repaired." Kimberlee earned her J.D., cum laude, from Florida International University College of Law and her B.A. in political science, with a minor in legal studies, from the University of Central Florida. About Ball Janik LLP Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel, to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 70-plus attorneys and paralegals in five offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, including for its construction law capabilities in Florida, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, Super Lawyers, and Corporate International. Read more at www.balljanik.com.

    Cal Unity Bar Names Angela Zanin as Statewide President

    August 11, 2026 —
    The California Unity Bar has named Los Angeles Partner Angela Zanin as its statewide president for the 2026-2027 term. This appointment follows Ms. Zanin's extensive involvement in the organization, including as the founding co-chair of the Los Angeles County Unity Bar in 2024 and as its chair for the 2024-2025 term. Ms. Zanin also has served as a member of the Executive Steering Committee of the California Unity Bar since 2025. In her inaugural message as president, which the Cal Unity Bar published in its newsletter of July 2026, Ms. Zanin stated that she vowed to continue the organization’s “commitment to promoting equal opportunities and embracing diversity, equity, and inclusion in the State of California.” She also noted that as she assumed the role of president, she thought of “the famous words of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.: ‘The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.”’ Ms. Zanin closed her message by observing, “At a time when the rule of law faces challenges, our alliance stands strong, built on trust and confidence in each other.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Late Notice Bars Insured’s Claim for Water Leak Damage

    August 11, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the insured’s claim due to late notice. Global Approach, Inc. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120183 (S. D. Fla. June 1, 2026). Global suffered water damage on September 3, 2021, which originated in the bathroom of one of its rental properties. Global reported the claim to its insurer, Scottsdale, on October 19, 2021. Prior to reporting the claim, Global hired a handyman to inspect the property and then demolished the damaged area and repaired the bathroom. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Wadsworth v. Regional Rail Partners — Verified Statements of Claim Under the Colorado Public Works Act

    August 25, 2026 —
    Editor’s Note: Wadsworth Revisited In August 2024, following the Colorado Court of Appeals’ decision in Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC v. Regional Rail Partners, we published Colorado Court of Appeals’ Ruling Highlights Dangers of Excessive Public Works Claims. At the time, the decision warranted a significant warning to contractors and subcontractors performing public work in Colorado. The Court of Appeals concluded that Wadsworth’s verified statement of claim improperly included unliquidated delay damages and that, because the claim was excessive, Wadsworth forfeited its right to recover the amounts included in the claim. We cautioned contractors to carefully scrutinize verified statements of claim and to avoid including unliquidated damages or amounts that were not yet due and payable. The Colorado Supreme Court has now reversed that decision. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Olivia Barden, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC

    Late Notice Bars Insured’s Claim for Wind Damage

    June 29, 2026 —
    The court found that a six-month delay in reporting damage from wind did not comply with the policy’s notice requirements. Touchmark Hotel Group, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61910 (S.D. N. Y. March 24, 2026). A storm caused damage to Touchstone’s hotel on January 4, 2023. Touchstone’s corporate representative, Rohit Patel, testified that he was not at the property on the day of the storm. In a telephone call the next day, the manager of the property reported to Patel that he observed detached shingles from the roof the hotel in the parking lot. Patel testified that he did not file a claim at that time because Touchmark’s employees did not detect any water leakage in the building and because he did not believe that the cost of the damage from the storm would exceed the policy’s deductible. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com