BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    low-income housing expert witness Pengilly Minnesota institutional building expert witness Pengilly Minnesota concrete tilt-up expert witness Pengilly Minnesota high-rise construction expert witness Pengilly Minnesota casino resort expert witness Pengilly Minnesota townhome construction expert witness Pengilly Minnesota office building expert witness Pengilly Minnesota custom home expert witness Pengilly Minnesota industrial building expert witness Pengilly Minnesota landscaping construction expert witness Pengilly Minnesota structural steel construction expert witness Pengilly Minnesota parking structure expert witness Pengilly Minnesota production housing expert witness Pengilly Minnesota custom homes expert witness Pengilly Minnesota hospital construction expert witness Pengilly Minnesota mid-rise construction expert witness Pengilly Minnesota Subterranean parking expert witness Pengilly Minnesota multi family housing expert witness Pengilly Minnesota housing expert witness Pengilly Minnesota tract home expert witness Pengilly Minnesota condominium expert witness Pengilly Minnesota condominiums expert witness Pengilly Minnesota
    Pengilly Minnesota construction scheduling expert witnessPengilly Minnesota construction expertsPengilly Minnesota building expertPengilly Minnesota expert witness roofingPengilly Minnesota construction project management expert witnessPengilly Minnesota testifying construction expert witnessPengilly Minnesota building code expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Pengilly, Minnesota

    Minnesota Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Statutory warranties for one-year, two-year and ten-year periods limits types of construction defects actionable under warranty law; This statute (Chapter 327A) limits liability and excludes normal wear and tear, normal shrinkage caused by drying of the dwelling, loss due to insufficient ventilation, loss or damage from negligence, improper maintenance, or alteration to dwelling, loss or damage from failure to maintain or failure to mitigate


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Pengilly Minnesota

    Residential contractors need to be licensed. If you work in two or more trades, certain trades will require a license. Call the state for details.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Northern MN Builders Association
    Local # 2417
    802 S Pokegama Ave Ste A
    Grand Rapids, MN 55744

    Pengilly Minnesota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Headwaters Builders Association
    Local # 2480
    PO Box 402
    Bemidji, MN 56619

    Pengilly Minnesota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lake Region Builders Association
    Local # 2470
    1114 Hwy. 59 South Ste 2
    Detroit Lakes, MN 56501

    Pengilly Minnesota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Arrowhead Builders Association
    Local # 2415
    5255 Maple Grove Road
    HERMANTOWN, MN 55811

    Pengilly Minnesota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Mid-Minnesota
    Local # 2450
    17068 Commercial Park Road
    Brainerd, MN 56401

    Pengilly Minnesota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Vikingland Builders Assoc
    Local # 2495
    509 22ND AVE E Ste 200
    Alexandria, MN 56308

    Pengilly Minnesota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Central Minnesota Builders Association
    Local # 2410
    1124 W Saint Germain St
    Saint Cloud, MN 56301

    Pengilly Minnesota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Pengilly Minnesota


    New Hampshire Applies Crete/Sutton Doctrine to Bar Subrogation Against College Dormitory Residents

    Blackstone to Buy Chicago’s Willis Tower for $1.3 Billion

    Feds to Repair Damage From Halted Border Wall Work in Texas, California

    Fed. Judge Blocks Release of Records on FIU Bridge Collapse, Citing NTSB Investigation

    A Tort, By Any Other Name, is Just a Tort: Massachusetts Court Bars Contract Claims That Sound in Negligence

    Congratulations 2016 DE, MA, NJ, NY and PA Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

    The EEOC Is Actively Targeting the Construction Industry

    Measure of Damages for a Chattel Including Loss of Use

    Slow Down?

    Navigate the New Health and Safety Norm With Construction Technology

    NY Construction Safety Firm Falsely Certified Workers, Says Manhattan DA

    Newmeyer Dillion Attorneys Named to 2020 Southern California Rising Stars List

    From Waste to Wealth: Texas Supreme Court Ruling in Cactus Water Defines Produced Water Ownership, Sets Stage for Clarity on Critical Mineral Markets in Texas

    Insurer Not Responsible for Insured's Assignment of Policy Benefits

    Updated Covid-19 Standards In The Workplace

    'There Was No Fighting This Fire,' California Survivor Says

    Cerberus, Blackstone Loosening Credit for U.S. Landlords

    California’s Fifth Appellate District Declares the “Right to Repair Act” the Exclusive Remedy for Construction Defect Claims

    How Finns Cut Construction Lead Times in Half

    AB 1701 – General Contractor Liability for Subcontractors’ Unpaid Wages

    Portion of Washington State’s Prevailing Wage Statute Struck Down … Again

    No Collapse Coverage Where Policy's Collapse Provisions Deleted

    140 Days Until The California Consumer Privacy Act Becomes Law - Why Aren't More Businesses Complying?

    Stuck in Seattle: The Aggravating Adventures of a Gigantic Tunnel Drill

    Framework, Tallest Mass Timber Project in the U.S., Is On Hold

    One Sector Is Building Strength Amid Slow Growth

    General Contractor’s Intentionally False Certifications Bar It From Any Recovery From Owner

    EEOC Suit Alleges Site Managers Bullied Black Workers on NY Project

    Public Works Bid Protests – Who Is Responsible? Who Is Responsive?

    Traub Lieberman Recognized in the 2026 Edition of Chambers USA

    Windows and Lawsuits Fly at W Hotel

    Prospective Additional Insureds May Be Obligated to Arbitrate Coverage Disputes

    Reasonable Expectations – Pennsylvania’s Case by Case Approach to the Sutton Rule

    "Over? Did You Say 'Over'?" Determining the Preclusive Effect of an Earlier Arbitration Award

    Insurer’s Broad Duty to Defend in Oregon, and the Recent Ruling in State of Oregon v. Pacific Indemnity Company

    French Government Fines National Architects' Group $1.6M Over Fee-Fixing

    How the Cumulative Impact Theory has been Defined

    One Shot to Get It Right: Navigating the COVID-19 Vaccine in the Workplace

    California Court Holds No Coverage Under Pollution Policy for Structural Improvements

    Licensing Reciprocity Comes to Virginia

    Specific Source of Water Not Relevant in Construction Defect Claim

    You Can Pay Me Now, or . . .

    Mortgage Whistleblower Stands Alone as U.S. Won’t Join Lawsuit

    Toolbox Talk Series: Direct Versus Consequential Damages--Is There a Clear Demarcation?

    Design, Legal and Accounting all Fight a War on Billable Hours After the Advent of AI

    New York Court Rejects Owner’s Bid for Additional Insured Coverage

    The Little Ice Age and Delay Claims

    West Coast Casualty’s Quarter Century of Service

    Excess Carrier Successfully Appeals Primary Insurer’s Summary Judgment Award

    Utah’s Highest Court Holds That Plaintiffs Must Properly Commence an Action to Rely on the Relation-Back Doctrine to Overcome the Statute of Repose
    Corporate Profile

    PENGILLY MINNESOTA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Pengilly, Minnesota Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Pengilly's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Pengilly, Minnesota

    Insured’s Failure to Determine Depreciation When Presenting Claim for Replacement Cost Value

    August 16, 2026 —
    The Third Circuit affirmed the district court’s granting of summary judgment to the insurer when the insured submitted replacement cost value of the loss but did not include a determination of depreciation. Kimmel v. Massachusetts Bay Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 16569 (3d Cir. June 9, 2026). A lightning strike downed a tree on the insured’s property, causing extensive damage to the home. The insured had a homeowner’s policy with Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company (MBIC). MBIC denied the claim, determining that much of the claimed damage already existed and that several policy exclusions otherwise barred coverage. The insured filed suit for breach of contract and bad faith. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Jurisdiction Over Foreign Manufacturers in Construction Litigation

    May 14, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the Washington Court of Appeals provides important guidance on personal jurisdiction over foreign product manufacturers in construction and infrastructure litigation. In King County v. Aquatherm GmbH, No. 85572-7-I (Wash.Ct. App.Div.I)(unpublished), the court addressed whether a German manufacturer could be sued in Washington for alleged defects in piping used in major public infrastructure projects. The ruling offers a detailed, fact-driven roadmap for how Washington courts evaluate jurisdiction over foreign manufacturers operating through layered distribution networks. It also reflects a broader trend toward focusing on real-world commercial conduct rather than formal corporate structure. Background of the Case King County sued after widespread failures in polypropylene piping installed at the King County Correctional Facility. The pipe, manufactured by Aquatherm GmbH in Germany, was marketed, distributed, and installed through a network of U.S.-based entities. Following a six-week trial, the jury returned a verdict exceeding $18 million on claims under the Washington Product Liability Act and Consumer Protection Act. Aquatherm challenged, among other things, the trial court's exercise of personal jurisdiction. Reprinted courtesy of Timothy J. Repass, Wood Smith Henning Berman and Miki J. Saito, Wood Smith Henning Berman Mr. Repass may be contacted at trepass@wshblaw.com Ms. Saito may be contacted at msaito@wshblaw.com Read the full story...

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Recognized by 2026 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!

    July 20, 2026 —
    Wilke Fleury is pleased to announce that 18 of the firm’s attorneys have been selected for inclusion on the 2026 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars lists. The annual Super Lawyers and Rising Stars selections recognize attorneys across a wide range of practice areas. This year’s honorees reflect the depth of Wilke Fleury’s litigation, business, healthcare, employment, bankruptcy, appellate, real estate, construction, and estate planning practices. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Wilke Fleury

    From CERCLA to Drinking Water: D.C. Circuit’s PFAS Ruling Enters a Second Regulatory Fight

    October 06, 2026 —
    On August 18, 2026, a unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld EPA’s designation of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund). In Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. EPA, the court rejected challenges to EPA’s interpretation of CERCLA Section 102(a), the adequacy of its notice and comment process, its analysis of costs and benefits, and its decision to proceed despite uncertainty about future response actions and costs. This decision is already being invoked in a separate D.C. Circuit challenge to EPA’s 2024 PFAS drinking water rule promulgated under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). Six days after the CERCLA decision, respondent intervenors cited it as supplemental authority in American Water Works Association v. EPA, No. 24-1188, ahead of oral argument scheduled for September 18, 2026. The Chamber of Commerce decision may assist the respondent intervenors on certain notice and comment and economic analysis arguments, but its significance should not be overstated. The principal challenges to the standards for the four PFAS subject to EPA’s Hazard Index-based maximum contaminant level (MCL) turn on requirements specific to the SDWA, and EPA itself now agrees that those provisions were promulgated through an unlawful process. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury, Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury and Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Four Kahana Feld Attorneys Selected to 2027 Southern California Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars Lists

    August 16, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – Aug. 3, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce that partners Jason Feld, Amir Kahana, and Sharon Oh-Kubisch were selected to the 2027 Southern California Super Lawyers list, and attorney Hannah Ellenhorn Bloom was selected to the 2027 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars list. Jason Feld was recognized in the area of Construction Litigation. He is a founding partner of Kahana Feld and focuses his practice on the defense of homebuilders, contractors, developers, and real estate professionals primarily in construction defect, general liability, insurance defense, construction accident, and real estate matters. He also represents government entities handling construction, premises liability, general liability, and environmental claims. He serves as panel counsel for many prominent insurance carriers, as well as personal counsel to several national and regional homebuilders, developers, and general contractors. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    Chambers USA Recognizes Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Practice in 2026 Guide

    June 29, 2026 —
    Hunton is pleased to announce that its insurance coverage practice was recognized nationally for Insurance: Dispute Resolution – Policyholder in the recently released 2026 Chambers USA guide. The team also received state rankings in Florida (Insurance: Dispute Resolution), Georgia (Insurance), the District of Columbia (Insurance: Policyholder), and Massachusetts (Insurance). In addition to the insurance team’s group recognition across multiple states, the 2026 guide included individual rankings for Lorelie “Lorie” S. Masters (USA Nationwide and District of Columbia), Latosha M. Ellis (District of Columbia), Michael S. Levine (District of Columbia), Koorosh “KT” Talieh (District of Columbia), Walter J. Andrews (Florida), Andrea DeField (Florida), Cary D. Steklof (Florida), Lawrence J. Bracken II (Georgia), and Geoffrey B. Fehling (Massachusetts). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    $356 Million Judgement Against Developer for Defective Construction of DC Condominium

    August 16, 2026 —
    On July 31, 2026, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia entered a $356,085,513.00 judgment against developers JBG Smith for defective construction and renovation of the Wardman Tower Residential Condominium in Washington, D.C. The case is Wardman Tower Residential Condominium Unit Owners Association v. JBG Smith Properties, et al., No. 2020 CA 004807 B (D.C. Super. Ct.). In a 148-page Trial Order, the D.C. Superior Court awarded $118,695,171.00 in damages in favor of the condominium association and against the condominium developers, including JBG Smith. The Court trebled those damages pursuant to the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“CPPA”) to reach an ultimate judgment of $356,085,513.00. See Cowie Law Group: DC Condominium Construction Defects: Recovering Attorney’s Fees, Litigation Expenses & Treble Damages Under the Consumer Protection Procedures Act. Cowie Law Group, P.C. filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Association in 2020. The firm represented the Association throughout years of pretrial discovery and ultimately served as trial counsel with Williams & Connolly LLP during a lengthy bench trial before the Honorable Yvonne Williams. The Cowie Law Group team included attorneys, George A. Bealefeld, III, Albert G. McCarraher, Stanford L. Kimmel, III and Nicholas D. Cowie. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Nicholas D. Cowie, Cowie Law Group
    Mr. Cowie may be contacted at ndc@cowielawgroup.com

    Nordics Are Europe’s Next Data Center Hub

    October 05, 2026 —
    On September 9, 2026, Google announced its largest single investment in Europe. The company commits at least €13 billion to Finnish data centers and energy infrastructure in 2027 and 2028, expanding the existing Hamina campus and adding three new sites in Kajaani, Muhos, and Vaala. For the construction sector, this is great news: thousands of hectares, dozens of buildings, and a construction program that will extend well beyond the two-year investment window. Four Sites, One Regional Cluster Google is not a newcomer in Finland. Back in 2009, it converted a former paper mill in Hamina into a seawater-cooled data center. It has invested around €4.5 billion there over 15 years, and the site’s waste heat already feeds Hamina’s district heating network. The new program shifts the center of gravity north, to the border of North Ostrobothnia and Kainuu. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi