BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    tract home expert witness Esko Minnesota Medical building expert witness Esko Minnesota casino resort expert witness Esko Minnesota multi family housing expert witness Esko Minnesota retail construction expert witness Esko Minnesota custom homes expert witness Esko Minnesota industrial building expert witness Esko Minnesota condominiums expert witness Esko Minnesota structural steel construction expert witness Esko Minnesota housing expert witness Esko Minnesota condominium expert witness Esko Minnesota hospital construction expert witness Esko Minnesota landscaping construction expert witness Esko Minnesota low-income housing expert witness Esko Minnesota high-rise construction expert witness Esko Minnesota custom home expert witness Esko Minnesota mid-rise construction expert witness Esko Minnesota office building expert witness Esko Minnesota production housing expert witness Esko Minnesota concrete tilt-up expert witness Esko Minnesota Subterranean parking expert witness Esko Minnesota townhome construction expert witness Esko Minnesota
    Esko Minnesota building consultant expertEsko Minnesota ada design expert witnessEsko Minnesota slope failure expert witnessEsko Minnesota OSHA expert witness constructionEsko Minnesota expert witness windowsEsko Minnesota stucco expert witnessEsko Minnesota construction defect expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Esko, Minnesota

    Minnesota Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Statutory warranties for one-year, two-year and ten-year periods limits types of construction defects actionable under warranty law; This statute (Chapter 327A) limits liability and excludes normal wear and tear, normal shrinkage caused by drying of the dwelling, loss due to insufficient ventilation, loss or damage from negligence, improper maintenance, or alteration to dwelling, loss or damage from failure to maintain or failure to mitigate


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Esko Minnesota

    Residential contractors need to be licensed. If you work in two or more trades, certain trades will require a license. Call the state for details.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Arrowhead Builders Association
    Local # 2415
    5255 Maple Grove Road
    HERMANTOWN, MN 55811

    Esko Minnesota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lake Region Builders Association
    Local # 2470
    1114 Hwy. 59 South Ste 2
    Detroit Lakes, MN 56501

    Esko Minnesota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Mid-Minnesota
    Local # 2450
    17068 Commercial Park Road
    Brainerd, MN 56401

    Esko Minnesota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Northern MN Builders Association
    Local # 2417
    802 S Pokegama Ave Ste A
    Grand Rapids, MN 55744

    Esko Minnesota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Headwaters Builders Association
    Local # 2480
    PO Box 402
    Bemidji, MN 56619

    Esko Minnesota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Vikingland Builders Assoc
    Local # 2495
    509 22ND AVE E Ste 200
    Alexandria, MN 56308

    Esko Minnesota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Central Minnesota Builders Association
    Local # 2410
    1124 W Saint Germain St
    Saint Cloud, MN 56301

    Esko Minnesota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Esko Minnesota


    Don't Count On a Housing Slowdown to Improve Affordability

    Can a Lease Force a Tenant's Insurer to Defend the Landlord?

    A Court-Side Seat: As SCOTUS Decides Another Regulatory “Takings” Case, a Flurry of Action at EPA

    China Allows Construction to Resume of High-Rise Stopped for Last Decade

    New Nafta Could Settle Canada-U.S. Lumber War, Resolute CEO Says

    AIA Releases Decennial 2017 Updates to its Contracts Suites

    Coverage Denied for Insured's Defective Product

    Let’s Get Surety Podcast – #126 Building the Future: AI, Construction and Law

    Performance Bond Primer: Need to Knows and Need to Dos

    Colorado’s New Construction Defect Law Takes Effect in September: What You Need to Know

    Skyline Cockpit’s Game-Changing Tower Crane Teleoperation

    This Is the Most Remote and Magical Hotel on Earth

    Consequential Damages From Subcontractor's Faulty Work Constitutes "Property Damage" and An "Occurrence"

    Stacking of Service Interruption and Contingent Business Interruption Coverages Permitted

    How BIM Can Serve Building Owners

    How I Prevailed on a Remote Jury Trial

    Avoid Drowning in Data: Keep Afloat with ESI in Construction Litigation

    Busting Major Alternative-Lending Myths

    Almost Nothing Is Impossible

    Second Circuit Finds Potential Ambiguity in Competing “Anti-Concurrent Cause” Provisions in Hurricane Sandy Property Loss

    Association Insurance Company v. Carbondale Glen Lot E-8, LLC: Federal Court Reaffirms That There Is No Duty to Defend or Indemnify A Builder For Defective Construction Work

    Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series, Part 7: How to Successfully Prepare, Submit and Negotiate the Claim

    Brandy Price, Dean Pillarella Named to Lawdragon's "Next Generation" List

    Texas LGI Homes Goes After First-Time Homeowners

    MapLab: Why More Americans Are Moving Toward Wildfire

    House Committee Kills Colorado's 2015 Attainable Housing Bill

    San Francisco Bay Bridge Tower Rod Fails Test

    The DOL Claims Most Independent Contractors Are Employees

    United States Supreme Court Upholds Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements

    Alert: Fraudulent Notice of Nonpayment Defense Applies to Payment Bond Claims

    Wisconsin Supreme Court Holds that Subrogation Waiver Does Not Violate Statute Prohibiting Limitation on Tort Liability in Construction Contracts

    Ensuing Loss Provision Found Ambiguous

    Policy's Operation Classification Found Ambiguous

    Time to Repair Nevada’s Construction Defect Laws?

    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Recognized as Largest Litigation Presence in Sacramento

    PSA: Be Sure to Document (Even When Time is Short)

    Force Majeure, Construction Delays, Labor Shortages and COVID-19

    How to Fireproof a Neighborhood

    Colorado’s Abbreviated Legislative Session Offers Builders a Reprieve

    Legislative Update: Bid Protest Law Changes to Benefit Contractors

    Run Spot...Run!

    OSHA Investigating Bridge Accident Resulting in Construction Worker Fatality

    Should I Stay or Should I Go? The Supreme Court Says “Stay”

    Colorado’s New Construction Defect Law Takes Effect in September: What You Need to Know

    Congratulations to Las Vegas Team on Their Successful Motion for Summary Judgment!

    Colorado statutory “property damage” caused by an “occurrence”

    Michigan: Identifying and Exploiting the "Queen Exception" to No-Fault Subrogation

    Forecast Sunny for Solar Contractors in California

    8 Secrets About Working with Contractors – Bad Contractor Series Part 5

    Staffing Company Not Entitled to Make a Claim Against a Payment Bond and Attorneys’ Fees on State Public Works Payment Bonds
    Corporate Profile

    ESKO MINNESOTA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Esko, Minnesota Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Esko's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Esko, Minnesota

    EPA Steps Back, Arizona Moves Forward

    May 12, 2026 —
    In a significant development for Arizona’s business community and environmental policymakers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has paused its planned reclassification of Maricopa County from “Moderate” to “Serious” ozone nonattainment status pursuant to the Clean Air Act’s National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). This decision marks a shift in federal air policy — one that recognizes the unique challenges faced by regions like metro Phoenix, where environmental conditions beyond local control are often key contributors to air quality readings. The EPA’s move follows a series of meetings between EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, Arizona elected officials, and business and civic leaders, including a recent roundtable in Phoenix convened by U.S. Senator Mark Kelly. In announcing the pause, Zeldin acknowledged the need for flexibility and fairness in the application of Clean Air Act standards, especially when emissions from other states, nations, and natural events significantly influence local air quality. Reprinted courtesy of Patrick J. Paul, Snell & Wilmer, John Habib, Snell & Wilmer and Sukhmani K. Singh, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Paul may be contacted at ppaul@swlaw.com Mr. Habib may be contacted at jhabib@swlaw.com Ms. Singh may be contacted at ssingh@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Hidden Risks Behind Today’s Stadium Construction Boom

    July 20, 2026 —
    After a decade-plus lull, professional sports leagues, universities and municipalities are once again spending heavily on new stadiums and major renovations. In the NFL alone, multiple marquee projects are underway or planned, representing more than $10 billion in facilities and mixed-use entertainment districts, rivaling or exceeding the scale of development during the last stadium-build cycle of the early 2000s. Beneath the excitement of architectural ambition and civic pride lies a risk landscape that has fundamentally changed since the last wave of stadium construction. Teams, cities and contractors that rely on outdated assumptions may find themselves exposed to cost overruns, schedule delays and liabilities that are far more difficult to unwind once construction is underway. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Insureds’ Altering Dates for Hailstorm Damage Justifies Denial of Claim

    June 02, 2026 —
    The Firth Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the insurer due to the insureds’ failure to establish the date of loss after a hailstorm. Cutchall v. Chubb Lloyds Ins. Co. of Texas, 2026 WL 625633 (5th Cir. March 5, 2026). In September 2021, the Cutchalls made a claim on their policy for interior water damage due to a hailstorm that breached their roof. Chubb retained two engineers to inspect the home, but neither found evidence that a hailstorm caused the damage. Instead, the engineers concluded a variety of other causes, such as poor ventilation and as-built defects, caused the damage. Because Chubb concluded that some of these other causes were covered by the policy, it paid only for the covered portions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Louisiana Legislature Enacts Act 932 – Significant Changes to Insurer Bad-Faith Exposure for Failure to Settle

    July 13, 2026 —
    The Louisiana Legislature has enacted Act 932 (formerly House Bill 1162), which became law this week without the Governor's signature pursuant to the Louisiana Constitution, after expiration of the applicable constitutional review period. Act 932 makes several important amendments to Louisiana's insurer bad-faith statute and appears intended, at least in part, to address issues arising from the Louisiana Supreme Court's decision in Kelly v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 169 So.3d 328 (La. 2015). The Act also makes changes regarding claim payments involving licensed contractors. The Act takes effect on August 1, 2026. Key Takeaways Act 932:
    • Limits certain bad-faith causes of action (bad faith failure to settle) involving personal injury and bodily injury claims where good-faith disputes exist or where an insurer has not been afforded sufficient opportunity to respond to a settlement demand.
    • Requires insurers and adjusters to verify a contractor's Louisiana license status before issuing claim payments when a contractor is named as a payee on a check for repair or restoration of immovable property.
    • Creates a statutory safe harbor protecting insurers from bad-faith penalties and attorney fees when payment delays result from an inability to verify a contractor's license, provided specified documentation and notice requirements are met.
    Reprinted courtesy of Tabitha R. Durbin, Lewis Brisbois and Jennifer E. Michel, Lewis Brisbois Ms. Durbin may be contacted at Tabitha.Durbin@lewisbrisbois.com Ms. Michel may be contacted at Jenny.Michel@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

    Structuring Water Resilience for Data Center Development: Water Rights, Reuse Incentives, and Emerging Disclosure Risk

    March 10, 2026 —
    As AI-driven data center development accelerates, developers, communities and regulators are increasingly focused on water demand—both the volume required and the sources from which that water will be drawn. While industry attention has largely centered on electricity procurement and grid impacts, the availability and legal entitlement to a firm water supply has become equally material to siting, permitting and community acceptance. Particularly as surface and groundwater supplies become increasingly constrained and new projects are sited in regions experiencing tighter hydrologic conditions or growth-related supply constraints, project teams are increasingly integrating water supply analysis into early-stage development to address issues that can materially affect schedule, financing and long-term operations. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh Myers, Pillsbury, Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury and Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Thomson Reuters Construction Law (Virginia Practice Series)

    March 31, 2026 —
    P&A Partners Michael A. Branca and Jennifer L. Harris have authored the most recent edition (2025) of Construction Law (Virginia Practice Series), part of Thomson Reuters’ ProView legal reference library. Associate Julia Loudenburg also provided substantial assistance for this edition. Construction Law includes summaries and analysis of statutes, regulations, and cases. It covers all major legal issues, including:
    • Licensing
    • Building code compliance
    • Public-private partnerships
    • Public contract bidding and performance
    • Dispute resolution
    • Damages
    • Third-party liability
    • Liens and bonds
    Reprinted courtesy of Jennifer L. Harris, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Michael A. Branca, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Ms. Harris may be contacted at jharris@pecklaw.com Mr. Branca may be contacted at mbranca@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    California Enacts Change Order Fair Payment Act

    March 24, 2026 —
    For private works construction contracts entered on or after January 1, 2026, recent legislation establishes a claims and dispute resolution process for change orders. The law is codified at Civil Code § 8850. A synopsis of the pertinent provisions includes the following:
    1. Submitting a Claim. Contractors or subcontractors must submit a detailed, documented claim when requesting additional time or payment.
    2. Owner’s Response Time. The owner must meet and confer within thirty (30) days after receiving the claim. Within ten (10) days of meeting, the owner must provide a written statement identifying which portions of the claim are undisputed and which are disputed. An owner’s failure to respond is treated as disputing the entire claim.
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael J. Baker, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Baker may be contacted at mjbaker@swlaw.com

    Are “Financial Hardship” Damages Recoverable?

    June 08, 2026 —
    In a case out of the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, F.O.G., LLC v. Department of the Interior, CBCA 8203, 2026 WL 1191881 (CBCA 2026) a contractor claimed damages that included “financial hardship” damages due to slow payments. The financial hardship damages included personal damages to the contractor’s president and his wife. Are these damages recoverable? Drumroll…The Board ruled that the contractor cannot recover such financial hardship damages. As it relates the personal financial hardship damages, the Board ruled, “Neither [the contractor’s] president nor his wife are a party to this contract, are in privity of contract with [the government], or are the beneficiaries under this contract. [The contractor], therefore, cannot recover for any losses that either one has suffered individually and that [the contractor] claimed in this appeal.” F.O.G., LLC, supra. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com