BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    casino resort expert witness Caseville Michigan industrial building expert witness Caseville Michigan structural steel construction expert witness Caseville Michigan hospital construction expert witness Caseville Michigan retail construction expert witness Caseville Michigan multi family housing expert witness Caseville Michigan institutional building expert witness Caseville Michigan Medical building expert witness Caseville Michigan mid-rise construction expert witness Caseville Michigan condominiums expert witness Caseville Michigan concrete tilt-up expert witness Caseville Michigan custom home expert witness Caseville Michigan townhome construction expert witness Caseville Michigan office building expert witness Caseville Michigan high-rise construction expert witness Caseville Michigan parking structure expert witness Caseville Michigan housing expert witness Caseville Michigan Subterranean parking expert witness Caseville Michigan landscaping construction expert witness Caseville Michigan tract home expert witness Caseville Michigan condominium expert witness Caseville Michigan production housing expert witness Caseville Michigan
    Caseville Michigan building code compliance expert witnessCaseville Michigan expert witnesses fenestrationCaseville Michigan roofing and waterproofing expert witnessCaseville Michigan building code expert witnessCaseville Michigan construction expert testimonyCaseville Michigan building consultant expertCaseville Michigan construction expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Caseville, Michigan

    Michigan Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Article 24 of the Occupational Code dictates that a complaint against a builder must be filed with the Department of Consumer and Industry Service within 18 months of the completion, occupancy or purchase of a residence. If building official determines complaint has merit, "Notice to Respondent: sent to provide builder with opportunity to repair; additional administrative procedures follow to conclusion; Individual townships have local rules regarding properties; Example: Bloomfield has mandated that structures must meet ongoing minimum maintenance standards.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Caseville Michigan

    Residential contractors need to be licensed. License required for plumbing and electrical trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Mid-Eastern Michigan Home Builders Association
    Local # 2365
    3823 W Wheeler Rd
    Standish, MI 48658
    Caseville Michigan Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builder & Remodelers of Greater Northwest Michigan
    Local # 2357
    PO Box 1062
    Big Rapids, MI 49307

    Caseville Michigan Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Central Michigan
    Local # 2364
    2026 Independence Dr
    Mount Pleasant, MI 48858

    Caseville Michigan Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Midland County
    Local # 2360
    PO Box 1763 7600 Commerce Court Ste. C
    Midland, MI 48641

    Caseville Michigan Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of West Michigan
    Local # 2390
    PO Box 247
    Hesperia, MI 49421

    Caseville Michigan Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Bay County
    Local # 2316
    2939 Bay Arenac Dr
    Bay City, MI 48706

    Caseville Michigan Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Saginaw
    Local # 2378
    3165 Cabaret Trl S
    Saginaw, MI 48603

    Caseville Michigan Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Caseville Michigan


    School Board Sues Multiple Firms over Site Excavation Problem

    Insurer Not Responsible for Insured's Assignment of Policy Benefits

    NTSB Pittsburgh Bridge Probe Update Sheds Light on Collapse Sequence

    How To Lock Disputes Out Of Your Project In Construction

    Ways of Evaluating Property Damage Claims in Various Contexts

    Policy Reformed to Add New Building Owner as Additional Insured

    Blog Completes Fifteenth Year

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Builder’s Risk Indeed”

    Construction Law Alert: Appellate Court Lets Broad General Release Stand in SB 800 Case

    New Florida Law Adds Licensing Risk to Contractor/Subcontractor Payment Disputes

    Bridges Crumble as Muni Rates at Least Since ’60s Ignored

    Architect Plans to 3D-Print a Two-Story House

    BHA has a Nice Swing Benefits the Wounded Warrior Project

    Pulte’s Kitchen Innovation Throw Down

    Homebuilding Down in North Dakota

    DOD Contractors Receive Reprieve on Implementation of Chinese Telecommunications Ban

    Supreme Court Set to Alter Law on Key Project, Workforce Issues

    Burden of Proof Under All-Risk Property Insurance Policy

    Condo Building Increasing in Washington D.C.

    Court of Appeal Holds Only “Named Insureds” May Sue for Bad Faith Under California FAIR Plan Policy

    DOI Finalizes Long-Awaited Modernization of Type A Natural Resource Damage Assessment Regulations

    Don’t Do this When it Comes to Construction Liens

    Association Insurance Company v. Carbondale Glen Lot E-8, LLC: Federal Court Reaffirms That There Is No Duty to Defend or Indemnify A Builder For Defective Construction Work

    Home Sales Topping $100 Million Smash U.S. Price Records

    Shoring of Problem Girders at Salesforce Transit Center Taking Longer than Expected

    COVID-19 Response: Environmental Compliance Worries in the Time of Coronavirus

    Delaware “occurrence” and exclusions j(5) and j(6)

    Winners Announced in Seattle’s Office-to-Residential Call for Ideas Contest

    Taylor Morrison Home Corp’ New San Jose Development

    Executive Insights 2024: Leaders in Construction Law

    Floating Crane on Job in NYC's East River Has a Storied Past of Cold War Intrigue

    Building with Recycled Plastics – Interview with Jeff Mintz of Envirolastech

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized as 2022 Illinois Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars

    School District Settles Construction Lawsuit

    Australian Developer Denies Building Problems Due to Construction Defects

    Connecting IoT Data to BIM

    Not Everything Flows Downhill (At Least Not In New York): The Importance of Understanding How New York Courts Interpret Subcontract Incorporation by Reference and Flow-Down Provisions

    Timber Prices Likely to Keep Rising

    Ensuing Loss Provision Does Not Salvage Coverage

    Two Paths to Industrialized Construction: Lessons from China

    White House Explores Opening Antitrust Probe on Homebuilders

    “Genuine” Issue of “Material” Fact and Summary Judgments

    Trump Order Waives Project Environment Rules to Push COVID-19 Recovery

    What is a Personal Injury?

    Louisiana Court Applies Manifestation Trigger to Affirm Denial of Coverage

    Environmental Due Diligence - What's The Hold Up?

    Subcontractor's Faulty Workmanship Is Not an "Occurrence"

    Comparing Contracts: A Review of the AIA 201 and ConsensusDocs - Part I

    Enforceability Of Subcontract “Pay-When-Paid” Provisions – An Important Update

    Florida Condo Collapse Victims Reach $1 Billion Settlement
    Corporate Profile

    CASEVILLE MICHIGAN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Caseville, Michigan Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Caseville's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Caseville, Michigan

    From CERCLA to Drinking Water: D.C. Circuit’s PFAS Ruling Enters a Second Regulatory Fight

    October 06, 2026 —
    On August 18, 2026, a unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld EPA’s designation of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund). In Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. EPA, the court rejected challenges to EPA’s interpretation of CERCLA Section 102(a), the adequacy of its notice and comment process, its analysis of costs and benefits, and its decision to proceed despite uncertainty about future response actions and costs. This decision is already being invoked in a separate D.C. Circuit challenge to EPA’s 2024 PFAS drinking water rule promulgated under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). Six days after the CERCLA decision, respondent intervenors cited it as supplemental authority in American Water Works Association v. EPA, No. 24-1188, ahead of oral argument scheduled for September 18, 2026. The Chamber of Commerce decision may assist the respondent intervenors on certain notice and comment and economic analysis arguments, but its significance should not be overstated. The principal challenges to the standards for the four PFAS subject to EPA’s Hazard Index-based maximum contaminant level (MCL) turn on requirements specific to the SDWA, and EPA itself now agrees that those provisions were promulgated through an unlawful process. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury, Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury and Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Utah’s Emerging Framework for Responsible Data Center Development

    September 08, 2026 —
    Utah is establishing itself as one of the nation’s most attractive jurisdictions for large-scale data center development, with a structured, defensible regulatory pathway that gives developers and investors the clarity needed to deploy capital at scale. The cornerstone is Executive Order 2026-03, “Establishing a Higher Bar for Data Center Development in Utah,” signed by Governor Spencer J. Cox on May 29, 2026. The Executive Order creates an actionable compliance framework letting developers demonstrate stewardship across water, air quality, energy, wildlife, and community engagement – reducing regulatory and reputational risk. Recent enactments on energy self-supply and water rights operationalize these principles, while a few counties have adopted short-term local moratoria to update zoning; understanding how these interact with the state framework matters for site selection. Reprinted courtesy of Denise A. Dragoo, Snell & Wilmer and Josh Miller, Snell & Wilmer Ms. Dragoo may be contacted at ddragoo@swlaw.com Mr. Miller may be contacted at jmiller@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Los Angeles Times Ranks Lewis Brisbois Third Largest Firm in LA County, Largest for Litigation

    June 08, 2026 —
    The Los Angeles Times has ranked Lewis Brisbois the third largest firm in LA County by attorney headcount, and first for number of litigation attorneys. Lewis Brisbois, whose Los Angeles office is led by Co-Managing Partners Jana I. Lubert and Kathleen Walker, has 273 attorneys working in LA County, including 167 partners. The firm ranked No. 1 for Litigation in the county, with 206 attorneys under the leadership of Partner Craig Holden. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Parties’ Post-Default Conduct Cannot Validate Void Default Orders

    August 24, 2026 —
    After filing a lawsuit, the first step is always serving process on the opposing party. While that preliminary step sounds basic enough, in McMahan v. Grasshopper, the Arizona Supreme Court recently provided a helpful refresher on the nuances of the service requirement and its importance in litigation for plaintiffs and defendants alike.1 Background McMahan arose from a hit-and-run where a tractor-trailer collided with safety barricades and injured a construction worker. The construction worker sued the tractor-trailer company, and he attempted to serve the company by leaving a copy of the complaint with the assistant to the company’s statutory agent who forwarded the complaint to the company. The assistant, however, was not authorized to accept service on the company’s behalf. Before the company appeared in the action, the construction worker successfully obtained an entry of default. Reprinted courtesy of Joseph Kanefield, Snell & Wilmer, Ryan P. Hogan, Snell & Wilmer and Lilly M. Geiler, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Kanefield may be contacted at jkanefield@swlaw.com Mr. Hogan may be contacted at rhogan@swlaw.com Ms. Geiler may be contacted at lgeiler@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    AI Data Centers Become City-Scale Infrastructure, Prompting New Industry Playbook

    August 11, 2026 —
    AI data centers are no longer just buildings. They are increasingly reaching power-demand levels more commonly associated with municipalities, prompting industry groups to launch a new framework they say is needed to keep pace with rapidly changing power, cooling and reliability requirements. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Breaking Ground On New California Public Works Prevailing Wage Requirements

    April 27, 2026 —
    Seyfarth Synopsis: As of January 1, 2026, AB 889 bulldozed California’s Prevailing Wage law, which impacts public works employers—including public agencies, the contractors that work for them, and private owners and developers whose projects may be subject to public works requirements. The amended law reframes the calculation of fringe benefits for individuals who work on public works project and mandates annualization of such benefits, demolishes the practice of frontloading these benefits, and requires employers to maintain inspection-ready records of compliance. This year, AB 889 significantly revised California’s prevailing wage law, codified at Labor Code section 1773.1, to clarify the state’s prevailing wage regulations and streamline enforcement. Accordingly, as of January 1, 2026, California public works employers are required to annualize employees’ fringe benefits and maintain specific documentation demonstrating statutory compliance. These new obligations impact public agencies and their contractors, as well as private owners and developers whose projects may be subject to public works requirements. Continue reading for the blueprint of how to comply with the state’s amended prevailing wage law. Reprinted courtesy of Heather Frisch, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Christopher Bouquet, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Ashley Stein, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Ms. Frisch may be contacted at hfrisch@seyfarth.com Mr. Bouquet may be contacted at cbouquet@seyfarth.com Ms. Stein may be contacted at astein@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    Legal 500 US Ranks Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Team Among Top Policyholder Practices in 2026 Guide

    July 06, 2026 —
    Hunton’s insurance coverage practice was once again recognized among the nation’s top policyholder insurance practices, receiving a Band 2 national ranking in the 2026 United States Edition of The Legal 500 for Insurance: Advice to Policyholders. The Legal 500 recognizes firms solely based on merit through numerous factors including client feedback and peer input. Bolstering the team’s national recognition, several coverage lawyers received individual accolades: special counsel Lorelie “Lorie” S. Masters was named to The Legal 500’s Hall of Fame; team head Syed S. Ahmad and partner Michael S. Levine were named Leading Lawyers; and partners Andrea DeField and Latosha M. Ellis were named Next Generation Partners. In addition, partners Walter J. Andrews, Lawrence J. Bracken II, and Koorosh “KT” Talieh were recognized as Key Lawyers on the team. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    At the Frontier of Change: How—or Where—to Rebuild as Alaska's Permafrost Disappears

    September 28, 2026 —
    In some areas of the tiny subsistence coastal village of Kwigillingok along the Bering Sea in western Alaska, pockets of ground feel squishy, almost gelatinous, rather than solid. It’s an odd sensation, as if there is only a thin layer of muddy soil preventing people from falling into the water beneath their feet. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pam McFarland, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. McFarland may be contacted at mcfarlandp@enr.com