BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    housing expert witness Grafton Massachusetts parking structure expert witness Grafton Massachusetts Subterranean parking expert witness Grafton Massachusetts condominium expert witness Grafton Massachusetts mid-rise construction expert witness Grafton Massachusetts office building expert witness Grafton Massachusetts tract home expert witness Grafton Massachusetts production housing expert witness Grafton Massachusetts retail construction expert witness Grafton Massachusetts condominiums expert witness Grafton Massachusetts custom home expert witness Grafton Massachusetts Medical building expert witness Grafton Massachusetts townhome construction expert witness Grafton Massachusetts hospital construction expert witness Grafton Massachusetts casino resort expert witness Grafton Massachusetts structural steel construction expert witness Grafton Massachusetts landscaping construction expert witness Grafton Massachusetts high-rise construction expert witness Grafton Massachusetts concrete tilt-up expert witness Grafton Massachusetts institutional building expert witness Grafton Massachusetts custom homes expert witness Grafton Massachusetts industrial building expert witness Grafton Massachusetts
    Grafton Massachusetts contractor expert witnessGrafton Massachusetts stucco expert witnessGrafton Massachusetts construction claims expert witnessGrafton Massachusetts expert witness structural engineerGrafton Massachusetts expert witnesses fenestrationGrafton Massachusetts construction expert witnessesGrafton Massachusetts delay claim expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Grafton, Massachusetts

    Massachusetts Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Grafton Massachusetts

    No state license required for general contracting. Licensure required for plumbing and electrical trades. Companies selling home repair services must be registered with the state.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Massachusetts Home Builders Association
    Local # 2200
    700 Congress St Suite 200
    Quincy, MA 02169

    Grafton Massachusetts Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Greater Boston
    Local # 2220
    700 Congress St. Suite 202
    Quincy, MA 02169

    Grafton Massachusetts Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders and Remodelers Association of Western Mass
    Local # 2270
    240 Cadwell Dr
    Springfield, MA 01104

    Grafton Massachusetts Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Central Massachusetts Inc
    Local # 2280
    51 Pullman Street
    Worcester, MA 01606

    Grafton Massachusetts Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Bristol-Norfolk Home Builders Association
    Local # 2211
    65 Neponset Ave Ste 3
    Foxboro, MA 02035

    Grafton Massachusetts Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    North East Builders Assn of MA
    Local # 2255
    170 Main St Suite 205
    Tewksbury, MA 01876

    Grafton Massachusetts Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders & Remodelers Association of Cape Cod
    Local # 2230
    9 New Venture Dr #7
    South Dennis, MA 02660

    Grafton Massachusetts Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Grafton Massachusetts


    Colorado Springs may be Next Colorado City to Add Construction Defects Ordinance

    The G2G Mid-Year Roundup (2022)

    What to Know Before Building a Guesthouse

    Bert L. Howe & Associates Celebrates 21-Year Success Story

    Jury Convicts Ciminelli, State Official in Bid-Rig Case

    With Trump's Tariff Talk, Time to Negotiate for Escalation Clauses in Construction Contracts

    Hunton Insurance Coverage Group Ranked in National Tier 1 by US News & World Report

    Accident/Occurrence Requirement Does not Preclude Coverage for Vicarious Liability or Negligent Supervision

    2011 West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar – Recap

    My Employees Could Have COVID-19. What Now?

    Cardinal Change Examines the Entire, Factual Undertaking

    Retroactive Application of a Construction Subcontract Containing a Merger Clause? Florida’s Fifth District Court of Appeal Answers in the Affirmative

    The Indemnification Limitation in Section 725.06 does not apply to Utility Horizontal-Type Projects

    Strict Rules for Home Remodel Contracts in California

    Why’d You Have To Say That?

    Does Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code Impact Your Construction Project?

    Are Untimely Repairs an “Occurrence” Triggering CGL Coverage?

    Los Angeles Office Secures Summary Judgment for Electric Company Client in Asbestos Lawsuit

    Congratulations to San Diego Partner Alex Giannetto and Senior Associate Michael Ibach on Settling a Case 3 Weeks Into a 5-Week Trial!

    A Riveting (or at Least Insightful) Explanation of the Privette Doctrine

    Housing Inflation Begins to Rise

    Illinois Federal Court Applies Insurer-Friendly “Mutual Exclusive Theories” Test To Independent Counsel Analysis

    “Source of Duty,” Tort, and Contract, Oh My!

    Washington Court of Appeals Upholds Standard of Repose in Fruit Warehouse Case

    Application of Ordinance and Law Coverage in Property Insurance Policy and Twenty-Five Percent Rule

    It Was a Wild Week for Just About Everyone. Ok, Make that Everyone.

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “How Bad Is It?”

    Insurer Must Defend Construction Defect Claims

    Connecticut Court Clarifies Construction Coverage

    Trump’s Infrastructure Weak

    Environmental Update: Regulatory Notes – April 2025

    Court of Federal Claims: Upstream Hurricane Harvey Case Will Proceed to Trial

    Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series, Part 6: Ensuring Availability of Insurance and State Regulations

    Fifth Circuit: Primary Insurer Relieved of Duty to Defend Without Release of Liability of Insured

    Construction Defect Suit Can Continue Against Plumber

    Rhode Island District Court Dismisses Plaintiff’s Case for Spoliation Due to Potential Unfair Prejudice to Defendant

    Break out the Neon: ‘80s Era Davis-Bacon “Prevailing Wage” Definition Restored in DOL Final Rule

    Brian Newberry Accepted into ABOTA

    Settlement Ends Construction Defect Lawsuit for School

    On Rehearing, Fifth Circuit Finds Contractual-Liability Exclusion Does Not Apply

    Ontario Court of Appeal Clarifies the Meaning of "Living in the Same Household" for Purposes of Coverage Under a Homeowners Policy

    Federal Court Denies Summary Judgment in Leaky Condo Conversion

    BWB&O Partner Tyler Offenhauser and Associate Lizbeth Lopez Won Their Motion for Summary Judgment Based on the Privette Doctrine

    Court Finds Matching of Damaged Materials is Required by Policy

    Travelers Injury Impact Report Highlights Longer Recovery Times Amid Declining Injury Rates

    California Appellate Court Rules That Mistakenly Grading the Wrong Land Is Not an Accident

    Toolbox Talk Series Recap – Arbitration Motion Practice

    Demanding a Reduction in Retainage

    Steel Cooling: Steel Costs Steadily Decline After Pandemic Price Shock

    Changes to Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act in New York Introduced
    Corporate Profile

    GRAFTON MASSACHUSETTS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Grafton, Massachusetts Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Grafton's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Grafton, Massachusetts

    Newmeyer Dillion Partner Jeff Masters Recognized by Chambers USA for Representation of Insurance Policyholders

    June 08, 2026 —
    NEWPORT BEACH, Calif. – June 4, 2026 – Newmeyer Dillion is proud to announce that litigation partner Jeffrey D. Masters has been ranked among a select group of California lawyers representing insurance policyholders in the 2026 edition of Chambers USA. This marks two consecutive years of recognition for Masters by this prestigious international attorney rating resource. "This recognition by Chambers and Partners is a testament to Jeff’s dedication to our clients," said Managing Partner, Paul Tetzloff. "We are thrilled to see his hard work acknowledged and the level of passion and care that he delivers to clients fully recognized." Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Newmeyer Dillion

    Contract Disputes Act and Jurisdictional Requirements

    March 17, 2026 —
    When dealing with a claim on a federal construction project, there are a couple of key background jurisdictional points. These points were briefly highlighted in the recent appeal, Mega Star Logistics Service Co. v. Department of State, CBCA 8232, 2026 WL 253738 (CBCA 2026). Here are the two points. FIRST, when it comes to jurisdiction, for a board of contract appeals “to exercise jurisdiction over a claim, the CDA [Contract Disputes Act] requires the contractor to submit a written claim to the contracting officer for a COFD [contracting officer final decision], with a subsequent appeal of the COFD or deemed denial if the CO [contracting officer] does not issue a COFD.” Thus, you need to submit a formal claim under the Contract Disputes Act to the contracting officer to get a final decision from the contracting officer (or the contracting officer waiving the final decision by not timely furnishing one). Mega Star Logistics, supra. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Soot Constitutes Property Damage

    March 17, 2026 —
    Applying Missouri law, the Eighth Circuit affirmed the jury verdict awarding damages for the presence of soot after a fire. Maxus Metropolitan, LLC v. Travelers Property Cas. Co. of Am., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 29921 (8th Cir. Nov, 17, 2025). A fire destroyed Phase 6 of a multi-building apartment complex known as the Metropolitan. At the time of the fire, all six phases of the Metropolitan were at various stages of completion, including some of which were occupied by tenants. Phase 6 was still under construction. The fire caused severe damage to Phase 5. The interiors of Phases 1-4 were unaffected by the fire. Maxus Metropolitan, the owner of the complex, had a policy with Travelers which covered up to $35 million in “direct physical loss, . . or damage.” The policy also provided coverage for up to $5 million in lost business income. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Construction Companies Are Nearly Seven Times Safer With These Best Practices

    June 15, 2026 —
    WASHINGTON, May 4—Associated Builders and Contractors released its 2026 Health and Safety Performance Report, an annual guide to health and safety best practices on construction jobsites. The 2026 report shows the positive effects of participating in ABC’s STEP® Health and Safety Management System, which enables top-performing ABC members to achieve incident rates 686% safer than the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics construction industry average, reducing total recordable incident rates by 85%. Established in 1989, STEP is a proven system that provides contractors and suppliers with a robust, no-cost framework for measuring health and safety data and benchmarking with peers in the industry. This self-assessment tool helps participants identify real opportunities for scalable growth in their health and safety programs to lower their total recordable incident rates and become an employer of choice in a competitive labor market. Reprinted courtesy of ABC, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Contractor Dispute Resolution Framework and Prevention

    July 06, 2026 —
    WHAT DEFINES A CONTRACTOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION FRAMEWORK A contractor dispute resolution framework is a structured system of contractual terms, governance processes and escalation pathways designed to prevent, manage and resolve conflicts between contracting parties with minimal disruption to cost, schedule and performance. The framework operates as both a preventive control and a corrective mechanism. Preventive elements establish clarity in scope, expectations and accountability before work begins. Corrective elements define how disagreements are identified, documented, escalated and resolved once they arise. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    The “Pay When Paid” Clause in California Construction—Strategies as the Battle Continues

    August 03, 2026 —
    It is well known in California Construction circles that the “Pay If Paid” clause is illegal in this state. There is a great distinction, though, between this clause and a similar clause, known as a “Pay When Paid” clause. A pay if paid clause allows a contractor to tell a subcontractor that if the contractor is unpaid for the subcontractor’s work, then the contractor has no legal obligation to pay the subcontractor, ever. For a great variety of reasons, the California Supreme Court, in the case of Wm. R. Clarke Corp v. Safeco Ins. Co. of America (1997) 15 Cal.4th 882, declared this type of clause illegal in California Construction. Although the pay if paid clause is illegal in California, the pay when paid clause is still perfectly legal and is found in many subcontracts that contractors issue to their subcontractors. The pay when paid clause allows a contractor to delay paying its subcontractors until the dispute between the contractor and the property owner over payment has been resolved and the contractor is paid by the property owner. Although seemingly reasonable (since it merely delays payment until the contractor is paid by the owner, thereby providing a funding source to pay subcontractors), significant problems still arise. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of William L. Porter, Porter Law Group
    Mr. Porter may be contacted at bporter@porterlaw.com

    Insurer Cannot Dispose of Water Leak or Bad Faith Claims on Motion for Summary Judgment

    July 20, 2026 —
    The insurer’s motion for summary judgment seeking to eliminate the insured’s claims for damage from a water leak, bad faith and punitive damages failed. Nargizyan v, State Farm General Ins. Co., 2026 Cal App. LEXIS 302 (Cal. Ct. App. April 15, 2026). The insured noticed tiles on his kitchen floor were warmer than usual. He found water dripping from the top of the crawl space under the house. He noticed water was “dripping in different places” but not pouring like a faucet. “There were too many places to count where water was dripping and there was water all over the place.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Lawmakers Vote to Reauthorize Programs to Support Water Quality, Coastal Protection

    April 20, 2026 —
    The U.S. House of Representatives has passed a package of 14 bills that includes measures to reauthorize several U.S. Environmental Protection Agency programs to protect and restore critical water ecosystems, expand access to broadband, reduce regulatory requirements on airport projects and programs and lower costs of federal buildings. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pam McFarland, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. McFarland may be contacted at mcfarlandp@enr.com