BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    retail construction expert witness Severna Park Maryland production housing expert witness Severna Park Maryland townhome construction expert witness Severna Park Maryland parking structure expert witness Severna Park Maryland landscaping construction expert witness Severna Park Maryland institutional building expert witness Severna Park Maryland concrete tilt-up expert witness Severna Park Maryland condominium expert witness Severna Park Maryland custom home expert witness Severna Park Maryland Subterranean parking expert witness Severna Park Maryland office building expert witness Severna Park Maryland high-rise construction expert witness Severna Park Maryland Medical building expert witness Severna Park Maryland condominiums expert witness Severna Park Maryland structural steel construction expert witness Severna Park Maryland multi family housing expert witness Severna Park Maryland tract home expert witness Severna Park Maryland industrial building expert witness Severna Park Maryland low-income housing expert witness Severna Park Maryland mid-rise construction expert witness Severna Park Maryland hospital construction expert witness Severna Park Maryland casino resort expert witness Severna Park Maryland
    Severna Park Maryland hospital construction expert witnessSeverna Park Maryland expert witnesses fenestrationSeverna Park Maryland construction safety expertSeverna Park Maryland testifying construction expert witnessSeverna Park Maryland structural engineering expert witnessesSeverna Park Maryland construction project management expert witnessesSeverna Park Maryland window expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Severna Park, Maryland

    Maryland Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Severna Park Maryland

    License required for electrical, plumbing, HVAC, and home improvement.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Maryland National Capital Building Industry Association
    Local # 2178
    1738 Elton Rd Ste 200
    Silver Spring, MD 20903

    Severna Park Maryland Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Maryland State Builders Association
    Local # 2100
    204 Duke of Gloucester St
    Annapolis, MD 21401

    Severna Park Maryland Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Maryland
    Local # 2125
    7127 Ambassador Rd Ste 150
    Baltimore, MD 21244

    Severna Park Maryland Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Frederick County Builders Association
    Local # 2175
    186 Thomas Johnson Dr Ste 204
    Frederick, MD 21702

    Severna Park Maryland Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Western Maryland
    Local # 2150
    16 Greene St
    Cumberland, MD 21502

    Severna Park Maryland Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Eastern Shore Building Industry Association Affil w/National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 2118
    PO Box 3104
    Salisbury, MD 21804

    Severna Park Maryland Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Severna Park Maryland


    Kahana Feld Partner Dominic Donato Receives a Pre-Answer Motion to Dismiss

    Beam Fracture on Closed Mississippi River Bridge Is at Least Two Years Old

    Court Addresses HOA Attempt to Restrict Short Term Rentals

    Federal Court Again Confirms No Coverage For Construction Defects in Hawaii

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (3/18/25) – Data Center Frenzy, China’s Expanding REIT Market and Tariff-Affected Construction Costs

    A Riveting (or at Least Insightful) Explanation of the Privette Doctrine

    Court Addresses Insurers' Dispute Over Which is Primary, Which is Excess

    Southern California Super Lawyers Recognizes Four Snell & Wilmer Attorneys As Rising Stars

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Recognized by 2026 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!

    Who Says You Can’t Choose between Liquidated Damages or Actual Damages?

    Insurers Dispute Sharing of Defense in Construction Defect Case

    Follow the Dispute Resolution Provision(s) in Your Contract

    States Sue Trump Admin Over Wind Energy Permitting Pause

    Haight Brown & Bonesteel Ranked on the 2017 "Best Law Firms" List by U.S. News - Best Lawyers

    Two Snell & Wilmer Attorneys Selected as 2026 San Diego Super Lawyers Rising Stars

    Contract Change #8: Direct Communications between Owners and Contractors (law note)

    California Court of Appeal Finds Coverage for Injured Worker Despite Contractor's Exclusion

    EPA, Maryland Sue DC Water Over Massive Potomac River Sewage Spill

    Ortega Outbids Pros to Build $10 Billion Property Empire

    Top 10 Insurance Cases of 2024

    Ill-fated Complaint Fails to State Claims Against Broker and FEMA

    Statutes of Limitations May be the Colorado Contractors’ Friend

    Mitigating Mold Exposure in Manufacturing and Multifamily Buildings

    Documentation Important for Defending Construction Defect Claims

    Are You Taking Full Advantage of Available Reimbursements for Assisting Injured Workers?

    Federal Court Holds that Demolition Exclusion Does Not Apply and Carrier Has Duty to Defend Additional Insureds

    The U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals Rules on Greystone

    Snell & Wilmer’s Orange County Office Recognized as One of the “Best Places to Work” by the Orange County Business Journal

    What Startup Funding Reveals About the Future of Construction Technology

    For Urban Walkers, a Patchy Dilemma: Who Owns the Sidewalk?

    Where-Forum Art Thou? Is the Chosen Forum Akin to No Forum at All?

    Compliance Doesn’t Pay: Compliance Evidence Inadmissible in Strict Liability Actions

    Connecticut Appellate Court Breaks New Ground on Policy Exhaustion

    Nevada Supreme Court Holds That Insureds Can Use Extrinsic Evidence to Prove Duty to Defend

    Dynamics of Managing Professional Liability Claims for Design Builders

    Top 10 Cases of 2019

    Court of Appeals Discusses Implied Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Public Works Contracting

    The Prompt Payment Act Obligation is Not Triggered When the Owner Holds Less Retention from the General Contractor

    Missouri Asbestos Litigation Reform: New Bill Seeks to Establish Robust Disclosure Obligations

    Filing Motion to Increase Lien Transfer Bond (Before Trial Court Loses Jurisdiction Over Final Judgment)

    U.S. Supreme Court Allows Climate Change Lawsuits to Proceed in State Court

    Construction Calamity: Risk Transfer Tips for Contractors After a Catastrophic Loss

    Real Estate Developer Convicted in $1.3 Billion Tax Case After Juror Removed

    Construction Defects Are Not An Occurrence Under New York, New Jersey Law

    Arctic Fires Are Melting Permafrost That Keeps Carbon Underground

    U.S. Architecture Firms’ Billing Index Faster in Dec.

    Legislative Changes that Impact Construction 2017

    Do Municipal Gas Bans Slow the Clean Hydrogen Transition in Real Estate?

    In Massachusetts, the Statute of Repose Applies to Consumer Protection Claims Against Building Contractors

    HHMR is pleased to announce that David McLain has been selected as a 2020 Super Lawyer
    Corporate Profile

    SEVERNA PARK MARYLAND CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Severna Park, Maryland Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Severna Park's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Severna Park, Maryland

    No Bad Faith Despite Insurer’s Appraisal Award Exceeding Initial Payment

    August 03, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment, finding no bad faith despite the appraisal award exceeding the amount the insurer initially paid. Jazi Kat 4659 Rockridge LLC, et al. v. Travelers Cas. Ins. Co. of Am., et al., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105634 (D. Ariz. May 13, 2026). Plaintiffs sued Travelers for breach of contract and bad faith, alleging that Travelers failed to pay money plaintiffs were owed under the policy. Plaintiffs held a commercial property policy for two properties. A fire destroyed one of the properties. Travelers adjusted the claim and issued two payments. Plaintiffs disagreed with the amount of the payments and demanded an appraisal. Travelers agreed to the appraisal. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Arizona Court of Appeals Clarifies Homeowners Association Open Meeting Requirements

    June 29, 2026 —
    A Z N H Revocable Trust v. Sunland Springs Village Homeowners Association, No. 1 CA-CV 25-0424 (Ariz. Ct. App. Apr. 28, 2026) OVERVIEW The Arizona Court of Appeals issued an opinion clarifying how homeowners associations must conduct meetings under A.R.S. § 33-1804. The decision reinforces the legislative policy favoring transparency in association governance, bringing association meeting requirements more in line with the open meeting standards applicable to public bodies under A.R.S. § 38-431 et seq. (Arizona’s Open Meeting Law). KEY HOLDINGS 1. All Voting and Formal Actions Must Occur in Open Meetings The Court affirmed that association boards cannot vote or take formal action during closed (executive) sessions. Under A.R.S. § 33-1804(A), associations may close portions of meetings only for “consideration” of certain enumerated topics, such as legal advice, pending litigation, or personal/financial information about individual members. The Court interpreted “consideration” to mean discussion and deliberation, not voting. The Court noted that dictionaries define “consider” as “spending time thinking about a possibility” and “formulating an opinion,” which are processes that precede formal action. This interpretation mirrors how Arizona’s Open Meeting Law (A.R.S. § 38-431.03(D)) prohibits public bodies from voting in executive session. Reprinted courtesy of Jill Casson Owen, Snell & Wilmer, Benjamin J. Hawkins, Snell & Wilmer and Stephen Wright, Snell & Wilmer Ms. Owen may be contacted at jowen@swlaw.com Mr. Hawkins may be contacted at bhawkins@swlaw.com Mr. Wright may be contacted at swright@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Flatiron Said Disputed Concrete Mix Cost Millions on Large Caltrans Project

    June 22, 2026 —
    For awhile in 2023, part of the California Dept. of Transportation's (Caltrans) Fix 50 HOV lane and resurfacing project in Sacramento itself needed to be fixed. Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record and Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com Read the full story...

    Alert: Fraudulent Notice of Nonpayment Defense Applies to Payment Bond Claims

    April 27, 2026 —
    Under Florida’s Lien Law, there’s an affirmative defense or affirmative claim known as a “fraudulent lien.” The fraudulent lien defense or claim is set out in Florida Statute s. 713.31. This defense also extends to payment bond claims, whether under a private statutory payment bond (Florida Statute s. 713.23) or a public payment bond (Florida Statute s. 255.05), as it pertains to the notice of nonpayment. A notice of nonpayment needs to be served within 90 days from final furnishing to preserve a claimant’s rights against the bond. However, there really has not been a case, until now, that discusses a “fraudulent notice of nonpayment.” In K&M Electric Supply, Inc. v. Brown Electrical Solutions, LLC, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D672a (Fla. 4th DCA 2026), a prime contractor and surety prevailed at the trial level on their fraudulent notice of nonpayment defense based on a supplier’s notice of nonpayment and action against a public payment bond (under Florida Statute s. 255.05). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Substantial Evidence of Flood Loss is Not a Substitute for Required Proof of Loss

    April 20, 2026 —
    The court found that the insurer properly denied the insured’s claim for loss due to flood because a proof of loss was never submitted. Bay Haven at Coco Bay Condominium Association, Inc. v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6847 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 14, 2026). Bay Haven managed several condo buildings. When Hurricane Ian hit, it caused significant flood damage to these properties. Bay Haven held federal flood insurance policies through Hartford under “Write-Your-Own” policies. This meant Hartford was essentially a fiscal agent that managed policies and handled claims but paid them using federal funds. Following the storm, FEMA extended the usual 60-day deadline for filing a proof of loss to one year, or until September 28, 2023. Bay Haven did not submit its proofs of loss until November 2023. FEMA granted an extension but only for the specific amounts in the November requests. Hartford did not waive the 60-day proof of loss requirement for any other proof of loss. Hartford paid the amounts reflected in the November submissions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    How Engineers Will Determine Why NYC's Pfizer HQ Conversion Buckled

    July 13, 2026 —
    Construction crews have stabilized the former Pfizer headquarters redevelopment in Midtown Manhattan after two load-bearing structural columns buckled on the 21st floor July 7. The focus has now shifted from emergency response to determining what caused the office-to-residential conversion to suffer a major structural failure. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Arbitration in Construction Disputes: Process and Best Practices

    July 27, 2026 —
    Arbitration in construction disputes is a private process where owners, contractors, subcontractors, designers or suppliers present claims to one or more neutral arbitrators instead of taking the dispute through court. The arbitrator reviews evidence, hears testimony and issues a decision that is usually binding. Construction arbitration is common because project disputes are technical, document-heavy and time-sensitive. Claims may involve schedule delays, disputed change orders, defective work, differing site conditions, payment, termination, indemnity, surety issues or professional liability. Arbitration can be faster and more specialized than litigation, but speed is not guaranteed. Poor contract language, broad discovery, weak records and unclear damages can make arbitration expensive. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    GRSM Attorneys Named Finalists in 2026 Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards

    March 10, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani attorneys have been shortlisted as finalists for Corporate Counsel’s 2026 Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) Awards, which honor women leaders who have demonstrated a commitment to advancing the empowerment of women in the legal profession. In the Law Firm Internal Collaborative Leadership category, Stephanie Jones was recognized for her exceptional ability to foster collaboration, mentor talent, and align colleagues across GRSM. Jones has consistently demonstrated leadership rooted in trust, inclusion, and shared purpose, qualities that have strengthened the firm during a period of extraordinary growth. Her impact on the firm’s culture and success will continue as she steps into her role as Chief Operating Partner in June 2026, where she will further build on her leadership in fostering teamwork, mentorship, and alignment across the firm’s national platform. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani