BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    parking structure expert witness Pinto Maryland multi family housing expert witness Pinto Maryland retail construction expert witness Pinto Maryland office building expert witness Pinto Maryland tract home expert witness Pinto Maryland custom homes expert witness Pinto Maryland hospital construction expert witness Pinto Maryland condominium expert witness Pinto Maryland concrete tilt-up expert witness Pinto Maryland low-income housing expert witness Pinto Maryland production housing expert witness Pinto Maryland mid-rise construction expert witness Pinto Maryland industrial building expert witness Pinto Maryland casino resort expert witness Pinto Maryland townhome construction expert witness Pinto Maryland housing expert witness Pinto Maryland structural steel construction expert witness Pinto Maryland Subterranean parking expert witness Pinto Maryland condominiums expert witness Pinto Maryland custom home expert witness Pinto Maryland Medical building expert witness Pinto Maryland high-rise construction expert witness Pinto Maryland
    Pinto Maryland construction safety expertPinto Maryland construction code expert witnessPinto Maryland construction expert witness consultantPinto Maryland building code compliance expert witnessPinto Maryland building envelope expert witnessPinto Maryland expert witnesses fenestrationPinto Maryland consulting architect expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Pinto, Maryland

    Maryland Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Pinto Maryland

    License required for electrical, plumbing, HVAC, and home improvement.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Western Maryland
    Local # 2150
    16 Greene St
    Cumberland, MD 21502

    Pinto Maryland Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Frederick County Builders Association
    Local # 2175
    186 Thomas Johnson Dr Ste 204
    Frederick, MD 21702

    Pinto Maryland Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Maryland
    Local # 2125
    7127 Ambassador Rd Ste 150
    Baltimore, MD 21244

    Pinto Maryland Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Maryland National Capital Building Industry Association
    Local # 2178
    1738 Elton Rd Ste 200
    Silver Spring, MD 20903

    Pinto Maryland Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Maryland State Builders Association
    Local # 2100
    204 Duke of Gloucester St
    Annapolis, MD 21401

    Pinto Maryland Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Eastern Shore Building Industry Association Affil w/National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 2118
    PO Box 3104
    Salisbury, MD 21804

    Pinto Maryland Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Pinto Maryland

    Corporate Profile

    PINTO MARYLAND CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Pinto, Maryland Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Pinto's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Pinto, Maryland

    Safeguarding Your Privileged Construction Information With a Clawback Agreement

    June 08, 2026 —
    For contractors and construction executives, a dispute that escalates to litigation brings risks that go well beyond the jobsite. When a dispute escalates to litigation, the attorney-client privilege is a critical protection to safeguard your interests. Disclosing privileged material can undermine your litigation position and, in some cases, negatively impact your business. In the construction context, this often includes sensitive communications about project delays, defect investigations, safety incidents or payment disputes—materials that can significantly impact both liability and reputation. During litigation, the discovery process requires the exchange of documents and data with your adversary. If privileged materials are disclosed to your adversary during discovery you risk the waiver of your privilege, which in plain terms means you lose the protection of the privilege and make the privileged information, and in some cases all other information related to the same subject matter, available to your adversary. It is critical that your attorney take steps to protect against the unintentional disclosure of privileged materials during discovery to avoid a waiver. Reprinted courtesy of Laura Fraher, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...
    Ms. Fraher may be contacted at lfraher@barclaydamon.com

    Los Angeles Times Ranks Lewis Brisbois Third Largest Firm in LA County, Largest for Litigation

    June 08, 2026 —
    The Los Angeles Times has ranked Lewis Brisbois the third largest firm in LA County by attorney headcount, and first for number of litigation attorneys. Lewis Brisbois, whose Los Angeles office is led by Co-Managing Partners Jana I. Lubert and Kathleen Walker, has 273 attorneys working in LA County, including 167 partners. The firm ranked No. 1 for Litigation in the county, with 206 attorneys under the leadership of Partner Craig Holden. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Can Anything Supersede Excel in AEC?

    April 27, 2026 —
    If there’s one piece of software that dominates the business world across industries, it’s Microsoft Excel. Can AI finally dethrone the mighty spreadsheet? Memorable Spreadsheet Moments Everyone has memorable spreadsheet moments. I have a few. For example, my then-architecture firm was involved in more than a dozen housing developments abroad. I developed an Excel workbook that took the required number of households as input and automatically generated a breakdown of buildings and their apartment types for AutoCAD. This was urban planning and architectural design done with a spreadsheet. I also developed business software using Excel for project portfolio management. The prototype was later scaled into a commercial SaaS that is now used globally. Another memorable moment was when a property owner told me their Excel file grew so large that it ran out of rows and columns. That must have been before 2007, when the maximum number of columns on a sheet was still just 256 and the maximum number of rows was 65,536. The current limits are 1,048,576 rows and 16,384 columns, which I hope no one will exceed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Nationwide Preliminary Injunction Ordering Department of Defense to Resume Review of Wind Energy Projects

    September 21, 2026 —
    On August 6, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon granted a preliminary injunction in Renewable Northwest v. Hegseth, Case No. 3:26-cv-01092-IM, ordering the Department of Defense (DoD) to resume processing wind energy project applications under the existing statutory and regulatory framework and staying DoD’s review freeze pending final adjudication on the merits. Background In 2011, Congress created the Military Aviation and Installation Assurance Siting Clearinghouse (Clearinghouse) within DoD to review wind energy projects that might affect military operations. When a wind project developer files an application with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the FAA refers it to DoD to determine whether the project poses an “unacceptable risk to the national security.” Reprinted courtesy of Victor J. Roehm III, Snell & Wilmer, Christopher P. Colyer, Snell & Wilmer and Sara M. Ajeti, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Roehm may be contacted at vroehm@swlaw.com Mr. Colyer may be contacted at ccolyer@swlaw.com Ms. Ajeti may be contacted at sajeti@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    NJ Public Works Contractors Beware – Pay Special Attention When Submitting Your Public Works Contractor Registration

    May 26, 2026 —
    While it is always important to be careful when making submissions to government agencies, recent activity by the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development (“NJDOL”) reveals considerably increased scrutiny in connection with contractors renewing their New Jersey Public Works Registration. Extra care when completing the registration renewal process is warranted, because the consequences of a misstep can be significant and disruptive. The New Jersey Public Works Contractor Registration Act requires all contractors bidding on or engaging in construction-related public works projects to register with the NJDOL. This registration, which must be resubmitted every 1-2 years, requires contractors to make a number of detailed disclosures relating to, among other things, the entity’s ownership structure, prior state and federal labor law violations, details regarding interests in other businesses, unlawful acts by owners/officers, and participation in apprenticeship programs. Reprinted courtesy of Levi W. Barrett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Aaron C. Schlesinger, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Barrett may be contacted at lbarrett@pecklaw.com Mr. Schlesinger may be contacted at aschlesinger@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Parties’ Post-Default Conduct Cannot Validate Void Default Orders

    August 24, 2026 —
    After filing a lawsuit, the first step is always serving process on the opposing party. While that preliminary step sounds basic enough, in McMahan v. Grasshopper, the Arizona Supreme Court recently provided a helpful refresher on the nuances of the service requirement and its importance in litigation for plaintiffs and defendants alike.1 Background McMahan arose from a hit-and-run where a tractor-trailer collided with safety barricades and injured a construction worker. The construction worker sued the tractor-trailer company, and he attempted to serve the company by leaving a copy of the complaint with the assistant to the company’s statutory agent who forwarded the complaint to the company. The assistant, however, was not authorized to accept service on the company’s behalf. Before the company appeared in the action, the construction worker successfully obtained an entry of default. Reprinted courtesy of Joseph Kanefield, Snell & Wilmer, Ryan P. Hogan, Snell & Wilmer and Lilly M. Geiler, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Kanefield may be contacted at jkanefield@swlaw.com Mr. Hogan may be contacted at rhogan@swlaw.com Ms. Geiler may be contacted at lgeiler@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    New York Team Secures Dismissal of Premises Liability Action Against Client

    May 26, 2026 —
    New York Associate Nicole Koch and Partner Jennine Gerrard recently secured a complete dismissal of a plaintiff’s claims for injuries following a fall in front of a client’s business at an outdoor mall. The plaintiff alleged that she was walking on the sidewalk outside of the client's hair care supply store in the Bronx in May 2024 when she tripped and fell on a broken/defective portion of the sidewalk. As a result of the accident, the plaintiff suffered injuries to her spine, hip, wrist, and both knees. She proceeded to file suit in New York County Supreme Court against Lewis Brisbois’ client and the landlord for the property. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Construction Liens: Liening for Amounts Not Yet Technically Due Does Not Mean Lien Is Fraudulent

    August 11, 2026 —
    A 2024 bankruptcy ruling, In re Edgewater Construction Group, Inc., 657 B.R. 668 (S.D.Fla. 2024), touched upon an interesting issue when it comes to construction liens. Is a construction lien fraudulent simply because the lien includes amounts not yet due? Not necessarily. In this bankruptcy dispute, the subcontractor debtor (that filed for bankruptcy) recorded two construction liens on projects. The general contractor argued in the bankruptcy court that the subcontractor debtor’s liens were fraudulent. As to the first lien, the general contractor argued that the lien was fraudulent because it included amounts that the debtor knew the general contractor had already paid to the debtor’s subcontractors/suppliers. The bankruptcy court disagreed: “The Court finds that, although the Debtor had been told that [the general contractor] had paid these subcontractors, in light of the ongoing dispute between Debtor and [the general contractor], it was reasonable for the Debtor to demand proof. Debtor’s subsequent filing of a partial satisfaction of lien once the Debtor received the requested proof of payment from [the general contractor] counters any claim of willful exaggeration.” In re Edgewater Construction Group, supra, at 672-673. Reporting Requirements for Architects under California Business and Professions Code Section 5588

    Wall Street’s Favorite Suburban Housing Bet Is Getting Crowded

    Facing Manslaughter Charges In Worker's 2021 Trench Collapse Death, Colorado Contractor Who Willfully Ignored Federal Law Surrenders To Police

    Former UN General Assembly President Charged in Bribe Scheme

    Natural Hydrogen May Seem New in Town, but It’s Been Here All Along

    Duty to Defend Sorted Between Two Insurers Based Upon Lease and Policies

    Australia Warns of Multi-Billion Dollar Climate Disaster Costs

    White and Williams Ranked in Top Tiers of "Best Law Firms"

    Newmeyer Dillion Announces Jacqueline McCalla as Its Newest Partner

    Faulty Workmanship Claims Amount to Multiple Occurrences

    Don’t Miss the 2015 West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar

    The ALI Restatement – What Lies Ahead?

    2026 Colorado Super Lawyers Recognizes 11 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys

    New York Appellate Court Expands Policyholders’ Ability to Plead and Seek Consequential Damages

    Another TV Fried as Georgia Leads U.S. in Lightning Costs

    The Road to Hell is Paved with Good Intentions: A.B. 1701’s Requirement that General Contractors Pay Subcontractor Employee Wages Will Do More Harm Than Good

    Mandatory Arbitration Provision Upheld in Construction Defect Case

    Nevada’s Home Building Industry can Breathe Easier: No Action on SB250 Leaves Current Attorney’s Fees Provision Intact

    Federal Miller Act Payment Bond Claim: Who Gets Paid and Who Does Not? What Are the Deadlines?

    Unjust Enrichment and Express Contract Don’t Mix

    Private Statutory Cause of Action Under Florida’s Underground Facility Damage Prevention and Safety Act

    Calling Hurricanes a Category 6 Risks Creating Deadly Confusion

    The AI Knows Too Much: When Employees Feed Trade Secrets into Generative AI Tools

    When Does it End?

    Unjust Enrichment Damages Must Be Measurable and Quantifiable

    Texas Legislative Update

    Claim for Vandalism Loss Survives Motion to Dismiss

    What Construction Contractors Should Know About the California Government Claims Act

    Sales of U.S. New Homes Decline After Record May Revision

    "Over? Did You Say 'Over'?" Determining the Preclusive Effect of an Earlier Arbitration Award

    Sales of Existing U.S. Homes Unexpectedly Fell in January

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules that Insurance Salesman had No Fiduciary Duty to Policyholders

    GRSM Named “Powerhouse in Litigation” in 2026 Industry Report

    Naples, Florida, Is Getting So Expensive That City Workers Can’t Afford It

    Contractors: Consult Your Insurance Broker Regarding Your CGL Policy

    Claim for Consequential Damages Survives Motion to Dismiss

    Pulte’s Kitchen Innovation Throw Down

    Subcontrator’s Insurer Must Reimburse for Defense of Contractor

    Port Authority Reaches Deal on Silverstein 3 World Trade

    Open & Known Hazards Under the Kinsman Exception to Privette

    Notice of Completion Determines Mechanics Lien Deadline

    Will Future Megacities Be a Marvel or a Mess? Look at New Delhi

    Housing Inflation Begins to Rise

    Battle Looms as Feds Order Washington State Coal Plant to Stay Open

    Application of Frye Test to Determine Admissibility of Expert

    Location, Location, Location—Even in Construction Liens

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s 2026 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Honorees!

    Insurance Policies Broadly Defining “Suits” May Prompt an Insurer’s Duty to Defend and Indemnify During the Chapter 558 Pre-Suit Notice Process

    Nashville Stadium Bond Deal Tests Future of Spectator Sports

    New Green Standards; Same Green Warnings for Architects & Engineers (law note)

    William Lyon to Acquire RSI Communities

    Just Because You Record a Mechanic’s Lien Doesn’t Mean You Get Notice of Foreclosure
    n Defense Costs Are Not Subject To Joint Venture Liability Limits