BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Medical building expert witness Westbrook Maine multi family housing expert witness Westbrook Maine Subterranean parking expert witness Westbrook Maine high-rise construction expert witness Westbrook Maine office building expert witness Westbrook Maine townhome construction expert witness Westbrook Maine tract home expert witness Westbrook Maine custom homes expert witness Westbrook Maine structural steel construction expert witness Westbrook Maine production housing expert witness Westbrook Maine parking structure expert witness Westbrook Maine low-income housing expert witness Westbrook Maine casino resort expert witness Westbrook Maine landscaping construction expert witness Westbrook Maine condominium expert witness Westbrook Maine mid-rise construction expert witness Westbrook Maine retail construction expert witness Westbrook Maine hospital construction expert witness Westbrook Maine custom home expert witness Westbrook Maine institutional building expert witness Westbrook Maine concrete tilt-up expert witness Westbrook Maine industrial building expert witness Westbrook Maine
    Westbrook Maine expert witness roofingWestbrook Maine civil engineering expert witnessWestbrook Maine construction forensic expert witnessWestbrook Maine structural engineering expert witnessesWestbrook Maine building envelope expert witnessWestbrook Maine reconstruction expert witnessWestbrook Maine consulting general contractor
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Westbrook, Maine

    Maine Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Westbrook Maine


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Southern Maine Home Builders & Rem Assn
    Local # 2020
    8 Mulliken Ct Suite 3
    Augusta, ME 04330

    Westbrook Maine Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Southern York County Home Builders Association
    Local # 2030
    8 Mulliken Ct Suite 3
    Augusta, ME 04330

    Westbrook Maine Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders & Remodelers Assn of Maine
    Local # 2000
    8 Mulliken Ct Suite 3
    Augusta, ME 04330

    Westbrook Maine Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Modular Home Builders Association of Maine
    Local # 2015
    8 Mulliken Ct Suite 3
    Augusta, ME 04330

    Westbrook Maine Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Westbrook Maine


    Apartment Construction Ominously Nears 25-Year High

    Jurisdiction Over Foreign Manufacturers in Construction Litigation

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (05/17/23) – A Flop in Flipping, Plastic Microbes and Psychological Hard Hats

    Important Information Regarding Colorado Mechanic’s Lien Rights.

    No Cross-Complaint Needed - Court of Appeal Clarifies Co-Defendants May Oppose Each Other’s Summary Judgment Motions Without a Cross-Complaint

    Construction Spending Highest Since April 2009

    Nailing Social Media: The Key to Generating Leads for Construction Companies

    Bound by Group Builders, Federal District Court Finds No Occurrence

    The International Codes Development Process is Changing to Continue Building Code Modernization

    Colorado’s Three-Bill Approach to Alleged Construction Defect Issues

    Infrared Photography Illuminates Construction Defects and Patent Trolling

    Time is of the Essence, Even When the Contract Doesn’t Say So

    United States Supreme Court Backtracks on Recent Trajectory Away from Assertions of General Jurisdiction in Mallory v. Norfolk Southern

    Spearin Doctrine 100 Years Old and Still Thriving in the Design-Build Delivery World

    Colorado homebuilders target low-income buyers with bogus "affordable housing" bill

    Motion for Reconsideration Challenging Appraisal Determining Cause of Loss Denied

    Risky Business: Contractual Versus Equitable Rights of Subrogation

    Penalty for Failure to Release Expired Liens

    ASCE Report Calls for Sweeping Changes to Texas Grid Infrastructure

    New Orleans Is Auctioning Off Vacant Lots Online

    Playing Hot Potato: Indemnity Strikes Again

    Home Prices Up, Inventory Down

    United States Supreme Court Limits Class Arbitration

    Third Circuit Holds No Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Despite Insured’s Expectations

    Florida Extends Filing Time for Claims Subject to the Statute of Repose

    Congratulations to Partner Madeline Arcellana on Her Selection as a Top Rank Attorney in Nevada!

    Indiana Court Enforces Contract Provisions rather than Construction Drawing Markings

    #12 CDJ Topic: Am. Home Assur. Co. v. SMG Stone Co., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75910 (N. D. Cal. June 11, 2015)

    Venue for Miller Act Payment Bond When Project is Outside of Us

    Hurricane Handbook: A Policyholder's Guide to Handling Claims during Hurricane Season

    Want to Build Affordable Housing in the Heart of Paris? Make It Chic.

    Emerging Issues in Construction CGL Insurance Part 1: Continuing or Progressive Loss Exclusions

    The Coronavirus, Zoom Meetings and Now a CCPA Class Action

    Missouri Asbestos Litigation Reform: New Bill Seeks to Establish Robust Disclosure Obligations

    Construction Jobs Expected to Rise in Post-Hurricane Rebuilding

    New York Public Library’s “Most Comprehensive Renovation” In Its History

    Supreme Court Limits EPA’s Options for Wastewater Discharge Permits

    Carwash Prosecutors Seek $1.6 Billion From Brazil Builders

    EPA Fines Ivory Homes for Storm Water Pollution

    Equitable Lien Designed to Prevent Unjust Enrichment

    Washington Supreme Court Interprets Ensuing Loss Exception in All-Risk Property Insurance Policy

    Tariffs and the Art of the Price Escalation “Deal”

    Select the Best Contract Model to Mitigate Risk and Achieve Energy Project Success

    Work without Permits may lead to Problems Later

    Adjuster's Report No Substitute for Proof of Loss Under Flood Policy

    Exception to Watercraft Exclusion Does Not Apply

    The Power of Team Bonding: Transforming Workplaces for the Better

    Historical Long-Tail Claims in California Subject to a Vertical Exhaustion Rule

    Sometimes it Depends on “Whose” Hand is in the Cookie Jar

    White House Hopefuls Make Pitches to Construction Unions
    Corporate Profile

    WESTBROOK MAINE CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Westbrook, Maine Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Westbrook's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Westbrook, Maine

    Nordics Are Europe’s Next Data Center Hub

    October 05, 2026 —
    On September 9, 2026, Google announced its largest single investment in Europe. The company commits at least €13 billion to Finnish data centers and energy infrastructure in 2027 and 2028, expanding the existing Hamina campus and adding three new sites in Kajaani, Muhos, and Vaala. For the construction sector, this is great news: thousands of hectares, dozens of buildings, and a construction program that will extend well beyond the two-year investment window. Four Sites, One Regional Cluster Google is not a newcomer in Finland. Back in 2009, it converted a former paper mill in Hamina into a seawater-cooled data center. It has invested around €4.5 billion there over 15 years, and the site’s waste heat already feeds Hamina’s district heating network. The new program shifts the center of gravity north, to the border of North Ostrobothnia and Kainuu. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Shane Singh Named One of Los Angeles Business Journal's 'Top 100 Lawyers of Los Angeles' for 2026

    April 27, 2026 —
    Sacramento Partner Shane Singh has been named one of the Los Angeles Business Journal's "Top 100 Lawyers of Los Angeles" for 2026. The LABJ’s annual list honors Los Angeles' top lawyers for their achievements within the city's business community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Structural Engineer Claims Reinforcement Was Never Installed on Troubled NYC Tower

    September 01, 2026 —
    New York City has expanded its investigation into the structural failure at the former Pfizer headquarters tower in Midtown Manhattan as the Dept. of Investigation confirmed a parallel inquiry and the Dept. of Buildings directed the property owner to retain third-party engineering oversight. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    EPA Steps Back, Arizona Moves Forward

    May 12, 2026 —
    In a significant development for Arizona’s business community and environmental policymakers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has paused its planned reclassification of Maricopa County from “Moderate” to “Serious” ozone nonattainment status pursuant to the Clean Air Act’s National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). This decision marks a shift in federal air policy — one that recognizes the unique challenges faced by regions like metro Phoenix, where environmental conditions beyond local control are often key contributors to air quality readings. The EPA’s move follows a series of meetings between EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, Arizona elected officials, and business and civic leaders, including a recent roundtable in Phoenix convened by U.S. Senator Mark Kelly. In announcing the pause, Zeldin acknowledged the need for flexibility and fairness in the application of Clean Air Act standards, especially when emissions from other states, nations, and natural events significantly influence local air quality. Reprinted courtesy of Patrick J. Paul, Snell & Wilmer, John Habib, Snell & Wilmer and Sukhmani K. Singh, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Paul may be contacted at ppaul@swlaw.com Mr. Habib may be contacted at jhabib@swlaw.com Ms. Singh may be contacted at ssingh@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Achieving Sustainability Through Design-Build Delivery: Part I – An Overview

    September 21, 2026 —
    This article was written for the AGC’s Law in Brief and first appeared here. Sustainability is no longer optional. What was once a matter of public policy or corporate preference has become a regulatory mandate and is reshaping how construction projects are designed, built, and operated. This mandate is not solely figurative. Rather, states have started to follow Europe’s lead by beginning to codify sustainability requirements into regulations and law. California led the charge by adding mandatory embodied-carbon emissions regulations into CALGreen, and other states, such as New York, have introduced bills to implement similar requirements. Owners, designers, and builders must now treat sustainability not as aspirational, but as a clearly defined contract issue from the outset, particularly where the project is expected to achieve a third-party rating, meet energy or resiliency targets, qualify for incentives, or comply with evolving green building codes. In the federal public sector, construction contracts include a layered compliance framework—executive order-inspired policy, FAR-mandated clauses, and enduring statutory requirements—requiring contractors to integrate sustainability into design, material selection, and lifecycle management. Staying ahead means aligning with regulatory standards, conducting life-cycle cost analyses, and embedding sustainability into every procurement and construction decision. Reprinted courtesy of Joshua M. Pruett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C., Jennifer L. Harris, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Tiffany A. Harrod, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Pruett may be contacted at jpruett@pecklaw.com Ms. Harris may be contacted at jharris@pecklaw.com Ms. Harrod may be contacted at tharrod@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    U.S. Supreme Court Decision Alters Course of $745M Louisiana Coastal Damage Judgment

    June 15, 2026 —
    The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a unanimous decision allowing oil and gas companies to move Louisiana coastal erosion lawsuits from state court to federal court under the federal officer removal statute. While the ruling is procedural, it carries significant implications for environmental- and energy-related risks. The case, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, Slip Op. 24-813 (April 17, 2026), addressed a threshold jurisdictional question but has broader significance for environmental and climate related litigation. State courts are often viewed as more favorable forums for plaintiffs asserting environmental damage claims, particularly those brought by governmental entities. The opinion issued on April 17, 2026 is the latest development in long-running Louisiana coastal litigation that began more than a decade ago. Starting in 2013, Louisiana parishes filed 42 lawsuits against oil and gas companies alleging environmental damage related to historic oil field operations. The parishes alleged that oil and gas companies violated state coastal management laws by failing to properly restore impacted areas. Chevron sought to remove the cases from state court under 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1), known as federal officer removal, which provides federal jurisdiction over “any person acting under [an] officer” of the United States "for or relating to any act under color of such office." The Fifth Circuit rejected the argument and remanded the case, and others like it, to state court. Trial began in March 2025 in Point à la Hache, Louisiana. On April 4, 2025, the jury awarded a total of $745 million to compensate for land loss, contamination and abandoned equipment. On June 16, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review the question of whether a federal contractor can remove to federal court when sued for oil-production activities undertaken to fulfill a federal oil-refinement contract. Reprinted courtesy of Jennifer Kretschmann, Lewis Brisbois and Jennifer E. Michel, Lewis Brisbois Ms. Kretschmann may be contacted at Jennifer.Kretschmann@lewisbrisbois.com Ms. Michel may be contacted at Jenny.Michel@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

    Insurer Cannot Raise Issues on Appeal that Were Not Presented to the Trial Court

    June 15, 2026 —
    The Florida Court of Appeals affirmed a judgment on a collapse claim for the insured, rejecting the insurer’s arguments that were not presented to the trial court. Homeowner’s Choice Prop. & Cas. Ins, Co. v. Oakes, 2026 Fl. App. LEXIS 2086 (Fl. Ct. App. March 18, 2026). The insured’s ceiling collapsed in the secondary home on the insured’s property. The claim was reported to the insurer, but coverage was denied after its investigation. The insured sued the insurer for breach of contract. Under the Additional Coverage provisions of the policy, collapse was covered if it was “abrupt.” An abrupt collapse was not covered, however, if exclusions for “Fungi, Wet or Dry Rot” and “faulty, inadequate or defective design, specifications, workmanship, repair, construction, renovation, remodeling, materials or maintenance” applied. The collapse provisions contained no language stating that the coverage granted in the provision was also subject to all the other exclusions in the policy. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Seattle Team Obtains Summary Judgment in Real Estate Broker Professional Liability Action

    July 20, 2026 —
    Seattle Partner Kathleen A. Nelson and Associate Synova M. L. Edwards prevailed on a hotly contested motion for summary judgment in Whatcom County, Washington court in a real estate broker professional liability action. The plaintiff filed an action against Lewis Brisbois' clients, a real estate agent and brokerage firm, among several others, including the title company, purchasers and others related to the sale of real property following his complicated and long running divorce action. These claims primarily arose out of the clients’ reliance on an order signed by the court in the underlying divorce action. The order allowed the clients to execute the purchase and sale agreement, as the plaintiff was non-cooperative. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois