BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominium expert witness South Windham Maine concrete tilt-up expert witness South Windham Maine casino resort expert witness South Windham Maine tract home expert witness South Windham Maine low-income housing expert witness South Windham Maine custom home expert witness South Windham Maine production housing expert witness South Windham Maine Subterranean parking expert witness South Windham Maine custom homes expert witness South Windham Maine multi family housing expert witness South Windham Maine parking structure expert witness South Windham Maine office building expert witness South Windham Maine housing expert witness South Windham Maine townhome construction expert witness South Windham Maine industrial building expert witness South Windham Maine hospital construction expert witness South Windham Maine Medical building expert witness South Windham Maine structural steel construction expert witness South Windham Maine retail construction expert witness South Windham Maine institutional building expert witness South Windham Maine landscaping construction expert witness South Windham Maine mid-rise construction expert witness South Windham Maine
    South Windham Maine construction claims expert witnessSouth Windham Maine construction defect expert witnessSouth Windham Maine building code compliance expert witnessSouth Windham Maine delay claim expert witnessSouth Windham Maine stucco expert witnessSouth Windham Maine construction expert witness consultantSouth Windham Maine fenestration expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    South Windham, Maine

    Maine Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines South Windham Maine


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Southern Maine Home Builders & Rem Assn
    Local # 2020
    8 Mulliken Ct Suite 3
    Augusta, ME 04330

    South Windham Maine Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Southern York County Home Builders Association
    Local # 2030
    8 Mulliken Ct Suite 3
    Augusta, ME 04330

    South Windham Maine Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders & Remodelers Assn of Maine
    Local # 2000
    8 Mulliken Ct Suite 3
    Augusta, ME 04330

    South Windham Maine Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Modular Home Builders Association of Maine
    Local # 2015
    8 Mulliken Ct Suite 3
    Augusta, ME 04330

    South Windham Maine Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For South Windham Maine


    Increases in U.S. Office Rents Led by San Jose and Dallas

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “I Never Had a Chance”

    Is Performance Bond Liable for Delay Damages?

    Is an Initial Decision Maker, Project Neutral, or Dispute Resolution Board Right for You?

    ETF Bulls Bet Spring Will Thaw the U.S. Housing Market

    Arizona Court Cites California Courts to Determine Construction Defect Coverage is Time Barred

    Contractor’s Burden When It Comes to Delay

    Measures Landlords and Property Managers Can Take in Response to a Reported COVID-19 Infection

    Louisiana State Legislature 2025 Regular Session: Tort Reform - Acts & Vetoed Insurance Bill

    Texas Federal Court Delivers Another Big Win for Policyholders on CGL Coverage for Construction-Defect Claims and “Rip-and-Tear” Damages

    Aging-in-Place Features Becoming Essential for Many Home Buyers

    2013 May Be Bay Area’s Best Year for Commercial Building

    Breach Of Duty of Good Faith And Fair Dealing Packaged With Contract Disputes Act Claim

    Whose Employee is it Anyway?: Federal Court Finds No Coverage for Injured Subcontractor's Claim Based on Modified Employer's Liability Exclusion

    Termination for Convenience Clauses: Maybe More Than Just Convenience

    The Metaphysics of When an Accident is an “Accident” (or Not) Under Your Insurance Policy

    Newmeyer Dillion Announces New Partners

    Construction Law Advisory: Mechanical Contractor Scores Victory in Prevailing Wage Dispute

    Lack of Credibility Can Destroy a Claim

    Chinese Telecommunications Ban to Expand to Federally Funded Contracts Effective November 12, 2020

    Hydrogen Powers Its Way from Proof of Concept to Reality in Real Estate

    Payne & Fears Recognized by Best Lawyers in 2026 Best Law Firms®

    Apartments pushed up US homebuilding in September

    AI – A Designer’s Assistant or a Replacement?

    Newmeyer Dillion Named One of "The Best Places To Work In Orange County" by Orange County Business Journal

    California Enacts New Claims Resolution Process for Public Works Projects

    New Opportunities for “Small” Construction Contractors as SBA Adjusts Its Size Standards Again Due to Unprecedented Inflation

    Couple Claims ADA Renovation Lead to Construction Defects

    Water Alone is Not Property Damage under a CGL policy in Connecticut

    Around the State

    Thieves Stole Backhoe for Use in Bank Heist

    Industry Groups Decry Jan. 6 Riot; DOT Chief Chao Steps Down in Protest

    Ayushi Neogi Published in ADC Defense Comment on Arbitration in Evolving Plaintiff-Friendly Landscape

    Court Addresses When Duty to Defend Ends

    Architectural Firm Disputes Claim of Fault

    Stuck in Seattle: The Aggravating Adventures of a Gigantic Tunnel Drill

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Stop - In the Name of the Law!”

    NYC Condo Skyscraper's Builder Wins a Round -- With a Catch

    NY Supreme Court Rules City Not Liable for Defective Sidewalk

    Revel Closing Shows Gambling Is No Sure Thing for Renewal

    When is Construction Put to Its “Intended Use”?

    False Implied Certifications in Making Payment Requests: What We Can Learn from Lance Armstrong

    Structural Engineer Claims Reinforcement Was Never Installed on Troubled NYC Tower

    New York Appellate Court Affirms 1966 Insurance Policy Continues to Cover WTC Asbestos Claims

    Buyers Are Flocking to NYC’s Suburbs. Too Bad There Aren’t Many Homes to Sell.

    National Infrastructure Leaders Visit Dallas' Able Pump Station to Tout Benefits of Water Infrastructure Investment

    Faulty Workmanship Exclusion Does Not Bar Coverage

    More (and Simpler) Options Under New Oregon Retention Law

    Watchdog Opens Cartel Probe Into Eight British Homebuilders

    One Colorado Court Allows Negligence Claim by General Contractor Against Subcontractor
    Corporate Profile

    SOUTH WINDHAM MAINE CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The South Windham, Maine Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    South Windham, Maine

    What Massachusetts Contractors and Developers Can Learn from Cannistraro v. Columbia Construction

    July 13, 2026 —
    Introduction On June 26, 2026 the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued its decision in J.C. Cannistraro, LLC v. Columbia Construction Co.—a holding that sits at the intersection of Prompt Pay Act compliance and the Massachusetts Arbitration Act.[1] Most already know that the Massachusetts Prompt Pay Act (PPA) imposes strict timing and certification requirements for rejecting payment applications and proposed change orders on projects valued at $3 million or more. Most notably, the PPA requires the paying party to give the payee written notice of its approval or rejection of progress applications and proposed changes within 15 days of receipt, which notice must include a “factual and contractual basis for the rejection” and must be “certified as made in good faith.”[2] In the absence of a timely certified notice, payment is “deemed to be approved” unless the payor properly rejects payment before it comes due.[3] Reprinted courtesy of Anthony LaPlaca, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Luke Marston, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Mr. LaPlaca may be contacted at alaplaca@seyfarth.com Mr. Marston may be contacted at lmarston@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    June 08, 2026 —
    The court denied the insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment on the insured’s bad faith claim, but granted the motion on the insured’s claim for punitive damages. Serbian Orthodox Church v. Brotherhood Mut. Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58234 (S.D. Cal. March 19, 2026). On February 1, 2023, the Church filed a claim for water damage with Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (BMIC). The claim was based on rain and wind that caused extensive water intrusion into the Sanctuary, damaging its plaster walls and ceilings and fresco paintings. The claim was assigned to Patrick Hurley. Hurley sent a letter discussing potential bars to coverage and requesting further information and documents from the Church. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Segal McCambridge Shareholders and Associates Recognized in 2027 Best Lawyers in America®

    September 01, 2026 —
    Segal McCambridge is pleased to announce that 24 firm shareholders and associates have been recognized in the 2027 editions of the Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America. Best Lawyers® is an elite global network of legal professionals recognized through a trusted, peer-reviewed distinction. For more than four decades, its Purely Peer Review® methodology has upheld the principle that recognition should be earned through the opinions of fellow attorneys, not marketing influence or paid listings. No fees are accepted for consideration or inclusion.    "This Best Lawyers recognition is especially meaningful because it reflects the caliber of advocacy our attorneys bring to clients every day, across a wide range of practice areas," said Jason P. Eckerly, Segal McCambridge Managing Shareholder. "We are proud to see so many of our colleagues honored for their legal skills, dedication, and professionalism. This continued recognition underscores the strength of our national platform and the depth of talent across our firm." Segal McCambridge's attorneys named in Best Lawyers in America® include: Jason P. Eckerly; Chicago, IL; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Scott R. Emery; New York, NY; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants Jay Evans; Pittsburgh, PA; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Richard H. Glucksman; Los Angeles, CA; Construction Law Nathan R. Horne; Austin, TX; Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Alice Sacks Johnston; Pittsburgh, PA; Commercial Litigation; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Patrick M. Kemp; Austin, TX; Litigation - Insurance Mitchell P. Morinec; Chicago, IL; Commercial Litigation Anthony J. Sbarra, Jr.; Milton, MA; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Alan J. Taylor; Southfield, MI; Litigation - Construction; Real Estate Law Kenneth P. Williams; Southfield, MI; Insurance Law; Litigation - Insurance; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants David J. Yates; Southfield, MI; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Segal McCambridge's attorneys named in Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America® include: Masood Syed Ali; Chicago, IL; Labor and Employment Law - Management Mari Bryn Dowdy; Austin, TX; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Chaniece M. Hill; Chicago, IL; Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Mandy Kolodkin; Indianapolis, IN; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Jeffrey M. Marchese; New York, NY; Litigation - Construction Courtney C. McLaren; Memphis, TN; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Benjamin J. Nellans; Chicago, IL; Commercial Litigation Christopher P. Norton; Los Angeles, CA; Commercial Litigation Nelson T. Rainey; Memphis, TN; Family Law; Health Care Law; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Nicholas E. Richardson; Tampa, FL; Insurance Law Jordan B. Rosenberg; Philadelphia, PA; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Ian M. Sadler; Austin, TX; Commercial Litigation; Insurance Law About Best Lawyers® Best Lawyers® is an elite global network of legal professionals recognized through trusted, peer-reviewed distinction. For over four decades, its Purely Peer Review® methodology has upheld the principle that recognition should be earned through the opinions of fellow attorneys, not marketing influence or paid listings. Each year, millions of confidential evaluations are collected worldwide, contributing to one of the legal industry's most rigorous and trusted vetting processes. Only about 5% of lawyers in the United States and 3% globally are recognized, reflecting the selectivity and credibility of the results. No fees are accepted for consideration or inclusion, maintaining the integrity and independence of all recognitions. For more information, visit: www.bestlawyers.com. About Segal McCambridge Segal McCambridge has built a reputation as a national law firm of accomplished trial attorneys for almost four decades. Founded in 1986, the firm has grown from a four-lawyer shop in Chicago to a firm with more than 20 offices nationwide. The firm routinely counsels and defends clients, including Fortune 500 companies, corporations, and individuals, across the United States in complex litigation matters including, but not limited to: asbestos, class action, construction, employment, environmental, food and beverage, insurance coverage and bad faith, life sciences, product liability, professional liability, technology and cyber risk, transportation, and warranty. For more information, visit: www.segalmccambridge.com.

    Communication Gaps Can Cost Construction Firms in the Data Center Boom

    June 02, 2026 —
    The data center construction boom is transforming the construction industry at a historic pace. Fueled by cloud computing, artificial intelligence and relentless demand for digital infrastructure, data centers have become one of the fastest-growing project types in the built environment. Billions of dollars are flowing into new facilities and expansions, creating unprecedented opportunities for construction firms positioned to deliver reliably. But opportunity alone does not guarantee success. As competition intensifies, communication failures and poor information management are emerging as some of the most common (and costly) reasons firms lose margins, miss deadlines or fail to secure repeat work. In data center construction, where schedules are compressed and tolerance for error is minimal, even small breakdowns in communication can have outsized consequences. Reprinted courtesy of Mike Lewis, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Fatalities Edge Down: New Data Reveals a Promising Decline

    April 27, 2026 —
    Construction fatalities in the United States declined slightly in 2024, according to new data released from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The sector recorded just over 1,000 worker deaths last year—a modest decrease from the previous year but still among the highest totals of any industry. Falls remained the leading cause of death, accounting for roughly one-third of all construction fatalities. Transportation incidents—including workers struck by vehicles or equipment—ranked second, followed by contact with objects or equipment and electrocutions. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Potential Gap in Workers Compensation Immunity Statutory Framework

    June 02, 2026 —
    Workers compensation insurance is important. As an owner, you want to ensure the contractors you hire have workers compensation insurance. Assuming you hire a contractor that is statutorily exempt from workers compensation, you want to make sure, no exception, that any subcontractor that is hired has workers compensation insurance. (Regardless, you always want subcontractors to have workers compensation insurance.). In construction, the prime contractor serves as the “statutory employer” for purposes of workers compensation insurance. With workers compensation comes workers compensation immunity. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Alert: Fraudulent Notice of Nonpayment Defense Applies to Payment Bond Claims

    April 27, 2026 —
    Under Florida’s Lien Law, there’s an affirmative defense or affirmative claim known as a “fraudulent lien.” The fraudulent lien defense or claim is set out in Florida Statute s. 713.31. This defense also extends to payment bond claims, whether under a private statutory payment bond (Florida Statute s. 713.23) or a public payment bond (Florida Statute s. 255.05), as it pertains to the notice of nonpayment. A notice of nonpayment needs to be served within 90 days from final furnishing to preserve a claimant’s rights against the bond. However, there really has not been a case, until now, that discusses a “fraudulent notice of nonpayment.” In K&M Electric Supply, Inc. v. Brown Electrical Solutions, LLC, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D672a (Fla. 4th DCA 2026), a prime contractor and surety prevailed at the trial level on their fraudulent notice of nonpayment defense based on a supplier’s notice of nonpayment and action against a public payment bond (under Florida Statute s. 255.05). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Endorsement is Void Where Compliance is Impossible

    September 21, 2026 —
    The Sixth Circuit found that the insured’s loss of property due to fire was covered despite noncompliance with an endorsement requiring encompassing the property. 3371 Reading, LLC v. Liberty Mut Group, Inc., et al., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 19156 (6th Cir. June 29, 2026). The insured, 3371 Reading, owned a building undergoing renovation. After the structure burned down, 3371 Reading made a claim under its policy with Ohio Casualty Insurance Company. Ohio Casualty relied on an endorsement requiring fencing round the jobsite. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com