BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom home expert witness Ness City Kansas townhome construction expert witness Ness City Kansas structural steel construction expert witness Ness City Kansas mid-rise construction expert witness Ness City Kansas low-income housing expert witness Ness City Kansas custom homes expert witness Ness City Kansas parking structure expert witness Ness City Kansas Medical building expert witness Ness City Kansas high-rise construction expert witness Ness City Kansas industrial building expert witness Ness City Kansas multi family housing expert witness Ness City Kansas retail construction expert witness Ness City Kansas institutional building expert witness Ness City Kansas production housing expert witness Ness City Kansas condominium expert witness Ness City Kansas condominiums expert witness Ness City Kansas landscaping construction expert witness Ness City Kansas Subterranean parking expert witness Ness City Kansas casino resort expert witness Ness City Kansas office building expert witness Ness City Kansas hospital construction expert witness Ness City Kansas tract home expert witness Ness City Kansas
    Ness City Kansas reconstruction expert witnessNess City Kansas construction project management expert witnessNess City Kansas expert witness windowsNess City Kansas construction defect expert witnessNess City Kansas defective construction expertNess City Kansas slope failure expert witnessNess City Kansas soil failure expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Ness City, Kansas

    Kansas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 2294 requires a claimant to serve a written notice of claim upon the contractor prior to filing a lawsuit. The law places deadlines on the contractor to serve notice on each subcontractor (15 days) and provide a written response to the claimant (30 days). It permits the claimant to file a lawsuit without further notice if the contractor disputes the claim, does not respond to the notice, does not complete work on the defect on a timely basis or does not make a payment in the time allowed.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Ness City Kansas

    No state license for general contracting. All businesses must register with the Department of Revenue.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    McPherson Area Contractors Association
    Local # 1735
    PO Box 38
    McPherson, KS 67460
    Ness City Kansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Hutchinson
    Local # 1720
    PO Box 2209
    Hutchinson, KS 67504

    Ness City Kansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Salina
    Local # 1750
    2125 Crawford Place
    Salina, KS 67401

    Ness City Kansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lawrence Home Builders Association
    Local # 1723
    PO Box 3490
    Lawrence, KS 66046

    Ness City Kansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Topeka Home Builders Association
    Local # 1765
    1505 SW Fairlawn Rd
    Topeka, KS 66604

    Ness City Kansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Kansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 1700
    212 SW 8th Ave Ste 201
    Topeka, KS 66603

    Ness City Kansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Wichita Area Builders Association
    Local # 1780
    730 N Main St
    Wichita, KS 67203

    Ness City Kansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Ness City Kansas


    Not Just Another Client Alert about Cyber-Risk and Effective Cybersecurity Insurance Regulatory Guidance

    Condos Down in Denver Due to Construction Defect Litigation

    Risk Associated with Design-Build Project Delivery Method

    Second Circuit Denies Petitions for Review of EPA’s Final Regulations to Establish Requirements for Cooling Water Intake Structures

    Recent Supreme Court Decision Could Have Substantial Impact on Builders

    Thank You for 14 Consecutive Years of Legal Elite Elections

    Clean Energy and Conservation Collide in California Coastal Waters

    California Fears El Nino's Dark Side Will Bring More Trouble

    Dust Infiltration Due to Construction Defect Excluded from Policy

    Hunton Insurance Practice Receives Top (Tier 1) National Ranking by US News & World Report

    Presidential Memorandum Promotes Reliable Supply and Delivery of Water in the West

    “Pay When Paid” Provisions May Not Be Dead, at Least Not Yet

    Congratulations to Wilke Fleury’s 2025 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!

    GRSM Named Among 2026 “Best Law Firms” by Best Lawyers®

    Background Owner of Property Cannot Be Compelled to Arbitrate Construction Defects

    Mich. AG Says Straits of Mackinac Tunnel Deal Unconstitutional

    Making Construction Innovation Stick

    Georgia Federal Court Holds That Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage Under Liability Policy for Claims Arising From Discharge of PFAS Into Waterways

    Beware of Design Pitfalls In Unfamiliar Territory

    Bertha – The Tunnel is Finished, but Her Legacy Continues

    Brown and Caldwell Appoints Stigers as Design Chief Engineer

    Subcontractor Default Insurance (“SDI”): What Is It?

    Smart Home Products go Mainstream as Consumer Demand Increases

    How AI Can Become a Design Adviser

    NEHRP Recommendations Likely To Improve Seismic Design

    Time is Money: Escalating Stalled Termination Cost Negotiations

    Collapse Claim Dismissed as Untimely

    Back to Basics: What is a Changes Clause?

    Evolving Climate Patterns and Extreme Weather Demand New Building Methods

    Deadlines Count for Construction Defects in Florida

    School Blown Down by Wind Still Set to Open on Schedule

    Ohio Court of Appeals: Absolute Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage For Workplace Coal-Tar Pitch Exposure Claims

    Is Arbitration Final and Binding?

    Note on First-Party and Third-Party Spoliation of Evidence Claims

    Florida Appellate Courts Holds Underwriting Manuals are Discoverable in Breach of Contract Case

    Thomson Reuters Construction Law (Virginia Practice Series)

    The Impact of Nuclear Verdicts on Construction Businesses

    Insurer Has No Obligation to Cover Arbitration Award in Construction Defect Case

    As Climate Changes, 'Underwater Mortgage' May Take on New Meaning

    2021 Real Estate Trends: New Year, New Reality—A Day of Reckoning for Borrowers and Tenants

    What is a Civil Dispute?

    Enerpac Plays Critical Role in Industry-changing Discovery for Long Span Bridges at The University of Nebraska-Lincoln

    City of Pawtucket Considering Forensic Investigation of Tower

    Taking Service Network Planning to the Next Level

    Contractor Manslaughter? Safety Shortcuts Are Not Worth It

    From Ashes to Action: LA Fire Recovery Enters New Phase

    The Anatomy of a Construction Dispute Stage 3- The Last Straw

    Think Twice Before Hedging A Position Or Defense On A Speculative Event Or Occurrence

    Avoid Delay or Get Ready to Pay: The Risks of “Time-Is-of-The-Essence” Clauses

    Delaware Settlements with Minors and the Uniform Transfer to Minor Act
    Corporate Profile

    NESS CITY KANSAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Ness City, Kansas Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Ness City's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Ness City, Kansas

    Court Denies Cross Summary Judgment Motions on Coverage for Odors in Newly Purchased Home

    October 06, 2026 —
    The federal district court denied cross motions seeking to establish whether the policy covered damage due to smells in the insureds’ newly purchased home. Akina v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co., 2026 U.S Dist. LEXIS 162817 (W. D. Wash. July 22, 2026). Plaintiffs bought a home in May 2024 but never conducted an inspection before purchasing the property. Before moving in, plaintiffs secured a homeowners’ polilcy from State Farm. After moving in, plaintiffs began noticing smells in the house and started suffering from health symptoms. Plaintiffs learned from neighbors that the prior occupants had been witnessed in “drug activity.” Plaintiffs moved out of the house and had testing done. The home tested positive for methamphetamine pollution. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Louisiana Enacts Important Tort Reform Legislation

    May 12, 2026 —
    The Louisiana legislature enacted tort reform legislation in 2025 to address the increasing cost of insurance in Louisiana and to provide some predictability to the Louisiana legal system. While our colleagues, Jenny Michel and Jennifer Kretschmann, have provided an excellent and comprehensive analysis of the legislation in their article entitled “Louisiana State Legislature 2025 Regular Session: Tort Reform - Acts & Vetoed Insurance Bill,” which can be found here, this article examines the anticipated impact of the tort reform legislation on personal injury trials in federal and state courts in Louisiana. The most significant reform involves the institution of a modified defense of contributory negligence, which went into effect on January 1, 2026. Since 1996, Louisiana had operated as a pure comparative fault state; the liability of each party whose fault caused damages was to be allocated among the respective parties based upon their appropriate percentage of fault, regardless of the legal theory of liability asserted against each party. Thus, a plaintiff 55 percent at fault could recover 45 percent of their damages from the liable defendants. The 2025 Tort Reform Amendments now prohibit a plaintiff in a personal injury action from recovering any damages if they are found to be 51 percent or more at fault for their damages. The 55 percent at-fault party in the example above is now prohibited from recovering any damages from any party. Importantly, this new legislation now requires the trial court to instruct the jury that if they find a plaintiff to be more than 50 percent at fault, then the plaintiff will not recover any damages. Reprinted courtesy of Lee M. Peacocke, Lewis Brisbois and Benjamin Perkins, Lewis Brisbois Mr. Peacocke may be contacted at Lee.Peacocke@lewisbrisbois.com Mr. Perkins may be contacted at Benjamin.Perkins@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

    Every High-Tech Building Has Many Lifespans

    August 16, 2026 —
    When I worked as an architect, our team designed a laboratory for fuel research. The facility included a large research hall where various boilers and other devices were tested and analyzed. The setup required extensive floor channeling under the thick concrete floor. We suggested building a modular system that would allow flexibility in the future, when requirements would certainly change. They did not want that because of budget constraints. The high-tech construction trend is spreading. Data centers, semiconductor fabs, battery plants, and life science facilities share one property that sets them apart from ordinary buildings. The technology inside turns over faster than the structure around it. Server generations change every three to five years. Rack densities have risen from 10 or 20 kW to 130 kW and beyond in just a few years. A high-tech facility is really several buildings with different lifespans inside one envelope, and we keep designing them as if they were one. The failure is not that things become obsolete. It is that we never say when each layer is expected to. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Samuel Alhadeff Represents LGI Homes in Acquisition and Re-Entitlement of Maravilla Estates

    July 06, 2026 —
    Temecula Partner Samuel Alhadeff recently represented LGI Homes in its acquisition and re-entitlement of Maravilla Estates, a 169-lot active adult community located in San Jacinto, California. The acquisition and re-entitlement of the project provide LGI Homes with the opportunity to deliver much-needed age-qualified housing in one of Riverside County's growing residential markets. The community includes a recorded final map and finished lots, as well as future development inventory and planned amenities, positioning the project for continued development and completion. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Balancing the Right to Repair With Evidence Preservation in Construction Defect Litigation

    April 20, 2026 —
    Every major construction project comes with risk, whether it’s a warehouse build, a multifamily development or a major renovation. Parties tend to be aligned when things are proceeding as planned. But when something goes wrong—cracked concrete, water intrusion, systems that don’t perform as expected—those interests can quickly diverge. Property owners are often caught in the middle when construction defects surface. They’re expected to act quickly to limit damage and costs. But they also have legal obligations to preserve evidence and allow potentially responsible parties, such as contractors or designers, to observe testing, demolition and repairs. Additionally, owners often have duties to lenders and investors to fix problems promptly and pursue claims against those responsible. Meanwhile, contractors and other parties have obligations of their own—not to interfere with repairs and not to delay mitigation efforts while investigations are underway. What follows will examine how those competing responsibilities play out in construction defect disputes. Reprinted courtesy of Benton Wheatley & Anna Spicer, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Recognized by 2026 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!

    July 20, 2026 —
    Wilke Fleury is pleased to announce that 18 of the firm’s attorneys have been selected for inclusion on the 2026 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars lists. The annual Super Lawyers and Rising Stars selections recognize attorneys across a wide range of practice areas. This year’s honorees reflect the depth of Wilke Fleury’s litigation, business, healthcare, employment, bankruptcy, appellate, real estate, construction, and estate planning practices. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Wilke Fleury

    Two Important Points Regarding the Miller Act

    September 15, 2026 —
    A recent Miller Act case, U.S. f/u/b/o Boundless Management Outsourcing Group, LLC v. Endurance Assurance Corp, 2026 WL 2241491 (D. Puerto Rico 2026), confirms two important points when it comes to the Miller Act. In this case, a subcontractor pursued a Miller Act payment bond lawsuit more than one year after its work was finished. The subcontractor also asserted a claim against the federal government. The lawsuit was dismissed. Below are two takeaway points to consider if you are dealing with a Miller Act payment bond lawsuit. First, as it relates the claim against the federal government, the federal district court followed authority that held that the Miller Act does NOT include a waiver of sovereign immunity against the federal government. “[T]he Court does not identify any clear language in the Miller Act expressly waiving the United States or its agencies’ sovereign immunity.” Endurance Assurance Corp., supra at *3. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    EPA, Maryland Sue DC Water Over Massive Potomac River Sewage Spill

    May 14, 2026 —
    The state of Maryland and the federal government have filed separate lawsuits against the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water), both alleging that the agency’s failure to address longstanding deterioration in the Potomac Interceptor contributed to a weeklong release of more than 240 million gallons of raw sewage into the Potomac River this past January. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com