BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    housing expert witness Morland Kansas condominiums expert witness Morland Kansas hospital construction expert witness Morland Kansas parking structure expert witness Morland Kansas custom home expert witness Morland Kansas retail construction expert witness Morland Kansas production housing expert witness Morland Kansas tract home expert witness Morland Kansas low-income housing expert witness Morland Kansas condominium expert witness Morland Kansas Medical building expert witness Morland Kansas custom homes expert witness Morland Kansas institutional building expert witness Morland Kansas industrial building expert witness Morland Kansas structural steel construction expert witness Morland Kansas high-rise construction expert witness Morland Kansas multi family housing expert witness Morland Kansas Subterranean parking expert witness Morland Kansas office building expert witness Morland Kansas casino resort expert witness Morland Kansas mid-rise construction expert witness Morland Kansas landscaping construction expert witness Morland Kansas
    Morland Kansas architect expert witnessMorland Kansas construction cost estimating expert witnessMorland Kansas construction code expert witnessMorland Kansas expert witness windowsMorland Kansas engineering consultantMorland Kansas consulting engineersMorland Kansas consulting general contractor
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Morland, Kansas

    Kansas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 2294 requires a claimant to serve a written notice of claim upon the contractor prior to filing a lawsuit. The law places deadlines on the contractor to serve notice on each subcontractor (15 days) and provide a written response to the claimant (30 days). It permits the claimant to file a lawsuit without further notice if the contractor disputes the claim, does not respond to the notice, does not complete work on the defect on a timely basis or does not make a payment in the time allowed.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Morland Kansas

    No state license for general contracting. All businesses must register with the Department of Revenue.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Flint Hills Area Builders Association
    Local # 1726
    2601 Anderson Ave Ste 207
    Manhattan, KS 66502

    Morland Kansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Kansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 1700
    212 SW 8th Ave Ste 201
    Topeka, KS 66603

    Morland Kansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Topeka Home Builders Association
    Local # 1765
    1505 SW Fairlawn Rd
    Topeka, KS 66604

    Morland Kansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lawrence Home Builders Association
    Local # 1723
    PO Box 3490
    Lawrence, KS 66046

    Morland Kansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Salina
    Local # 1750
    2125 Crawford Place
    Salina, KS 67401

    Morland Kansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    McPherson Area Contractors Association
    Local # 1735
    PO Box 38
    McPherson, KS 67460
    Morland Kansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Hutchinson
    Local # 1720
    PO Box 2209
    Hutchinson, KS 67504

    Morland Kansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Morland Kansas


    Cutting the Salt Out: Tips for Avoiding Union Salting Charges

    Maximizing Contractual Indemnity Rights: Insuring the Indemnitor's Obligation

    Denver Airport's Renovator Uncovers Potential Snag

    How Berger’s Peer Review Role Figures In Potential Bridge Collapse Settlement

    Ex-Turner Exec Gets 46 Months for Bloomberg Construction Bribes

    Good Signs for Housing Market in 2013

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Recognized by 2026 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!

    Washington’s Court of Appeals Protects Contracting Parties’ Rights to Define the Terms of their Indemnity Agreements

    $10.5M Settlement Ends George Washington Bridge Debris Liability Fight

    Risk Management and Contracting after Hurricane Irma: Suggestions to Avoid a Second Disaster

    L.A. Mixes Grit With Glitz in Downtown Revamp: Cities

    To Sea or Not to Sea: Fifth Circuit Applies Maritime Law to Offshore Service Contract, Spares Indemnity Provision from Louisiana Oilfield Indemnity Act

    Double-Wide World Cup Seats Available to 6-Foot, 221-Pound Fans

    Next Steps for Policyholders in the Aftermath of the California Wildfires

    Florida Supreme Court Decision Limits Special Damages Presented to Juries

    Dispute Among Joint Venture Partners and Joint Venture Agreement

    Final Rule Regarding Project Labor Agreement Requirements for Large-Scale Federal Construction Projects

    Insurance Measures Passed by 2015 Hawaii Legislature

    New Jersey’s Proposed Construction Defect Law May Not Cover Everything

    A Chicago Skyscraper Cements the Legacy of a Visionary Postmodern Architect

    U.S. Housing Starts Exceed Estimates After a Stronger December

    Generally, What Constitutes A Trade Secret Is A Question of Fact

    Hawaii Construction Defect Law Increased Confusion

    Does Your U.S. Company Pull Data From European Citizens? Fall In Line With GDPR by May 2018 or Suffer Substantial Fines

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Ursinus is Cleared!”

    Warning! Danger Ahead for Public Entities

    Celebrating 29 Years – Thank You for Your Continued Trust!

    Los Angeles County Sues Utility Edison Over Deadly Wildfire

    Insured Cannot Sue to Challenge Binding Appraisal Decision

    Appraiser Declarations Inadmissible When Offered to Challenge the Merits of an Appraisal Award

    Skipping Depositions does not Constitute Failure to Cooperate in New York

    Supreme Court of New York Denies Motion in all but One Cause of Action in Kikirov v. 355 Realty Assoc., et al.

    Monitoring Building Moisture with RFID – Interview with Jarmo Tuppurainen

    Why the Renovation of Federal Reserve Headquarters Costs $2.5 Billion

    Mortgage Company Fails to Prove Loss or Entitlement to Damages, Eliminating Recovery

    Congratulations to Partner Madeline Arcellana on Her Selection as a Top Rank Attorney in Nevada!

    Not so Fast! How Does Revoking Acceleration of a Note Impact the Statute of Limitations?

    Employee or Independent Contractor? New Administrator’s Interpretation Issued by Department of Labor Provides Guidance

    SB800 Not the Only Remedy for Construction Defects

    Corps, State Agencies Prep for Flood Risks From California Snowmelt Runoff

    NJ Court Reaffirms Rule Against Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Claims and Finds Fraud Claims Inherently Intentional

    Subprime Bonds Are Back With Different Name Seven Years After U.S. Crisis

    Where-Forum Art Thou? Is the Chosen Forum Akin to No Forum at All?

    Does Stricter Decertification Mean More “Leedigation?”

    Timely Written Notice to Insurer and Cooperating with Insurer

    New Jersey Courts Speed Up Sandy Litigation

    A Court-Side Seat – Case Law Update (February 2022)

    It is Time to Assess Your Strategy

    Green Builder Media Releases 2025 Sustainable Brand Index Results

    Wall Street Journal Analyzes the Housing Market Direction
    Corporate Profile

    MORLAND KANSAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Morland, Kansas Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Morland's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Morland, Kansas

    GRSM Defeats Class Certification in Precedent-Setting HOA Management Case

    September 15, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Partners Fletcher Alford and Kevin Liu and Associate Jigar Desai secured a favorable outcome on behalf of an HOA management company in a precedent-setting class action before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, obtaining denial of the plaintiff’s motion for class certification and dismissal without prejudice of the three claims at issue. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant received earnings credit payments from a bank in exchange for maintaining HOA deposit accounts and failed to disclose the arrangement to its HOA clients. The plaintiff sought more than $40 million in damages, asserting five claims: (1) breach of contract for failing to act in class members’ best interests by not disclosing the alleged earnings credit arrangement; (2) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) based on alleged violations of California Civil Code §§ 5375, 5375.5, and 5380; (3) breach of fiduciary duty based on the alleged undisclosed arrangement; (4) violation of the UCL for unfair business practices arising from the alleged nondisclosure; and (5) unjust enrichment. The plaintiff sought class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) and 23(b)(3) only as to its second, third, and fourth causes of action. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Alexander Hopkins Authors Law360 Article on Wisconsin Supreme Court Coverage Decision

    October 06, 2026 —
    Alexander Hopkins recently authored an Expert Analysis for Law360 examining a recent Wisconsin Supreme Court decision addressing coverage for water damage arising from alleged construction defects. In “Wis. Coverage Ruling Rejects Strict Ensuing Loss Test,” Alex explores the relationship between construction defect exclusions and ensuing loss provisions, and what the decision means for policyholders seeking coverage when an excluded condition contributes to subsequent damage. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Alexander G. Hopkins, SDV Fenchurch
    Mr. Hopkins may be contacted at alexander.hopkins@sdvfenchurch.us

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Best Lawyers in America

    September 08, 2026 —
    Nomos LLP partner Garret Murai has been recognized in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® in the area of Construction Law. Only about 5% of lawyers in the United States are recognized by Best Lawyers in America®. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Judge's Order Halts Google Data Center Project in Minnesota

    July 27, 2026 —
    Construction of a $1-billion Google data center planned by Ryan Cos. on 485 acres in southeastern Minnesota was expected to start in July but is now halted under a judge’s order. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Annemarie Mannion, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. Mannion may be contacted at manniona@enr.com

    Lienor Dealing With “Show Cause” Summons by Condominium Unit Owner

    September 01, 2026 —
    One of the statutory vehicles to shorten a construction lienor’s statute of limitations to foreclose on a construction lien is through a “show cause” summons that essentially requires the lienor to foreclose on the lien within 20 days from receipt of the “show cause” summons. This is a statutory procedure under Florida’s Lien Law in Fla. Stat. s. 713.21(4). If a lienor receives a “show cause” summons and lawsuit, the lienor should, without delay, counterclaim or file a separate lien foreclosure lawsuit within the 20-day period without exception. This is provided the lienor wants to move forward with its lien. If a lienor does not, the lien will be discharged of record. If you are a lienor and receive a “show cause” summons, please immediately consult with construction counsel that can best advise you and perfect your lien rights. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    HHMR and Every One of its Partners Recognized by Legal 500 in Denver Elite – Real Estate

    April 20, 2026 —
    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC is pleased to announce its recognition as a Tier 1 firm in the Denver Elite rankings for Real Estate, a category that includes construction law and construction litigation, by The Legal 500. In addition, each of the firm’s partners has been individually recognized in the same rankings. The firm’s individual recognitions include: Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    The Grenfell & Champlain Towers: Risk Management Considerations in the Wake of Catastrophic Loss — A UK/US Comparison

    June 02, 2026 —
    1. Introduction As part of the multinational collaborative relationship between Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and Fenchurch Law, we continually find ourselves in conversations about the sometimes subtle but sometimes drastic differences between risk management and coverage considerations from one country to the next. These differences are often highlighted by the fallout from large catastrophic losses that are widely publicized and illuminate sometimes widespread risks and perils that many others may be facing in the coming years. The response of governments and their subdivisions to the needs of victims and/or commercial parties, and insurance markets’ evaluation of and reactions to catastrophic losses vary widely from country to country and jurisdiction. In this article, we discuss these responses and reactions in the cases of the Grenfell Tower Fire in London, England, and the Champlain Tower collapse in Surfside, Florida, within the United States. These two widely publicized losses involved different risk management and insurance considerations based on where they occurred. They also saw substantially different government responses and raised varied questions about what the next steps are for their respective commercial and insurance markets. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Eric M. Clarkson, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
    Mr. Clarkson may be contacted at EClarkson@sdvlaw.com

    A Customized Approach to Data Center Construction

    June 29, 2026 —
    Data center construction projects are, to put it mildly, distinct. They differ from traditional construction in a host of manners, and are particularly distinctive because the value of the facility depends on unique measures of performance. A center that cannot meet uptime, cooling, redundancy or connectivity standards will not achieve its mission, whether or not the structure itself meets standard industry contract-form “substantial completion” or “mechanical completion” definitions. Owners, developers, lenders, operators and hyperscalers—especially hyperscalers!—want it all. They seek favorable and stable pricing, accelerated delivery and sophisticated components, all of which are evolving in “real project time.” Standard construction contract forms deserve extensive modifications to align clauses with expectations, with a heightened focus on systems integration, commissioning, and allocation of special risks. This article details customized considerations for drafting, negotiating and administering data center design and construction agreements. Reprinted courtesy of James P. Bobotek, Pillsbury, Arielle L. Murphy, Pillsbury and Robert A. James, Pillsbury Mr. Bobotek may be contacted at james.bobotek@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Murphy may be contacted at arielle.murphy@pillsburylaw.com Mr. James may be contacted at rob.james@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...