BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    parking structure expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas industrial building expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas mid-rise construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas tract home expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas condominiums expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas landscaping construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas custom homes expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas casino resort expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas structural steel construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas housing expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas hospital construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas production housing expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas institutional building expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas multi family housing expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas low-income housing expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas concrete tilt-up expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas high-rise construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas Medical building expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas retail construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas custom home expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas Subterranean parking expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas townhome construction expert witness Cheyenne County Kansas
    Cheyenne County Kansas construction cost estimating expert witnessCheyenne County Kansas delay claim expert witnessCheyenne County Kansas civil engineer expert witnessCheyenne County Kansas construction defect expert witnessCheyenne County Kansas window expert witnessCheyenne County Kansas building code compliance expert witnessCheyenne County Kansas fenestration expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Cheyenne County, Kansas

    Kansas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 2294 requires a claimant to serve a written notice of claim upon the contractor prior to filing a lawsuit. The law places deadlines on the contractor to serve notice on each subcontractor (15 days) and provide a written response to the claimant (30 days). It permits the claimant to file a lawsuit without further notice if the contractor disputes the claim, does not respond to the notice, does not complete work on the defect on a timely basis or does not make a payment in the time allowed.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Cheyenne County Kansas

    No state license for general contracting. All businesses must register with the Department of Revenue.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Flint Hills Area Builders Association
    Local # 1726
    2601 Anderson Ave Ste 207
    Manhattan, KS 66502

    Cheyenne County Kansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Kansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 1700
    212 SW 8th Ave Ste 201
    Topeka, KS 66603

    Cheyenne County Kansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Topeka Home Builders Association
    Local # 1765
    1505 SW Fairlawn Rd
    Topeka, KS 66604

    Cheyenne County Kansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lawrence Home Builders Association
    Local # 1723
    PO Box 3490
    Lawrence, KS 66046

    Cheyenne County Kansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Salina
    Local # 1750
    2125 Crawford Place
    Salina, KS 67401

    Cheyenne County Kansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    McPherson Area Contractors Association
    Local # 1735
    PO Box 38
    McPherson, KS 67460
    Cheyenne County Kansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Hutchinson
    Local # 1720
    PO Box 2209
    Hutchinson, KS 67504

    Cheyenne County Kansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Cheyenne County Kansas


    Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Denied

    Wilke Fleury Celebrates the Addition of Two New Partners

    Congratulations to San Diego Partner Alex Giannetto and Senior Associate Michael Ibach on Settling a Case 3 Weeks Into a 5-Week Trial!

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (8/20/25) – Hotel Growth Forecast, Data Center Availability and an AI Rental Revolution

    Policy Renewals: Has Your Insurer Been Naughty or Nice?

    Insurer Must Defend Claims of Negligence and Private Nuisance

    Notice and Claims Provisions In Contracts Matter…A Lot

    COVID-19 Likely No Longer Covered Under Force Majeure

    How Will Today’s Pandemic Impact Tomorrow’s Construction Contracts?

    South Adams County Water and Sanitation District Takes Proactive Step to Treat PFAS, Safeguard Water Supplies

    U.S. Home Sellers Return for Spring as Buyers Get Relief

    DE Confirms Robust D&O Protection Despite Company Demise

    2026 Colorado Super Lawyers Recognizes 11 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys

    The Reptile Theory in Practice

    No Choice between Homeowner Protection and Bankrupt Developers?

    Engineers Propose 'River' Alternative to Border Wall

    Year in Review: Top Insurance Cases of 2024

    Tejon Ranch Co. Announces Settlement of Litigation Related to the Tejon Ranch Conservation and Land Use Agreement

    New Recommendations for Healthy and Safe Housing Conditions

    Eleventh Circuit Finds No Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Claims

    U.S. Supreme Court Limits the Powers of the Nation’s Bankruptcy Courts

    Resulting Loss From Faulty Workmanship Covered

    Ohio Does Not Permit Retroactive Application of Statute of Repose

    Breaking The Ice: A Policyholder's Guide to Insurance Coverage for Texas Winter Storm Uri Claims

    Failure to Comply with Contract Leaves No Additional Insured Coverage

    Jury Awards Aluminum Company 35 Million in Time Element Losses

    When a Request for Equitable Adjustment Should Be Treated as a Claim Under the Contract Disputes Act

    After the Fire, Should Some Parts of Los Angeles Never Rebuild?

    Concerns About On-the-job Safety Persist

    Patriarch Partners Decision Confirms Government Subpoenas May Constitute a “Claim” Under D&O Policy; Warns Policyholders to Think Broadly When Representing Facts and Circumstances to Insurers

    Contingent Business Interruption Claim Denied

    General Liability Alert: A Mixed Cause of Action with Protected and Non-Protected Activity Not Subject to Anti-SLAPP Motion

    Case Remanded for Application of Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine

    Finding Plaintiff Intentionally Spoliated Evidence, the Northern District of Indiana Imposes Sanction

    Steven Cvitanovic Recognized in JD Supra's 2017 Readers' Choice Awards

    The Burden of Betterment

    Is Settling a Bond Claim in the Face of a Seemingly Clear Statute of Limitations Defense Bad Faith?

    Timely Filed, Wrongly Rejected: Court of Appeal Reinforces Summary Judgment Rights

    General Partner Is Not Additional Insured For Construction Defect Claim

    Trump Abandons Plan for Council on Infrastructure

    California Case Is a Reminder That Not All Insurance Policies Are Alike Regarding COVID-19 Losses

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (1/16/24) – Algorithms Affect the Rental Market, Robots Aim to Lower Construction Costs, and Gen Z Struggle to Find Their Own Space

    New Joint Venture to Develop a New Community in Orange County, California

    A Discussion on Home Affordability

    Slump in U.S. Housing Starts Led by Multifamily: Economy

    Subsequent Purchaser Can Assert Claims for Construction Defects

    Indemnity: What You Don’t Know Can Hurt You!

    Eleventh Circuit Finds Professional Services Exclusion Applies to Construction Management Activities

    Finalists in San Diego’s Moving Parklet Design Competition Announced

    Sales of Existing U.S. Homes Unexpectedly Fell in January
    Corporate Profile

    CHEYENNE COUNTY KANSAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Cheyenne County, Kansas Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Cheyenne County's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Cheyenne County, Kansas

    Chambers Global 2026 Recognizes Sheppard Practices and Attorneys

    March 03, 2026 —
    Sheppard has been recognized by Chambers Global 2026 in the following practice areas:
    • Privacy & Data Security in the United States
    • Projects: Power & Renewables: Transactional in the United States
    • Projects: Renewables & Alternative Energy in the United States
    Additionally, the following Sheppard partners have been recognized by Chambers Global 2026:
    • Justin Boose (Projects: Renewables & Alternative Energy – USA)
    • Will Chen (Intellectual Property: International Firms – South Korea)
    • David Chun (Intellectual Property – South Korea)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sheppard

    CEO/Founding Principal Nicole Whyte is recognized as one of the most Influential Leaders in Orange County by the OC Business Journal!

    December 15, 2025 —
    Congratulations to CEO/Founding Principal Nicole Whyte on her recognition as one of the most Influential Leaders in Orange County by the OC Business Journal! Why: Nicole leads over 200 attorneys in 11 offices in the Western U.S. She specializes in family law and complex civil litigation. Of those, 89 are based in the firm’s Newport Beach headquarters. Notable: Nicole was born, raised, and educated in South Africa. She practiced law in Johannesburg before emigrating to the United States in 1991. After quickly learning the U.S. Legal system, Nicole founded Bremer Whyte in 1997. Her husband, Steve Nataupsky, is a managing partner at Knobbe Martens. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    GRSM Attorneys Selected to 2025 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists

    January 06, 2026 —
    Super Lawyers® has released its 2025 attorney lists across various regions of the United States. This year, 189 Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani attorneys have been selected, with 60 named to Super Lawyers and 129 named to Rising Stars. *For attorneys licensed to practice in New Jersey: No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. Please visit the Super Lawyers Selection Process for a detailed description of the Super Lawyers and Rising Stars selection methodology. GRSM Super Lawyers 2025 Northern California Michael D. Bruno David C. Capell Lisa M. Cappelluti Dion N. Cominos Matthew S. Foy Natalie Fujikawa Marie Trimble Holvick Michael A. Laurenson Michael J. Pietrykowski Andrew I. Port Gina Stassi Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Alert: Fraudulent Notice of Nonpayment Defense Applies to Payment Bond Claims

    April 27, 2026 —
    Under Florida’s Lien Law, there’s an affirmative defense or affirmative claim known as a “fraudulent lien.” The fraudulent lien defense or claim is set out in Florida Statute s. 713.31. This defense also extends to payment bond claims, whether under a private statutory payment bond (Florida Statute s. 713.23) or a public payment bond (Florida Statute s. 255.05), as it pertains to the notice of nonpayment. A notice of nonpayment needs to be served within 90 days from final furnishing to preserve a claimant’s rights against the bond. However, there really has not been a case, until now, that discusses a “fraudulent notice of nonpayment.” In K&M Electric Supply, Inc. v. Brown Electrical Solutions, LLC, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D672a (Fla. 4th DCA 2026), a prime contractor and surety prevailed at the trial level on their fraudulent notice of nonpayment defense based on a supplier’s notice of nonpayment and action against a public payment bond (under Florida Statute s. 255.05). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    US Energy Dept. Withdraws Federal ‘Zero-Emissions Building’ Definition

    December 22, 2025 —
    The U.S. Dept. of Energy has withdrawn the Biden-era federal definition of a “zero-emissions building,” marking another step in the Trump administration’s rollback of climate-focused initiatives and creating uncertainty for states, cities and owners that had informally used the guidance in project planning. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Kahana Feld Earns Recognition in Five Practice Areas in 2026 Best Law Firms® Rankings

    December 15, 2025 —
    IRVINE, CA – Nov. 6, 2025 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce that the firm has been recognized across five practice areas in the 2026 edition of Best Law Firms®. Now in its 16th year, Best Law Firms provides a comprehensive guide to the top-performing firms across 127 practice areas and 188 local jurisdictions. A listing of Kahana Feld’s 2026 rankings follows: Orange County
    • Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law (Metropolitan Tier 2)
    • Litigation – Real Estate (Metropolitan Tier 3)
    • Real Estate Law (Metropolitan Tier 3)
    New York City
    • Litigation – Insurance (Metropolitan Tier 3)
    Houston
    • Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants (Metropolitan Tier 3)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Eva Paulson, Kahana Feld
    Ms. Paulson may be contacted at epaulson@kahanafeld.com

    Reducing Rework on Construction Projects Benefits Budget, Schedule and Financial Loss

    February 10, 2026 —
    The costs of not building it right the first time is statistically staggering—some research suggests up to 20% of the total project costs. This article highlights the costs of re-work, provides a financial worksheet to track the costs of re-work, and a trusted tool to help reduce the impact of re-work. Typically, when discussing rework, one thinks of the labor and material costs, but there are other costs associated with rework that are less easily quantified:
    • Liquidated damages and related legal costs
    • Potential for increasing safety incidents associated with rework
    • Morale loss due to performing rework
    • Loss of previously trained workers due to delays caused by rework
    • Reputational loss and the inability to bid on future work
    • Challenges of future work to be performed due to schedule delays on a current project
    Reprinted courtesy of Brian Clarke, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Mr. Clarke may be contacted at brianclarke1121@aol.com Read the full story...

    Top Developments 2025 - Issue 4

    December 22, 2025 —
    “ARISING OUT OF” Rowe v. State Mut. Ins. Co., 2025 Me. LEXIS 89 (Me., Sept. 23, 2025) Maine Supreme Court, in the premises liability context, holds that an exclusion in a mobile homeowners policy for injury or damage "arising out of a premises . . . that is not an insured location'” precluded coverage for underlying negligent failure-to-warn claims. The court looked to authority from a workers compensation case, where it stated that “the term ‘arising out of' employment means that there must be some causal connection between the conditions under which the employee worked and the injury, or that the injury, in some proximate way, had its origin, its source, or its cause in the employment. . . . [T]he employment need not be the sole or predominant causal factor for the injury and . . . the causative circumstance need not have been foreseen or expected.” In this case, it found there to be “an immediate relationship between the injury and a condition of the uninsured premises” (specifically, a gap created by the owner-insured at the entrance to a mobile home), and rejected the claimant’s argument that the injury instead arose from the insureds’ negligent conduct in failing to warn. Separately, the court held that the property did not qualify as an “insured location,” reasoning it was not listed in the declarations and there was no evidence the insureds had resided there or acquired it for use as a residence. Reprinted courtesy of John S. Anooshian, White and Williams LLP, Paul A. Briganti, White and Williams LLP, Elizabeth L. Ferguson, White and Williams LLP, Alexandra M. George, White and Williams LLP and Haley S. Newman, White and Williams LLP Mr. Anooshian may be contacted at anooshianj@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Briganti may be contacted at brigantip@whiteandwilliams.com Ms. Ferguson may be contacted at fergusone@whiteandwilliams.com Ms. Newman may be contacted at newmanh@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...