BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    casino resort expert witness Knierim Iowa custom homes expert witness Knierim Iowa multi family housing expert witness Knierim Iowa high-rise construction expert witness Knierim Iowa production housing expert witness Knierim Iowa tract home expert witness Knierim Iowa concrete tilt-up expert witness Knierim Iowa Medical building expert witness Knierim Iowa landscaping construction expert witness Knierim Iowa townhome construction expert witness Knierim Iowa office building expert witness Knierim Iowa structural steel construction expert witness Knierim Iowa mid-rise construction expert witness Knierim Iowa parking structure expert witness Knierim Iowa low-income housing expert witness Knierim Iowa institutional building expert witness Knierim Iowa condominium expert witness Knierim Iowa condominiums expert witness Knierim Iowa retail construction expert witness Knierim Iowa hospital construction expert witness Knierim Iowa custom home expert witness Knierim Iowa industrial building expert witness Knierim Iowa
    Knierim Iowa structural concrete expertKnierim Iowa contractor expert witnessKnierim Iowa building code compliance expert witnessKnierim Iowa expert witness roofingKnierim Iowa construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessKnierim Iowa stucco expert witnessKnierim Iowa construction forensic expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Knierim, Iowa

    Iowa Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Knierim Iowa

    Licensing for plumbers and electricians is done at the local level. No state license for general contracting, however, all businesses must register with the state.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Fort Dodge Chapter of National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 1656
    110 S 21st St
    Fort Dodge, IA 50501
    Knierim Iowa Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Greater Siouxland
    Local # 1684
    3900 Stadium Drive
    Sioux City, IA 51106

    Knierim Iowa Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of NE Iowa
    Local # 1614
    PO Box 1857
    Waterloo, IA 50704
    Knierim Iowa Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Dubuque IndependentChapter of National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 1640
    12230 Forest Meadow
    Dubuque, IA 52001
    Knierim Iowa Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Gr Cedar Rapids Area
    Local # 1621
    350 Miller Rd Ste1
    Hiawatha, IA 52233

    Knierim Iowa Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Ames
    Local # 1607
    PO Box 864
    Ames, IA 50010

    Knierim Iowa Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Gr Des Moines
    Local # 1649
    6751 Corporate Drive
    Johnston, IA 50131

    Knierim Iowa Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Knierim Iowa


    Congratulations Bryan Stofferahn, August Hotchkin, and Eileen Gaisford on Their Promotion to Partner!

    Even Where Fraud and Contract Mix, Be Careful With Timing

    Where There’s Smoke, Is There Coverage? A Closer Look at Bottega, LLC v. National Surety and Gharibian v. Wawanesa

    He Turned Wall Street Offices Into Homes. Now He Vows to Remake New York

    "My Bad, I Thought It Was in Good Faith" is Not Good Enough - Contractor Ordered to Pay Prompt Payment Penalties

    Federal Public Works Construction Collection Remedies: The Miller Act Payment Bond Claim

    COVID-19 Response: California Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board Implements Sweeping New Regulations to Prevent COVID-19 in the Workplace

    Dump Site Provider Has Valid Little Miller Act Claim

    Scary Movie: Theatre Developer Axed By Court of Appeal In Prevailing Wage Determination Challenge

    Insurer Must Defend and Indemnify Construction Defect Claims Under Iowa Law

    Blackstone to Buy Apartments From Greystar in $2 Billion Deal

    Seventh Circuit Remands “Waters of the United States” Case to Corps of Engineers to Determine Whether there is a “Significant Nexus”

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight Nationally Ranked as a 2020 “Best Law Firm” by U.S. News – Best Lawyers®

    Eight Things You Need to Know About the AAA’s New Construction Arbitration Rules

    That’s What I have Insurance For, Right?

    Las Vegas Harmon Hotel to be Demolished without Opening

    Lost Productivity or Inefficiency Claim Can Be Challenging to Prove

    Minimum Wage on Federal Construction Projects is $10.10

    Department of Transportation Revises Its Rules Affecting Environmental Review of Transportation Projects

    An Oregon School District Files Suit Against Robinson Construction Co.

    Hurricane Ian: Florida Expedites Road Work as Damage Comes Into Focus

    Federal Court Upholds Uninsured Contractor Endorsement; Finds Duty to Defend Anyway

    Nevada Provides Independant Counsel When Conflict Arises Between Insurer and Insured

    Construction Contract Provisions that Should Pique Your Interest

    Colorado Supreme Court Rules that Developers Retain Perpetual Control over Construction Defect Covenants

    BHA Attending the Construction Law Conference in San Antonio, TX

    Extreme Heat, Smoke Should Get US Disaster Label, Groups Say

    Florida trigger

    CDJ’s #6 Topic of the Year: Does Colorado Need Construction Defect Legislation to Spur Affordable Home Development?

    Bert Hummel Appointed to Chief Justice’s Commission on Professionalism

    Maximizing Contractual Indemnity Rights: Insuring the Indemnitor's Obligation

    Defects in Texas High School Stadium Angers Residents

    Summary Judgment for Insurer Reversed Based on Expert Opinion

    Policyholders' Coverage Checklist in Times of Coronavirus

    Remand of Bad Faith Claim Evidences Split Among Florida District Courts

    Segal McCambridge Expands West Coast Presence with the Addition of 36 Attorneys from Chapman Glucksman to Los Angeles Office

    Contractor Definition Central to Coverage Dispute

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Highlighted | 2019 Northern California Super Lawyers

    The Living Makes Buildings Better with Computational Design

    US Supreme Court Backs Panama Canal Owner in Dispute with Builders

    World Cup May Pull Out of Brazil because of Construction Delays

    Precedent-Setting ‘Green’ Apartments in Kansas City

    Construction Insurance Costs for New York Schools is Going Up

    Colorado’s Abbreviated Legislative Session Offers Builders a Reprieve

    Georgia Supreme Court Rules Construction Defects Can Constitute an Occurrence in CGL Policies

    Update: Supreme Court Issues Opinion in West Virginia v. EPA

    White House Reverses Trump Administration NEPA Cutbacks

    Jenny Michel Named Top Lawyer by Acadiana Profile Magazine

    Hurry Up and Wait! Cal/OSHA Hits Pause on Emergency Temporary Standards for COVID-19 Prevention

    Architect Sues over Bidding Procedure
    Corporate Profile

    KNIERIM IOWA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Knierim, Iowa Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Knierim's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Knierim, Iowa

    Fight for Your Right: Effects of FAR Final Rule on Construction

    October 12, 2026 —
    Since the Federal Acquisition Regulation final rule Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects took effect, contractors seeking to compete for federal projects of $35 million or more must “negotiate or become a party to a project labor agreement with one or more labor organizations.” While this requirement significantly reduces competition for covered procurements, contractors may seek to restore competition on individual solicitations by filing a bid protest with the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. Bid protests through the COFC become possible once a federal agency posts a solicitation that includes contract provisions mandating a PLA. (In some cases, a presolicitation notice that a PLA mandate will be applied may be sufficient.) Reprinted courtesy of Michael Altman, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...
    Mr. Altman may be contacted at altman@abc.org

    Arizona Court of Appeals Clarifies Homeowners Association Open Meeting Requirements

    June 29, 2026 —
    A Z N H Revocable Trust v. Sunland Springs Village Homeowners Association, No. 1 CA-CV 25-0424 (Ariz. Ct. App. Apr. 28, 2026) OVERVIEW The Arizona Court of Appeals issued an opinion clarifying how homeowners associations must conduct meetings under A.R.S. § 33-1804. The decision reinforces the legislative policy favoring transparency in association governance, bringing association meeting requirements more in line with the open meeting standards applicable to public bodies under A.R.S. § 38-431 et seq. (Arizona’s Open Meeting Law). KEY HOLDINGS 1. All Voting and Formal Actions Must Occur in Open Meetings The Court affirmed that association boards cannot vote or take formal action during closed (executive) sessions. Under A.R.S. § 33-1804(A), associations may close portions of meetings only for “consideration” of certain enumerated topics, such as legal advice, pending litigation, or personal/financial information about individual members. The Court interpreted “consideration” to mean discussion and deliberation, not voting. The Court noted that dictionaries define “consider” as “spending time thinking about a possibility” and “formulating an opinion,” which are processes that precede formal action. This interpretation mirrors how Arizona’s Open Meeting Law (A.R.S. § 38-431.03(D)) prohibits public bodies from voting in executive session. Reprinted courtesy of Jill Casson Owen, Snell & Wilmer, Benjamin J. Hawkins, Snell & Wilmer and Stephen Wright, Snell & Wilmer Ms. Owen may be contacted at jowen@swlaw.com Mr. Hawkins may be contacted at bhawkins@swlaw.com Mr. Wright may be contacted at swright@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Preventing Common and Costly Water Intrusion Events in Construction

    July 13, 2026 —
    Water leaking into a building is a leading cause of damage and loss in the construction industry. On one jobsite, heavy rains flooded a sub-basement, damaging a new electrical transformer—all because a roof drain was not property connected. On another jobsite, a drinking-fountain supply line broke in a multistory building that was undergoing renovation, causing water to run—undetected—for an entire weekend, resulting in water damage to all lower floors, where construction had been finished. Those loss scenarios could have been prevented with a comprehensive and effective water damage prevention plan (WDPP). This includes routine site inspections to identify uncontrolled water damage exposures and basic maintenance to make sure drains are clean of debris and divert them to a catch basin or low point away from the building. An effective WDPP plan also incorporates technology such as backflow preventers on sewer connections and water sensing technology to monitor the most vulnerable exposures. Reprinted courtesy of Andrew Swift, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    What Massachusetts Contractors and Developers Can Learn from Cannistraro v. Columbia Construction

    July 13, 2026 —
    Introduction On June 26, 2026 the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued its decision in J.C. Cannistraro, LLC v. Columbia Construction Co.—a holding that sits at the intersection of Prompt Pay Act compliance and the Massachusetts Arbitration Act.[1] Most already know that the Massachusetts Prompt Pay Act (PPA) imposes strict timing and certification requirements for rejecting payment applications and proposed change orders on projects valued at $3 million or more. Most notably, the PPA requires the paying party to give the payee written notice of its approval or rejection of progress applications and proposed changes within 15 days of receipt, which notice must include a “factual and contractual basis for the rejection” and must be “certified as made in good faith.”[2] In the absence of a timely certified notice, payment is “deemed to be approved” unless the payor properly rejects payment before it comes due.[3] Reprinted courtesy of Anthony LaPlaca, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Luke Marston, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Mr. LaPlaca may be contacted at alaplaca@seyfarth.com Mr. Marston may be contacted at lmarston@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    Fatalities Edge Down: New Data Reveals a Promising Decline

    April 27, 2026 —
    Construction fatalities in the United States declined slightly in 2024, according to new data released from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The sector recorded just over 1,000 worker deaths last year—a modest decrease from the previous year but still among the highest totals of any industry. Falls remained the leading cause of death, accounting for roughly one-third of all construction fatalities. Transportation incidents—including workers struck by vehicles or equipment—ranked second, followed by contact with objects or equipment and electrocutions. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Water Reuse Emerges as a Critical Strategy for Data Center Development

    June 22, 2026 —
    As demand for data centers continues to accelerate, water availability is emerging as a critical factor in project development and long-term operations. Although power supply and transmission access have historically dominated siting discussions, increasing water constraints in many regions are placing greater focus on the substantial volumes of water required to support data center cooling systems. As we covered previously, data centers are frequently located in areas already experiencing water stress and require substantial volumes of water to operate—roughly 228 billion gallons in 2023 in the United States alone—with water use projected to increase by up to 170% by 2030. Alternative cooling options, such as free-air cooling or mechanical chillers, can reduce direct water consumption but introduce their own tradeoffs. Free-air cooling is climate-dependent and often ineffective in hotter regions, while mechanical chillers increase energy demand, potentially shifting water consumption upstream through increased electricity generation. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh Myers, Pillsbury, Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury and Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    White and Williams LLP Secures Trio of Cyber Coverage Wins

    May 12, 2026 —
    Three weeks, three jurisdictions, three cyber wins. White and Williams picked up the first victory on March 9, 2026, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, where the court granted summary judgment to their client enforcing a Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. See Perry & Perry Builders, Inc. v. Cowbell Cyber and Obsidian Specialty Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49409 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 9, 2026). In Perry, the insured was deceived into transferring money intended for a vendor to an unintended third party. The insurer acknowledged that the loss was covered and paid the insured the policy’s Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. Discontent with a single sublimit, the insured argued that because it wired the money to the fraudster in separate transfers, it was entitled to a second Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. Reprinted courtesy of Gabriel Darwick, White and Williams LLP and Sean Elman, White and Williams LLP Mr. Darwick may be contacted at darwickg@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Elman may be contacted at elmans@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    New York Construction: New Rules for Reporting and Cancellation Pay

    October 12, 2026 —
    Effective December 8, 2026, covered New York construction employers generally must provide up to four hours of reporting pay when an employee reports for a scheduled shift but receives no work, and two hours of pay when a scheduled shift is canceled with less than 12 hours’ notice. Separate requirements apply to certain prevailing-wage construction projects. Before the law takes effect, contractors should identify which projects and employees are covered and make sure their scheduling, payroll, labor, and contract practices are ready. What the New Law Requires New York’s Construction Reporting Pay Act introduces two principal compensation requirements for covered construction employees:
    • Reporting pay: An employee who reports for a scheduled shift but is not provided work generally must receive up to four hours of pay.
    • Shift-cancellation pay: An employee generally must receive two hours of pay when a scheduled shift is canceled with less than 12 hours’ notice.
    Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Seyfarth and Howard Wexler, Seyfarth Ms. Douris may be contacted at mdouris@seyfarth.com Mr. Wexler may be contacted at hwexler@seyfarth.com Read the full story...