BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    housing expert witness Spencer County Indiana parking structure expert witness Spencer County Indiana retail construction expert witness Spencer County Indiana mid-rise construction expert witness Spencer County Indiana Medical building expert witness Spencer County Indiana townhome construction expert witness Spencer County Indiana condominiums expert witness Spencer County Indiana structural steel construction expert witness Spencer County Indiana institutional building expert witness Spencer County Indiana Subterranean parking expert witness Spencer County Indiana concrete tilt-up expert witness Spencer County Indiana production housing expert witness Spencer County Indiana low-income housing expert witness Spencer County Indiana tract home expert witness Spencer County Indiana high-rise construction expert witness Spencer County Indiana custom home expert witness Spencer County Indiana hospital construction expert witness Spencer County Indiana office building expert witness Spencer County Indiana custom homes expert witness Spencer County Indiana multi family housing expert witness Spencer County Indiana condominium expert witness Spencer County Indiana industrial building expert witness Spencer County Indiana
    Spencer County Indiana roofing and waterproofing expert witnessSpencer County Indiana defective construction expertSpencer County Indiana structural concrete expertSpencer County Indiana expert witness concrete failureSpencer County Indiana architectural expert witnessSpencer County Indiana civil engineer expert witnessSpencer County Indiana stucco expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Spencer County, Indiana

    Indiana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to SB45160, §IC 32-27-3-1&2 a claimant must provide written notice 60 days before filing an action. Within 21 days after service of the notice, the construction professional must serve a written response. Claimant must file list of known construction defects, description, and the construction professional responsible for each alleged defect (to the extent known).


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Spencer County Indiana

    License required for plumbing. All other licensing is done at the local county level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Southern Indiana
    Local # 1566
    1601 Greentree Court
    Clarksville, IN 47129

    Spencer County Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Gibson Co Chapter
    Local # 1530
    PO Box 386
    Princeton, IN 47670
    Spencer County Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Southwestern Indiana Builders
    Local # 1524
    2175 N Cullen Avenue
    Evansville, IN 47715

    Spencer County Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Dubois County
    Local # 1511
    1813 S A St
    Jasper, IN 47546

    Spencer County Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Vincennes Area Chapter
    Local # 1563
    PO Box 531
    Vincennes, IN 47591
    Spencer County Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    River Valley Chapter of National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 1576
    PO Box 365
    Hanover, IN 47243
    Spencer County Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lawrence County Chapter
    Local # 1535
    201 Main Street c/o Hoosier Door
    Oolitic, IN 47451
    Spencer County Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Spencer County Indiana


    Building Supplier Sued for Late and Defective Building Materials

    Pensacola Bridge Repair Plan Grows as Inspectors Uncover More Damage

    California to Require Disclosure of Construction Defect Claims

    Behavioral Hiring Builds a Stronger Construction Workforce

    Certified Question Asks Washington Supreme Court Whether Insurer is Bound by Contradictory Certificate of Insurance

    Governor Inslee’s Recent Vaccination Mandate Applies to Many Construction Contractors and their Workers

    Alleged Negligent Misrepresentation on Condition of Home is Not an Occurrence Causing Property Damage

    Asbestos Exclusion Bars Coverage

    Utah Becomes First State to Enact the Uniform Commercial Real Estate Receivership Act

    Collapse of Breezeway Attached to Building Covered

    Exclusion Bars Coverage For Cosmetic Hail Damage to Roof

    Poor Pleading Leads to Loss of Claim for Trespass Due to Relation-Back Doctrine, Statute of Limitations

    Blackstone to Buy Apartments From Greystar in $2 Billion Deal

    Norfolk Southern Agrees to $310M Settlement With Feds Over 2023 Ohio Derailment

    Trump Soho May Abandon Condos to Operate Mainly as Hotel

    Blurred Lines: New York Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Privileged Documents in Connection with Pre-Denial Communications Prepared by Insurer's Coverage Counsel

    No Hiring Surge by Homebuilders Says Industry Group

    Drilling Rig Topples at Citadel Miami Headquarters Site, Injuring Four

    Seven Trends That Impact Commercial Construction Litigation in 2021

    Connecticut Court Holds Unresolved Coverage Issues Makes Appraisal Premature

    Nuclear Energy Gets a Much-Needed Boost

    The ABCs of PFAS: What You Need to Know About Liabilities for the “Forever Chemical”

    White and Williams Elects Four Lawyers to Partnership, Promotes Six Associates to Counsel

    Toddler Crashes through Window, Falls to his Death

    Canada Home Resales Post First Fall in Eight Months

    California Clarifies Its Inverse Condemnation Standard

    Contractor Suffolk's Hospital Project Is on Critical List After Steward Health Care Bankruptcy

    Resulting Loss Claims Denied

    Shea Homes CEO Receives Hearthstone Builder Humanitarian Award

    NYC Rail Tunnel Cost Jumps and Construction Start Pushed Back

    Remand of Bad Faith Claim Evidences Split Among Florida District Courts

    Insurer's Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Failure to Cover Collapse Fails

    More on the VCPA and Construction

    When is a Residential Subcontractor not Subject to the VCPA? Read to Find Out

    Veolia Agrees to $25M Settlement in Flint Water Crisis Case

    Owner’s Slander of Title Claim Against Contractor Recording Four Separate Mechanics Liens Fails Under the Anti-SLAPP Statute

    Time Limits on Hidden Construction Defects

    Am I Still Covered Under the Title Insurance Policy?

    Most Common OSHA Violations Highlight Ongoing Risks

    Court Resolves Carriers' Dispute Over Which Must Defend

    Fifth Circuit Holds Insurer Owes Duty to Defend Latent Condition Claim That Caused Fire Damage to Property Years After Construction Work

    Cable-Free Elevators Will Soar to New Heights, and Move Sideways

    Attorneys’ Fees and the American Arbitration Association Rule

    I-35W Bridge Collapse may be Due to “Inadequate Load Capacity”

    Cal/OSHA Approves COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standards; Executive Order Makes Them Effective Immediately

    #5 CDJ Topic: David Belasco v. Gary Loren Wells et al. (2015) B254525

    Michigan: Identifying and Exploiting the "Queen Exception" to No-Fault Subrogation

    Urban Digital Twins: How Virtual Cities Could Help Build Smarter Cities

    Injured Subcontractor Employee Asserts Premise Liability Claim Against General Contractor

    Supreme Court of Idaho Rules That Substantial Compliance With the Notice and Opportunity to Repair Act Suffices to Bring Suit
    Corporate Profile

    SPENCER COUNTY INDIANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Spencer County, Indiana Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Spencer County's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Spencer County, Indiana

    Chambers USA Recognizes Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Practice in 2026 Guide

    June 29, 2026 —
    Hunton is pleased to announce that its insurance coverage practice was recognized nationally for Insurance: Dispute Resolution – Policyholder in the recently released 2026 Chambers USA guide. The team also received state rankings in Florida (Insurance: Dispute Resolution), Georgia (Insurance), the District of Columbia (Insurance: Policyholder), and Massachusetts (Insurance). In addition to the insurance team’s group recognition across multiple states, the 2026 guide included individual rankings for Lorelie “Lorie” S. Masters (USA Nationwide and District of Columbia), Latosha M. Ellis (District of Columbia), Michael S. Levine (District of Columbia), Koorosh “KT” Talieh (District of Columbia), Walter J. Andrews (Florida), Andrea DeField (Florida), Cary D. Steklof (Florida), Lawrence J. Bracken II (Georgia), and Geoffrey B. Fehling (Massachusetts). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    “The Superintendent Told Us to Do It:” Why Verbal Approval May Not Be Enough

    June 02, 2026 —
    In construction defect litigation, one scenario appears repeatedly: a subcontractor installs work in a manner that differs from the plans, specifications, manufacturer instructions, or industry standards after being verbally directed to do so by the general contractor, superintendent, architect, or owner’s representative. At the time, the decision may seem minor. The project is moving quickly, the field team wants to maintain progress, and nobody wants to stop working over what appears to be a small issue. The subcontractor may trust the superintendent or project manager and assume the conversation will be remembered later if questions arise. Years later, however, when the project experiences problems, the people involved may deny the conversation occurred, remember it differently, or simply no longer remember the project. Without written documentation, the subcontractor can find itself defending claims for defective work, even though it performed the installation exactly as directed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Andrew Lintner, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. Lintner may be contacted at alintner@hhmrlaw.com

    Kahana Feld Announces Key Partner Additions Coast to Coast

    June 22, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – June 10, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce Yvette Davis, Evan Kalooky, Beth Obra-White, Sean Paden, Michael Parme, Jeffrey Schmid, and Julieanne Yanez have joined the firm as partners. Four of these partners are joining the San Diego office, which further strengthens the firm’s General Liability and Construction Litigation practices and enhances Kahana Feld’s ability to serve clients across a broad range of complex matters in the region. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s 2027 Southern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Honorees!

    September 08, 2026 —
    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP is proud to announce that Partners Nicole Whyte, Keith Bremer, John Toohey, and Tyler Offenhauser have been named to the 2027 Southern California Super Lawyers list. Notably, Nicole Whyte was also selected to the Top 50 Orange County Super Lawyers list, an honor reflecting her outstanding work, leadership, and impact in the legal community. Associates Kevin Moore, Sukayna Jaidi, and Andrew Mathews are also being recognized as 2027 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars. Our team is being honored for their distinguished service and dedication in Family Law, Civil, Business, Construction, and Personal Injury Litigation. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara, LLP

    Brenda Radmacher Authors Chapter in ABA Publication on Construction Delays

    May 26, 2026 —
    Brenda Radmacher, a partner in Seyfarth’s Construction Law practice and a mediator and arbitrator serving on the American Arbitration Association’s panels, is among the contributing authors to the American Bar Association’s forthcoming guide on construction disputes: Time – The Legal Implications of Project Delay in Construction. Drawing on three decades of experience, Radmacher authors Chapter 8, Contractor Delay Damages, offering practical insight into one of the most contested issues in construction litigation and arbitration. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brenda Radmacher, Seyfarth Shaw LLP

    Best Lawyers Honors Hundreds of Lewis Brisbois Attorneys, Names Five Partners 'Lawyers of the Year'

    September 08, 2026 —
    Best Lawyers has selected 207 Lewis Brisbois attorneys across 45 offices for its 33rd edition of The Best Lawyers in America. It has also recognized five Lewis Brisbois partners on its "Lawyers of the Year" list: Akron Partner John R. Conley (Product Liability Litigation - Defendants); Akron Managing Partner David Kern (Corporate Law; Mergers and Acquisitions Law; Private Funds / Hedge Funds Law; Tax Law; Trusts and Estates); Weirton Managing Partner Michelle L. Gorman (Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants); Portland Partner Megan Cook (Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants); and San Diego Partner Craig T. Mann (Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants). Please join us in congratulating the following attorneys on their Best Lawyers recognition! You can also see the full list of attorneys named to Best Lawyers' Ones to Watch in America here. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Achieving Sustainability Through Design Build Delivery: Part II – A Framework for Managing Sustainability Objectives on Private Commercial Construction

    October 06, 2026 —
    Part I of this series traced the history and development of sustainability in construction and explained why design-build (“DB”) contracting is particularly well suited to achieve sustainability objectives. But selecting DB contracting does not by itself ensure a sustainable outcome. The parties must define their sustainability objectives with precision, establish measurable performance criteria and identify who will measure compliance with the criteria, and also draft contract terms that clearly and fairly allocate the associated responsibilities and risks. Otherwise, the completed project may fall short of its sustainability objectives and expose the parties to claims, disputes, and litigation. Part II offers a non-exhaustive list of practical guidance for addressing these issues and reducing those risks. This article references the ConsensusDocs 310 Green Building Addendum, in conjunction with an agreement between the Owner and the Design-Builder (e.g., ConsensusDocs 415)[1], [2] and AIA Document E204–2017 Sustainable Projects Exhibit,[3] together with AIA A141,[4] as its contractual baseline. The five-part framework that follows is a roadmap for allocating sustainability risk between private owners and design-builders: define the requirements, identify hidden performance guarantees, map out the sustainable objective, address third-party certification risk, and track performance against agreed benchmarks. Reprinted courtesy of Jennifer Harris, Peckar & Abramson, P.C., Tiffany Harrod, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Joshua Pruett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Ms. Harris may be contacted at jharris@pecklaw.com Ms. Harrod may be contacted at tharrod@pecklaw.com Mr. Pruett may be contacted at jpruett@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Ninth Circuit Holds That Policies Covering Environmental Claims Do Not Have Aggregate Limits

    May 12, 2026 —
    In the case of County of San Bernardino v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, the Ninth Circuit recently addressed the issue of whether general liability policies issued in the 1960s and 1970s included aggregate limits for claims arising under the premises-operations coverage in CGL policies. The difference between the policyholder’s interpretation of the policies’ limits clauses and the insurer’s interpretation was worth hundreds of millions of dollars in exposure for the insurer. The Court closely examined the policy language and extrinsic evidence from both the insurance industry’s drafting history and the parties before concluding that the policies were ambiguous. The Court construed that ambiguity in favor of the policyholder and ruled that aggregate limits did not apply to the claims at issue. The Court’s decision underscores the importance of carefully examining a policy’s limits, especially for older policies written before 1986 when the insurance industry revised the standard-form CGL policy to state the aggregate limits apply not only to products liability claims but to premises-operations claims as well. Decades of insurance industry drafting history confirms, as the policyholder’s submissions in this case indicate, that the industry well understood that operations claims like the environmental waste-disposal claims at issue here typically were not subject to aggregate limits. Reprinted courtesy of Lorelie S. Masters, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Joseph T. Niczky, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Ms. Masters may be contacted at lmasters@hunton.com Mr. Niczky may be contacted at jniczky@hunton.com Read the full story...