BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    production housing expert witness La Porte Indiana custom homes expert witness La Porte Indiana high-rise construction expert witness La Porte Indiana office building expert witness La Porte Indiana housing expert witness La Porte Indiana retail construction expert witness La Porte Indiana tract home expert witness La Porte Indiana multi family housing expert witness La Porte Indiana custom home expert witness La Porte Indiana parking structure expert witness La Porte Indiana casino resort expert witness La Porte Indiana condominium expert witness La Porte Indiana landscaping construction expert witness La Porte Indiana low-income housing expert witness La Porte Indiana Medical building expert witness La Porte Indiana institutional building expert witness La Porte Indiana industrial building expert witness La Porte Indiana Subterranean parking expert witness La Porte Indiana condominiums expert witness La Porte Indiana mid-rise construction expert witness La Porte Indiana structural steel construction expert witness La Porte Indiana hospital construction expert witness La Porte Indiana
    La Porte Indiana construction forensic expert witnessLa Porte Indiana construction defect expert witnessLa Porte Indiana forensic architectLa Porte Indiana concrete expert witnessLa Porte Indiana reconstruction expert witnessLa Porte Indiana construction defect expert witnessLa Porte Indiana construction experts
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    La Porte, Indiana

    Indiana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to SB45160, §IC 32-27-3-1&2 a claimant must provide written notice 60 days before filing an action. Within 21 days after service of the notice, the construction professional must serve a written response. Claimant must file list of known construction defects, description, and the construction professional responsible for each alleged defect (to the extent known).


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines La Porte Indiana

    License required for plumbing. All other licensing is done at the local county level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders Association of Laporte County
    Local # 1534
    2626 N S R 39
    La Porte, IN 46350

    La Porte Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Elkhart Co
    Local # 1512
    25428 County Road 20
    Elkhart, IN 46517

    La Porte Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Northeast IN
    Local # 1572
    PO Box 861
    Angola, IN 46703

    La Porte Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of St Joseph Valley
    Local # 1578
    105 E Grove St
    Mishawaka, IN 46545

    La Porte Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Northwest Indiana
    Local # 1564
    1356 W Lincolnway
    Valparaiso, IN 46385

    La Porte Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Marshall Co Chapter
    Local # 1554
    PO Box 464
    Plymouth, IN 46563
    La Porte Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Kosciusko-Fulton Counties
    Local # 1541
    313 S Buffalo St Suite B
    Warsaw, IN 46580

    La Porte Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For La Porte Indiana


    HHMR Recognized in 2026 Best Law Firms® Rankings for Construction Litigation and Construction Law

    Class Action Certification by Association for “Matters of Common Interest”

    Avoiding Construction Defect “Nightmares” in Florida

    Did the Court of Appeals Just Raise the Bar for California Contractors to Self-Report Construction-Related Judgments?

    Architects Group Lowers U.S. Construction Forecast

    Lasso Needed to Complete Vegas Hotel Implosion

    As the Term Winds Down, Several Important Regulatory Cases Await the U.S. Supreme Court

    BHA Has a Nice Swing: Firm Supports NCHV and Final Salute at 2017 WCC Seminar

    Enforcement Of Contractual Terms (E.G., Flow-Down, Field Verification, Shop Drawing Approval, And No-Damage-For-Delay Provisions)

    Virginia Tech Has Its Own Construction Boom

    New Law Raises Standard for Defense Experts as to Medical Causation

    U.S. State Adoption of the National Electrical Code

    Hospital Settles Lawsuit over Construction Problems

    New York High Court: “Issued or Delivered” Includes Policies Insuring Risks in New York

    Insurer’s Consent Not Needed for Settlement

    NY Construction Safety Firm Falsely Certified Workers, Says Manhattan DA

    Does a No-Damage-for-Delay Clause Also Preclude Acceleration Damages?

    Course of Conduct Can Serve as Waiver or Modification of Parties’ Contract

    Reference to "Man Made" Movement of Earth Corrects Ambiguity

    Building Recovery Comes to Las Vegas, Provides Relief

    Replevin Actions: What You Should Know

    As Natural Gas Expands in Gulf, Residents Fear Rising Damage

    Admissibility of Expert Opinions in Insurance Bad Faith Trials

    Heatup of Giant DOE Nuclear Waste Melter Succeeds After 2022 Halt

    Developer’s Fraudulent Statements Are His Responsibility Alone in Construction Defect Case

    Texas Public Procurements: What Changed on September 1, 2017? a/k/a: When is the Use of E-Verify Required?

    Be a Good Neighbor: Techniques to Mitigate the Risk of Claims from Adjacent Landowners

    Regional US Airports Are Back After Years of Decay

    Nation’s Top Court Limits EPA's Authority in Clean Air Case

    Ex-San Francisco DPW Director Sentenced to Seven Years in Corruption Case

    Broker Not Liable for Failure to Reveal Insurer's Insolvency After Policy Issued

    HHMR: A Retrospective — Chapter One (2001–2025)

    Construction Up in Northern Ohio

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized as 2021 Top Lawyers by Hudson Valley Magazine

    A New Way to Design in 3D – Interview with Pouria Kay of Grib

    #12 CDJ Topic: Am. Home Assur. Co. v. SMG Stone Co., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75910 (N. D. Cal. June 11, 2015)

    Washington Court Denies Subcontractor’s Claim Based on Contractual Change and Notice Provisions

    At the Intersection of Indemnity and Prevailing Wages

    DC Circuit Upholds EPA’s Latest RCRA Recycling Rule

    Dealing with Hazardous Substances on the Construction Site

    No Duty to Defend Additional Insured for Construction Defects

    An Era of Legends

    Colorado Court of Appeals Confirms Senior Living Communities as “Residential Properties” for Purposes of the Homeowner Protection Act

    Factor the Factor in Factoring

    BWB&O Senior Associate Kyle Riddles and Associate Alexandria Heins Obtain a Trial Victory in a Multi-Million Dollar Case!

    Will Protecting Copyrights Get Easier for Architects?

    Hamptons Home Up for Foreclosure That May Set Record

    The Future of Construction Defects in Utah Unclear

    New York Appellate Court Holds Insurers May Suffer Consequences of Delayed Payment of Energy Company Property and Business Interruption Claims

    Governor Ducey Vetoes Water and Development Bills
    Corporate Profile

    LA PORTE INDIANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The La Porte, Indiana Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to La Porte's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    La Porte, Indiana

    The Seventh Circuit Rejects Navigators Insurance Company’s Attempt to Escape Additional Insured Coverage For a Gas Explosion

    March 24, 2026 —
    In a recent Seventh Circuit decision, Atlanta Gas Light Company v. Navigators Insurance Company, the court addressed a theme that policyholders are often confronted with by insurers[1] – insurers disputing additional insured coverage where the named insured is not named in the underlying action. The court aptly rejected this position since it was undisputed that the bodily injuries alleged in the underlying lawsuits were due to a gas explosion that was “caused, in whole or in part, by” the named insured’s acts or omissions. I. Background The additional insureds, Atlanta Gas Light Company and Southern Company Gas (collectively, “AGL”), retained the named insured, United States Infrastructure Corporation (“USIC”), to locate and mark gas lines that AGL owned in Georgia. USIC failed to mark a certain gas line, which was later struck by a boring company, leading to an explosion that injured three people. Reprinted courtesy of Kyle A. Rudolph, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and Anna M. Perry, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Mr. Rudolph may be contacted at KRudolph@sdvlaw.com Ms. Perry may be contacted at APerry@sdvlaw.com Read the full story...

    Protect Your Projects By Identifying and Controlling Hidden Contract Risks

    March 10, 2026 —
    In a recent webinar entitled “Spreading the Risk and Avoiding Killer Contract Clauses,” Phelps lawyers Daniel Lund and Larry Borda examined contractual provisions that most often expose construction professionals to unexpected financial and legal risk. While construction contracts may appear routine, each contract serves as the primary mechanism for managing, allocating, and mitigating risk among parties involved in complex projects—often valued in the hundreds of millions or billions of dollars. When parties fail to fully understand the terms they sign, costly and avoidable consequences frequently follow. Contracts as Risk-Transfer Instruments Construction contracts are the primary method for transferring risk. While contracts authorize work and define scope, they also allocate responsibility for the risks inherent in construction projects. Some may imagine a world where a one-page agreement and a set of plans would suffice. In reality, modern construction requires detailed agreements—particularly provisions designed to anticipate problems, distribute burdens and reduce disputes. Reprinted courtesy of Larry Borda, Phelps and Daniel Lund III, Phelps Mr. Borda may be contacted at larry.borda@phelps.com Mr. Lund may be contacted at daniel.lund@phelps.com Read the full story...

    Navigating Timelines and Technology: Patent Strategies for Space and Earth

    June 01, 2026 —
    More than half a century after the Apollo 11 landing fulfilled President John F. Kennedy’s bold vision, the global race back to the Moon is no longer theoretical. With renewed attention on NASA’s Artemis program and a surge of commercial investment in space infrastructure, lunar exploration is again shaping technology priorities here on Earth. Reprinted courtesy of Kate Nuehring Su, Engineering News-Record and Vanessa Wang, Engineering News-Record Read the full story...
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Micromobility in Smart Cities: Keeping the Wheels in Motion

    May 26, 2026 —
    Mobility is the lifeblood of any city. How people are able to travel in, out and within a metropolitan area is vital to its citizens, businesses, supply chains and social services. And as U.S. cities have expanded in size and population density, the strategies for addressing mobility have evolved. Many have taken different approaches to public transit, and each city boasts a dense tapestry of roadways, walking paths and various parking options. But as cities continue to reexamine infrastructure strategies through smart city technology, a new field of transportation has emerged—micromobility. Designed for short-distance travel using lightweight vehicles (bikes, e-bikes, e-scooters, etc.), the industry’s global net worth has grown exponentially in recent years to the tune of hundreds of billions, with one forecast predicting it could reach $340 billion by 2030. Micromobility also finds itself at the forefront of various smart city technological improvements. Geofencing has been implemented in U.S. cities to determine where micromobility vehicles can operate, control speed limits, and park utilizing the vehicles’ GPS location. Internet of Things (IoT) technologies (satellite-based location receivers, cloud communication, internet links, etc.) have improved vehicle lifespans by keeping track of when vehicles require service and prevent vandalism and theft. Data collected from vehicles’ location tracking is routinely used for urban planning and smart city development. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of James P. Bobotek, Pillsbury
    Mr. Bobotek may be contacted at james.bobotek@pillsburylaw.com

    Why Travelers Fought a Fire Claim for Invisible Smoke Damage

    February 23, 2026 —
    Just 40 minutes after midnight on Sept. 27, 2018, the sky lit up over Birmingham, Ala. A fire engulfed an apartment building under construction—the last-to-be completed section of a wood-framed complex called the Metropolitan. It fueled one of the largest recorded blazes in the city’s history. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Tariffs As Taxes — What Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump Means for Contractors and the WSDOT Specifications

    March 17, 2026 —
    In October 2025, we explored a pressing question for public works contractors: should post-contract award tariffs be reimbursable? The crux of that analysis was whether tariffs imposed after contract award constitute a tax under the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Standard Specifications, triggering reimbursement under Section 1-07.1(5)B (“tax changes”). Since then, a landmark Supreme Court ruling in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump has clarified the legal nature of tariffs in a way that could significantly affect this debate. In Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, 607 U.S. (2026), the U.S. Supreme Court addressed whether the President had the authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to unilaterally impose broad tariffs on imports. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brett M. Hill, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at brett.hill@acslawyers.com

    Louisiana Enacts Important Tort Reform Legislation

    May 12, 2026 —
    The Louisiana legislature enacted tort reform legislation in 2025 to address the increasing cost of insurance in Louisiana and to provide some predictability to the Louisiana legal system. While our colleagues, Jenny Michel and Jennifer Kretschmann, have provided an excellent and comprehensive analysis of the legislation in their article entitled “Louisiana State Legislature 2025 Regular Session: Tort Reform - Acts & Vetoed Insurance Bill,” which can be found here, this article examines the anticipated impact of the tort reform legislation on personal injury trials in federal and state courts in Louisiana. The most significant reform involves the institution of a modified defense of contributory negligence, which went into effect on January 1, 2026. Since 1996, Louisiana had operated as a pure comparative fault state; the liability of each party whose fault caused damages was to be allocated among the respective parties based upon their appropriate percentage of fault, regardless of the legal theory of liability asserted against each party. Thus, a plaintiff 55 percent at fault could recover 45 percent of their damages from the liable defendants. The 2025 Tort Reform Amendments now prohibit a plaintiff in a personal injury action from recovering any damages if they are found to be 51 percent or more at fault for their damages. The 55 percent at-fault party in the example above is now prohibited from recovering any damages from any party. Importantly, this new legislation now requires the trial court to instruct the jury that if they find a plaintiff to be more than 50 percent at fault, then the plaintiff will not recover any damages. Reprinted courtesy of Lee M. Peacocke, Lewis Brisbois and Benjamin Perkins, Lewis Brisbois Mr. Peacocke may be contacted at Lee.Peacocke@lewisbrisbois.com Mr. Perkins may be contacted at Benjamin.Perkins@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

    Pulling the Plug, Preserving the Product: Protecting Rights to a Modular Subcontractor’s Work Post-Termination

    June 08, 2026 —
    Volumetric Modular Construction (VMC) is a building method where a structure is divided into large components or modules, fabricated in an offsite factory and then transported to a construction site for assembly.[1] Proponents of VMC hail it as a cost-efficient alternative to traditional building methods that leads to more consistent quality and shorter construction duration.[2] Due to a growing labor shortage, high demand for compressed project schedules, and stagnant construction productivity rates, the construction industry is embracing VMC.[3] A recent report on the market size of prefabricated construction estimates that from 2026 to 2031, VMC will grow at a compound annual growth rate of 7.16% and become a 413.11-billion-dollar industry.[4] As VMC becomes more prevalent, owners, general contractors, and subcontractors must consider how to effectively contract for modular construction. One important consideration, which this article focuses on, is navigating termination of a modular subcontractor. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Paul Williamson, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Mr. Williamson may be contacted at pwilliamson@pecklaw.com