BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    high-rise construction expert witness Kempton Indiana institutional building expert witness Kempton Indiana custom homes expert witness Kempton Indiana landscaping construction expert witness Kempton Indiana mid-rise construction expert witness Kempton Indiana industrial building expert witness Kempton Indiana townhome construction expert witness Kempton Indiana retail construction expert witness Kempton Indiana parking structure expert witness Kempton Indiana condominiums expert witness Kempton Indiana hospital construction expert witness Kempton Indiana custom home expert witness Kempton Indiana low-income housing expert witness Kempton Indiana casino resort expert witness Kempton Indiana housing expert witness Kempton Indiana structural steel construction expert witness Kempton Indiana Medical building expert witness Kempton Indiana concrete tilt-up expert witness Kempton Indiana tract home expert witness Kempton Indiana office building expert witness Kempton Indiana condominium expert witness Kempton Indiana multi family housing expert witness Kempton Indiana
    Kempton Indiana construction scheduling expert witnessKempton Indiana defective construction expertKempton Indiana soil failure expert witnessKempton Indiana building code expert witnessKempton Indiana construction project management expert witnessesKempton Indiana construction expert witnessesKempton Indiana construction project management expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Kempton, Indiana

    Indiana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to SB45160, §IC 32-27-3-1&2 a claimant must provide written notice 60 days before filing an action. Within 21 days after service of the notice, the construction professional must serve a written response. Claimant must file list of known construction defects, description, and the construction professional responsible for each alleged defect (to the extent known).


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Kempton Indiana

    License required for plumbing. All other licensing is done at the local county level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    East Central Indiana Builders Association Inc
    Local # 1556
    PO Box 1072
    Muncie, IN 47308
    Kempton Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Greater Lafayette
    Local # 1548
    PO Box 5795
    Lafayette, IN 47903

    Kempton Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Howard County Inc
    Local # 1532
    PO Box 1187
    Kokomo, IN 46903

    Kempton Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Henry County Chapter
    Local # 1598
    PO Box 925
    New Castle, IN 47362
    Kempton Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Wayne County Builders Association
    Local # 1570
    PO Box 1591
    Richmond, IN 47375

    Kempton Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Indiana Builders Association
    Local # 1500
    101 W Ohio St Ste 1111
    Indianapolis, IN 46204

    Kempton Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Greater Indianapolis
    Local # 1544
    PO Box 44670
    Indianapolis, IN 46244

    Kempton Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Kempton Indiana


    Wisconsin Court of Appeals Re-affirms American Girl To Find Coverage for Damage Caused by Subcontractors

    A Teaming Agreement is Still a Contract (or, Be Careful with Agreements to Agree)

    The Rubber Hits the Ramp: A Maryland Personal Injury Case

    Review of Recent Contractors State License Board Changes

    Climate Superfund Litigation: Courts Split on Venue and Intervention in New York and Vermont Cases

    KB Homes Sues Condo Buyers over Alleged Cybersquatting and Hacking

    Blue-Sky Floods Take a Rising Toll for Businesses

    New Change Order Bill Becomes Law: RCW 39.04.360

    Don’t Be the First One to Breach Your Construction Contract

    Sometimes a Reminder is in Order. . .

    Insurer's Judgment on the Pleadings Based Upon Expected Injury Exclusion Reversed

    Town Sues over Defective Work on Sewer Lines

    Remediation Work Caused by Installation of Defective Tiles Not Covered

    Chicago Criticized for Not Maintaining Elevator Inspections

    Los Angeles Tower Halted Over Earthquake and other Concerns

    Fourth Circuit Confirms Scope of “Witness Litigation Privilege”

    How Philadelphia I-95 Span Destroyed by Fire Reopened in Just 12 Days

    How AEC Firms Move AI Beyond the Pilot

    Traub Lieberman Partner Greg Pennington Wins Summary Judgment in Favor of Property Owner

    Haight Proudly Supports JDC's 11th Annual Bike-A-Thon Benefitting Pro Bono Legal Services

    Bert Hummel Appointed Vice Chair of State Bar of Georgia Bench & Bar Committee

    The “Your Work” Exclusion—Is there a Trend against Coverage?

    The Final Frontier Opens Up New Business Opportunities for Private Contractors

    What to Look for in Subcontractor Warranty Endorsements

    New Mexico Holds One-Sided Dispute Resolution Provisions Are Unenforceable

    Construction Defects Lead to Demolition of Seattle’s 25-story McGuire Apartments Building

    Edison Utility Accused of Igniting LA Fire in Lawsuits

    What Sustainable Building Materials Will the Construction Industry Rely on in 2020?

    Recommendations for Property Owners After A Hurricane: Submit a Claim

    Will Claims By Contractors on Big Design-Build Projects Ever End?

    Understanding Entitlement to Delays and Proper Support

    Contractual Fee-Shifting in Litigation: Who Pays the Price?

    Preventing Common Electrical Injuries on the Jobsite

    School District Settles Construction Lawsuit with Additional Million

    What Should Be in Every Construction Agreement

    Contractor Succeeds At the Supreme Court Against Public Owner – Obtaining Fee Award and Determination The City Acted In Bad Faith

    Precedent-Setting ‘Green’ Apartments in Kansas City

    Amazon Can be Liable in Louisiana

    Surfside Condo Collapse Investigators Have Nearly Finished Technical Work

    Bert Hummel Appointed to Chief Justice’s Commission on Professionalism

    Balancing Risk and Reward: The Complexities of Stadium Construction Projects

    DC Circuit Upholds EPA’s Latest RCRA Recycling Rule

    Replacement of Defective Gym Construction Exceeds Original Cost

    Replacing Coal Plants with Renewables Is Cheaper 80% of the Time

    Courts Favor Arbitration in Two Recent Construction Dispute Cases

    Truck Hits Warning Beam That Falls, Kills Motorist at Las Vegas Bridge Project

    Ensuring Arbitration in Construction Defect Claims

    Dispute Resolution in Your Construction Contract

    The Privilege Is All Mine: California Appellate Court Finds Law Firm Holds Attorney Work Product Privilege Applicable to Documents Created by Formerly Employed Attorney

    Reference to "Man Made" Movement of Earth Corrects Ambiguity
    Corporate Profile

    KEMPTON INDIANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Kempton, Indiana Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Kempton's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Kempton, Indiana

    Predict Risk, Not Incidents: A New Analytics Framework for Your Construction Safety Data

    August 03, 2026 —
    Behind every “zero-incidents” company report, hidden hazards may already be accumulating—risks that could become serious injuries tomorrow. The question every executive should be asking is not, “Did anything go wrong last month?” It is: “Where is risk building on my projects right now?” Most construction organizations cannot answer that question. Not because the data does not exist—it does. Every active project generates daily inspection findings, labor records, near-miss reports and audit results. The problem is that standard safety systems collect this data and then report it in ways that make it operationally useless for prevention. They describe the past. They predict nothing. The predictive safety analytics framework (PSAF) is a practical, deployable system developed from years of applying data science to large-scale construction portfolio operations that takes the safety data construction organizations already collect and transforms it into a forward-looking risk signal. The result? A single weekly score that tells executives where risk is concentrating across their portfolio before anyone gets hurt. Reprinted courtesy of Tabrez Zahoor, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    GRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior Court

    August 11, 2026 —
    A Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani multi-state team, including Partners Christine Barker, Sean Ferron, and Keith Cramer, obtained a defense verdict on behalf of a homeowners’ association (HOA) in an Orange County Superior Court bench trial spanning two months. The case began in 2022 when a homeowner sued after the Architectural Review Committee and HOA Board of Directors declined his teardown-and-rebuild plans due to view and aesthetic concerns. After a motion for summary judgment ruling in which the court found that the existing covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) did not protect views, the HOA held a special election to add explicit view protections to the CC&Rs. At the February 2025 trial call, the plaintiff sought leave to file a third amended complaint challenging the validity of that vote, drastically reframing the case from CC&R enforcement to one of election validity. A second plaintiff then filed a parallel action toward the end of the limitations period, and the two cases were consolidated. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Construction Attorneys: Contract Negotiation Strategy

    September 01, 2026 —
    Contract negotiation is where project expectations become enforceable business obligations. A reasonable bid can become a high-risk agreement when the final contract expands the scope, shortens notice periods, limits payment rights or transfers liability that was never included in the price. Construction attorneys help project leaders identify those consequences before execution. Their role is not to eliminate every risk or prolong negotiations. It is to determine which risks can be controlled, insured, priced, shared or rejected while preserving a workable deal. The financial stakes can be substantial. HKA's 2025 analysis of more than 2,200 distressed construction and engineering projects found that disputed costs averaged 33.4% of contract budgets. Scope changes affected more than 28% of the projects studied and remained the most common cause of conflict. In North America, the average dispute studied by Arcadis in 2024 had a value of $60.1 million and took 12.5 months to resolve. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Newmeyer Dillion Ranked in Chambers Spotlight California 2026 Guide

    May 26, 2026 —
    NEWPORT BEACH, Calif. – May 14, 2026 - Prominent business and real estate law firm Newmeyer Dillion has been ranked in Chambers Spotlight California 2026 guide and recognized as a leading firm in Litigation: General Commercial for Orange County. Newmeyer Dillion was selected based on an independent and in-depth market analysis, coupled with an assessment of the firm’s experience, expertise and caliber of talent where the firm stood out for its exceptional work and is recognized in Litigation: General Commercial. Managing Partner Paul Tetzloff expressed the firm's gratitude: “It is an honor for our firm to be recognized by Chambers and Partners in their Spotlight California 2026 guide. This acknowledgment reflects our commitment to providing high quality legal services tailored to the unique needs of our clients.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Newmeyer Dillion

    Properly Taking Judicial Notice of Florida’s Building Code

    October 12, 2026 —
    Many construction defects cases involve Florida’s Building Code. A recent non-construction case, BSREP II PBG Resort, LLC v Ginsburg, 2026 WL 265226 (Fla. 4th DCA 2026), discussed a court taking judicial notice of a provision in the Florida Building Code. This case was a premise liability case where the plaintiff tripped in an asphalt parking lot. The plaintiff, without complying with proper procedural notice protocol, asked the court to take judicial notice of a section of Florida’s Building Code, i.e., admitting this section as relevant evidence in the case. The trial court granted the request for judicial notice and the plaintiff used this as the basis of her cross-examination, the jury instructions, and closing argument that the violation of this section of Florida’s Building Code was evidence of negligence. This was in error. First, Florida’s Building Code is NOT a statute but an administrative rule. Ginsburg, supra. As an administrative rule, a court “may” but is not obligated to take judicial notice of the rule – it is a permissive judicial notice request per Florida Statute s. 90.203 and 90.202(9). This is important because the trial court viewed Florida’s Building Code as a statute it mandatorily had to take judicial notice of per Florida Statute s. 90.201, which was in error. Because it was permissive, the plaintiff needed to comply with statutory procedural notice protocols, which the plaintiff failed to do. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Every High-Tech Building Has Many Lifespans

    August 16, 2026 —
    When I worked as an architect, our team designed a laboratory for fuel research. The facility included a large research hall where various boilers and other devices were tested and analyzed. The setup required extensive floor channeling under the thick concrete floor. We suggested building a modular system that would allow flexibility in the future, when requirements would certainly change. They did not want that because of budget constraints. The high-tech construction trend is spreading. Data centers, semiconductor fabs, battery plants, and life science facilities share one property that sets them apart from ordinary buildings. The technology inside turns over faster than the structure around it. Server generations change every three to five years. Rack densities have risen from 10 or 20 kW to 130 kW and beyond in just a few years. A high-tech facility is really several buildings with different lifespans inside one envelope, and we keep designing them as if they were one. The failure is not that things become obsolete. It is that we never say when each layer is expected to. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (8/5/26) – Data Centers Reshape Hotel Demand, AI Changes Construction Workflows and Global Tariffs Raise CRE Construction Costs

    August 16, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, AI creates new real estate play for VCs, Wall Street sells more rental homes, builders capitalize on flood of water projects and more!
    • Data center construction has the potential to be a significant opportunity for extended stay hotels in the near and long term, provided sustainable demand patterns exist within a given market. (Jenna Graber, Hotel Dive)
    • Artificial intelligence doesn’t represent an “extinction event” for AEC firms, but it will fundamentally change the way construction pros streamline certain tasks. (Matthew Thibault, Construction Dive)
    • With the 21st Century ROAD to Housing now law, there are a number of outstanding questions about implementation and compliance for multifamily pros. (Julie Strupp, Multifamily Dive)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    Defend Now, Allocate Later? An Unresolved Tension in Colorado Construction Law

    August 16, 2026 —
    For decades, Colorado law has recognized an important distinction between the duty to defend and the duty to indemnify. The former ordinarily arises at the beginning of litigation; the latter generally cannot be determined until the underlying liability is known. That distinction makes intuitive sense. A defense that becomes due only after litigation concludes is not much of a defense. But Colorado’s construction anti-indemnity statute, C.R.S. § 13-21-111.5(6), raises an interesting question about how that familiar rule operates in construction disputes. The statute expressly regulates contractual obligations not only to indemnify, but also to insure and defend, and it reflects a legislative policy that construction businesses should bear financial responsibility for their own negligence. Those principles have developed along separate tracks. At some point, a Colorado appellate court may have to decide precisely how they fit together. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com