BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Subterranean parking expert witness Allen County Indiana Medical building expert witness Allen County Indiana high-rise construction expert witness Allen County Indiana multi family housing expert witness Allen County Indiana concrete tilt-up expert witness Allen County Indiana landscaping construction expert witness Allen County Indiana industrial building expert witness Allen County Indiana condominium expert witness Allen County Indiana mid-rise construction expert witness Allen County Indiana parking structure expert witness Allen County Indiana institutional building expert witness Allen County Indiana tract home expert witness Allen County Indiana custom home expert witness Allen County Indiana custom homes expert witness Allen County Indiana production housing expert witness Allen County Indiana housing expert witness Allen County Indiana office building expert witness Allen County Indiana structural steel construction expert witness Allen County Indiana condominiums expert witness Allen County Indiana townhome construction expert witness Allen County Indiana low-income housing expert witness Allen County Indiana retail construction expert witness Allen County Indiana
    Allen County Indiana hospital construction expert witnessAllen County Indiana consulting engineersAllen County Indiana slope failure expert witnessAllen County Indiana expert witness structural engineerAllen County Indiana construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessAllen County Indiana construction claims expert witnessAllen County Indiana roofing construction expert
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Allen County, Indiana

    Indiana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to SB45160, §IC 32-27-3-1&2 a claimant must provide written notice 60 days before filing an action. Within 21 days after service of the notice, the construction professional must serve a written response. Claimant must file list of known construction defects, description, and the construction professional responsible for each alleged defect (to the extent known).


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Allen County Indiana

    License required for plumbing. All other licensing is done at the local county level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Fort Wayne
    Local # 1528
    305 W Main St
    Fort Wayne, IN 46802

    Allen County Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Jasper County Home Builders Association
    Local # 1550
    511 4th Ave. NW
    Demotte, IN 46310

    Allen County Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Kosciusko-Fulton Counties
    Local # 1541
    313 S Buffalo St Suite B
    Warsaw, IN 46580

    Allen County Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Marshall Co Chapter
    Local # 1554
    PO Box 464
    Plymouth, IN 46563
    Allen County Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Northwest Indiana
    Local # 1564
    1356 W Lincolnway
    Valparaiso, IN 46385

    Allen County Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Elkhart Co
    Local # 1512
    25428 County Road 20
    Elkhart, IN 46517

    Allen County Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Laporte County
    Local # 1534
    2626 N S R 39
    La Porte, IN 46350

    Allen County Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Allen County Indiana


    Mexico City Metro Collapse Kills 24 After Neighbors’ Warnings

    Arezoo Jamshidi Selected to the 2023 San Diego Super Lawyers List

    Buyers Are Flocking to NYC’s Suburbs. Too Bad There Aren’t Many Homes to Sell.

    The California Privacy Rights Act Passed – Now What?

    Tips for Drafting Construction Contracts

    Traub Lieberman Partner Eric D. Suben Obtains Federal Second Circuit Affirmance of Summary Judgment in Insurer’s Favor

    Court of Appeal Confirms Privette Doctrine as Applied to Passive Conduct of Property Owner

    Federal Contractors Should Request Debriefings As A Matter Of Course

    Appeals Court Upholds Decision by Referee in Trial Court for Antagan v Shea Homes

    Illinois Court Determines Duty to Defend Construction Defect Claims

    Insured’s Breach of Contract Claim Survives Motion to Dismiss, but Bad Faith Claim Does Not

    Port Authority Revises Plans for $10B Midtown NYC Bus Terminal Replacement

    Hawaii Supreme Court Finds Excess Can Sue Primary for Equitable Subrogation

    A Court-Side Seat: As SCOTUS Decides Another Regulatory “Takings” Case, a Flurry of Action at EPA

    How Do You Get to the Five Year Mark? Some Practical Advice

    Ball Janik LLP Welcomes Construction Defect Associate Miguel Bonnelly as Orlando Office Continues to Grow

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s Los Angeles Office on Another Successful MSJ!

    Ninth Circuit Construes Known Loss Provision

    But Wait There’s More: Preserving Claims on Commonwealth Projects

    Michigan: Identifying and Exploiting the "Queen Exception" to No-Fault Subrogation

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight Rated as One of the Top 50 in a Survey of Construction Law Firms in the United States

    Torrey Pines Court Receives Funding for Renovation

    Working Safely With Silica: Health Hazards and OSHA Compliance

    Nevada Supreme Court Reverses Decision against Grader in Drainage Case

    Complying With Data Breach Regulations in the Construction Industry

    What Happens When a Secured Creditor Files a Late Claim in an Equity Receivership?

    Why Being Climate ‘Positive’ Is the Buzzy New Goal of Green Building

    What are the Potential Damages when a House is a Lemon?

    Insureds' Summary Judgment Motion on Mold Limitation Denied

    Ohio Court of Appeals: Absolution Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Workplace Coal-Tar Pitch Exposure Claims

    Developer Africa Israel Wins a Round in New York Condominium Battle

    Contractor Removed from Site for Lack of Insurance

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “A Less Than Valiant Effort”

    Failure to Allege Property Damage Within Policy Period Defeats Insured's Claim

    Mitigate Construction Risk Through Use of Contingency

    Occurrence Definition Trends Analyzed

    Skanska Will Work With Florida on Barge-Caused Damage to Pensacola Bay Bridge

    The AVOID Act: A New Timeline for Liability in New York Construction Projects

    A Look at Business and Professions Code Section 7031

    An Insurance Policy Isn’t Ambiguous Just Because You Want It to Be

    Builders Can’t Rely on SB800

    Collapse Claim Fails Due To Defectively Designed Roof and Deck

    Show Me the Money: The Good Faith Dispute Exception to Prompt Payment Penalties

    Insurance Policies Broadly Defining “Suits” May Prompt an Insurer’s Duty to Defend and Indemnify During the Chapter 558 Pre-Suit Notice Process

    Haight’s Kristian Moriarty Selected for Super Lawyers’ 2021 Southern California Rising Stars

    How Slow and Steady Can Lose the Race - Pacing and Delay Claims

    Court of Federal Claims: Upstream Hurricane Harvey Case Will Proceed to Trial

    Seattle Condos, Close to Waterfront, Construction Defects Included

    Brown Orders Mandatory Water Curbs for California Drought

    Corps Spells Out Billions in Infrastructure Act Allocations
    Corporate Profile

    ALLEN COUNTY INDIANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Allen County, Indiana Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Allen County's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Allen County, Indiana

    No Ink, No Problem: When Employees and Agents Can Enforce Arbitration Agreements

    August 11, 2026 —
    Arbitration is a fundamental component of modern construction contracting. Many in the industry recognize the potential benefits and protections arbitration can provide to the business in the event of a dispute. But an important question many contracts do not address is: who does the arbitration agreement cover? Does it include the business entity only, or the individuals acting on behalf of the entity? As courts have long recognized, entities can generally only act through their employees, representatives, or agents.[1] This article discusses the circumstances in which an agent may rely on an arbitration provision entered by its employer. This is known as the agency doctrine. Reprinted courtesy of Jordan Heath, Associate, Jones Walker LLP and Jacob Morrison, Law Student University of Georgia, Jones Walker LLP Read the full story...
    Mr. Heath may be contacted at jheath@joneswalker.com

    Achieving Sustainability Through Design Build Delivery: Part II – A Framework for Managing Sustainability Objectives on Private Commercial Construction

    October 06, 2026 —
    Part I of this series traced the history and development of sustainability in construction and explained why design-build (“DB”) contracting is particularly well suited to achieve sustainability objectives. But selecting DB contracting does not by itself ensure a sustainable outcome. The parties must define their sustainability objectives with precision, establish measurable performance criteria and identify who will measure compliance with the criteria, and also draft contract terms that clearly and fairly allocate the associated responsibilities and risks. Otherwise, the completed project may fall short of its sustainability objectives and expose the parties to claims, disputes, and litigation. Part II offers a non-exhaustive list of practical guidance for addressing these issues and reducing those risks. This article references the ConsensusDocs 310 Green Building Addendum, in conjunction with an agreement between the Owner and the Design-Builder (e.g., ConsensusDocs 415)[1], [2] and AIA Document E204–2017 Sustainable Projects Exhibit,[3] together with AIA A141,[4] as its contractual baseline. The five-part framework that follows is a roadmap for allocating sustainability risk between private owners and design-builders: define the requirements, identify hidden performance guarantees, map out the sustainable objective, address third-party certification risk, and track performance against agreed benchmarks. Reprinted courtesy of Jennifer Harris, Peckar & Abramson, P.C., Tiffany Harrod, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Joshua Pruett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Ms. Harris may be contacted at jharris@pecklaw.com Ms. Harrod may be contacted at tharrod@pecklaw.com Mr. Pruett may be contacted at jpruett@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Emerging Issues in Construction CGL Insurance Part 2: The Separation of Insureds and Additional Insured Interests

    September 29, 2026 —
    Many coverage disputes hinge on first principles—the fundamentals of insurance —rather than the minutiae. Unfortunately, the basic anatomy of insurance policies can get lost sometimes when parties are laser-focused on a particular term or set of circumstances. This is true not just in disputes, but also when writing coverage. One of the fundamentals that is commonly misunderstood and overlooked—but which is absolutely critical to the intended operation of insurance coverage—is what is commonly known as the “separation of insureds.” The “separation of insureds” is the concept that each “insured” under a policy are referred to and treated differently, and most of all that the distinctions matter. The concept is usually included as a condition in the policy. It embodies the requirement that the policy applies to each insured distinctly from how it applies to other insureds. The ISO Form CGL policies specifically state that they apply “[s]eparately to each insured against whom a claim is made or ‘suit’ is brought.” The separate and distinct treatment of insureds is more critical in construction operations than anywhere else. This distinction is essential to ensure coverage works as intended, especially when contracted operations are involved, because the policy must insure the subcontractor that purchased the policy, the general contractor who hired the subcontractor, and the owner that hired the general contractor. Even small modifications can easily frustrate the intent of the parties. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Eric M. Clarkson, SDV Fenchurch
    Mr. Clarkson may be contacted at eric.clarkson@sdvfenchurch.us

    AI Data Centers Become City-Scale Infrastructure, Prompting New Industry Playbook

    August 11, 2026 —
    AI data centers are no longer just buildings. They are increasingly reaching power-demand levels more commonly associated with municipalities, prompting industry groups to launch a new framework they say is needed to keep pace with rapidly changing power, cooling and reliability requirements. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    EPA Steps Back, Arizona Moves Forward

    May 12, 2026 —
    In a significant development for Arizona’s business community and environmental policymakers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has paused its planned reclassification of Maricopa County from “Moderate” to “Serious” ozone nonattainment status pursuant to the Clean Air Act’s National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). This decision marks a shift in federal air policy — one that recognizes the unique challenges faced by regions like metro Phoenix, where environmental conditions beyond local control are often key contributors to air quality readings. The EPA’s move follows a series of meetings between EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, Arizona elected officials, and business and civic leaders, including a recent roundtable in Phoenix convened by U.S. Senator Mark Kelly. In announcing the pause, Zeldin acknowledged the need for flexibility and fairness in the application of Clean Air Act standards, especially when emissions from other states, nations, and natural events significantly influence local air quality. Reprinted courtesy of Patrick J. Paul, Snell & Wilmer, John Habib, Snell & Wilmer and Sukhmani K. Singh, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Paul may be contacted at ppaul@swlaw.com Mr. Habib may be contacted at jhabib@swlaw.com Ms. Singh may be contacted at ssingh@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Parties’ Post-Default Conduct Cannot Validate Void Default Orders

    August 24, 2026 —
    After filing a lawsuit, the first step is always serving process on the opposing party. While that preliminary step sounds basic enough, in McMahan v. Grasshopper, the Arizona Supreme Court recently provided a helpful refresher on the nuances of the service requirement and its importance in litigation for plaintiffs and defendants alike.1 Background McMahan arose from a hit-and-run where a tractor-trailer collided with safety barricades and injured a construction worker. The construction worker sued the tractor-trailer company, and he attempted to serve the company by leaving a copy of the complaint with the assistant to the company’s statutory agent who forwarded the complaint to the company. The assistant, however, was not authorized to accept service on the company’s behalf. Before the company appeared in the action, the construction worker successfully obtained an entry of default. Reprinted courtesy of Joseph Kanefield, Snell & Wilmer, Ryan P. Hogan, Snell & Wilmer and Lilly M. Geiler, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Kanefield may be contacted at jkanefield@swlaw.com Mr. Hogan may be contacted at rhogan@swlaw.com Ms. Geiler may be contacted at lgeiler@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Super Lawyers

    July 13, 2026 —
    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai has been recognized as a 2026 Northern California Super Lawyer honoree in the area of Construction Litigation. This is the thirteenth consecutive year he has been recognized by Super Lawyers. Super Lawyers, an annual listing of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and personal achievement, is limited to no more than five percent (5%) of lawyers in a state who are selected through a multiphase process that includes a statewide survey of lawyers, independent research evaluation and peer reviews by practice area. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    EPA, Maryland Sue DC Water Over Massive Potomac River Sewage Spill

    May 14, 2026 —
    The state of Maryland and the federal government have filed separate lawsuits against the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water), both alleging that the agency’s failure to address longstanding deterioration in the Potomac Interceptor contributed to a weeklong release of more than 240 million gallons of raw sewage into the Potomac River this past January. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com