BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    mid-rise construction expert witness Roberts Idaho hospital construction expert witness Roberts Idaho institutional building expert witness Roberts Idaho custom home expert witness Roberts Idaho townhome construction expert witness Roberts Idaho housing expert witness Roberts Idaho Subterranean parking expert witness Roberts Idaho condominium expert witness Roberts Idaho structural steel construction expert witness Roberts Idaho multi family housing expert witness Roberts Idaho retail construction expert witness Roberts Idaho landscaping construction expert witness Roberts Idaho Medical building expert witness Roberts Idaho parking structure expert witness Roberts Idaho concrete tilt-up expert witness Roberts Idaho production housing expert witness Roberts Idaho tract home expert witness Roberts Idaho custom homes expert witness Roberts Idaho condominiums expert witness Roberts Idaho high-rise construction expert witness Roberts Idaho low-income housing expert witness Roberts Idaho industrial building expert witness Roberts Idaho
    Roberts Idaho defective construction expertRoberts Idaho concrete expert witnessRoberts Idaho construction code expert witnessRoberts Idaho multi family design expert witnessRoberts Idaho civil engineering expert witnessRoberts Idaho soil failure expert witnessRoberts Idaho engineering consultant
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Roberts, Idaho

    Idaho Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB133; title 6 increases builder liability by creating responsibility for attorney fees if the homeowner/HOA prevails; places stringent demands on builder to comply with statutes and repair/compromise/settle; compliance protects against liability for resultant personal property damage; NOR is triggered by any construction defect in a new or substantially remodeled dwelling; Owner must notice "professional"; pro must respond within 21 days; claimant must accept/reject within 30 days; or if the pro inspects, he must provide offer or statement within 14 days and claimant must accept/reject within 30 days; law appears, by definition, to impose same timelines on builder pro in cross-complaining


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Roberts Idaho

    License required for electrical, plumbing, pesticide, manufactured housing, landscape architecture, and asbestos removal. No state license for general contracting.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Upper Valley Building Contractors Association
    Local # 1335
    310 North 2nd East Ste 143
    Rexburg, ID 83440

    Roberts Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Contractors Association of SW Idaho
    Local # 1325
    6206 N Discovery Way Ste A
    Boise, ID 83713

    Roberts Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Idaho State Home Builders Association
    Local # 1300
    6206 N Discovery Way Ste A
    Boise, ID 83713

    Roberts Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Contractors Association of Wood River Valley
    Local # 1395
    PO Box 2721
    Hailey, ID 83333
    Roberts Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Snake River Valley Building Contractors Association
    Local # 1375
    1123 12 Ave S
    Nampa, ID 83651

    Roberts Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Eastern Idaho Builders Association
    Local # 1340
    PO Box 1782
    Idaho Falls, ID 83403

    Roberts Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Contractors Association of South East Idaho Afiil w/ National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 1305
    770 E Chubbuck Rd.
    Chubbuck, ID 83205

    Roberts Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Roberts Idaho


    U.S. Home Lending Set to Bounce Back in 2015 After Slump

    Fall 2024 Legislative Update:

    New York Court Grants Insured's Motion to Dismiss Construction Defect Case and Awards Fees to Insured

    Florida “get to” costs do not constitute damages because of “property damage”

    Neighbor Allowed to Remove Tree Roots on Her Property That Supported Adjoining Landowners’ Two Large Trees With Legal Immunity

    UCF Sues Architects and Contractors Over Stadium Construction Defects

    Withdrawal of an Admission in California May Shift Costs—Including Attorneys’ Fees—Incurred in Connection with the Withdrawal

    Texas Granted Primacy Over Class VI Carbon Storage Wells

    California Attempts to Tackle Housing Affordability Crisis

    Valerie A. Moore and Christopher Kendrick are JD Supra’s 2020 Readers’ Choice Award Recipients

    Florida Governor Signs Construction Defect Amendments into Law

    Workers Compensation Insurance: Dangers of the Audit Process

    Exceptions to Privette Doctrine Do Not Apply Where There is No Evidence a General Contractor Affirmatively Contributed to the Injuries of an Independent Contractor's Employee

    Hong Kong Buyers Queue for New Homes After Prices Plunge

    EEOC Builds on Best Practice Guidance Regarding Harassment Within the Construction Industry

    The First UK Hospital Being Built Using AI Technology

    Texas School System Goes to Court over Construction Defect

    New York Preserves Subrogation Rights

    40 Year Anniversary – Congratulations Ed Doernberger

    Idaho Supreme Court Address Water Exclusion in Commercial Property Exclusion

    No Hiring Surge by Homebuilders Says Industry Group

    July 1, 2015 Statutory Changes Affecting Virginia Contractors and Subcontractors

    Washington Court of Appeals Divisions Clash Over Interpretations of the Statute of Repose

    Congratulations 2024 DE, MA, MD, NJ, NY, and PA Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

    New Orleans Is Auctioning Off Vacant Lots Online

    Surety's Settlement Without Principal's Consent Is Not Bad Faith

    Construction Defect Lawsuits Hinted for Dublin, California

    When Licensing Lapses: How One Contractor Lost a $1 Million Dispute

    Insurer's Motion to Compel Inspection Denied

    Three Firm Members Are Top 100 Super Lawyers & Ten Are Recognized As Super Lawyers Or Rising Stars In 2018

    Man Pleads Guilty in Construction Kickback Scheme

    Business Interruption, Food Spoilage Claims Resulting from Off Premise Power Failure Denied

    Unfinished Building Projects Litter Miami

    Gain in Home Building Points to Sustained U.S. Growth

    AI Systems and the Real Estate Industry

    After Restoring Power in North Carolina, Contractor Faces Many Claims

    Use of Dispute Review Boards in the Construction Process

    A UK Bridge That Is a Lesson on How to Build Infrastructure

    U.S. Construction Value Flat at End of Summer

    Condominium Exclusion Bars Coverage for Construction Defect

    Policy Sublimit Does Not Apply to Business Interruption Loss

    Traub Lieberman Chair Emeritus Awarded the 2022 Vince Donohue Award by the International Association of Claim Professionals

    Winning Construction Disputes: Strategic Negotiation for Better Outcomes

    AB 1701 Has Passed – Developers and General Contractors Are Now Required to Double Pay for Labor Due to Their Subcontractors’ Failure to Pay

    Developer’s Fraudulent Statements Are His Responsibility Alone in Construction Defect Case

    $2B Waldorf Astoria Renovation in NYC Resumes After Jobsite Fatality

    Policy Renewals: Has Your Insurer Been Naughty or Nice?

    Happy Thanksgiving from CDJ

    Not in My Kitchen – California Supreme Court Decertifies Golden State Boring Case

    Do You Have A Florida’s Deceptive And Unfair Trade Practices Act Claim
    Corporate Profile

    ROBERTS IDAHO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Roberts, Idaho Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Roberts' most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Roberts, Idaho

    Ninth Circuit Holds That Policies Covering Environmental Claims Do Not Have Aggregate Limits

    May 12, 2026 —
    In the case of County of San Bernardino v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, the Ninth Circuit recently addressed the issue of whether general liability policies issued in the 1960s and 1970s included aggregate limits for claims arising under the premises-operations coverage in CGL policies. The difference between the policyholder’s interpretation of the policies’ limits clauses and the insurer’s interpretation was worth hundreds of millions of dollars in exposure for the insurer. The Court closely examined the policy language and extrinsic evidence from both the insurance industry’s drafting history and the parties before concluding that the policies were ambiguous. The Court construed that ambiguity in favor of the policyholder and ruled that aggregate limits did not apply to the claims at issue. The Court’s decision underscores the importance of carefully examining a policy’s limits, especially for older policies written before 1986 when the insurance industry revised the standard-form CGL policy to state the aggregate limits apply not only to products liability claims but to premises-operations claims as well. Decades of insurance industry drafting history confirms, as the policyholder’s submissions in this case indicate, that the industry well understood that operations claims like the environmental waste-disposal claims at issue here typically were not subject to aggregate limits. Reprinted courtesy of Lorelie S. Masters, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Joseph T. Niczky, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Ms. Masters may be contacted at lmasters@hunton.com Mr. Niczky may be contacted at jniczky@hunton.com Read the full story...

    'Drywall Isn't Light': Peter Lupo on Safety Management at Standard Drywall

    May 26, 2026 —
    Peter Lupo has been safety director since 2019 at San Diego-based Standard Drywall Inc., a major wall and ceiling contractor. He draws on over two decades of safety experience across a wide range of commercial construction work, having previously served as safety director for general contractor T.B. Penick & Sons. He has also previously operated Peter Lupo Consulting, where he reviewed legal cases and provided expert testimony, and blogged on safety for ENR.com. Lupo recently spoke to ENR Correspondent Elaine Silver about the weight of drywall, heat hazard control, bilingual crews and how he supports safety creativity and learning on the Standard Drywall staff. The conversation has been edited. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Super Lawyers

    July 13, 2026 —
    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai has been recognized as a 2026 Northern California Super Lawyer honoree in the area of Construction Litigation. This is the thirteenth consecutive year he has been recognized by Super Lawyers. Super Lawyers, an annual listing of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and personal achievement, is limited to no more than five percent (5%) of lawyers in a state who are selected through a multiphase process that includes a statewide survey of lawyers, independent research evaluation and peer reviews by practice area. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Best Lawyers Honors Hundreds of Lewis Brisbois Attorneys, Names Five Partners 'Lawyers of the Year'

    September 08, 2026 —
    Best Lawyers has selected 207 Lewis Brisbois attorneys across 45 offices for its 33rd edition of The Best Lawyers in America. It has also recognized five Lewis Brisbois partners on its "Lawyers of the Year" list: Akron Partner John R. Conley (Product Liability Litigation - Defendants); Akron Managing Partner David Kern (Corporate Law; Mergers and Acquisitions Law; Private Funds / Hedge Funds Law; Tax Law; Trusts and Estates); Weirton Managing Partner Michelle L. Gorman (Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants); Portland Partner Megan Cook (Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants); and San Diego Partner Craig T. Mann (Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants). Please join us in congratulating the following attorneys on their Best Lawyers recognition! You can also see the full list of attorneys named to Best Lawyers' Ones to Watch in America here. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Idaho Contractor Registration: Lessons from the Ward v. Bishop Decision

    April 20, 2026 —
    The Idaho Supreme Court’s recent decision in Ward v. Bishop Constr., Ltd. Liab. Co., No. 51118, 2025 Ida. LEXIS 143 (Dec. 31, 2025) offers valuable guidance for contractors and construction attorneys navigating the Idaho Contractor Registration Act (ICRA). The December 2025 ruling clarifies critical questions about when and how defendants may raise contractor registration defenses, the weight of pretrial stipulations, and the consequences of procedural missteps in construction litigation. This article examines the key takeaways from the decision and offers practical actions for consideration by those working in Idaho’s construction industry. The Facts Behind the Dispute The case arose from a long-standing working relationship between cousins Joel Ward and Ren Bishop dating to the 1990s. Ward performed general construction work for Bishop Construction, LLC, including building, plumbing, electrical, framing, roofing, and siding work on projects in Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming. Bishop agreed to pay Ward $10 per hour, later increased to $12 per hour, plus one-way travel expenses. Between 2017 and 2019, Ward worked over 1,100 hours but was never paid, totaling $12,443.54 in claimed damages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tara Martens Miller, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. Miller may be contacted at tmmiller@swlaw.com

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (8/19/26) – Single-Family Housing Investors Worry, Confidence in Multifamily REITs and Construction Backlog Falls

    September 08, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, U.S. Chamber of Commerce creates Housing Advisory Council, a legal battle develops over new federal rules related to mortgage escrow accounts, hospitality dealmakers pursue ‘bigger, higher-conviction’ M&A, and more!
    • In the wake of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act becoming law, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has created a Housing Advisory Council with the goal of advancing market-driven policies that help increase housing supply and promote affordability. (Julie Strupp, Multifamily Dive)
    • Investors in the single-family housing market are increasingly concerned about interest rates, rising insurance and home costs, and the ongoing war with Iran. (Diana Olick, CNBC)
    • A legal battle is brewing over new federal rules related to accounts that hold money to pay homeowners’ property taxes and insurance payments. (Sarah Agostino, CNBC)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    New Executive Order Prohibits Federal Contractors from Engaging in DEI Through Employment and Procurement Activities

    April 27, 2026 —
    On March 26, 2026, President Trump signed Executive Order 14398, entitled Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors, requiring federal agencies to add contractual language in all federal contracts prohibiting contractors and subcontractors from engaging in any racially discriminatory DEI activities, as defined by the Executive Order (EO). While this EO includes language similar to prior DEI-related orders, it introduces a significant expansion in enforcement by subjecting non-compliant contractors to liability under the False Claims Act (FCA), including exposure to whistleblower actions and qui tam litigation. A qui tam claim is a civil action by a private individual on behalf of the government alleging fraud against federal programs and seeking to recover damages. The new EO states that involvement in any racially discriminatory DEI activities is not only unethical and illegal, but also deemed fraudulent against federal programs because it is material to the government’s payment decisions. The definition of DEI activities here matters, as this EO expands a contractor’s obligations beyond the management of its employment policies and includes prohibitions against funding or expending time or resources on DEI activities and contracting with subcontractors, vendors, or suppliers utilizing DEI programs. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Laura De Santos, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani
    Ms. De Santos may be contacted at ldesantos@grsm.com

    GRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior Court

    August 11, 2026 —
    A Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani multi-state team, including Partners Christine Barker, Sean Ferron, and Keith Cramer, obtained a defense verdict on behalf of a homeowners’ association (HOA) in an Orange County Superior Court bench trial spanning two months. The case began in 2022 when a homeowner sued after the Architectural Review Committee and HOA Board of Directors declined his teardown-and-rebuild plans due to view and aesthetic concerns. After a motion for summary judgment ruling in which the court found that the existing covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) did not protect views, the HOA held a special election to add explicit view protections to the CC&Rs. At the February 2025 trial call, the plaintiff sought leave to file a third amended complaint challenging the validity of that vote, drastically reframing the case from CC&R enforcement to one of election validity. A second plaintiff then filed a parallel action toward the end of the limitations period, and the two cases were consolidated. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani