BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom home expert witness Custer County Idaho office building expert witness Custer County Idaho condominium expert witness Custer County Idaho high-rise construction expert witness Custer County Idaho Medical building expert witness Custer County Idaho Subterranean parking expert witness Custer County Idaho low-income housing expert witness Custer County Idaho casino resort expert witness Custer County Idaho landscaping construction expert witness Custer County Idaho institutional building expert witness Custer County Idaho condominiums expert witness Custer County Idaho parking structure expert witness Custer County Idaho multi family housing expert witness Custer County Idaho tract home expert witness Custer County Idaho mid-rise construction expert witness Custer County Idaho housing expert witness Custer County Idaho hospital construction expert witness Custer County Idaho retail construction expert witness Custer County Idaho production housing expert witness Custer County Idaho industrial building expert witness Custer County Idaho custom homes expert witness Custer County Idaho concrete tilt-up expert witness Custer County Idaho
    Custer County Idaho building envelope expert witnessCuster County Idaho architectural expert witnessCuster County Idaho delay claim expert witnessCuster County Idaho construction claims expert witnessCuster County Idaho testifying construction expert witnessCuster County Idaho architecture expert witnessCuster County Idaho architectural engineering expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Custer County, Idaho

    Idaho Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB133; title 6 increases builder liability by creating responsibility for attorney fees if the homeowner/HOA prevails; places stringent demands on builder to comply with statutes and repair/compromise/settle; compliance protects against liability for resultant personal property damage; NOR is triggered by any construction defect in a new or substantially remodeled dwelling; Owner must notice "professional"; pro must respond within 21 days; claimant must accept/reject within 30 days; or if the pro inspects, he must provide offer or statement within 14 days and claimant must accept/reject within 30 days; law appears, by definition, to impose same timelines on builder pro in cross-complaining


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Custer County Idaho

    License required for electrical, plumbing, pesticide, manufactured housing, landscape architecture, and asbestos removal. No state license for general contracting.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Upper Valley Building Contractors Association
    Local # 1335
    310 North 2nd East Ste 143
    Rexburg, ID 83440

    Custer County Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Contractors Association of SW Idaho
    Local # 1325
    6206 N Discovery Way Ste A
    Boise, ID 83713

    Custer County Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Idaho State Home Builders Association
    Local # 1300
    6206 N Discovery Way Ste A
    Boise, ID 83713

    Custer County Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Contractors Association of Wood River Valley
    Local # 1395
    PO Box 2721
    Hailey, ID 83333
    Custer County Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Snake River Valley Building Contractors Association
    Local # 1375
    1123 12 Ave S
    Nampa, ID 83651

    Custer County Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Eastern Idaho Builders Association
    Local # 1340
    PO Box 1782
    Idaho Falls, ID 83403

    Custer County Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Salmon River Builders Association
    Local # 1350
    PO Box 25
    Carmen, ID 83462

    Custer County Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Custer County Idaho


    Ohio Court of Appeals: Absolute Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage For Workplace Coal-Tar Pitch Exposure Claims

    Port Authority Revises Plans for $10B Midtown NYC Bus Terminal Replacement

    Every High-Tech Building Has Many Lifespans

    The Secret to Success Is Doing Things a Little Bit Differently

    VinFast Breaks Ground in North Carolina on its Promised $4B EV Plant

    What You Need to Know About Home Improvement Contracts

    Burden to Prove Exception to Exclusion Falls on Insured

    Man Pleads Guilty in Construction Kickback Scheme

    Mitigating Mold Exposure in Manufacturing and Multifamily Buildings

    Dozens Missing in LA as High Winds Threaten to Spark More Fires

    Tacoma Construction Site Uncovers Gravestones

    Specific Performance of an Option Contract to Purchase Real Property is Barred Absent Agreement on All Material Terms

    Fifth Circuit Concludes Government’s CAA Legal Claims are Time-Barred But Injunctive-Relief Claims are Not

    New York Federal Court Enforces Construction Exclusion, Rejects Reimbursement Claim

    Charles Eppolito Appointed Vice-Chair of the PBA Judicial Evaluation Commission and Receives Prestigious “President’s Award”

    Eleventh Circuit’s Noteworthy Discussion on Bad Faith Insurance Claims

    Subcontrator’s Insurer Must Reimburse for Defense of Contractor

    It's a Wrap! Enforcing Online Agreements in Light of the CPRA

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (05/17/23) – A Flop in Flipping, Plastic Microbes and Psychological Hard Hats

    Do Change Orders Need to be in Writing and Other Things That Might Surprise You

    Loan Modifications Due to COVID-19 Pandemic: FDIC Answers CARES Act FAQs

    Bally's Secures Funding for $1.7B Chicago Casino and Hotel Project

    Tax Increase Pumps $52 Billion Into California Construction

    AB5 Construction Exemption – A Checklist to Avoid Application of AB5’s Three-Part Test

    Submitting Claims on Government Projects Can Be Tricky

    Will the AI Frenzy Continue in 2025?

    Understanding Liability Insurer’s Two Duties: To Defend and to Indemnify

    You Cannot Arbitrate Claims Not Covered By The Arbitration Agreement

    Immigrants, Accidents and Lawsuit Loans: Does NY Need New Rules?

    Cal/OSHA Approves COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standards; Executive Order Makes Them Effective Immediately

    Brown Orders Mandatory Water Curbs for California Drought

    New York Restrictions on Flow Through Provision in Subcontracts

    Purely “Compensatory” Debts Owed by Attorneys to Clients (Which Are Not Disciplinary or Punitive Fees Imposed by the State Bar) Are Dischargeable In Bankruptcy

    Cyber Thieves Phish Away a $735K Payment to a Minnesota Contractor

    Arizona Court Enters $323 Million Judgment Against ZOM Living Following Unanimous Jury Verdict

    Federal Contract Termination For Convenience

    Don’t Be Lazy with Your Tenders

    Federal Judge Rips Shady Procurement Practices at DRPA

    Being deposed—not just for dictators! Depositions in the construction lawsuit (Law & Order: Hard Hat files Part 5)

    Solicitor General’s Views to Supreme Court on Two Circuit Court Rulings that Groundwater Can be Considered “Waters of the United States”

    Reckless Disregard is. . . Well. . .Reckless

    Traub Lieberman Partner Colleen Hastie Wins Summary Judgment in Favor of Sub-Contracted Electrical Company

    LA County Begins Arduous Cleanup, Rebuild Effort in Altadena as New Fire Flares

    Contractors and Force Majeure: Contractual Protection from Hurricanes and Severe Weather

    New Hampshire Asbestos Abatement Firm Pleads Guilty in Federal Fraud Case

    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC Announces Leadership Changes and New Vision for Growth

    Word of the Day: “Contractor”

    Don’t Put All Your Eggs in the Silent-Cyber Basket

    Housing Starts in U.S. Drop to Lowest Level in Three Months

    Tension Over Municipal Gas Bans Creates Uncertainty for Real Estate Developers
    Corporate Profile

    CUSTER COUNTY IDAHO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Custer County, Idaho Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Custer County's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Custer County, Idaho

    EPA Steps Back, Arizona Moves Forward

    May 12, 2026 —
    In a significant development for Arizona’s business community and environmental policymakers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has paused its planned reclassification of Maricopa County from “Moderate” to “Serious” ozone nonattainment status pursuant to the Clean Air Act’s National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). This decision marks a shift in federal air policy — one that recognizes the unique challenges faced by regions like metro Phoenix, where environmental conditions beyond local control are often key contributors to air quality readings. The EPA’s move follows a series of meetings between EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, Arizona elected officials, and business and civic leaders, including a recent roundtable in Phoenix convened by U.S. Senator Mark Kelly. In announcing the pause, Zeldin acknowledged the need for flexibility and fairness in the application of Clean Air Act standards, especially when emissions from other states, nations, and natural events significantly influence local air quality. Reprinted courtesy of Patrick J. Paul, Snell & Wilmer, John Habib, Snell & Wilmer and Sukhmani K. Singh, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Paul may be contacted at ppaul@swlaw.com Mr. Habib may be contacted at jhabib@swlaw.com Ms. Singh may be contacted at ssingh@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Congratulations to Reno Partner Karen Baytosh for Securing a Complete Dismissal via a Motion for Summary Judgment

    July 13, 2026 —
    BWB&O is proud to announce that Reno Partner Karen Baytosh received a significant victory on behalf of the firm’s Developer Client in a high-exposure personal injury matter. Plaintiff, a teenager, was struck by an intoxicated driver while walking her dog at night, sustaining catastrophic injuries requiring 24-hour critical care for the remainder of her life. Plaintiff’s Guardian brought suit against the drunk driver and her husband, the City, and BWB&O’s Developer Clients, alleging that the City and Developers failed to improve street lighting and install a sidewalk that would have prevented the accident. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Traub Lieberman Wins Affirmation of Judgment on Pleadings Before the Seventh Circuit

    August 16, 2026 —
    Traub Lieberman Partners Dana Rice and Adam Joffe obtained affirmation of judgment from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in favor of an Insurance Company. The Insurance Company filed suit seeking a declaration that it had no duty to defend or indemnify its Insured, a Roofing Contractor, in an underlying lawsuit. The Insurance Company issued a commercial general liability policy with a one-year policy term. The policy included an exclusion that barred coverage for any losses arising out of work the insured completed before the date the policy incepted. Reprinted courtesy of Dana A. Rice, Traub Lieberman and Adam P. Joffe, Traub Lieberman Mr. Rice may be contacted at drice@tlsslaw.com Mr. Joffe may be contacted at ajoffe@tlsslaw.com Read the full story...

    Insurer Cannot Dispose of Water Leak or Bad Faith Claims on Motion for Summary Judgment

    July 20, 2026 —
    The insurer’s motion for summary judgment seeking to eliminate the insured’s claims for damage from a water leak, bad faith and punitive damages failed. Nargizyan v, State Farm General Ins. Co., 2026 Cal App. LEXIS 302 (Cal. Ct. App. April 15, 2026). The insured noticed tiles on his kitchen floor were warmer than usual. He found water dripping from the top of the crawl space under the house. He noticed water was “dripping in different places” but not pouring like a faucet. “There were too many places to count where water was dripping and there was water all over the place.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Newark Team Obtains Appellate Ruling Affirming Summary Judgment for Lawyer and Firm in Professional Negligence Lawsuit

    April 14, 2026 —
    Newark Partner Meredith Kaplan Stoma and Associate Anthony Doss recently secured a decision from the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, affirming summary judgment for their clients, a lawyer and her firm, in a lawsuit alleging professional negligence in connection with the administration of a commercial loan. The circumstances giving rise to the lawsuit date back to September 2020, when the plaintiff was approached by members of a real estate investment company regarding a short-term loan opportunity whereby he would loan the company $200,000. The company provided the plaintiff with a “bridge loan package,” which stated that the requested funds would be held in the escrow account of their counsel and her firm (Lewis Brisbois’ clients), and returned to him with interest within six months once the company was “capitalized” by a senior lender. The company subsequently prepared two notes, each for $100,000, in connection with the agreement. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    “He Chose…Poorly: How Bad DSC Clauses Lead to Project Doom in the Last Crusade of Construction Risk”

    March 10, 2026 —
    “We do not follow maps to buried treasure, and X never, ever marks the spot.” That’s the advice that Indiana Jones offered in the Last Crusade film. But what’s beneath the surface isn’t just important to adventure archaeologists. It has real-world application to our industry, where success depends on the stability of materials below the surface. The study of geology and soils has ancient roots. Egyptians relied on soil stability for the pyramids; Rome built a continent-wide roadway system utilizing subgrade preparation techniques; Medieval builders implemented a rudimentary foundation pier system; Henri Gautier studied what is now called the “angle of repose” for French retaining walls in the early 18th Century. Through the 19th Century, contractors bore the risk of the stability of their work, and the attendant peril of unforeseen site conditions. But in the early 20th Century, design trades continued to develop increased understanding of soil and underground conditions. In the 1920’s US federal contracts began employing “differing site conditions” clauses, which provided for cost/time adjustments if subsurface conditions differed from expectations. Industry forms followed the federal policy, and these clauses became almost universally accepted. Reprinted courtesy of Curt Martin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Lee Banta, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Martin may be contacted at cmartin@pecklaw.com Mr. Banta may be contacted at lbanta@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    The Deadline to File Suit on a Public Works Payment Payment Bond is Triggered by a Claimant’s Work on a Project Not by a Claimant’s Work Under a Contract

    June 02, 2026 —
    California law requires that prime contractors furnish a payment bond – providing for payment to lower-tiered subcontractors and suppliers – on state and local public works projects with a value in excess of $25,000. There are three conditions that must be satisfied when a claimant makes a claim against a payment bond on a public works project in California:
    1. First, generally, the claimant must have served a preliminary notice, unless the claimant is a first-tier subcontractor or supplier;
    2. The claimant must have “ceased to provide work” on the project; and
    3. The claimant must file suit against the payment bond no later than six (6) months after the period in which a stop payment notice must be given or, in other words, the earlier of 270 days after completion of the public works project or 210 days after a notice of completion or cessation was recorded on a public works project.
    In Tarlton & Sons, Inc. v. Great American Insurance Company, 111 Cal.App.5th 376 (2025), the 2nd District Court of Appeal examined whether a subcontractor timely filed a claim against a payment bond when a prime contractor was terminated and replaced by another prime contractor who the subcontractor continued to perform work for. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Angela Zanin Featured in LACBA List of Women’s History Month Honorees

    March 17, 2026 —
    Los Angeles Partner Angela Zanin was recently honored for her leadership and diversity initiatives in the California legal community by the Los Angeles County Bar Association (LACBA) as part of the organization’s Women’s History Month initiative. LACBA highlighted Ms. Zanin’s efforts in the community. After serving as President of the Italian American Lawyers Association (IALA) in 2023, she co-founded the Los Angeles County Unity Bar (LACUB), an alliance of bar associations dedicated to promoting diversity in the judiciary. Consisting of ten member organizations, the LACUB takes pride in its endorsement of over 40 candidates appointed to the California Court of Appeal, U.S. District Courts, Los Angeles Superior Court, and Orange County Superior Court. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois