• Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    high-rise construction expert witness Lake Hamilton Florida landscaping construction expert witness Lake Hamilton Florida Subterranean parking expert witness Lake Hamilton Florida production housing expert witness Lake Hamilton Florida parking structure expert witness Lake Hamilton Florida concrete tilt-up expert witness Lake Hamilton Florida retail construction expert witness Lake Hamilton Florida mid-rise construction expert witness Lake Hamilton Florida condominium expert witness Lake Hamilton Florida industrial building expert witness Lake Hamilton Florida casino resort expert witness Lake Hamilton Florida office building expert witness Lake Hamilton Florida custom home expert witness Lake Hamilton Florida hospital construction expert witness Lake Hamilton Florida condominiums expert witness Lake Hamilton Florida Medical building expert witness Lake Hamilton Florida townhome construction expert witness Lake Hamilton Florida low-income housing expert witness Lake Hamilton Florida custom homes expert witness Lake Hamilton Florida structural steel construction expert witness Lake Hamilton Florida multi family housing expert witness Lake Hamilton Florida housing expert witness Lake Hamilton Florida
    Lake Hamilton Florida multi family design expert witnessLake Hamilton Florida roofing construction expertLake Hamilton Florida expert witness structural engineerLake Hamilton Florida slope failure expert witnessLake Hamilton Florida expert witness windowsLake Hamilton Florida architect expert witnessLake Hamilton Florida building envelope expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Lake Hamilton, Florida

    Florida Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: In Title XXXIII Chapter 558, the Florida Legislature establishes a requirement that homeowners who allege construction defects must first notify the construction professional responsible for the defect and allow them an opportunity to repair the defect before the homeowner canbring suit against the construction professional. The statute, which allows homeowners and associations to file claims against certain types of contractors and others, defines the type of defects that fall under the authority of the legislation and the types of housing covered in thelegislation. Florida sets strict procedures that homeowners must follow in notifying construction professionals of alleged defects. The law also establishes strict timeframes for builders to respond to homeowner claims. Once a builder has inspected the unit, the law allows the builder to offer to repair or settle by paying the owner a sum to cover the cost of repairing the defect. The homeowner has the option of accepting the offer or rejecting the offer and filing suit. Under the statute the courts must abate any homeowner legal action until the homeowner has undertaken the claims process. The law also requires contractors, subcontractors and other covered under the law to notify homeowners of the right to cure process.

    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Lake Hamilton Florida

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.

    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Polk County Builders Association
    Local # 1028
    2232 Heritage Dr
    Lakeland, FL 33801

    Lake Hamilton Florida Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders & CA of Brevard
    Local # 1012
    1500 W Eau Gallie Blvd Ste A
    Melbourne, FL 32935

    Lake Hamilton Florida Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Tampa Bay Builders Association
    Local # 1036
    11242 Winthrop Main St
    Riverview, FL 33578

    Lake Hamilton Florida Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Hernando Bldrs Assoc
    Local # 1010
    7391 Sunshine Grove Rd
    Brooksville, FL 34613

    Lake Hamilton Florida Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Highlands County Builders Association
    Local # 1022
    PO Box 7546
    Sebring, FL 33872
    Lake Hamilton Florida Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Metro Orlando
    Local # 1040
    544 Mayo Ave
    Maitland, FL 32751

    Lake Hamilton Florida Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Manatee - Sarasota County
    Local # 1041
    8131 Lakewood Main St Ste 207
    Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202

    Lake Hamilton Florida Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Lake Hamilton Florida

    Toronto Contractor Bondfield Wins Court Protection as Project Woes Mount

    One Nation, Under Renovation

    Wisconsin Court Enforces Breach of Contract Exclusion in E&O Policy

    Cybersecurity on Your Project: Why Not Follow National Security Strategy?

    Up in Smoke - 5th Circuit Finds No Coverage for Hydrochloric Acid Spill Based on Pollution Exclusion

    A Closer Look at an HOA Board Member’s Duty to Homeowners

    "Decay" Found Ambiguous in Collapse Case

    Oregon Construction Firm Sued for Construction Defects

    Contractors with Ties to Trustees Reaped Benefits from LA Community College Modernization Program

    Four Companies Sued in Pool Electrocution Case

    Best Practices After Receiving Notice of a Construction Claim

    Texas Supreme Court Cements Exception to “Eight-Corners” Rule Through Two Recent Rulings

    Appraisers May Determine Causation

    Supplement to New California Construction Laws for 2019

    Preserving your Rights to Secure Payment on Construction Projects (with Examples)

    Distressed Home Sales Shrinking

    Communications between Counsel and PR Firm Hired by Counsel Held Discoverable

    Deterioration Known To Insured Forecloses Collapse Coverage

    U.S. Building Permits Soared to Their Highest Level in Nearly Eight Years

    Undocumented Debris at Mississippi Port Sparks Legal Battle

    White House Proposal Returns to 1978 NEPA Review Procedures

    Good Signs for Housing Market in 2013

    Texas School District Accepts Settlement Agreement in Construction Defect Case

    California Supreme Court Protects California Policyholders for Intentional Acts of Employees

    Builders Association Seeks to Cut Down Grassroots Green Building Program (Guest Post)

    As Climate Changes, 'Underwater Mortgage' May Take on New Meaning

    CDJ’s #10 Topic of the Year: Transport Insurance Company v. Superior Court (2014) 222 Cal.App.4th 1216.

    How a Maryland County Created the Gold Standard for Building Emissions Reduction

    Oregon Supreme Court Confirms Broad Duty to Defend

    Small to Midsize Builders Making Profit on Overlooked Lots

    COVID-19 Response: Key Legal Considerations for Event Cancellations

    Possible Real Estate and Use and Occupancy Tax Relief for Philadelphia Commercial and Industrial Property Owners

    Condominium Association Wins $5 Million Judgment against Developer

    Court Grants Motion to Dismiss Negligence Claim Against Flood Insurer

    Settlement Ends Construction Defect Lawsuit for School

    The California Legislature Return the Power Back to the People by Passing the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018

    Coverage Denied for Condominium Managing Agent

    Goldberg Segalla Welcomes William L. Nimick

    Few Homes Available to Reno Buyers, Plenty of Commercial Properties

    Construction Defect Suit Can Continue Against Plumber

    New Highway for Olympics Cuts off Village near Sochi, Russia

    Third Circuit Limits Pennsylvania’s Kvaerner Decision; Unexpected and Unintended Injury May Constitute an “Occurrence” Under Pennsylvania Law

    Were Condos a Bad Idea?

    Architectural Democracy – Interview with Pedro Aibéo

    ACS Obtains Overwhelming Jury Trial Victory for General Contractor Client

    Congratulations to Partner John O’Meara for Being Named as One of America’s Top 100 Civil Defense Litigators for Three Consecutive Years!

    Quick Note: Notice of Contest of Claim Against Payment Bond

    Architects Group Lowers U.S. Construction Forecast

    Jury Convicts Ciminelli, State Official in Bid-Rig Case

    Key Legal Considerations for Modular Construction Contracts
    Corporate Profile


    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Lake Hamilton, Florida Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Lake Hamilton's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Lake Hamilton, Florida

    Lien Law Change in Idaho

    December 05, 2022 —
    July 1, 2022, the Idaho Legislature’s amendments to I.C. 45-507 came into effect. This statute regulates the steps and requirements to sustain a valid mechanics and materialmen lien. There were three changes to the statute: (1) clarification as to who may personally serve a notice of lien; (2) additional contents that must be included in a lien claim; and (3) authorization for attorney fees. Prior to the amendments, any person could, on behalf of the entity (contractor) seeking to establish a lien, personally serve the owner of the property with a claim of lien. Now, for personal service to be considered effective, the owner or reputed owner must be personally served by an officer “authorized by law” to serve process. Essentially, a process server needs to be employed for personal service. A contractor may still serve an owner via certified mail The second change relates to required disclosures. Now, in order to have a valid lien, a contractor must attach a copy of the required disclosures and acknowledgement of receipt of said disclosures with the claim of lien. If the claim does not contain the required documents, it will be considered invalid. This is an important change, because even if the contractor provides all required documents to the owner if there is no copy of the documents attached to the claim of lien the contractor will lose their lien rights – assuming the deficiency is not corrected prior to the statute of limitations running. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Grace Maldonado, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani
    Ms. Maldonado may be contacted at

    UK Agency Seeks Stricter Punishments for Illegal Wastewater Discharges

    August 07, 2022 —
    Bosses of U.K. water and wastewater utilities that are responsible for illegal, serious pollution should be jailed, said Emma Howard Boyd, head of the government's Environment Agency. She made the recommendation along with release of the agency’s annual report on the nine major companies, which recorded the worst environmental performance in a decade. Reprinted courtesy of Peter Reina, Engineering News-Record Mr. Reina may be contacted at Read the full story...

    Home Builders and Developers Beware: SC Supreme Court Beats Up Hybrid Arbitration Clauses Mercilessly

    November 15, 2022 —
    Today’s guest post is by one of my favorite construction lawyers and friends, Burr partner Ned Nicholson in our Columbia, SC office. Ned regularly represents clients in construction defect and compensation claims, manufacturer/dealer disputes, and insurance coverage lawsuits. He is also a South Carolina certified mediator. Ned can be reached at or (803) 799-9800. If you are a homebuilder, residential housing developer, construction industry insurer, or any one of the many participants in the industry providing affordable and decent housing for the citizens of South Carolina, you are already aware that South Carolina courts have for decades prioritized the promotion of consumer (i.e., home buyer) rights, usually at the expense of the providers of housing. There is nothing inherently wrong with that; the goal is laudable. But as in so many things, the implementation has been extremely costly for the residential construction industry as a savvy plaintiff’s bar has taken advantage of grey areas that are inevitably created in our judicial system. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Matthew Devries, Burr & Forman LLP
    Mr. Devries may be contacted at

    Unravel the Facts Before Asserting FDUTPA and Tortious Interference Claims

    September 05, 2022 —
    CMR Construction and Roofing, LLC v. UCMS, LLC, 2022 WL 3012298 (11th Cir. 2022) is an interesting opinion where a contractor asserted a Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (known by its acronym “FDUTPA”) claim and tortious interference claims (with a contract and with an advantageous business relationship) against another contractor, i.e., a competitor, that were dismissed from the get-go. It is an opinion worthy of interest based on the claims asserted against a competitor. Throwing around FDUTPA and tortious interference may sound good from an intimidation standpoint, but pleading and then proving these claims are a lot different than loosely throwing around these claims. Before filing a lawsuit for FDUTPA and tortious interference, spend time unraveling the facts and the chronology. Do not rely on conclusory allegations simply to check the box regarding required elements to plead while ignoring the actual facts that support the allegations. These are fact-based claims and it is imperative the facts are fully known from on the onset so that they can be strategically pled and pursued. In this matter, a contractor, the plaintiff, was hired by a condominium association around April 2018 to repair damage caused by a hurricane which included roofing work. The association was going to have its insurer pay its contractor. In May 2020, the association hired a new contractor to perform the same work (the “new contractor”). The association then directed the plaintiff to cease work since it hired the new contractor. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris, P.A.
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at

    The Credibility of Your Expert (Including Your Delay Expert) Matters in Construction Disputes

    October 03, 2022 —
    Here is a quote from a judge in an order after the bench trial of a complex construction dispute between a prime contractor and subcontractor on a federal project:
    The evidence received in this case demonstrates the dynamic nature of complicated construction projects. At every step, the details matter, and coordination and cooperation among the companies tasked with performing the job is essential. Thankfully, as even this case shows, most disagreements that arise as projects evolve are handled during construction, far away from a courthouse, by the professionals who know best how to achieve the ultimate goal of a completed project.
    U.S. f/u/b/o McKenney’s, Inc. v. Leebcor Services, LLC, 2022 WL 3549980, *1 (E.D. Va. 2022).
    This is a true statement. A statement that parties should remember as they navigate the nuances of a complicated construction project and dispute. The facts of the case, however, would hardly be construed as a win for either party. Something else for parties to consider as they navigate the nuances of a complicated construction project and dispute. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris, P.A.
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at

    Court Bars Licensed Contractor From Seeking Compensation for Work Performed by Unlicensed Sub

    June 06, 2022 —
    It all started with a tree. A eucalyptus tree to be exact. What followed is one of the more important cases to be decided under Business and Professions Code section 7031 in recent years. Yes, that Section 7031. The statute variously described by the state’s courts as “harsh[ ],” draconian” and “unjust,” but, importantly, nevertheless valid. Under Section 7031, an unlicensed contractor is barred from seeking compensation for work requiring a contractor’s license. This has been called the “shield.” However, in addition to the “shield,” project owners can also employ Section 7031’s “sword,” and seek disgorgement of all monies paid to an unlicensed contractor. Section 7031’s “shield” and “sword” applies even if the project owner knew that the contractor was unlicensed. They also apply even if the unlicensed contractor’s work was flawless. And they also apply even if a contractor was unlicensed during a portion of its work. This is because, as courts have stated, Section 7031 is a consumer protection statute intended to protect the public from unlicensed contractors and applies irrespective of the equities. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at

    The Brooklyn Condominium That’s Reinventing Outdoor Common Space

    October 24, 2022 —
    Courtyard apartments have a long history in the US, particularly in temperate climes, where shaded outdoor corridors and centralized playspaces can be year-round amenities. New York City, however, has only selectively embraced this approach, with private yards and public parks taking up the slack. A new 18-unit condominium, 450 Warren — one of four planned Brooklyn collaborations between architects SO-IL and developers Tankhouse — aims to change that relationship, while also twisting the idea of common outdoor space into something that gets used. Rather than creating one large courtyard, with the open space protected from the street by an L-shaped plan, SO-IL chopped up the outdoor amenities, betting that smaller, more carefully shaped and planted terraces would be more popular than a large undifferentiated expanse of grass. The building’s plan reads as three towers connected by curvy concrete walkways. The building sits across the street from the Gowanus Houses, a public housing development, completed in 1949 with towers of up to 14 stories. The area was rezoned for denser mixed-use development in 2021, but when SO-IL and Tankhouse were developing the plans, regulations limited building heights to a maximum of five stories. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Alexandra Lange, Bloomberg

    Indemnity: What You Don’t Know Can Hurt You!

    September 19, 2022 —
    Risk allocation between the parties is a critical component of any construction contract. Indemnity obligations can be some of the important risk-shifting provisions of any design or construction contract. Indemnity provisions typically require one party, the Indemnitor, to agree to “hold harmless,” and/or reimburse another party, the indemnitee, from claims and liability arising out of the party’s work. Considering the financial consequences that an indemnity provision can have on a construction project, it is critical that all parties to a construction contract know the legal implications of the contract indemnity provisions and understand any limitations in enforcing the indemnity provisions depending on the controlling jurisdiction. While most indemnity clauses and obligations are enforceable, many states have enacted anti-indemnity statutes prohibiting or restricting specific indemnification provisions. These anti-indemnity statutes afford protection to contractors and subcontractors not generally in a position to protect themselves from overly extensive indemnity obligations. This article highlights several examples of indemnity provisions typically seen in construction contracts, the measures are taken by a growing number of states to protect parties with less bargaining power in the form of anti-indemnity statutes, and offers practical considerations when negotiating or drafting indemnity provisions.[1] Reprinted courtesy of Caitlin Kicklighter, Emory Law Student (2024 Graduate), (ConsensusDocs) and Bill Shaughnessy, Jones Walker LLP (ConsensusDocs) Mr. Shaughnessy may be contacted at Read the full story...