BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    landscaping construction expert witness Stamford Connecticut high-rise construction expert witness Stamford Connecticut townhome construction expert witness Stamford Connecticut condominiums expert witness Stamford Connecticut mid-rise construction expert witness Stamford Connecticut tract home expert witness Stamford Connecticut institutional building expert witness Stamford Connecticut Subterranean parking expert witness Stamford Connecticut structural steel construction expert witness Stamford Connecticut low-income housing expert witness Stamford Connecticut office building expert witness Stamford Connecticut multi family housing expert witness Stamford Connecticut Medical building expert witness Stamford Connecticut concrete tilt-up expert witness Stamford Connecticut parking structure expert witness Stamford Connecticut retail construction expert witness Stamford Connecticut custom homes expert witness Stamford Connecticut industrial building expert witness Stamford Connecticut housing expert witness Stamford Connecticut casino resort expert witness Stamford Connecticut condominium expert witness Stamford Connecticut production housing expert witness Stamford Connecticut
    Stamford Connecticut construction project management expert witnessesStamford Connecticut building consultant expertStamford Connecticut hospital construction expert witnessStamford Connecticut expert witness windowsStamford Connecticut defective construction expertStamford Connecticut structural engineering expert witnessesStamford Connecticut engineering consultant
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Stamford, Connecticut

    Connecticut Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Stamford Connecticut

    License required for electrical and plumbing trades. No state license for general contracting, however, must register with the State.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders & Remo Assn of Fairfield Co
    Local # 0780
    433 Meadow St
    Fairfield, CT 06824

    Stamford Connecticut Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Eastern Connecticut
    Local # 0740
    20 Hartford Rd Suite 18
    Salem, CT 06420

    Stamford Connecticut Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of New Haven Co
    Local # 0720
    2189 Silas Deane Highway
    Rocky Hill, CT 06067

    Stamford Connecticut Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Hartford Cty Inc
    Local # 0755
    2189 Silas Deane Hwy
    Rocky Hill, CT 06067

    Stamford Connecticut Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of NW Connecticut
    Local # 0710
    110 Brook St
    Torrington, CT 06790

    Stamford Connecticut Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Connecticut (State)
    Local # 0700
    3 Regency Dr Ste 204
    Bloomfield, CT 06002

    Stamford Connecticut Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Stamford Connecticut


    Balfour in Talks With Carillion About $5 Billion Merger

    How Mobile Tools Are Capturing Safety Data on Jobsites

    Falls Requiring Time Off from Work are Increasing

    8 Secrets About Working with Contractors – Bad Contractor Series Part 5

    Colorado Chamber of Commerce CEO Calls for Change to Condo Defect Law

    Trends: “Nearshoring” Opportunities for the Construction Industry

    Statute of Limitations Upheld in Construction Defect Case

    Court Finds No Coverage for Workplace “Prank” With Nail Gun

    Newmeyer Dillion Ranked in Chambers Spotlight California 2026 Guide

    Dispute Resolution in Your Construction Contract

    Rise in Home Building Helps Other Job Sectors

    Sometimes it Depends on “Whose” Hand is in the Cookie Jar

    LA Scores Major Victory in a High-Exposure Premises Liability Action

    Force Majeure and COVID-19 in Construction Contracts – What You Need to Know

    What Counts as Adequate Opportunity to Cure?

    OSHA Launches Program to Combat Trenching Accidents

    Tidal Lagoon Plans Marine Project to Power Every Home in Wales

    Kahana Feld Enters National Law Journal 500 List for 2025

    California Contractors – You Should Know That Section 7141.5 May Be Your Golden Ticket

    Armor Up: Fortifying Your Business Against California Litigation

    When Licensing Lapses: How One Contractor Lost a $1 Million Dispute

    Did You Really Accept That Bid? – How Contractors Can Avoid Post-Acceptance Bid Disputes Over Contract Terms

    ADP Says Payrolls at Companies in U.S. Increase 200,000

    The Future for Tall Buildings Could Be Greener

    Late Notice Bars Insured's Claim for Loss Caused by Hurricane

    Building More Than a Ramp: HHMR and the Home Builders Foundation

    Sustainability Puts Down Roots in Real Estate

    Insurance Policy Provides No Coverage For Slab Collapse in Vision One

    Federal Court Requires Auto Liability Carrier to Cover Suit Involving Independent Contractor Despite “Employee Exclusion”

    Replevin Actions: What You Should Know

    General Contractors Have Expansive Common Law and Statutory Duties To Provide a Safe Workplace

    GRSM Named “Powerhouse in Litigation” in 2026 Industry Report

    New York Moves to Tighten Third-Party Practice: Key Changes to CPLR 1007

    Insurer’s Duty to Indemnify Not Ripe Until Underlying Lawsuit Against Insured Resolved

    Investigation of Orange County Landslide

    Top 10 Construction Contract Provisions – Changes and Claims

    Are You Overpromising on Your Construction Contracts? Here's How to Build With Transparency

    Substituting Materials and Failure to Comply with Contractual Requirements

    The Future Has Arrived: New Technologies in Construction

    Indictments Issued in Las Vegas HOA Scam

    Hanover, Germany Apple Store Delayed by Construction Defects

    Follow the Dispute Resolution Provision(s) in Your Contract

    NJ Public Works Contractors Beware – Pay Special Attention When Submitting Your Public Works Contractor Registration

    Construction Contract Basics: Venue and Choice of Law

    U.S. State Adoption of the National Electrical Code

    Building Permits Up in USA Is a Good Sign

    Negligent Misrepresentation in Sale of Building Altered without Permits

    ICYMI: Highlights From ABC Convention 2024

    Watch Your Step – Playing Golf on an Outdoor Course Necessarily Encompasses Risk of Encountering Irregularities in the Ground Surface

    Professional Services Exclusion Bars Coverage After Carbon Monoxide Leak
    Corporate Profile

    STAMFORD CONNECTICUT CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Stamford, Connecticut Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Stamford's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Stamford, Connecticut

    GRSM Trial Team Holds Alameda County Asbestos Verdict to $900,000 Against $50 Million Demand

    July 27, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Partners John Katerndahl and Vincent Gunter recently obtained an outstanding trial result for a manufacturer of asbestos-containing electrical cable, holding a jury verdict to $900,000 against a $50 million demand following an eight-week trial in Alameda County Superior Court, which is among the most challenging asbestos venues in the country. The GRSM team also included Associate Brandon Sanchez, on-site trial Paralegal Laura Vitanova, and Paralegal Kerrie Lease. The plaintiffs, the surviving spouse and four children of a former painter who died of mesothelioma, alleged that the decedent was exposed to asbestos from the company’s electrical cable during construction of a California nuclear power facility. GRSM’s client was the sole remaining defendant at trial. The plaintiffs asked the jury for $50 million and called 15 witnesses across their case-in-chief and rebuttal. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Vacant Building Negates Coverage for Broken Pipe

    September 01, 2026 —
    The Michigan Court of Appeals found the insured was not covered for water damage because the commercial space was left vacant. Cherry Hill Recreation Center, Inc. v. Conifer Ins Co., 2026 Mich, App. LEXIS 5099 (Mich Ct. App. June 18, 2026). Alan Abbas purchased a bowling alley. Due to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and executive orders issued by the governor, Abbas was unable to operate the bowling center for several months. During the winter, Abbas allowed the thermostat to drop significantly, with the building expected to be around 43 degrees Fahrenheit. He later admitted the sprinkler system’s pipes were not protected against freezing. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Cuomo Bridge Lawsuit Adversaries Weigh Mediated Settlement

    July 06, 2026 —
    Rival legal teams have reached a critical juncture as they consider a mediated settlement in one of two major payment lawsuits pending between a design-build contracting team and the New York State Thruway Authority over construction of the more than $3-billion Mario M. Cuomo Bridge north of New York City. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    LA Scores Major Victory in a High-Exposure Premises Liability Action

    July 06, 2026 —
    Our firm is proud to announce a decisive defense victory obtained by Partner Daniel Crespo and Associate Lauren Landau for our client in a high-exposure premises liability action arising from a 2022 incident at an active school construction site in Perris, California. On March 10, 2026, the Riverside County Superior Court granted Summary Judgment in full for our client, dismissing all claims brought by Plaintiff, who alleged she tripped and fell over a curb while picking up her daughter from school and sustained ankle and wrist injuries as a result. Through meticulous preparation and the strategic use of construction plans, contractual documents, and onsite surveillance video evidence, our team demonstrated that our client had no ownership, possession, or control over the portion of the existing sidewalk where the incident occurred, with construction plans unambiguously designating the area as pre-existing concrete outside our client’s scope of work, and the Construction Services Agreement expressly reserving control over all existing site improvements to the school district. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause Prevents Coverage for Collapse

    April 27, 2026 —
    The appellate court affirmed the decision of the trial court granting summary judgment to the insurer after agreeing that the policy’s anti-concurrent causation clause barred coverage. Lido Hospitality, Inc. v. AIX Specialty Ins. Co., 2026 Iii. App. Unpub. LEXIS 133 (Ill. Ct. App. Jan. 27, 2026). One of the brick veneer walls of the Lido Motel collapsed during a windstorm. Lido reported the loss it its insurer, AIX. AIX investigated and determined that the brick veneer collapsed due to pervasive wear and tear and corrosion of the underlying infrastructure that secured the veneer- specifically the components that anchored or tied the masonry veneer to the underlying wooden substrate. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Expands with New Office in Foxborough, Massachusetts

    June 08, 2026 —
    Foxborough, MA — April 1st, 2026— Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. (SDV), a national law firm focused exclusively on representing policyholders in insurance coverage disputes, is pleased to announce the opening of its new office in Foxborough, Massachusetts. The expansion marks another milestone in the firm’s continued growth and deepens SDV’s ability to serve clients across the region. The new location strengthens SDV’s presence in Massachusetts and expands the firm’s capacity to support both existing and anticipated client needs in an increasingly complex insurance landscape. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.

    Nationwide Preliminary Injunction Ordering Department of Defense to Resume Review of Wind Energy Projects

    September 21, 2026 —
    On August 6, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon granted a preliminary injunction in Renewable Northwest v. Hegseth, Case No. 3:26-cv-01092-IM, ordering the Department of Defense (DoD) to resume processing wind energy project applications under the existing statutory and regulatory framework and staying DoD’s review freeze pending final adjudication on the merits. Background In 2011, Congress created the Military Aviation and Installation Assurance Siting Clearinghouse (Clearinghouse) within DoD to review wind energy projects that might affect military operations. When a wind project developer files an application with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the FAA refers it to DoD to determine whether the project poses an “unacceptable risk to the national security.” Reprinted courtesy of Victor J. Roehm III, Snell & Wilmer, Christopher P. Colyer, Snell & Wilmer and Sara M. Ajeti, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Roehm may be contacted at vroehm@swlaw.com Mr. Colyer may be contacted at ccolyer@swlaw.com Ms. Ajeti may be contacted at sajeti@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Federal Court Highlights the Strategic Value of Additional Insured Coverage

    June 22, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the District of Maryland underscores a recurring—but often underutilized—opportunity for policyholders: securing and enforcing additional insured coverage under another party’s liability policy. In Charter Oak Fire Insurance Co. v. Builders Premier Insurance Co., the court held that an equipment lessor qualified as an additional insured under the lessee’s policy and was entitled to a primary defense. The decision is a useful reminder that additional insured coverage can fundamentally shift defense obligations and materially reduce a policyholder’s exposure. We build on the decision to highlight the practical steps policyholders should take to ensure that all potentially available insurance is identified and pursued. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
    Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@hunton.com