BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    industrial building expert witness Killingworth Connecticut retail construction expert witness Killingworth Connecticut landscaping construction expert witness Killingworth Connecticut production housing expert witness Killingworth Connecticut tract home expert witness Killingworth Connecticut housing expert witness Killingworth Connecticut hospital construction expert witness Killingworth Connecticut low-income housing expert witness Killingworth Connecticut custom homes expert witness Killingworth Connecticut institutional building expert witness Killingworth Connecticut Medical building expert witness Killingworth Connecticut multi family housing expert witness Killingworth Connecticut Subterranean parking expert witness Killingworth Connecticut concrete tilt-up expert witness Killingworth Connecticut condominiums expert witness Killingworth Connecticut office building expert witness Killingworth Connecticut condominium expert witness Killingworth Connecticut custom home expert witness Killingworth Connecticut casino resort expert witness Killingworth Connecticut high-rise construction expert witness Killingworth Connecticut parking structure expert witness Killingworth Connecticut mid-rise construction expert witness Killingworth Connecticut
    Killingworth Connecticut construction code expert witnessKillingworth Connecticut fenestration expert witnessKillingworth Connecticut construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessKillingworth Connecticut architectural expert witnessKillingworth Connecticut civil engineering expert witnessKillingworth Connecticut construction cost estimating expert witnessKillingworth Connecticut building envelope expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Killingworth, Connecticut

    Connecticut Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Killingworth Connecticut

    License required for electrical and plumbing trades. No state license for general contracting, however, must register with the State.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders Association of Eastern Connecticut
    Local # 0740
    20 Hartford Rd Suite 18
    Salem, CT 06420

    Killingworth Connecticut Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders & Remo Assn of Fairfield Co
    Local # 0780
    433 Meadow St
    Fairfield, CT 06824

    Killingworth Connecticut Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of New Haven Co
    Local # 0720
    2189 Silas Deane Highway
    Rocky Hill, CT 06067

    Killingworth Connecticut Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Hartford Cty Inc
    Local # 0755
    2189 Silas Deane Hwy
    Rocky Hill, CT 06067

    Killingworth Connecticut Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of NW Connecticut
    Local # 0710
    110 Brook St
    Torrington, CT 06790

    Killingworth Connecticut Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Connecticut (State)
    Local # 0700
    3 Regency Dr Ste 204
    Bloomfield, CT 06002

    Killingworth Connecticut Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Killingworth Connecticut


    Milwaukee's 25-Story Ascent Stacks Up as Tall Timber Role Model

    Digitalizing Cross-Laminated Timber Construction

    From ‘Cuckoo’s Egg’ to Today’s Cyber Threat Landscape

    Be a Good Neighbor: Techniques to Mitigate the Risk of Claims from Adjacent Landowners

    The Louvre Abu Dhabi’s Mega-Structure Domed Roof Completed

    Top 10 Take-Aways from the 2024 Annual Forum Meeting in New Orleans

    Relying Upon Improper Exclusion to Deny Coverage Allows Bad Faith Claim to Survive Summary Judgment

    Trump Replaces Architect to Lead $300 Million Ballroom Design

    Meet Orange County Bar Associations 2024 Leaders

    St. Mary & St. John Coptic Orthodox Church v. SBS Insurance Services, Inc.

    While Construction Permits Slowly Rise, Construction Starts and Completions in California Are Stagnant

    The DOL Claims Most Independent Contractors Are Employees

    The Court-Side Seat: FERC Reviews, Panda Power Plaints and Sovereign Immunity

    Home Construction Slows in Las Vegas

    California Court of Appeals Says, “We Like Eich(leay)!”

    Las Vegas’ McCarran Tower Construction Issues Delays Opening

    Meet the Forum's ADR Neutrals: LISA D. LOVE

    Kahana & Feld P.C. Enhances Client Offerings, Expands Litigation Firm Leadership

    Rescission of Policy for Misrepresentation in Application Reversed

    More on Fraud, Opinions and Contracts

    Insured's Collapse Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    Standard For Evaluating Delay – Directly from An Armed Services Board Of Contract Appeal’s Opinion

    Difficulty in Defending Rental Supplier’s Claim Under Credit Application

    Sales of New U.S. Homes Surged in August to Six-Year High

    Water Alone is Not Property Damage under a CGL policy in Connecticut

    Jury Finds Broker Liable for Policyholder’s Insufficient Business Interruption Limits

    Illinois Federal Court Applies Insurer-Friendly “Mutual Exclusive Theories” Test To Independent Counsel Analysis

    Reminder: Always Order a Title Search for Your Mechanic’s Lien

    Fed Inflation Goal Is Elusive as U.S. Rents Stabilize: Economy

    A Relatively Small Exception to Fraud and Contract Don’t Mix

    It’s All a Matter of [Statutory] Construction: Supreme Court Narrowly Interprets the Good Faith Dispute Exception to Prompt Payment Requirements in United Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Coast Iron & Steel Co.

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Hold the Pickles, Hold the Lettuce?”

    Miller Act Payment Bond Claim “No Nos!”

    Lewis Brisbois Ranks Among Top 25 Firms on NLJ’s 2021 Women in Law Scorecard

    Meet the Forum's Neutrals: MATTHEW W. ARGUE

    Breaking with Tradition, The Current NLRB is on a Rulemaking Tear: Election Procedures, Recognition Bar, and 9(a) Collective Bargaining Relationships

    A Race to the Finish on Oroville Dam Spillway Fix

    Lawsuit Gives Teeth to Massachusetts Pay Law

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight Rated as One of the Top 50 in a Survey of Construction Law Firms in the United States

    Convictions Obtained in Las Vegas HOA Fraud Case

    Associated Builders and Contractors Northern California Chapter Announces New President/CEO

    Quick Note: Steps to Protect and Avoid the “Misappropriation” of a “Trade Secret”

    Elliott Backed Venture Sues Lloyds Over Avant Cladding, Times Reports

    Are Housing Prices Poised to Fall in Denver?

    Virginia Civil Engineers Give the State's Infrastructure a "C" Grade

    New LA Home Designs, Reimagined By Fire

    Hunton Insurance Coverage Group Ranked in National Tier 1 by US News & World Report

    First Circuit Broadly Interprets Exclusion in Commercial General Liability Policy Under Current Massachusetts Law

    Skyline Cockpit’s Game-Changing Tower Crane Teleoperation

    The ROI of Estimating Accuracy in Preconstruction
    Corporate Profile

    KILLINGWORTH CONNECTICUT CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Killingworth, Connecticut Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Killingworth's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Killingworth, Connecticut

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (8/19/26) – Single-Family Housing Investors Worry, Confidence in Multifamily REITs and Construction Backlog Falls

    September 08, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, U.S. Chamber of Commerce creates Housing Advisory Council, a legal battle develops over new federal rules related to mortgage escrow accounts, hospitality dealmakers pursue ‘bigger, higher-conviction’ M&A, and more!
    • In the wake of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act becoming law, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has created a Housing Advisory Council with the goal of advancing market-driven policies that help increase housing supply and promote affordability. (Julie Strupp, Multifamily Dive)
    • Investors in the single-family housing market are increasingly concerned about interest rates, rising insurance and home costs, and the ongoing war with Iran. (Diana Olick, CNBC)
    • A legal battle is brewing over new federal rules related to accounts that hold money to pay homeowners’ property taxes and insurance payments. (Sarah Agostino, CNBC)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    Powering Data Centers in a Moving Regulatory Landscape: Positioning Deals Before FERC’s Next Move

    April 27, 2026 —
    The explosive growth of data‑center load—driven by artificial intelligence, cloud computing and the expansion of digital infrastructure across industries—has forced U.S. energy regulators into unfamiliar territory. Nowhere is this more evident than at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which is actively considering how large, concentrated loads can be powered without compromising grid reliability or shifting costs to other customers. FERC has not yet issued a standalone rulemaking on data centers. But make no mistake, the regulatory framework is quietly and deliberately being built. For developers, hyperscalers, utilities and investors, the period before FERC finalizes its next round of decisions represents the critical window to crystallize advocacy and structure transactions in ways that anticipate regulatory change. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury and Andrew H. Jacobs, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Jacobs may be contacted at andrew.jacobs@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Owner Taking Assignment of General Contractor’s Claims Against a Subcontractor(s)

    September 21, 2026 —
    Here’s a scenario that occurs in construction defect cases. An owner sues a general contractor and subs for construction defects. The owner settles with a number of parties and takes an assignment of the general contractor’s claims against some or all of the subs and pursues the remaining parties for indemnity based on the assignment of the general contractor’s claims. This was the scenario in Craftsman Plastering and Lath, Inc. v. Rath Mor, LLC, 2026 WL 2328032 (Fla. 4th DCA 2026). The owner settled with the general contractor and all subs except one. The owner took an assignment of the general contractor’s claim against the sub, and really the indemnity claim. The owner was then substituted as the real party in interest as it relates to the general contractor’s claims against the sub. The owner sought roughly $780,000 in attorney’s fees and costs in connection with the dispute claiming the sub was liable for such fees. The jury didn’t buy the argument and awarded the owner about $55,000. Basically, the jury seemingly prorated the fees by the number of parties, at least, that’s how the math worked out. The owner didn’t like that and moved for an additur to increase the jury’s verdict which the trial court granted. This was reversed on appeal despite the fact that a trial court has broad discretion to grant a motion for additur. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized in the 2027 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America®

    September 08, 2026 —
    Traub Lieberman is pleased to announce that four Partners have been selected by their peers for inclusion in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America®. In addition, six attorneys have been included in the 2027 Best Lawyers®: Ones to Watch list. These recognitions include attorneys from the firm’s White Plains, NY; Chicago, IL; Palm Beach Gardens, FL; and St. Petersburg, FL offices. 2027 Best Lawyers® White Plains, NY
    • Lisa L. Shrewsberry – Commercial Litigation
    Chicago, IL
    • Brian C. Bassett – Insurance Law
    Palm Beach Gardens, FL
    • Rina Clemens – Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants, Product Liability Litigation – Defendants
    St. Petersburg, FL
    • Lauren S. Curtis – Insurance Law
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Traub Lieberman

    Construction Liens: Liening for Amounts Not Yet Technically Due Does Not Mean Lien Is Fraudulent

    August 11, 2026 —
    A 2024 bankruptcy ruling, In re Edgewater Construction Group, Inc., 657 B.R. 668 (S.D.Fla. 2024), touched upon an interesting issue when it comes to construction liens. Is a construction lien fraudulent simply because the lien includes amounts not yet due? Not necessarily. In this bankruptcy dispute, the subcontractor debtor (that filed for bankruptcy) recorded two construction liens on projects. The general contractor argued in the bankruptcy court that the subcontractor debtor’s liens were fraudulent. As to the first lien, the general contractor argued that the lien was fraudulent because it included amounts that the debtor knew the general contractor had already paid to the debtor’s subcontractors/suppliers. The bankruptcy court disagreed: “The Court finds that, although the Debtor had been told that [the general contractor] had paid these subcontractors, in light of the ongoing dispute between Debtor and [the general contractor], it was reasonable for the Debtor to demand proof. Debtor’s subsequent filing of a partial satisfaction of lien once the Debtor received the requested proof of payment from [the general contractor] counters any claim of willful exaggeration.” In re Edgewater Construction Group, supra, at 672-673. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Defend Now, Allocate Later? An Unresolved Tension in Colorado Construction Law

    August 16, 2026 —
    For decades, Colorado law has recognized an important distinction between the duty to defend and the duty to indemnify. The former ordinarily arises at the beginning of litigation; the latter generally cannot be determined until the underlying liability is known. That distinction makes intuitive sense. A defense that becomes due only after litigation concludes is not much of a defense. But Colorado’s construction anti-indemnity statute, C.R.S. § 13-21-111.5(6), raises an interesting question about how that familiar rule operates in construction disputes. The statute expressly regulates contractual obligations not only to indemnify, but also to insure and defend, and it reflects a legislative policy that construction businesses should bear financial responsibility for their own negligence. Those principles have developed along separate tracks. At some point, a Colorado appellate court may have to decide precisely how they fit together. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    Late Notice Bars Insured’s Claim for Wind Damage

    June 29, 2026 —
    The court found that a six-month delay in reporting damage from wind did not comply with the policy’s notice requirements. Touchmark Hotel Group, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61910 (S.D. N. Y. March 24, 2026). A storm caused damage to Touchstone’s hotel on January 4, 2023. Touchstone’s corporate representative, Rohit Patel, testified that he was not at the property on the day of the storm. In a telephone call the next day, the manager of the property reported to Patel that he observed detached shingles from the roof the hotel in the parking lot. Patel testified that he did not file a claim at that time because Touchmark’s employees did not detect any water leakage in the building and because he did not believe that the cost of the damage from the storm would exceed the policy’s deductible. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Greg Katz Quoted in Insurance Journal Article About How Big Data & AI Are Driving Up Verdicts, Settlements

    October 06, 2026 —
    National Managing Partner Greg Katz was recently quoted in an Insurance Journal article about how plaintiff's lawyers are harnessing big data and artificial intelligence to attempt to drive up jury awards and settlement demands. The article, titled "The Big Data/AI ‘Revolution’ Is Driving Up Verdicts, Settlements as Plaintiffs Buy In," points out that a growing number of personal injury and claims law firms, some of which are working with an influx of cash from investors and litigation funders, are using a multitude of high-tech tools to try to gain an advantage in litigation. They are using large online mock juries to test legal theories, big data to find sympathetic jurors and venues in which to try cases, and AI programs to analyze their own arguments and those of opponents. “They’re taking instincts and intuition out of the equation,” Mr. Katz told Insurance Journal. “They think they’ve come up with a different way to ring the bell and, in their words, add zeroes to awards.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois