BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    tract home expert witness Springfield Colorado office building expert witness Springfield Colorado institutional building expert witness Springfield Colorado housing expert witness Springfield Colorado multi family housing expert witness Springfield Colorado mid-rise construction expert witness Springfield Colorado townhome construction expert witness Springfield Colorado high-rise construction expert witness Springfield Colorado structural steel construction expert witness Springfield Colorado landscaping construction expert witness Springfield Colorado hospital construction expert witness Springfield Colorado industrial building expert witness Springfield Colorado low-income housing expert witness Springfield Colorado condominium expert witness Springfield Colorado retail construction expert witness Springfield Colorado parking structure expert witness Springfield Colorado casino resort expert witness Springfield Colorado custom homes expert witness Springfield Colorado Medical building expert witness Springfield Colorado Subterranean parking expert witness Springfield Colorado concrete tilt-up expert witness Springfield Colorado production housing expert witness Springfield Colorado
    Springfield Colorado engineering consultantSpringfield Colorado construction defect expert witnessSpringfield Colorado expert witness windowsSpringfield Colorado reconstruction expert witnessSpringfield Colorado construction expert testimonySpringfield Colorado concrete expert witnessSpringfield Colorado roofing and waterproofing expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Springfield, Colorado

    Colorado Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1161 has three significant components that effect construction defect litigation. The first is a right to remedy and notice provision (75 days written notice) The homeowner must give the builder a notice that describes the nature of the claimed construction defects, the location of the defects and a general description of the type of damages that are claimed. The second component is a limitation on the nature and type of damages that can be pursued and awarded in a construction defect case. The third is a limitation on the availability and amount of punitive damages ($250,000) under the provisions of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Springfield Colorado

    State license required for electrical, asbestos removal, plumbers, and pesticides trade; no state license for general contracting. Licensing may be required on a city or county level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Southwest Co Inc
    Local # 0683
    1199 Main Ave #234
    Durango, CO 81301

    Springfield Colorado Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Four Corners Chapter
    Local # 0655
    PO Box TL
    Cortez, CO 81321

    Springfield Colorado Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Pagosa Springs
    Local # 0698
    PO Box 3956
    Pagosa Springs, CO 81147

    Springfield Colorado Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of the Upper Rio Grande
    Local # 0679
    PO Box 1210
    South Fork, CO 81154

    Springfield Colorado Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Pueblo Associated Home Builders
    Local # 0675
    635 West Corona Ave Suite 101
    Pueblo, CO 81004

    Springfield Colorado Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Housing & Builders Association Of Colorado Springs
    Local # 0625
    4585 Hilton Pkwy Ste 100
    Colorado Springs, CO 80907

    Springfield Colorado Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Teller Co
    Local # 0690
    PO Box 713
    Woodland Park, CO 80866

    Springfield Colorado Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Springfield Colorado


    Court Slams the Privette Door on Independent Contractor’s Bodily Injury Claim

    Negligent Misrepresentation Claim Does Not Allege Property Damage, Barring Coverage

    Colorado Construction-Defects Reform Law Attempt Expected in 2015

    Subcontract Requiring Arbitration Outside of Florida

    Owner Bankruptcy: What’s a Contractor to Do?

    Can Businesses Resolve Construction Disputes Outside of Court?

    Is Privity of Contract with the Owner a Requirement of a Valid Mechanic’s Lien? Not for GC’s

    Insurer Must Defend Faulty Workmanship Claims

    Arizona Court Determines Statute of Limitations Applicable to a Claim for Reformation of a Deed of Trust (and a Related Claim for Declaratory Judgment)

    Wisconsin Supreme Court Holds Fire Damage Resulted from Single Occurrence

    Agrihoods: The Best of Both Worlds

    Leonard Fadeeff v. State Farm General Insurance Company

    Need to Cover Yourself for “Crisis” Changes on a Job Site? Try These Tips (guest post)

    California Supreme Court Rejects Third Exception to Privette Doctrine

    How is Negotiating a Construction Contract Like Buying a Car?

    Arbitration Clause Found Ambiguous in Construction Defect Case

    Faulty Workmanship Causing Damage to Other Property Covered as Construction Defect

    Ex-Detroit Demolition Official Sentenced for Taking Bribes

    Waiver of Subrogation Enforced, Denying Insurers Recovery Against Additional Insured in $500 Million Off-Shore Oil Rig Loss

    Minnesota Senate Office Building Called Unconstitutional

    Beginning of the 2020 Colorado Legislative Session: Here We Go Again

    Crowdfunding Comes to Manhattan’s World Trade Center

    Where Did That Punch List Term Come From Anyway?

    Maybe California Actually Does Have Enough Water

    Traub Lieberman Chair Emeritus Awarded the 2022 Vince Donohue Award by the International Association of Claim Professionals

    Providing “Labor” Under the Miller Act

    Meet the Forum's Neutrals: MATTHEW W. ARGUE

    Maui Wildfire Cleanup Advances to Debris Removal Phase

    Make Prudent Decisions regarding your Hurricane Irma Property Damage Claims

    Potential Coverage Issues Implicated by the Champlain Towers Collapse

    First-Time Buyers Home Sales Stagnates

    Surety’s Several Liability Under Bonds

    Musk Backs Off Plan for Tunnel in Tony Los Angelenos' Backyard

    Don’t Ignore Prejudgment Interest

    Study Finds San Francisco Bay is Sinking Faster than Expected

    No Duty to Indemnify When Discovery Shows Faulty Workmanship Damages Insured’s Own Work

    Tarriffs, a Pandemic and War: Construction Contracts Must Withstand the Unforeseeable

    Is the Obsession With Recordable Injury Rates a Deadly Safety Distraction?

    Examination of the Product Does Not Stop a Pennsylvania Court From Applying the Malfunction Theory

    Washington Supreme Court Expands Contractor Notice Obligations

    Termination for Convenience Clauses: Maybe More Than Just Convenience

    Home-Sales Fall in 2014 Has U.S. Waiting for 2015: Economy

    Insured's Lack of Knowledge of Tenant's Growing Marijuana Means Coverage Afforded for Fire Loss

    Preparation Is Key: How Condo and Homeowner Associations Can Protect Their Communities Amid Hurricane Season

    Steel Makeover Under Way for Brooklyn's Squibb Footbridge

    Connecticut Supreme Court Further Refines Meaning of "Collapse"

    Required Contract Provisions for Construction Contracts in California

    SB800 Not the Only Remedy for Construction Defects

    Attorney Writing Series on Misconceptions over Construction Defects

    Subcontractors Found Liable to Reimburse Insurer Defense Costs in Equitable Subrogation Action
    Corporate Profile

    SPRINGFIELD COLORADO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Springfield, Colorado Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Springfield, Colorado

    A New Vision for Safety: Construction Safety Week’s Five-Year Plan

    February 17, 2026 —
    Construction Safety Week has long been a powerful show of force—a catalyst for bringing the industry together and focusing on the critical importance of health and safety. Over the last decade, we’ve made meaningful strides: advancing best practices, transitioning from hard hats to helmets, shedding light on vital issues such as mental health, fostering a culture of care and accountability and creating partnerships and initiatives that improve jobsite safety. Building on the progress we’ve made, we’ve launched a bold five-year vision to bring everyone together with trust and respect and to drive alignment in how safety is understood, owned and engineered at every step of the project. This is an industrywide effort to further deepen the culture of care centered around respect for the skilled craft and through all aspects of a project where all team members share this responsibility, this respect, across every phase: design, planning, construction and beyond. Reprinted courtesy of Adam Jelen, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Travelers Injury Impact Report Highlights Longer Recovery Times Amid Declining Injury Rates

    May 05, 2026 —
    HARTFORD, Conn.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Travelers Companies, Inc. (NYSE: TRV) today released its 2026 Injury Impact Report, an analysis of more than 1.2 million workers compensation claims received by the company from 2021 through 2025. The report finds that even as workplace injury rates decline, the injuries that do occur are growing more complex and taking longer to heal – a trend driven by an aging workforce and the disproportionate vulnerability of first-year employees. “The decrease in workplace injuries is a positive story, yet injured workers are still missing an average of 80 workdays,” said Claude Howard, Vice President of Workers Compensation Claim at Travelers. “This report is a reminder that progress doesn’t mean the risk environment requires any less attention, and an employer’s commitment to safety must keep pace with an ever-evolving workforce and injury landscape.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Travelers Companies, Inc.

    Surety Liability Is Coextensive with Its Bond Principal

    April 14, 2026 —
    A recent Miller act payment bond case, U.S. f/u/b/o Whitetail General Constructors v. Northcon, Inc., 2026 WL 46671 (D.Mont. 2026), contains a short noteworthy discussion as to a surety’s liability being coextensive with that of its bond principal. If you are bonded, or you are pursuing a bond, you need to appreciate this, which is why this is a noteworthy discussion:
    A “surety’s liability on a Miller Act bond must be at least coextensive with the obligations imposed by the Act if the bond is to have its intended effect.” “Therefore, ‘the liability of a surety and its principal on a Miller Act payment bond is coextensive with the contractual liability of the principal only to the extent that it is consistent with the rights and obligations created under the Miller Act.’” In other words, “[w]here a subcontract’s terms are consistent with the Miller Act’s provisions, the surety’s liability on the Miller Act bond is coextensive with the contractual liability of its princip[al].”
    “The liability of a surety under the Miller Act is controlled by federal law, rather than state contract law[.]” The court may, however, “look to state law when interpreting contractual provisions” in a Miller Act case.
    “[T]he measure of recovery under the Miller Act is generally determined by the terms of the subcontract [or underlying contract].”
    Northcon, supra, at *4-5 (internal citations omitted).
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (4/1/26) – President Trump’s EO Affects Federal Funding, Fannie Mae Accepts Crypto-Backed Mortgages, Private Sector Construction Weakness Offsets Public Sector Gains

    April 08, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, California to pursue office-to-housing conversions, hoteliers to increase investment in artificial intelligence, private credit exodus to boost commercial real estate capital, and more!
    • President Donald Trump’s executive order to remove regulatory barriers to affordable home construction could affect federal funding for cities and states that don’t follow what the order calls “regulatory best practices,” including faster permitting, fewer green building mandates and relaxed limits on exurban development. (Robyn Griggs Lawrence, Multifamily Dive)
    • California state policymakers have been pursuing policy changes that remove barriers to converting older commercial buildings into housing. (Keith Loria, Construction Dive)
    • Private sector weakness largely offset modest gains in public construction spending, despite data center gains. (Sebastian Obando, Construction Dive)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    John Palmeri and Peter Siachos Named to 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Lawyers in America

    February 17, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani is proud to announce that Partners John Palmeri and Peter Siachos have been named to the Lawdragon 500 Leading Lawyers in America for 2026. Their inclusion reflects their extensive trial experience, national leadership roles, and sustained excellence representing clients in complex, high-stakes matters. Now in its 21st year, the Lawdragon 500 Leading Lawyers in America guide honors attorneys who lead the profession through exceptional advocacy, dedication to clients, and influence within their firms and communities. Selected through yearlong research, peer discussion, and robust nominations, the guide recognizes lawyers who continue to shape the legal landscape at the highest levels. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    The AVOID Act: A New Timeline for Liability in New York Construction Projects

    February 23, 2026 —
    By April 18, 2026, New York construction litigation will operate on a faster—and far less forgiving—timeline. The Avoiding Vexatious Overuse of Impleading to Delay (the “AVOID Act”), signed into law on December 19, 2025, fundamentally rewrites third‑party practice under CPLR § 1007 by imposing strict deadlines to bring subcontractors, suppliers, and other responsible parties into a case. For owners, developers, general contractors, and their in‑house counsel, this change will shift risk assessment, contract enforcement, and litigation strategy to the very front end of a claim—particularly in New York Labor Law and construction defect cases. What Changed—and Why It Matters to Construction Cases Historically, New York defendants could implead subcontractors and other players well into discovery. The AVOID Act ends that practice. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Ms. Douris may be contacted at mdouris@seyfarth.com

    HHMR and Every One of its Partners Recognized by Legal 500 in Denver Elite – Real Estate

    April 20, 2026 —
    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC is pleased to announce its recognition as a Tier 1 firm in the Denver Elite rankings for Real Estate, a category that includes construction law and construction litigation, by The Legal 500. In addition, each of the firm’s partners has been individually recognized in the same rankings. The firm’s individual recognitions include: Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    Nevada’s Mandatory Nonbinding Arbitration Law for Civil Cases is Going Through Changes

    May 14, 2026 —
    Nevada currently operates an expedited litigation program designed to resolve civil disputes with a value up to $50,000 without incurring the “usual” expense of litigating these disputes. Over time, however, the number of civil cases that have been “exempted” from this program based on the claimed damages exceeding $50,000 has grown dramatically. In response, the Nevada Legislature recently enacted a number of rule changes designed to streamline Nevada’s arbitration process and include more cases. Among these changes are increasing the arbitration “cap” from $50,000 to $100,000. By way of background, the Nevada’s Court Annexed Arbitration program is a mandatory, non-binding program for civil cases in judicial districts that have county populations of 100,000 or more [1]. Nevada’s Court Annexed Arbitration was born out of NRS 38.250, which was enacted in 1991 and went into effect in the summer of 1992. The newly enacted NRS 38.250 was regarded as a way to address the problem of increased court caseloads while promoting judicial economy and efficiency in civil cases having a probable jury award of less than $25,000 [2]. Initially, cases that were automatically exempt from the program included class actions, medical malpractice disputes, divorce proceedings, and other domestic relations matters [3]. Reprinted courtesy of Brandon Wright, Lewis Brisbois and Manuel Gurule, Lewis Brisbois Mr. Wright may be contacted at Brandon.Wright@lewisbrisbois.com Mr. Gurule may be contacted at Manuel.Gurule@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...