BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom home expert witness Pope County Arkansas Medical building expert witness Pope County Arkansas office building expert witness Pope County Arkansas tract home expert witness Pope County Arkansas casino resort expert witness Pope County Arkansas condominium expert witness Pope County Arkansas townhome construction expert witness Pope County Arkansas concrete tilt-up expert witness Pope County Arkansas production housing expert witness Pope County Arkansas high-rise construction expert witness Pope County Arkansas retail construction expert witness Pope County Arkansas structural steel construction expert witness Pope County Arkansas landscaping construction expert witness Pope County Arkansas low-income housing expert witness Pope County Arkansas custom homes expert witness Pope County Arkansas hospital construction expert witness Pope County Arkansas housing expert witness Pope County Arkansas industrial building expert witness Pope County Arkansas institutional building expert witness Pope County Arkansas mid-rise construction expert witness Pope County Arkansas condominiums expert witness Pope County Arkansas multi family housing expert witness Pope County Arkansas
    Pope County Arkansas consulting architect expert witnessPope County Arkansas construction scheduling expert witnessPope County Arkansas structural engineering expert witnessesPope County Arkansas slope failure expert witnessPope County Arkansas building code expert witnessPope County Arkansas expert witness roofingPope County Arkansas multi family design expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Pope County, Arkansas

    Arkansas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB975: Requires that residential contractors be given notice and an opportunity to repair. Homeowners must provide 20 days notice in writing to builder prior to legal action to address defect and/or repair


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Pope County Arkansas

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    NE Arkansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 0432
    PO Box 17237
    Jonesboro, AR 72403

    Pope County Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Cleburne County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0405
    PO Box 1325
    Heber Springs, AR 72543
    Pope County Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Greater Fort Smith Associated Home Builders
    Local # 0436
    5111 Rogers Ave Ste 531
    Fort Smith, AR 72903

    Pope County Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    White County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0472
    PO Box 1501
    Searcy, AR 72143
    Pope County Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Northwest Arkansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 0424
    2022 Long Ave Ste C
    Springdale, AR 72764

    Pope County Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    North Central Arkansas Chapter
    Local # 0438
    PO Box 550
    Harrison, AR 72602

    Pope County Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Crittenden County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0415
    PO Box 2204
    West Memphis, AR 72303
    Pope County Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Pope County Arkansas


    NYC Shuts 9 Pre-Kindergartens for Health, Safety Issues

    Montana Significantly Revises Its Product Liability Laws

    Is It Time to Revisit Construction Defects in Kentucky?

    No Bad Faith in Insurer's Denial of Collapse Claim

    UPDATE - McMillin Albany LLC v. Superior Court

    Developer Transition - Maryland Condominiums

    GRSM Ranks Among World’s 70 Largest Law Firms in 2025 Global 200 Rankings

    Congress Relaxes Several PPP Loan Requirements

    ConsensusDOCS Hits the Cloud

    The Little Ice Age and Delay Claims

    Equitable Lien Designed to Prevent Unjust Enrichment

    Hawaii Supreme Court Finds Excess Can Sue Primary for Equitable Subrogation

    Texas “Loser Pays” Law May Benefit Construction Insurers

    Duty to Defend For Accident Exists, But Not Duty to Indeminfy

    Providence Partner Monica R. Nelson Helps Union Carbide Secure Defense Verdict in 1st Rhode Island Asbestos Trial in Nearly 40 Years

    Boston Building Boom Seems Sustainable

    Virginia General Assembly Tweaks Pay-if-Paid Ban

    Ohio Condo Development Case Filed in 2011 is Scheduled for Trial

    Are Housing Prices Poised to Fall in Denver?

    Never, Ever, Ever Assume! (Or, How a Stuck Shoe is Like a Construction Project Assumption)

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (10/06/21)

    Federal Court Predicts Coverage In Nevada for Damage Caused by Faulty Workmanship

    Tenants Underwater: Indiana Court of Appeals Upholds Privity Requirement for Property Damage Claims Against Contractors

    Pursuing Claims for Loss Caused by Recent Kona Low Storms for Homeowners and Businesses

    Florida trigger

    Candis Jones Named to Atlanta Magazine’s 2021 “Atlanta 500” List

    California Ranks As Leading State for Green Building in 2022

    Water Leak Covered for First Thirteen Days

    Defeating the Ten-Year Statute of Repose For Latent Construction Defects

    California Mediation Confidentiality May Apply to Third Party “Participants” Retained to Provide Analysis

    California Posts Nation’s Largest Gain in Construction Jobs

    Hawaii Court Finds No Bad Faith, But Negligent Misrepresentation Claim Survives Summary Judgment in Construction Defect Action

    The Pandemic, Proposed Federal Privacy Regulation and the CCPA

    Five Reasons to Hire Older Workers—and How to Keep Them

    Building Inspector Refuses to State Why Apartments Condemned

    Pending Sales of U.S. Existing Homes Rise Most in Four Years

    The Prolonged Effects on Commercial Property From Extreme Weather

    How to Get Your Bedroom Into the Met Museum

    With VA Mechanic’s Liens Sometimes “Substantial Compliance” is Enough (but don’t count on it) [UPDATE]

    Colorado Senate Bill 13-052: The “Transit-Oriented Development Claims Act of 2013.”

    Hunton Andrews Kurth Insurance Attorney, Latosha M. Ellis, Honored by Business Insurance Magazine

    Chicago’s Bungalows Are Where the City Comes Together

    Massive Redesign Turns Newark Airport Terminal Into a Foodie Theme Park

    A Recap of the Supreme Court’s 2019 Summer Slate

    The Insurance Coverage Debate on Construction Defects Continues

    Herman Russell's Big Hustle

    How Many New Home Starts are from Teardowns?

    How Robotics Can Improve Construction and Demolition Waste Sorting

    Congress Passes, President Signs Sweeping Energy Measure In Spend Bill

    New York Public Library’s “Most Comprehensive Renovation” In Its History
    Corporate Profile

    POPE COUNTY ARKANSAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Pope County, Arkansas Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Pope County's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Pope County, Arkansas

    GRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior Court

    July 20, 2026 —
    A Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani multi-state team, including Partners Christine Barker, Sean Ferron, and Keith Cramer, obtained a defense verdict on behalf of a homeowners’ association (HOA) in an Orange County Superior Court bench trial spanning two months. The case began in 2022 when a homeowner sued after the Architectural Review Committee and HOA Board of Directors declined his teardown-and-rebuild plans due to view and aesthetic concerns. After a motion for summary judgment ruling in which the court found that the existing covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) did not protect views, the HOA held a special election to add explicit view protections to the CC&Rs. At the February 2025 trial call, the plaintiff sought leave to file a third amended complaint challenging the validity of that vote, drastically reframing the case from CC&R enforcement to one of election validity. A second plaintiff then filed a parallel action toward the end of the limitations period, and the two cases were consolidated. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Kahana Feld Announces Key Partner Additions Coast to Coast

    June 22, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – June 10, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce Yvette Davis, Evan Kalooky, Beth Obra-White, Sean Paden, Michael Parme, Jeffrey Schmid, and Julieanne Yanez have joined the firm as partners. Four of these partners are joining the San Diego office, which further strengthens the firm’s General Liability and Construction Litigation practices and enhances Kahana Feld’s ability to serve clients across a broad range of complex matters in the region. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    Four Kahana Feld Attorneys Selected to 2027 Southern California Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars Lists

    August 16, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – Aug. 3, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce that partners Jason Feld, Amir Kahana, and Sharon Oh-Kubisch were selected to the 2027 Southern California Super Lawyers list, and attorney Hannah Ellenhorn Bloom was selected to the 2027 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars list. Jason Feld was recognized in the area of Construction Litigation. He is a founding partner of Kahana Feld and focuses his practice on the defense of homebuilders, contractors, developers, and real estate professionals primarily in construction defect, general liability, insurance defense, construction accident, and real estate matters. He also represents government entities handling construction, premises liability, general liability, and environmental claims. He serves as panel counsel for many prominent insurance carriers, as well as personal counsel to several national and regional homebuilders, developers, and general contractors. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    Construction Robotics Works Where Variation Ends

    August 11, 2026 —
    BuiltWorlds published its 2026 Robotics Top 50 this summer, and the list is genuinely wide. Fifty solutions across nine categories, from 3D printing and prefabricated component manufacturing to earthmoving, demolition, material transport, layout, installation, inspection, and drilling. The honorees come from sixteen countries. It looks like robotics has finally spread across the whole project lifecycle. However, having vendors in nine categories does not mean that contractors are robotizing their work en masse. Zacua Ventures, in its 2026 construction robotics report, estimates that on-site robotics accounted for less than 0.03% of global construction spending in 2025. Zacua says: “That is not a failed market. It is a market at the beginning of an adoption S-curve”, while warning that its estimates rest on private vendor data and may be high if vendors overstate how widely their machines are deployed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    A Customized Approach to Data Center Construction

    June 29, 2026 —
    Data center construction projects are, to put it mildly, distinct. They differ from traditional construction in a host of manners, and are particularly distinctive because the value of the facility depends on unique measures of performance. A center that cannot meet uptime, cooling, redundancy or connectivity standards will not achieve its mission, whether or not the structure itself meets standard industry contract-form “substantial completion” or “mechanical completion” definitions. Owners, developers, lenders, operators and hyperscalers—especially hyperscalers!—want it all. They seek favorable and stable pricing, accelerated delivery and sophisticated components, all of which are evolving in “real project time.” Standard construction contract forms deserve extensive modifications to align clauses with expectations, with a heightened focus on systems integration, commissioning, and allocation of special risks. This article details customized considerations for drafting, negotiating and administering data center design and construction agreements. Reprinted courtesy of James P. Bobotek, Pillsbury, Arielle L. Murphy, Pillsbury and Robert A. James, Pillsbury Mr. Bobotek may be contacted at james.bobotek@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Murphy may be contacted at arielle.murphy@pillsburylaw.com Mr. James may be contacted at rob.james@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Federal Bid Protest Standard of Review and Disparate Treatment with Ratings

    August 16, 2026 —
    A recent decision out of the Federal Claims Court explains the post-award bid protest standard of review. In Massman Construction Co. v. U.S., 2026 WL 1971985 (Fed.Cl. 2026), a protestor brought a post-award bid protest after the Army Corps of Engineers awarded the contract to another contractor. The protestor argued that the Army Corps (government) acted irrational in its evaluation through disparate treatment. The Court of Federal Claims agreed and remanded for the Army Corps to “either justify this disparity or explain why [awardee’s] lower-priced, but technically inferior proposal provides the best value to the government.” Massman Construction, supra at *1. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Land Use Team Wins Appeal for Affordable Senior Housing Development in San Francisco

    February 23, 2026 —
    Sheppard successfully defended client Mitchelville Real Estate Group and its non-profit development partner Bernal Heights Housing Corporation in an appeal of a 70-unit, 100% affordable senior housing development at 3333 Mission Street in San Francisco’s Bernal Heights neighborhood. The team secured approval of the project, representing the developer on complex land use issues including split zoning, SB 35, the State Density Bonus Law, the Housing Crisis Act, tribal cultural resources and the Subdivision Map Act. Although the ministerially approved parcel map for the project utilized SB 35, it was appealed to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and unanimously rejected. Sheppard’s real estate transactional team also assisted with the acquisition of the property. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sheppard

    Builders Oppose Senate Housing Bill Over Investor Ban Provision

    March 24, 2026 —
    A powerful group representing the nation’s home builders is coming out against the most significant housing legislation in more than a decade over a provision negotiated by the White House that would restrict institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes. The builders’ objection could imperil the bill’s chances of becoming law, even as leaders of both parties are desperate to show they are doing something to alleviate voters’ cost-of-living concerns. The Senate voted 90-8 to clear a procedural hurdle for the bill on Wednesday, with a vote on final passage expected early next week. The inclusion of the investor ban in a broader housing bill was key to getting the White House on board, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott, a Republican from South Carolina, told reporters Tuesday. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Katy O'Donnell, Bloomberg