BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    concrete tilt-up expert witness Pea Ridge Arkansas parking structure expert witness Pea Ridge Arkansas institutional building expert witness Pea Ridge Arkansas condominiums expert witness Pea Ridge Arkansas multi family housing expert witness Pea Ridge Arkansas landscaping construction expert witness Pea Ridge Arkansas mid-rise construction expert witness Pea Ridge Arkansas condominium expert witness Pea Ridge Arkansas industrial building expert witness Pea Ridge Arkansas office building expert witness Pea Ridge Arkansas casino resort expert witness Pea Ridge Arkansas low-income housing expert witness Pea Ridge Arkansas custom home expert witness Pea Ridge Arkansas custom homes expert witness Pea Ridge Arkansas tract home expert witness Pea Ridge Arkansas housing expert witness Pea Ridge Arkansas hospital construction expert witness Pea Ridge Arkansas Subterranean parking expert witness Pea Ridge Arkansas high-rise construction expert witness Pea Ridge Arkansas retail construction expert witness Pea Ridge Arkansas Medical building expert witness Pea Ridge Arkansas townhome construction expert witness Pea Ridge Arkansas
    Pea Ridge Arkansas consulting architect expert witnessPea Ridge Arkansas expert witness structural engineerPea Ridge Arkansas roofing and waterproofing expert witnessPea Ridge Arkansas construction expert witnessPea Ridge Arkansas construction safety expertPea Ridge Arkansas construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessPea Ridge Arkansas building code expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Pea Ridge, Arkansas

    Arkansas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB975: Requires that residential contractors be given notice and an opportunity to repair. Homeowners must provide 20 days notice in writing to builder prior to legal action to address defect and/or repair


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Pea Ridge Arkansas

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Twin Lakes Home Builders Association
    Local # 0448
    1520 Hwy 62 East
    Mountain Home, AR 72653

    Pea Ridge Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Carroll County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0412
    908 W. Trimble
    Berryville, AR 72616
    Pea Ridge Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    North Central Arkansas Chapter
    Local # 0438
    PO Box 550
    Harrison, AR 72602

    Pea Ridge Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Northwest Arkansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 0424
    2022 Long Ave Ste C
    Springdale, AR 72764

    Pea Ridge Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    NE Arkansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 0432
    PO Box 17237
    Jonesboro, AR 72403

    Pea Ridge Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Cleburne County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0405
    PO Box 1325
    Heber Springs, AR 72543
    Pea Ridge Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Greater Fort Smith Associated Home Builders
    Local # 0436
    5111 Rogers Ave Ste 531
    Fort Smith, AR 72903

    Pea Ridge Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Pea Ridge Arkansas


    Haight Brown & Bonesteel Attorneys Named Best Lawyers in America ® 2016

    Assert a Party’s Noncompliance of Conditions Precedent with Particularity

    Don’t Get Caught Holding the Bag: Hold the State Liable When General Contractor Fails to Pay on a Public Project.

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Super Lawyers

    NJ Condo Construction Defect Case Dismissed over Statute of Limitations

    Seventh Circuit Remands “Waters of the United States” Case to Corps of Engineers to Determine Whether there is a “Significant Nexus”

    Inside New York’s Newest Architectural Masterpiece for the Mega-Rich

    Economic Damages and the Right to Repair Act: You Can’t Have it Both Ways

    Residential Building Sector: Peaking or Soaring?

    Contractor Succeeds At the Supreme Court Against Public Owner – Obtaining Fee Award and Determination The City Acted In Bad Faith

    Scope of Alaska’s Dump Lien Statute Substantially Reduced For Natural Gas Contractors

    Work to Solve the Mental Health Crisis in Construction

    Wisconsin Federal Court Addresses Scope Of Appraisal Provision In Rental Dwelling Policy

    Mass Timber Reduces Construction’s Carbon Footprint, But Introduces New Risk Scenarios

    Amazon HQ2 Puts Concrete on an Embodied Carbon Diet

    California Supreme Court Approves of Annual Civility Oath for Attorneys, Rejects Incivility As Basis for Disciplinary Measures

    Hawaii Appellate Court Finds Agent May Be Liable for Failing to Submit Claim

    Monumental Museum Makeover Comes In For Landing

    Insurance for Large Construction Equipment Such as a Crane

    ASCE Statement on Passing of Senator Dianne Feinstein

    Surveys: Hundreds of Design Professionals See Big COVID-19 Business Impacts

    Architects and Engineers Added to Harmon Towers Lawsuit

    New York Assembly Reconsiders ‘Bad Faith’ Bill

    Standard Lifetime Shingle Warranties Aren’t Forever

    Court Compels Appraisal Although Coverage Issues Exist

    Michigan Civil Engineers Give the State's Infrastructure a "C-" Grade, Improving from "D+" Grade in 2018

    California Reinstates COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave

    Massachusetts Business Court Addresses Defense Cost Allocation and Non-Cumulation Provisions in Long-Tail Context

    When Does a Contractor Legally Abandon a Construction Project?

    Is Privity of Contract with the Owner a Requirement of a Valid Mechanic’s Lien? Not for GC’s

    Mark Van Wonterghem To Serve as Senior Forensic Consultant in the Sacramento Offices of Bert L. Howe & Associates, Inc.

    U.S. Supreme Court Limits the Powers of the Nation’s Bankruptcy Courts

    HHMR Joins Forces with HBF at 2025 Blitz Build: Building More Than Just Ramps

    Preventing Common Electrical Injuries on the Jobsite

    Delaware “occurrence” and exclusions j(5) and j(6)

    Attention Contractors: U.S. Department of Labor Issues Guidance on Avoiding Discrimination When Using AI in Hiring

    Another Reminder that Your Construction Contract is Only as Good as Those Signing It

    Water Seepage, Ensuing Mold Damage Covered by Homeowner's Policy

    PSA: Virginia DOLI Amends COVID Workplace Standard

    Warranty of Workmanship and Habitability Cannot Be Disclaimed or Waived Under Any Circumstance

    Boston Developer Sues Contractor Alleging Delays That Cost Millions

    Tesla Finishes First Solar Roofs—Including Elon's House

    Alert: AAA Construction Industry Rules Update

    New Jersey Construction Company Owner and Employees Arrested for Fraud

    ASCE Statement on Senate Passage of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024

    Denver Court Rules that Condo Owners Must Follow Arbitration Agreement

    Mediation v. Arbitration, Both Private Dispute Resolution but Very Different Sorts

    No Hiring Surge by Homebuilders Says Industry Group

    In Phoenix, Crews Thread Needle With $730M Broadway Curve Revamp

    Jury's Verdict for Loss Caused by Collapse Overturned
    Corporate Profile

    PEA RIDGE ARKANSAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Pea Ridge, Arkansas Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Pea Ridge's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Pea Ridge, Arkansas

    ZEC 2.0: New York’s Zero Emissions Credit Program Gets an Extension and a Reboot

    February 10, 2026 —
    In a landmark move that could shape New York’s energy landscape for decades, state officials have taken steps to both preserve its existing nuclear power facilities and significantly expand its advanced nuclear capacity. These actions are part of a broader strategy to maintain grid reliability and meet both escalating energy demand and the state’s ambitious greenhouse gas reduction and zero carbon goals. Renewing the Zero Emissions Credit Program On January 22, 2026, the New York Public Services Commission (PSC) unanimously voted to extend and reboot the Zero Emissions Credit program (now called ZEC 2.0) to ensure that New York’s four upstate nuclear reactors maintain operations through 2049. The program, which began in 2016, is designed to provide revenue subsidies for legacy nuclear facilities that have been facing financial difficulties in New York’s competitive wholesale power markets. State officials have stated that the benefits of ensuring the continued operations of these reactors far outweigh the costs due to the lack of zero-emissions alternatives and the importance of ensuring grid reliability in the face of escalating energy demand from large loads like data centers. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury and Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Builders Oppose Senate Housing Bill Over Investor Ban Provision

    March 24, 2026 —
    A powerful group representing the nation’s home builders is coming out against the most significant housing legislation in more than a decade over a provision negotiated by the White House that would restrict institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes. The builders’ objection could imperil the bill’s chances of becoming law, even as leaders of both parties are desperate to show they are doing something to alleviate voters’ cost-of-living concerns. The Senate voted 90-8 to clear a procedural hurdle for the bill on Wednesday, with a vote on final passage expected early next week. The inclusion of the investor ban in a broader housing bill was key to getting the White House on board, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott, a Republican from South Carolina, told reporters Tuesday. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Katy O'Donnell, Bloomberg

    Two Snell & Wilmer Attorneys Selected as 2026 San Diego Super Lawyers Rising Stars

    May 14, 2026 —
    SAN DIEGO – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that two attorneys in the San Diego office have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 San Diego Super Lawyers Rising Stars publication. Rising Stars is a listing of lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. To be eligible for inclusion, a candidate must be either 40 years old or younger or in practice for 10 years or less. The selection process is multi-phased and includes independent research and peer nominations, with no more than 2.5 percent of the lawyers in the state named to the Rising Stars list. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    $27B Meta Data Center Pushes Louisiana Toward Massive Power Expansion

    April 27, 2026 —
    Meta Platforms has reached an agreement with Entergy Louisiana to fund new energy infrastructure to support its planned $27-billion data center in Richland Parish, a project the company says could ultimately scale to 5 GW, becoming its largest facility to date. CEO Mark Zuckerberg has described the site as large enough to cover a significant portion of Manhattan. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Vince Kong, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Kong may be contacted at kongv@enr.com

    Construction Liens and the “Substantial Performance” Doctrine

    April 08, 2026 —
    In a recent case dealing with a construction lien, the driving issue was whether the air conditioning contractor “substantially performed” before recording its construction lien against residential property. The importance here pertains to the substantial performance doctrine with respect to construction liens. The Third District Court of Appeal explained, with relevant citations, this doctrine as follows: Under Florida law, a contractor is entitled to a mechanic’s lien if he complies with all provisions of Chapter 713, governing construction liens, and “has substantially performed the contract.” Grant v. Wester, 679 So. 2d 1301, 1307 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (quotation omitted); Langley v. Knowles, 958 So. 2d 1149, 1151 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (“The substantial performance doctrine recognizes that a contactor who complies with all of the provisions of the contactor’s lien statute is entitled to enforce a lien if he has substantially, but not completely, performed his contractual obligations.”). Substantial performance is performance “so nearly equivalent to what was bargained for that it would be unreasonable to deny the promisee the full contract price subject to the promisor’s right to recover whatever damages may have been occasioned him by the promisee’s failure to render full performance.” Ocean Ridge Dev. Corp. v. Quality Plastering, Inc., 247 So. 2d 72, 75 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    How to Properly Fill Out and Use the Conditional Waiver and Release on Final Payment Form Used in California Construction

    December 30, 2025 —
    This is the third article in a series of four articles discussing how to properly fill out the four California construction releases described in California Civil Code 8132 – 8138. Let me start by noting that in addition to practicing construction law for more than 35 years, I chaired the committee of California construction attorneys who revised those sections of the California Civil Code dealing with this release form and many other construction forms as part of Senate Bill 189 in 2010. I also wrote the first version of this release form and made it free to the public well before the new law took effect in 2012. With this background, let me note a few things about the Conditional Waiver and Release on Final Payment form to help you avoid mistakes that might prevent you from achieving the intended effect of the form or releasing claim rights to a greater extent than you intend. At the end of this article is a copy of the form itself which includes numbers coinciding with the instructions I will give below. A live electronically fillable version of the form is available on our firm’s website (www.porterlaw.com) under the “Forms” section. It is free and you can fill it out on your screen before printing it out and signing it. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of William L. Porter, Porter Law Group
    Mr. Porter may be contacted at bporter@porterlaw.com

    Shane Singh Named One of Los Angeles Business Journal's 'Top 100 Lawyers of Los Angeles' for 2026

    April 27, 2026 —
    Sacramento Partner Shane Singh has been named one of the Los Angeles Business Journal's "Top 100 Lawyers of Los Angeles" for 2026. The LABJ’s annual list honors Los Angeles' top lawyers for their achievements within the city's business community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Soot Constitutes Property Damage

    March 17, 2026 —
    Applying Missouri law, the Eighth Circuit affirmed the jury verdict awarding damages for the presence of soot after a fire. Maxus Metropolitan, LLC v. Travelers Property Cas. Co. of Am., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 29921 (8th Cir. Nov, 17, 2025). A fire destroyed Phase 6 of a multi-building apartment complex known as the Metropolitan. At the time of the fire, all six phases of the Metropolitan were at various stages of completion, including some of which were occupied by tenants. Phase 6 was still under construction. The fire caused severe damage to Phase 5. The interiors of Phases 1-4 were unaffected by the fire. Maxus Metropolitan, the owner of the complex, had a policy with Travelers which covered up to $35 million in “direct physical loss, . . or damage.” The policy also provided coverage for up to $5 million in lost business income. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com