BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    concrete tilt-up expert witness Joiner Arkansas Subterranean parking expert witness Joiner Arkansas high-rise construction expert witness Joiner Arkansas retail construction expert witness Joiner Arkansas Medical building expert witness Joiner Arkansas custom homes expert witness Joiner Arkansas townhome construction expert witness Joiner Arkansas low-income housing expert witness Joiner Arkansas hospital construction expert witness Joiner Arkansas condominiums expert witness Joiner Arkansas parking structure expert witness Joiner Arkansas multi family housing expert witness Joiner Arkansas casino resort expert witness Joiner Arkansas condominium expert witness Joiner Arkansas office building expert witness Joiner Arkansas mid-rise construction expert witness Joiner Arkansas landscaping construction expert witness Joiner Arkansas structural steel construction expert witness Joiner Arkansas industrial building expert witness Joiner Arkansas custom home expert witness Joiner Arkansas production housing expert witness Joiner Arkansas housing expert witness Joiner Arkansas
    Joiner Arkansas delay claim expert witnessJoiner Arkansas soil failure expert witnessJoiner Arkansas construction code expert witnessJoiner Arkansas concrete expert witnessJoiner Arkansas construction forensic expert witnessJoiner Arkansas structural engineering expert witnessesJoiner Arkansas construction expert witness public projects
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Joiner, Arkansas

    Arkansas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB975: Requires that residential contractors be given notice and an opportunity to repair. Homeowners must provide 20 days notice in writing to builder prior to legal action to address defect and/or repair


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Joiner Arkansas

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Cleburne County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0405
    PO Box 1325
    Heber Springs, AR 72543
    Joiner Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Greater Fort Smith Associated Home Builders
    Local # 0436
    5111 Rogers Ave Ste 531
    Fort Smith, AR 72903

    Joiner Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    White County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0472
    PO Box 1501
    Searcy, AR 72143
    Joiner Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Crittenden County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0415
    PO Box 2204
    West Memphis, AR 72303
    Joiner Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    NE Arkansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 0432
    PO Box 17237
    Jonesboro, AR 72403

    Joiner Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Faulkner County
    Local # 0439
    PO Box 1228
    Conway, AR 72033

    Joiner Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Cabot Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 0420
    PO Box 1291
    Cabot, AR 72023

    Joiner Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Joiner Arkansas


    Former Trump Atlantic City Casino Set for February Implosion

    No Interlocutory Appeals of "Garden-Variety" Contract Disputes

    The Colorado Court of Appeals Rules that a Statutory Notice of Claim Triggers an Insurer’s Duty to Defend.

    Bel Air Mansion Construction Draws Community Backlash

    Gilbert’s Plan for Downtown Detroit Has No Room for Jail

    Navigating the New Landscape: How AB 12 and SB 567 Impact Landlords and Tenants in California

    Confidence Among U.S. Homebuilders Declines to Eight-Month Low

    Skipping Depositions does not Constitute Failure to Cooperate in New York

    Lead Paint: The EPA’s Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule

    Defects in Texas High School Stadium Angers Residents

    It Has Started: Supply-Chain, Warehouse and Retail Workers of Essential Businesses Are Filing Suit

    After Fatal House Explosion, Colorado Seeks New Pipeline Regulations

    Construction Trust Fund Statutes: Know What’s Required in the State Where Your Project Is Underway

    A Year Later, Homeowners Still Repairing Damage from Sandy

    President Trump Repeals Contractor “Blacklisting” Rule

    Rikus Locati Selected to 2024 Northern California Rising Stars!

    Properly Trigger the Performance Bond

    SCOTUS to Weigh Landowners' Damage Claim Against Texas DOT

    Fifth Circuit Reverses Insurers’ Summary Judgment Award Based on "Your Work" Exclusion

    Florida Decides Against Adopting Daubert

    Duty to Defend Bodily Injury Evolving Over Many Policy Periods Prorated in Louisiana

    Vinny Testaverde Alleges $5 Million Mansion Riddled with Defects

    New Mandatory Bond Notice Forms in Florida

    Western Specialty Contractors Branches in San Francisco and Cleveland Take Home Top Industry Honors

    Sometimes You Get Away with Unwritten Contracts. . .

    Florida Duty to Defend a Chapter 558 Right to Repair Notice

    Lasso Needed to Complete Vegas Hotel Implosion

    Is Arbitration Okay Under the Miller Act? It Is if You Don’t Object

    Kiewit and Two Ex-Managers Face Canada Jobsite Fatality Criminal Trial

    Patrick Haggerty Promoted to Counsel

    Water Damage: Construction’s Often Unnoticed Threat

    DoD Will Require New Cybersecurity Standards in 2020: Could Other Agencies Be Next?

    Roots of Las Vegas Construction Defect Scam Reach Back a Decade

    Georgia HB 676: A Bill Property Owners and Contractors Should Watch

    How to Properly Fill Out and Use the Conditional Waiver and Release on Final Payment Form Used in California Construction

    Construction Law Job Opps and How to Create Them

    Henderson Engineers Tests AI for Building Systems Design with Torch.AI

    Court Grants Partial Summary Judgment on Conversion Claim Against Insurer

    LLMs in Construction: Where They Fail and Where They Shine

    Hong Kong Buyers Queue for New Homes After Prices Plunge

    U.S. State Adoption of the National Electrical Code

    Colorado Abandons the “Completed and Accepted Rule” in Favor of the “Foreseeability Rule” in Determining a Contractor’s Duty to a Third Party After Work Has Been Completed

    New York Bridge to Be Largest Infrastructure Project in North America

    Hawaii Supreme Court Finds Subcontractor Has No Duty to Defend Under Indemnity Provision

    Where Standing, Mechanic’s Liens, and Bankruptcy Collide

    District Court of Missouri Limits Whining About the Scope of Waiver of Subrogation Clauses in Wine Storage Agreements

    The Construction Project is Late—Allocation of Delay

    Biden Administration Issues Buy America Guidance for Federal Infrastructure Funds

    The Legal Landscape

    Unjust Enrichment Claims When There Is No Binding Contract
    Corporate Profile

    JOINER ARKANSAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Joiner, Arkansas Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Joiner's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Joiner, Arkansas

    One Industry, One Goal: Construction Safety Week 2026

    May 05, 2026 —
    Construction safety has long been a top priority across the industry. Yet fatality rates have remained stubbornly flat for more than a decade. Steven Carter, global health and safety director at Gilbane chair company for Construction Safety Week 2026—believes the industry has reached a pivotal moment. This year’s theme—”All In Together: Recognize. Respond. Respect.”—is a unified call to action for owners, designers, contractors and craft professionals around a shared, risk-based approach to preventing serious injuries and fatalities. In a recent interview with Construction Executive, Carter discusses why the industry must move beyond incremental improvements, how technology and AI can support better planning and what it will take to create a true culture of psychological safety on jobsites. Reprinted courtesy of Maggie Murphy, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Communication Gaps Can Cost Construction Firms in the Data Center Boom

    June 02, 2026 —
    The data center construction boom is transforming the construction industry at a historic pace. Fueled by cloud computing, artificial intelligence and relentless demand for digital infrastructure, data centers have become one of the fastest-growing project types in the built environment. Billions of dollars are flowing into new facilities and expansions, creating unprecedented opportunities for construction firms positioned to deliver reliably. But opportunity alone does not guarantee success. As competition intensifies, communication failures and poor information management are emerging as some of the most common (and costly) reasons firms lose margins, miss deadlines or fail to secure repeat work. In data center construction, where schedules are compressed and tolerance for error is minimal, even small breakdowns in communication can have outsized consequences. Reprinted courtesy of Mike Lewis, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    White and Williams LLP Secures Trio of Cyber Coverage Wins

    May 12, 2026 —
    Three weeks, three jurisdictions, three cyber wins. White and Williams picked up the first victory on March 9, 2026, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, where the court granted summary judgment to their client enforcing a Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. See Perry & Perry Builders, Inc. v. Cowbell Cyber and Obsidian Specialty Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49409 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 9, 2026). In Perry, the insured was deceived into transferring money intended for a vendor to an unintended third party. The insurer acknowledged that the loss was covered and paid the insured the policy’s Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. Discontent with a single sublimit, the insured argued that because it wired the money to the fraudster in separate transfers, it was entitled to a second Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. Reprinted courtesy of Gabriel Darwick, White and Williams LLP and Sean Elman, White and Williams LLP Mr. Darwick may be contacted at darwickg@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Elman may be contacted at elmans@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    What Is the Independent Tort Doctrine? New Case Explains…

    August 24, 2026 —
    Florida’s Sixth District Court of Appeals in Atout v. HHM Land Trust Dated October 29, 2013, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D1569a (Fla. 6th DCA 2026) recently included an extensive discussion on Florida’s independent tort doctrine. The independent tort doctrine is an important legal doctrine, particularly when parties are in contractual privity. This doctrine stands for the proposition that tort claims must be independent of any breach of contract. See Atout, supra. The Sixth District’s extensive discussion analyzed the indicators to determine this “independence,” which may arise from the source of the duty, the asserted conduct, the damages sought, or even public policy: Unlike claims that rely on contractual relationships, an “independent” tort is often characterized by a duty imposed by law rather than by agreement. As to this consideration, United States District Court Judge Steven Merryday has explained that the independent tort doctrine honors the same divide as the economic loss rule, but rather than looking at the nature of the loss, it focuses on the source of the duty allegedly breached. “If a contract imposes a duty, and the defendant breaches that duty, the plaintiff must sue for breach of contract. If society imposes the duty, the plaintiff must sue in tort.” Following this reasoning, courts should consider whether the alleged breach of a duty in tort coincides or overlaps with a duty imposed by a contract. If the duty at issue is within the scope of a contract, and the relationship of the parties that led to the creation of that duty stems from a contract, then that duty’s source is from contract and any alleged tort claims based on a breach of those duties may not be “independent.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Celebrating Freedom: The Overlooked Freedom to Contract in Commercial Insurance

    July 20, 2026 —
    Happy 4th and 250 years of freedom . . . to contract! Many policyholders assume insurance policies are “standard” and must be accepted as-is. That assumption is often wrong—and dangerously limiting. Unlike many consumer insurance markets, the commercial insurance realm preserves a robust “freedom to contract,” allowing sophisticated policyholders to negotiate terms, exclusions, definitions, and limits before a policy is even issued. Particularly in recent years, high-profile disputes over cyber coverage, business interruption, and war/cyber exclusions have shown not just what happens when coverage is denied, but what could have been done up front to avoid those fights. This post highlights the power policyholders still hold in the negotiation process and illustrates, with concrete examples from recent media-covered disputes, how that freedom can be strategically used. Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Andrea DeField, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@hunton.com Ms. DeField may be contacted at adefield@hunton.com Read the full story...

    Building the Research and Healthcare Facilities of Tomorrow Without Impacting the Progress of Today

    August 16, 2026 —
    Research labs run experiments that can’t be paused. Hospitals treat patients around the clock. Yet these same facilities constantly need upgrades—new infrastructure, modernized systems, renovated spaces—to meet the demands of twenty-first century science and medicine. The challenge for construction teams isn’t just building. It’s building without ever turning the lights off. This unique dynamic creates an environment where construction activities are happening adjacent to sensitive testing and treatment, a complex setting where disruptions can have serious consequences. Skanska continues to successfully navigate these challenges across multiple sectors, including from occupied lab space at the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality’s (NCDEQ) Reedy Creek Laboratory in Raleigh to hospital corridors alongside staff and patients in various hospital locations across the country. Reprinted courtesy of Jason Tobias, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    50 State Matrices | 2026 Edition

    March 03, 2026 —
    GRSM’s 50 State Legal Matrices provide a comprehensive, state-by-state snapshot of statutory law across all 50 U.S. states. Spanning critical areas such as indemnification, contractor licensing, labor standards, statute of limitations, and more, this resource enables businesses and counsel to quickly identify key legal requirements and variations across jurisdictions. Designed as a practical starting point rather than definitive legal advice, the Matrices help multi-state operators and attorneys navigate the complex patchwork of laws that can vary dramatically from one state to another. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Colorado Supreme Court Reverses Course on Public Project Liens: Key Takeaways From Wadsworth v. Regional Rail Partners

    July 27, 2026 —
    On April 6, 2026, the Colorado Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC v. Regional Rail Partners, 2026 CO 19, reversing the Colorado Court of Appeals and providing much-needed clarity regarding verified statements of claim (VSOCs) under the Colorado Public Works Act, C.R.S. §§ 38-26-101 et seq. The decision resolves two issues that have generated significant concern among construction industry professionals since the Court of Appeals issued its opinion on August 1, 2024. Under C.R.S. § 38-26-107(1), a subcontractor on a public works project may file a VSOC with the contracting public entity for amounts due and unpaid for “…furnished labor, materials, sustenance, or other supplies used or consumed by a contractor or his or her subcontractor in or about the performance of the work contracted to be done or that supplies laborers, rental machinery, tools, or equipment to the extent used in the prosecution of the work….” If a claimant files a VSOC for “an amount greater than the amount due” without a reasonable possibility that the amount is due and with knowledge that the claim is excessive, the claimant “shall forfeit all rights to the amount claimed” and becomes liable for the opposing party’s costs and attorneys’ fees. C.R.S. § 38-26-110. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Amanda E. McKinlay, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. McKinlay may be contacted at amckinlay@swlaw.com