BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom home expert witness Hunter Arkansas production housing expert witness Hunter Arkansas mid-rise construction expert witness Hunter Arkansas tract home expert witness Hunter Arkansas structural steel construction expert witness Hunter Arkansas industrial building expert witness Hunter Arkansas multi family housing expert witness Hunter Arkansas landscaping construction expert witness Hunter Arkansas institutional building expert witness Hunter Arkansas hospital construction expert witness Hunter Arkansas high-rise construction expert witness Hunter Arkansas condominium expert witness Hunter Arkansas townhome construction expert witness Hunter Arkansas custom homes expert witness Hunter Arkansas concrete tilt-up expert witness Hunter Arkansas low-income housing expert witness Hunter Arkansas Subterranean parking expert witness Hunter Arkansas Medical building expert witness Hunter Arkansas parking structure expert witness Hunter Arkansas office building expert witness Hunter Arkansas casino resort expert witness Hunter Arkansas condominiums expert witness Hunter Arkansas
    Hunter Arkansas construction claims expert witnessHunter Arkansas consulting engineersHunter Arkansas construction expertsHunter Arkansas building envelope expert witnessHunter Arkansas expert witness structural engineerHunter Arkansas window expert witnessHunter Arkansas structural concrete expert
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Hunter, Arkansas

    Arkansas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB975: Requires that residential contractors be given notice and an opportunity to repair. Homeowners must provide 20 days notice in writing to builder prior to legal action to address defect and/or repair


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Hunter Arkansas

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Faulkner County
    Local # 0439
    PO Box 1228
    Conway, AR 72033

    Hunter Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Crittenden County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0415
    PO Box 2204
    West Memphis, AR 72303
    Hunter Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Cabot Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 0420
    PO Box 1291
    Cabot, AR 72023

    Hunter Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    White County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0472
    PO Box 1501
    Searcy, AR 72143
    Hunter Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    SE Arkansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 0456
    2320 Grist Mill Rd
    Little Rock, AR 72227
    Hunter Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Greater Little Rock
    Local # 0408
    PO Box 755
    North Little Rock, AR 72115

    Hunter Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Arkansas Home Builders Association - State
    Local # 0400
    1400 W Markham St Ste 305
    Little Rock, AR 72201

    Hunter Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Hunter Arkansas


    Nevada Provides Independant Counsel When Conflict Arises Between Insurer and Insured

    Scarce Cemetery Space Creates Prices to Die For: Cities

    School Blown Down by Wind Still Set to Open on Schedule

    Make Your Business Great Again: Steven Cvitanovic Authors Construction Today Article

    BHA Attending the Construction Law Conference in San Antonio, Texas

    Hilary Soaks California With Flooding Rain and Snarls Flights

    Waiver of Consequential Damages: The Most Important Provision in a Construction Contract

    California Cracking down on Phony Qualifiers

    How Mobile Tools Are Capturing Safety Data on Jobsites

    Presenting a “Total Time” Delay Claim Is Not Sufficient

    Blue Gold: Critical Water for Critical Energy Materials

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “You Left Out a Key Ingredient!”

    When is a “Notice of Completion” on a California Private Works Construction Project Valid? Why Does It Matter for My Collection Rights?

    Oracle's $16B Michigan Data Center Secures Financing as Power Contracts Face Appeals

    Loss Caused by Theft, Continuous Water Discharge Not Covered

    EPA and the Corps of Engineers Repeal the 2015 “Waters of the United States” Rule

    Hawaii Federal District Court Rejects Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment on Construction Defect Claims

    New York City Construction: Boom Times Again?

    Bridges Need More Attention

    Quick Note: Mitigation of Damages in Contract Cases

    No Cross-Complaint Needed - Court of Appeal Clarifies Co-Defendants May Oppose Each Other’s Summary Judgment Motions Without a Cross-Complaint

    The Three L’s of Real Estate Have New, Urgent Meaning

    When is a Residential Subcontractor not Subject to the VCPA? Read to Find Out

    CGL Coverage for Liquidated Damages and the Contractual Liability Exclusion

    Law Firm Settles Two Construction Defect Suits for a Combined $4.7 Million

    Eighth Circuit Affirms Finding of Bad Faith, Award of Costs and Prejudgment Interest

    New Home for the Aged Suffers Construction Defects

    Legislative Update on Bills of Note (Updated Post-Adjournment)

    Detroit Showed What ‘Build Back Better’ Can Look Like

    Seattle’s Tallest Tower Said Readying to Go On the Market

    Partner Jonathan R. Harwood Obtained Summary Judgment in a Coverage Action Arising out of a Claim for Personal Injury

    Corrective Action Protest Grounds for GSA Schedule Federal Construction Contractors

    Arizona Is Smart About Water. It Should Stay That Way.

    Bert L. Howe & Associates Brings Professional Development Series to Their San Antonio Office

    Indictments Issued in Las Vegas HOA Scam

    Late Filing Contractor Barred from Involving Subcontractors in Construction Defect Claim

    Federal Judge Dismisses Insurance Coverage Lawsuit In Construction Defect Case

    Manhattan Condo Lists for Record $150 Million

    The Future of Construction Tech Is Decision Tech

    Fannie Mae Says Millennials Are Finally Leaving Their Parents' Basements

    New York Instructs Property Carriers to Advise Insureds on Business Interruption Coverage

    White Collar Overtime Regulations Temporarily Blocked

    Guidance for Construction Leaders: How Is the Americans With Disabilities Act Applied During the Pandemic?

    Mortgage Battle Flares as U.K. Homebuying Loses Allure

    Type I Differing Site Conditions Claim is Not Easy to Prove

    California Home Sellers Have Duty to Disclose Construction Defect Lawsuits

    Gibbs Giden is Pleased to Announce Four New Partners and Two New Associates

    Seven Trends That Impact Commercial Construction Litigation in 2021

    Water Reuse Emerges as a Critical Strategy for Data Center Development

    Louisiana Enacts Important Tort Reform Legislation
    Corporate Profile

    HUNTER ARKANSAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Hunter, Arkansas Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Hunter's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Hunter, Arkansas

    Ninth Circuit Affirms District Court’s Finding of No Coverage for Interior Leak

    March 24, 2026 —
    Applying California law, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s finding that water damage caused by a leaking pipe over time was not covered under the insured’s homeowners’ policy. Mojica v. State Farm General Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 32405 (9th Cir. Dec. 11, 2025). A small hole, slightly larger than a pen tip in size, developed in a pressurized hot water pipe. The resulting leak lasted for nearly six days and released enough water to saturate and ruin all the subflooring and flooring in the insureds’ home. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Insured’s Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    July 13, 2026 —
    The insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment to dispose of the insured’s bad faith claim was unsuccessful. Page v. State Farm Lloyds, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102293 (E.D. Texas March 18, 2026). Plaintiff insured alleged that hail and a windstorm caused damage to his property. The damage was reported to the defendant insurer. A claims adjuster inspected the property. Defendant then paid plaintiff $24,493.06, which was the total of the estimated damage minus depreciation and the deductible. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Construction Robotics Works Where Variation Ends

    August 11, 2026 —
    BuiltWorlds published its 2026 Robotics Top 50 this summer, and the list is genuinely wide. Fifty solutions across nine categories, from 3D printing and prefabricated component manufacturing to earthmoving, demolition, material transport, layout, installation, inspection, and drilling. The honorees come from sixteen countries. It looks like robotics has finally spread across the whole project lifecycle. However, having vendors in nine categories does not mean that contractors are robotizing their work en masse. Zacua Ventures, in its 2026 construction robotics report, estimates that on-site robotics accounted for less than 0.03% of global construction spending in 2025. Zacua says: “That is not a failed market. It is a market at the beginning of an adoption S-curve”, while warning that its estimates rest on private vendor data and may be high if vendors overstate how widely their machines are deployed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Court to General Contractor: Too Late to Reclaim $600K Sub Overpayment

    March 03, 2026 —
    Massachusetts contractors and their attorneys are once again testing the limits of the state's 15-year-old prompt-pay law, with concerned prime contractors asking an appeals court to overturn a lower court ruling that they believe gives subcontractors a powerful upper hand in payment disputes. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Court Rules Cook County Misspent $243M in Transportation Funds

    March 10, 2026 —
    A Cook County Illinois Circuit Court judge has ruled that the county violated the state constitution by using $243 million in transportation tax revenue during fiscal 2023 for non-transportation purposes, handing a legal win to a statewide coalition of construction trade groups. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Annemarie Mannion, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. Mannion may be contacted at manniona@enr.com

    IEEPA Tariff Refunds: CBP Launches CAPE Process

    April 27, 2026 —
    On April 20, 2026, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) launched the first phase of the Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) tool in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) portal to administer refunds of duties imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) through a streamlined electronic filing process. Background In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held that certain tariffs imposed under IEEPA were unlawful. Subsequent proceedings before the U.S. Court of International Trade required CBP to develop a scalable refund process applicable not only to litigants but also to non-plaintiffs. According to CBP and court filings, approximately 330,000 importers paid or deposited an estimated $166 billion in IEEPA duties across more than 53 million entries. In response, CBP developed CAPE as an electronic, consolidated refund mechanism within ACE. Reprinted courtesy of David J. Creagan, White and Williams LLP, Guido Antolini, White and Williams LLP, Bruce W. MacLennan, White and Williams LLP and Gary P. Biehn, White and Williams LLP Mr. Creagan may be contacted at creagand@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Antolini may be contacted at antolinig@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. MacLennan may be contacted at maclennanb@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Biehn may be contacted at biehng@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    Introducing the Updated 2026 Pillsbury Guide to Data Centers

    June 08, 2026 —
    Since the initial publication of the Pillsbury Guide to Data Centers in 2025, the market has continued to evolve—most notably with respect to power availability, energy strategy, tax and incentives planning, and investment activity across the sector. While many of the legal, commercial and regulatory frameworks addressed in the original Guide remain durable and relevant, recent developments warranted targeted updates and additions. The 2026 edition expands and updates our energy-focused content to reflect the increasingly central role of power procurement, interconnection and long-term energy strategy in data center development. We have incorporated new materials addressing power purchase and interconnection agreements, solar and other renewable energy solutions, advanced reactor designs, and nuclear-powered data centers projects, including an updated project tracker. We have also added new analysis covering state and local tax considerations and incentive structures relevant to data center development and operations, as well as current M&A and private equity trends shaping investment in the sector. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gravel2Gavel Team

    FERC Issues Show-Cause Orders: Impacts on California and Other Regional Power Markets

    July 13, 2026 —
    At an open meeting on June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued show-cause orders under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act to the six FERC-jurisdictional RTOs/ISOs—PJM Interconnection, ISO New England, Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Southwest Power Pool, New York Independent System Operator and California Independent System Operator—along with their transmission owners (TOs), directing each region and the TOs to justify or revise tariff provisions governing how data centers and other large loads connect to and receive transmission service from the grid. These show-cause orders will impact several power markets across the country, including California. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury and Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...