BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    retail construction expert witness Ben Lomond Arkansas townhome construction expert witness Ben Lomond Arkansas Medical building expert witness Ben Lomond Arkansas condominiums expert witness Ben Lomond Arkansas structural steel construction expert witness Ben Lomond Arkansas hospital construction expert witness Ben Lomond Arkansas institutional building expert witness Ben Lomond Arkansas production housing expert witness Ben Lomond Arkansas office building expert witness Ben Lomond Arkansas tract home expert witness Ben Lomond Arkansas condominium expert witness Ben Lomond Arkansas parking structure expert witness Ben Lomond Arkansas landscaping construction expert witness Ben Lomond Arkansas Subterranean parking expert witness Ben Lomond Arkansas high-rise construction expert witness Ben Lomond Arkansas mid-rise construction expert witness Ben Lomond Arkansas custom homes expert witness Ben Lomond Arkansas multi family housing expert witness Ben Lomond Arkansas low-income housing expert witness Ben Lomond Arkansas custom home expert witness Ben Lomond Arkansas casino resort expert witness Ben Lomond Arkansas housing expert witness Ben Lomond Arkansas
    Ben Lomond Arkansas construction cost estimating expert witnessBen Lomond Arkansas construction defect expert witnessBen Lomond Arkansas construction expert testimonyBen Lomond Arkansas forensic architectBen Lomond Arkansas architectural engineering expert witnessBen Lomond Arkansas consulting engineersBen Lomond Arkansas eifs expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Ben Lomond, Arkansas

    Arkansas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB975: Requires that residential contractors be given notice and an opportunity to repair. Homeowners must provide 20 days notice in writing to builder prior to legal action to address defect and/or repair


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Ben Lomond Arkansas

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Clark County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0403
    PO Box 502
    Arkadelphia, AR 71923
    Ben Lomond Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Hot Springs Arkansas
    Local # 0440
    PO Box 1046
    Hot Springs, AR 71902

    Ben Lomond Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Saline Home Builders Association
    Local # 0458
    PO Box 151
    Benton, AR 72018

    Ben Lomond Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Arkansas Home Builders Association - State
    Local # 0400
    1400 W Markham St Ste 305
    Little Rock, AR 72201

    Ben Lomond Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Greater Little Rock
    Local # 0408
    PO Box 755
    North Little Rock, AR 72115

    Ben Lomond Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    SE Arkansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 0456
    2320 Grist Mill Rd
    Little Rock, AR 72227
    Ben Lomond Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Cabot Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 0420
    PO Box 1291
    Cabot, AR 72023

    Ben Lomond Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Ben Lomond Arkansas


    Drastic Rebuild Resurrects Graves' Landmark Portland Building

    The Privilege Is All Mine: California Appellate Court Finds Law Firm Holds Attorney Work Product Privilege Applicable to Documents Created by Formerly Employed Attorney

    Los Angeles County Sues Utility Edison Over Deadly Wildfire

    Winners Announced in Seattle’s Office-to-Residential Call for Ideas Contest

    Perspectives from Pioneers: Kenneth C. Gibbs

    How BIM Can Serve Building Owners

    Contractor Covered for Voluntary Remediation Efforts in Completed Homes

    Developer Pre-Conditions in CC&Rs Limiting Ability of HOA to Make Construction Defect Claims, Found Unenforceable

    Engineer Probing Champlain Towers Debacle Eyes Possibility of Three Successive Collapses

    Anatomy of an Indemnity Provision

    Insureds Survive Summary Judgment on Coverage for Hurricane Loss

    Construction Defect Claims Not Covered

    Facing Manslaughter Charges In Worker's 2021 Trench Collapse Death, Colorado Contractor Who Willfully Ignored Federal Law Surrenders To Police

    Velazquez Framing, LLC v. Cascadia Homes, Inc. (Take 2) – Pre-lien Notice for Labor Unambiguously Not Required

    Banks Rejected by U.S. High Court on Mortgage Securities Suits

    Out of Eastern Europe, a Window Into the Post-Pandemic Office

    When Delays Cost More Than Time: Understanding Consequential Damages

    Liability Insurer’s Duty To Defend Insured Is Broader Than Its Duty To Indemnify

    Construction Client Advisory: The Power of the Bonded Stop Notice Extends to Expended Construction Funds

    Looking for a Way Out

    New Mexico Holds One-Sided Dispute Resolution Provisions Are Unenforceable

    New York Appellate Team Obtains Affirmance of Dismissal of Would-Be Labor Law Action Against Municipal Entities

    Collapse Claim Dismissed

    Overview of New Mexico Construction Law

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Super Lawyers

    Asbestos Exclusion Bars Coverage

    Rhode Island District Court Dismisses Plaintiff’s Case for Spoliation Due to Potential Unfair Prejudice to Defendant

    CGL Policy May Not Cover Cybersecurity and Data-Related Losses

    Supreme Court of New Jersey Reviews Statutes of Limitation and the Discovery Rule in Construction Defect Cases

    New Jersey/New York “Occurrence”

    Senate Committee Approves Military Construction Funds

    New York’s Highest Court Reverses Lower Court Ruling That Imposed Erroneous Timeliness Requirement For Disclaimers of Coverage

    I-35W Bridge Collapse may be Due to “Inadequate Load Capacity”

    Another (Insurer) Bites The Dust: Virginia District Court Rejects Narrow Reading of Pollution Exclusion

    Wildfire Risks Elevated for US Plains Due to Drought Conditions

    Maine Court Allows $1B Hydropower Transmission Project to Proceed

    10 Answers to Those Nagging Mechanics Lien Questions Keeping You Up at Night. Kind of

    New Jersey Judge Declared Arbitrator had no Duty to Disclose Past Contact with Lawyer

    Maximizing Contractual Indemnity Rights: Insuring the Indemnitor's Obligation

    Insurer Not Entitled to Summary Judgment Based Upon Vandalism Exclusion

    Illinois Insureds are Contesting One Carrier's Universal Denial to Covid-19 Losses

    Don’t Be Lazy with Your Tenders

    Experts: Best Bet in $300M Osage Nation Wind Farm Dispute Is Negotiation

    Recycled Water and New Construction. New Standards Being Considered

    New York Labor Laws and Action Over Exclusions

    The “Builder’s Remedy” Looms Over Bay Area Cities

    Lucky No. 7: Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Issues Pro-Policyholder Decision Regarding Additional Insured Coverage for Upstream Parties

    Defense Victory in Breach of Fiduciary Action

    ABA’s Fundamentals of Construction Law, 3rd Edition

    Hunton Insurance Partner Among Top 250 Women in Litigation
    Corporate Profile

    BEN LOMOND ARKANSAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Ben Lomond, Arkansas Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Ben Lomond's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Ben Lomond, Arkansas

    Suit Limitation Provision Eliminates Wind Loss Claim

    July 27, 2026 —
    The insurer’s motion for judgment on the pleadings was granted after the insured failed to file suit against the insurer within the policy’s two-year suit limitation provision. Interstate Investments, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Ins Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98108 (S.D. N. Y. May 4, 2026). On or before June 27, 2023, a wind, hail and rainstorm damaged Interstate’s property in Oklahoma. Interstate filed a claim under its policy with Mt. Hawley. The policy provided that New York law applied and contained a two- year suit limitation provision. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    How Mobile Tools Are Capturing Safety Data on Jobsites

    April 08, 2026 —
    Traditionally, construction safety management is “reactive compliance”—reporting on an incident, filling out a form on paper or electronically, taking a picture and filing it away for compliance purposes. Safety management is shifting from reactive to proactive. Forward-thinking companies are using data and leading indicators to identify risks before incidents happen, not just document injuries after the fact. Mobile tools have completely changed the way safety operations work on construction sites, enabling that transition to proactive safety management. Reprinted courtesy of Michael Bruns, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Colorado Legislature Considers Series of Bills Aimed at Boosting Affordable Housing Construction in Colorado — What Homebuilders Need to Know

    April 08, 2026 —
    On January 21, 2026, lawmakers introduced a series of bills with the goals of addressing affordable housing issues and incentivizing construction in Colorado. House Bill 26-1001 (known as the “Housing Opportunities Made Easier ‘HOME’ Act”) concerns the promotion for residential developments on “qualifying properties” that do not contain exempt parcels through the bypassing of often time-consuming local planning processes. Under HB26-1001, a “qualifying property is any real property that contains no more than five acres of land and is owned by: (i) a nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing; (ii) a nonprofit organization that provides public transit; (iii) a nonprofit organization that has entered into an agreement with another nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing, provided that the agreement requires the nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing to develop a residential development on the property; (iv) a school district; (v) a state college or university; (vi) a housing authority; or (vii) a local or regional transit district or a regional transportation authority serving one or more counties. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Amanda E. McKinlay, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. McKinlay may be contacted at amckinlay@swlaw.com

    Newmeyer Dillion Partner Jeff Masters Recognized by Chambers USA for Representation of Insurance Policyholders

    June 08, 2026 —
    NEWPORT BEACH, Calif. – June 4, 2026 – Newmeyer Dillion is proud to announce that litigation partner Jeffrey D. Masters has been ranked among a select group of California lawyers representing insurance policyholders in the 2026 edition of Chambers USA. This marks two consecutive years of recognition for Masters by this prestigious international attorney rating resource. "This recognition by Chambers and Partners is a testament to Jeff’s dedication to our clients," said Managing Partner, Paul Tetzloff. "We are thrilled to see his hard work acknowledged and the level of passion and care that he delivers to clients fully recognized." Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Newmeyer Dillion

    New York Moves to Tighten Third-Party Practice: Key Changes to CPLR 1007

    March 31, 2026 —
    Effective April 18, 2026, the New York Legislature enacted the Avoiding Vexatious Overuse of Impleading to Delay (“AVOID”) Act, amending CPLR 1007—the statute that governs third-party practice. The amendment sharply limits when and how defendants can commence third-party actions, curbing the expansive discretion they previously enjoyed and targeting the late-stage impleaders that often upend case schedules. What Changes Before the AVOID Act was signed into law on December 19, 2025 (and subsequently modified by Chapter Amendments A9502 and S8809, signed by Governor Hochul on February 13, 2026[1]), CPLR 1007 gave defendants broad latitude to implead “any person who is or may be liable” for all or part of the plaintiff’s claim. CPLR 1007 specified no outside time limit for the initiation of a third-party claim; courts assessed only whether a defendant’s delay was undue—such as impleading months after the note of issue—and whether the plaintiff would suffer prejudice if the third-party action were not severed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sophia L. Cahill, Sheppard
    Ms. Cahill may be contacted at scahill@sheppard.com

    How AEC Firms Move AI Beyond the Pilot

    July 27, 2026 —
    Most AEC firms can run an AI pilot, but few can scale it. Enthusiasm for a first experiment rarely extends beyond the pilot team, leaving the pilot as an isolated win that never changes how the company works. In a recent AEC Business Podcast episode, Adeline Chan, CEO and co-founder of Hong Kong-based AAL Innovation, explained why that gap exists and what separates the firms that close it from those that stall. The Pilot Mindset that Holds Construction Back Adeline draws a sharp contrast between finance and construction. Banks cannot afford to fall behind their competitors, so they pilot constantly, sometimes running hundreds of proof-of-concept teams in parallel and letting them compete internally to identify the approach that works. The winning concept becomes the standard and scales across the organization, and the return on investment is measured in undeniable numbers. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    HHMR Attorneys Steve Heisdorffer and Dave McLain Named to 2026 Super Lawyers List

    April 08, 2026 —
    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC is pleased to announce that Steve Heisdorffer and Dave McLain have been selected to the 2026 Colorado Super Lawyers list for construction litigation. Mr. Heisdorffer has been consistently recognized in recent years for his work in construction litigation and related business disputes. Mr. McLain has been recognized by Super Lawyers each year from 2020 through 2026, following his earlier inclusion on the Rising Stars list from 2009 through 2012. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC

    Are “Financial Hardship” Damages Recoverable?

    June 08, 2026 —
    In a case out of the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, F.O.G., LLC v. Department of the Interior, CBCA 8203, 2026 WL 1191881 (CBCA 2026) a contractor claimed damages that included “financial hardship” damages due to slow payments. The financial hardship damages included personal damages to the contractor’s president and his wife. Are these damages recoverable? Drumroll…The Board ruled that the contractor cannot recover such financial hardship damages. As it relates the personal financial hardship damages, the Board ruled, “Neither [the contractor’s] president nor his wife are a party to this contract, are in privity of contract with [the government], or are the beneficiaries under this contract. [The contractor], therefore, cannot recover for any losses that either one has suffered individually and that [the contractor] claimed in this appeal.” F.O.G., LLC, supra. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com