BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom home expert witness Mayer Arizona multi family housing expert witness Mayer Arizona housing expert witness Mayer Arizona condominiums expert witness Mayer Arizona townhome construction expert witness Mayer Arizona industrial building expert witness Mayer Arizona casino resort expert witness Mayer Arizona landscaping construction expert witness Mayer Arizona condominium expert witness Mayer Arizona hospital construction expert witness Mayer Arizona high-rise construction expert witness Mayer Arizona low-income housing expert witness Mayer Arizona custom homes expert witness Mayer Arizona production housing expert witness Mayer Arizona Medical building expert witness Mayer Arizona Subterranean parking expert witness Mayer Arizona parking structure expert witness Mayer Arizona mid-rise construction expert witness Mayer Arizona concrete tilt-up expert witness Mayer Arizona retail construction expert witness Mayer Arizona structural steel construction expert witness Mayer Arizona tract home expert witness Mayer Arizona
    Mayer Arizona delay claim expert witnessMayer Arizona contractor expert witnessMayer Arizona construction expert witness consultantMayer Arizona stucco expert witnessMayer Arizona construction expert witnessesMayer Arizona structural engineering expert witnessesMayer Arizona construction project management expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Mayer, Arizona

    Arizona Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2620; ARS §12-1363, 1361, 1364) Current laws on the books require a purchaser of a home to provide written notice at least 90 days before commencing legal action. This gives the homebuilder time to inspect, repair or replace the defect if it falls within the specifications of the warranty. Homebuilder has 60 days to respond to written notice which may include offer to replace, repair or offer monetary compensationSB 1311 is a similar statute that covers multi-family dwellings. If no resolution is met through alternative dispute resolution procedures and a civil lawsuit is filed, the seller’s insurance company must treat a notice of a dwelling action as a notice of a claim subject to the insurance policy without affecting available coverage under the policy


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Mayer Arizona

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License required to bid or contract.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Central Arizona
    Local # 0310
    16430 N Scottsdale Road Suite 150
    Scottsdale, AZ 85254

    Mayer Arizona Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Northern Arizona Builders Association
    Local # 0315
    1500 E Cedar Ave Suite 86
    Flagstaff, AZ 86004

    Mayer Arizona Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Southern Arizona Home Builders Association
    Local # 0335
    2840 N Country Club Rd Ste 100
    Tucson, AZ 85716

    Mayer Arizona Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Mayer Arizona


    Singer Ordered to Deposition in Construction Defect Case

    Business Interruption Claim Upheld

    Unpredictable Opinion Regarding Construction Lien (Reinstatement??)

    Insurer's Summary Judgment Motion to Reject Claim for Construction Defects Upheld

    OSHA Finalizes PPE Fitting Requirement for Construction Workers

    Insurer in Bad Faith Due to Adjuster's Failure to Keep Abreast of Case Law

    Report Highlights Trends in Construction Tech, Digitization, and AI

    Insurer Must Defend Construction Defect Claims

    Courts Will Not Rewrite Your Post-Loss Property Insurance Obligations

    Miami's Condo Craze Burns Out on Strong Dollar

    Denial of Coverage For Bodily Injury After Policy Period Does Not Violate Public Policy

    Chambers USA 2026 Recognizes Multiple Snell & Wilmer Attorneys and Practices

    Beam Cracks Cause Closure of San Francisco’s New $2B Transit Center

    Structural Defects in Thousands of Bridges in America

    Issuing Judgment After Confirmation of Appraisal Award Overturned

    A Guide to Evaluating Snow & Ice Cases

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (05/11/22)

    Construction Employers Beware: New, Easier Union Representation Process

    Construction Expert and Judge Living in the Same Hood Is Not Grounds For Recusal

    Death of Subcontractor’s Unjust Enrichment Claim Against Project Owner

    Wisconsin Supreme Court Holds Fire Damage Resulted from Single Occurrence

    AI in AEC 2026: Doing AI Right and Rethinking Your Business Model

    El Paso Increases Surety Bond Requirement on Contractors

    SEC Proposes Rule Requiring Public Firms to Report Climate Risks

    Product Manufacturers Beware: You May Be Subject to Jurisdiction in Massachusetts

    Steps to Curb Construction Defect Actions for Homebuilders

    What You Say...

    Alaska District Court Sets Aside Rulings Under New Administration’s EO 13795

    Feds Move To Indict NY Contractor Execs, Developer, Ex-Cuomo Aide

    Delaware Settlements with Minors and the Uniform Transfer to Minor Act

    N.J. Voters Approve $116 Million in School Construction

    United States Supreme Court Backtracks on Recent Trajectory Away from Assertions of General Jurisdiction in Mallory v. Norfolk Southern

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Who Needs Them”

    Why A.I. Isn’t Going to Replace Lawyers Anytime Soon

    Colorado Drillers Show Sensitive Side to Woo Fracking Foes

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC Recognized Among The Top 50 Construction Law Firms TM of 2024 by Construction Executive

    In Texas, a Certificate of Merit Must Address the Conduct of Each Defendant Specifically

    New York Court Finds No Coverage Owed for Asbestos Losses Because Insured Failed to Prove Material Terms

    Arizona Supreme Court Leaves Limits on Construction Defects Unclear

    Lessons Learned from Implementing Infrastructure BIM in Helsinki

    In Contracts, One Word Makes All the Difference

    Brooklyn’s Industry City to Get $1 Billion Modernization

    Massachusetts SJC Clarifies “Strict Compliance” Standard in Construction Contracts

    AB5 Construction Exemption – A Checklist to Avoid Application of AB5’s Three-Part Test

    Toll Brothers Shows how the Affluent Buyer is Driving Up Prices

    More (and Simpler) Options Under New Oregon Retention Law

    Disrupt a Broken Industry—The Industrial Construction Sandbox

    New York Bars Developers from Selling Condos due to CD Fraud Case

    When is a “Willful” Violation Willful (or Not) Under California’s Contractor Enforcement Statutes?

    No Conflict in Successive Representation of a Closely-Held Company and Its Insiders Where Insiders Already Possess Company’s Confidential Information
    Corporate Profile

    MAYER ARIZONA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Mayer, Arizona Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Mayer's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Mayer, Arizona

    No Ink, No Problem: When Employees and Agents Can Enforce Arbitration Agreements

    August 11, 2026 —
    Arbitration is a fundamental component of modern construction contracting. Many in the industry recognize the potential benefits and protections arbitration can provide to the business in the event of a dispute. But an important question many contracts do not address is: who does the arbitration agreement cover? Does it include the business entity only, or the individuals acting on behalf of the entity? As courts have long recognized, entities can generally only act through their employees, representatives, or agents.[1] This article discusses the circumstances in which an agent may rely on an arbitration provision entered by its employer. This is known as the agency doctrine. Reprinted courtesy of Jordan Heath, Associate, Jones Walker LLP and Jacob Morrison, Law Student University of Georgia, Jones Walker LLP Read the full story...
    Mr. Heath may be contacted at jheath@joneswalker.com

    That’s a Wrap! Pennsylvania Court Holds Arbitration Clause in Online Agreement Unenforceable

    May 14, 2026 —
    In Duffy v. Tatum, 2026 Pa. Super. LEXIS 112, 2026 PA Super 41, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania (Superior Court) considered whether an arbitration provision contained in the online Terms of Service on the defendant’s website were enforceable. The plaintiff, Daniel Duffy (Duffy), visited the website of defendant, Dolly, Inc. (Dolly), to purchase moving services. Duffy selected the number of movers, items to be moved and the type of vehicle needed. To complete the booking, the website required Duffy to checkmark a box labeled “By checking this box I accept the Dolly Terms of Service.” Duffy did not have to open the link or scroll to the bottom of the agreement before being able to click on the checkmark box. The Terms of Service included an arbitration provision requiring that any dispute related to the moving services to be resolved by arbitration in accordance with the American Arbitration Association. The Terms of Service did not include any statement that the user was waiving the right to a jury trial. The Superior Court found the internet Terms of Service unenforceable. During the moving process, an accident occurred and injured Duffy. In May 2024, Duffy and his wife sued Dolly and other related entities alleging negligence and loss of consortium. Dolly filed preliminary objections alleging that the parties agreed to alternative dispute resolution. The lower court overruled the preliminary objections, finding that Dolly’s website did not provide reasonably obvious notice of its Terms of Service to Duffy and, as such, Duffy never agreed to waive his constructional right to a jury trial. Dolly filed an appeal to the Superior Court. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gus Sara, White and Williams LLP
    Mr. Sara may be contacted at sarag@whiteandwilliams.com

    Introducing the Updated 2026 Pillsbury Guide to Data Centers

    June 08, 2026 —
    Since the initial publication of the Pillsbury Guide to Data Centers in 2025, the market has continued to evolve—most notably with respect to power availability, energy strategy, tax and incentives planning, and investment activity across the sector. While many of the legal, commercial and regulatory frameworks addressed in the original Guide remain durable and relevant, recent developments warranted targeted updates and additions. The 2026 edition expands and updates our energy-focused content to reflect the increasingly central role of power procurement, interconnection and long-term energy strategy in data center development. We have incorporated new materials addressing power purchase and interconnection agreements, solar and other renewable energy solutions, advanced reactor designs, and nuclear-powered data centers projects, including an updated project tracker. We have also added new analysis covering state and local tax considerations and incentive structures relevant to data center development and operations, as well as current M&A and private equity trends shaping investment in the sector. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gravel2Gavel Team

    Newark Team Obtains Appellate Ruling Affirming Summary Judgment for Lawyer and Firm in Professional Negligence Lawsuit

    April 14, 2026 —
    Newark Partner Meredith Kaplan Stoma and Associate Anthony Doss recently secured a decision from the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, affirming summary judgment for their clients, a lawyer and her firm, in a lawsuit alleging professional negligence in connection with the administration of a commercial loan. The circumstances giving rise to the lawsuit date back to September 2020, when the plaintiff was approached by members of a real estate investment company regarding a short-term loan opportunity whereby he would loan the company $200,000. The company provided the plaintiff with a “bridge loan package,” which stated that the requested funds would be held in the escrow account of their counsel and her firm (Lewis Brisbois’ clients), and returned to him with interest within six months once the company was “capitalized” by a senior lender. The company subsequently prepared two notes, each for $100,000, in connection with the agreement. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    ACEC Supports BUILD America 250 Act as Important First Step on Surface Reauthorization

    May 26, 2026 —
    WASHINGTON -- The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC), the business voice of America’s engineering and design services industry released the following statement on the BUILD America 250 Act: "Chairman Graves and Ranking Member Larsen have taken an important bipartisan step toward reauthorizing the federal surface transportation programs that are critical to economic growth in every state. The BUILD America 250 Act provides five years of stability in funding road and transit projects, raises new revenues to address the solvency of the Highway Trust Fund, and includes meaningful provisions to strengthen project delivery, advance digital infrastructure, and improve the contracting framework that engineering firms rely on every day. ACEC will continue to advocate for investment levels that keep pace with the country's growing infrastructure needs, and we urge the Committee to keep this process moving forward." The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC) is the business association of America’s engineering industry, representing more than 5,500 independent engineering firms and more than 650,000 professionals throughout the United States engaged in the development of America’s transportation, water, and energy infrastructure, along with environmental, industrial, and other public and private facilities. Founded in 1906 and headquartered in Washington, D.C., ACEC is a national federation of 51 state and regional organizations.

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (8/19/26) – Single-Family Housing Investors Worry, Confidence in Multifamily REITs and Construction Backlog Falls

    September 08, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, U.S. Chamber of Commerce creates Housing Advisory Council, a legal battle develops over new federal rules related to mortgage escrow accounts, hospitality dealmakers pursue ‘bigger, higher-conviction’ M&A, and more!
    • In the wake of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act becoming law, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has created a Housing Advisory Council with the goal of advancing market-driven policies that help increase housing supply and promote affordability. (Julie Strupp, Multifamily Dive)
    • Investors in the single-family housing market are increasingly concerned about interest rates, rising insurance and home costs, and the ongoing war with Iran. (Diana Olick, CNBC)
    • A legal battle is brewing over new federal rules related to accounts that hold money to pay homeowners’ property taxes and insurance payments. (Sarah Agostino, CNBC)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    Colorado Supreme Court Reverses Course on Public Project Liens: Key Takeaways From Wadsworth v. Regional Rail Partners

    July 27, 2026 —
    On April 6, 2026, the Colorado Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC v. Regional Rail Partners, 2026 CO 19, reversing the Colorado Court of Appeals and providing much-needed clarity regarding verified statements of claim (VSOCs) under the Colorado Public Works Act, C.R.S. §§ 38-26-101 et seq. The decision resolves two issues that have generated significant concern among construction industry professionals since the Court of Appeals issued its opinion on August 1, 2024. Under C.R.S. § 38-26-107(1), a subcontractor on a public works project may file a VSOC with the contracting public entity for amounts due and unpaid for “
furnished labor, materials, sustenance, or other supplies used or consumed by a contractor or his or her subcontractor in or about the performance of the work contracted to be done or that supplies laborers, rental machinery, tools, or equipment to the extent used in the prosecution of the work
.” If a claimant files a VSOC for “an amount greater than the amount due” without a reasonable possibility that the amount is due and with knowledge that the claim is excessive, the claimant “shall forfeit all rights to the amount claimed” and becomes liable for the opposing party’s costs and attorneys’ fees. C.R.S. § 38-26-110. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Amanda E. McKinlay, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. McKinlay may be contacted at amckinlay@swlaw.com

    GRSM Attorneys Recognized in The Best Lawyers in AmericaÂź 2027

    August 24, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani is pleased to announce that 183 of its attorneys were listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2027 Edition, six of whom received “Lawyer of the Year” recognitions. Additionally, 49 GRSM attorneys were recognized in Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch 2027. Best Lawyers lists are compiled based on peer-review evaluations. For the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in AmericaÂź, results were determined using millions of confidential attorney evaluations. Ones to Watch adopts the same peer-review methodology. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani