BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    landscaping construction expert witness Maricopa County Arizona tract home expert witness Maricopa County Arizona Subterranean parking expert witness Maricopa County Arizona office building expert witness Maricopa County Arizona mid-rise construction expert witness Maricopa County Arizona custom home expert witness Maricopa County Arizona multi family housing expert witness Maricopa County Arizona concrete tilt-up expert witness Maricopa County Arizona casino resort expert witness Maricopa County Arizona condominium expert witness Maricopa County Arizona Medical building expert witness Maricopa County Arizona housing expert witness Maricopa County Arizona structural steel construction expert witness Maricopa County Arizona production housing expert witness Maricopa County Arizona parking structure expert witness Maricopa County Arizona high-rise construction expert witness Maricopa County Arizona institutional building expert witness Maricopa County Arizona retail construction expert witness Maricopa County Arizona townhome construction expert witness Maricopa County Arizona custom homes expert witness Maricopa County Arizona low-income housing expert witness Maricopa County Arizona industrial building expert witness Maricopa County Arizona
    Maricopa County Arizona expert witness concrete failureMaricopa County Arizona consulting architect expert witnessMaricopa County Arizona consulting general contractorMaricopa County Arizona architecture expert witnessMaricopa County Arizona civil engineering expert witnessMaricopa County Arizona construction claims expert witnessMaricopa County Arizona contractor expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Maricopa County, Arizona

    Arizona Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2620; ARS §12-1363, 1361, 1364) Current laws on the books require a purchaser of a home to provide written notice at least 90 days before commencing legal action. This gives the homebuilder time to inspect, repair or replace the defect if it falls within the specifications of the warranty. Homebuilder has 60 days to respond to written notice which may include offer to replace, repair or offer monetary compensationSB 1311 is a similar statute that covers multi-family dwellings. If no resolution is met through alternative dispute resolution procedures and a civil lawsuit is filed, the seller’s insurance company must treat a notice of a dwelling action as a notice of a claim subject to the insurance policy without affecting available coverage under the policy


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Maricopa County Arizona

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License required to bid or contract.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Central Arizona
    Local # 0310
    16430 N Scottsdale Road Suite 150
    Scottsdale, AZ 85254

    Maricopa County Arizona Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Southern Arizona Home Builders Association
    Local # 0335
    2840 N Country Club Rd Ste 100
    Tucson, AZ 85716

    Maricopa County Arizona Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Northern Arizona Builders Association
    Local # 0315
    1500 E Cedar Ave Suite 86
    Flagstaff, AZ 86004

    Maricopa County Arizona Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Maricopa County Arizona


    Court Sharpens The “Sword” And Strengthens The “Shield” Of Contractors’ License Law

    Is the Obsession With Recordable Injury Rates a Deadly Safety Distraction?

    What the FIU Bridge Collapse Says About Peer Review

    Navigating the Diverging Landscape of Climate Disclosure Laws

    Render Unto Caesar: Considerations for Returning Withheld Sums

    Eastern District of Pennsylvania Clarifies Standard for Imposing Spoliation Sanctions

    Best Practices: Commercial Lockouts in Arizona

    Former Zurich Executive to Head Willis North America Construction Insurance Group

    Helsinki Stream City: A Re-imagining Outside the System

    The Expansion of Potential Liability of Construction Managers and Consultants

    NYC’s First Five-Star Hotel in Decade Seen at One57 Tower

    New California "Construction" Legislation

    Collapse Claim Fails Due To Defectively Designed Roof and Deck

    ASCE Statement on Passage of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 2022

    Massachusetts Appellate Court Confirms Construction Defects are Not Covered Under Commercial General Liability Policies

    A Trio of Environmental Decisions from the Fourth Circuit

    Separation of Insureds Provision in CGL Policies

    No Trial Credit in NJ Appellate Decision for Non-Settling Successive Tortfeasors – Must Demonstrate Proof of Initial Tortfeasor Negligence and Proximate Cause

    Thirteen Payne & Fears Attorneys Honored by Best Lawyers

    Immigrants, Accidents and Lawsuit Loans: Does NY Need New Rules?

    NAHB Examines Single-Family Detached Concentration Statistics

    Defeating the Ten-Year Statute of Repose For Latent Construction Defects

    The Complex Insurance Coverage Reporter – A Year in Review

    United States Supreme Court Limits Class Arbitration

    Lewis Brisbois Ranks Among Top 25 Firms on NLJ’s 2021 Women in Law Scorecard

    Cape Town Seeks World Cup Stadium Construction Collusion Damages

    Insurer's Motion to Dismiss Allegations of Collapse Rejected

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (05/23/23) – Distressed Prices, Carbon Removal and Climate Change

    Faulty Workmanship Exclusion Does Not Bar Coverage

    Insurer Must Defend Claims of Alleged Willful Coal Removal

    Los Angeles Is Burning. But California’s Insurance Industry Is Not About to Collapse.

    Angela Cooner Appointed Vice-Chair of Arizona’s Inaugural Board of Legal Specialization Construction Defect Law Advisory Commission

    Supreme Judicial Court of Maine Addresses Earth Movement Exclusion

    Trump Sues Casinos to Get Conditions Fixed or Name Off

    Brenda Radmacher to Speak at Construction Super Conference 2024

    Pandemic-Related Construction Materials Pricing Poses Challenges in Construction Lawsuits

    Understanding the California Consumer Privacy Act

    Keep it Simple with Nunn-Agreements in Colorado

    U.S. Construction Spending Rose in 2017 by Least in Six Years

    Minnesota Senate Office Building Called Unconstitutional

    Every High-Tech Building Has Many Lifespans

    Harlem Developers Reach Deal with Attorney General

    Updates to AIA Contract Applications

    Federal Court Reaffirms Arbitrators’ Role in Consolidation of Separate Arbitrations

    Los Angeles Considering Census of Seismically Unstable Buildings

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Adopts New Rule in Breach-of-the-Consent-to-Settle-Clause Cases

    Metrostudy Shows New Subdivisions in Midwest

    Settlement Conference May Not Be the End in Construction Defect Case

    Georgia Supreme Court Rules Construction Defects Can Constitute an Occurrence in CGL Policies

    Project Delivery Methods: A Bird’s-Eye View
    Corporate Profile

    MARICOPA COUNTY ARIZONA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Maricopa County, Arizona Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Maricopa County's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Maricopa County, Arizona

    Agent Not Liable for Loss Given Insured’s Vague Instructions for Coverage

    April 08, 2026 —
    The Illinois Appellate Court affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the insured’s agent because there was no breach of duty. Jon Van Order v. Hauk, et al., 2025 Ill. App. Unpub. LEXIS 2378 (Ill. Ct. App. Dec. 23, 2025). The insured began renovating a vacant home in October 2018. He met with agent Joseph Hauk and explained the property was vacant and would be going through renovations for the next several months. Hauk then procured a policy through Shelter Insurance Company insuring the vacant property against several specified perils. The policy provided coverage for water damage if “[t]he exterior of the building sustained a covered loss” and “that loss created an opening through which the water entered.” Damage caused by escaping water from within a plumbing system was excluded if: (1) the damage was caused by a “continuous or repeated leakage over a period of fourteen days or more” or (2) the insured premises had been vacant for 30 consecutive days immediately preceding the loss. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    PJM’s Reliability Backstop Procurement Proposal—Fast-Track Capacity to Meet Rising Large-Load Demand

    May 12, 2026 —
    In January, we discussed the Statement of Principles jointly signed by the National Energy Dominance Council and governors across the mid-Atlantic region—framing accelerating demand (especially from large-scale data centers) as an emergency reliability issue for PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM), the nation’s largest power grid operator. That policy signal is now becoming a near-term, accelerated procurement and contracting exercise. On April 8, 2026, PJM notified stakeholders of a critical issue fast path reliability backstop procurement process. PJM subsequently released a request for information (RFI) with respect to a proposed Reliability Backstop Procurement (RBP)—a one-time mechanism intended to attract significant new capacity to address projected reliability shortfalls driven by large-load growth. RBP compresses what is often a multiyear market and regulatory conversation into a fast-moving set of commercial choices. Developers, large loads, utilities and capital providers should be preparing now for (i) an accelerated bilateral contracting window and (ii) a standardized PJM-led backstop procurement if bilateral deals do not clear enough capacity. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury, Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury and Andrew H. Jacobs, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Jacobs may be contacted at andrew.jacobs@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Four Kahana Feld Attorneys Selected to 2027 Southern California Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars Lists

    August 16, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – Aug. 3, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce that partners Jason Feld, Amir Kahana, and Sharon Oh-Kubisch were selected to the 2027 Southern California Super Lawyers list, and attorney Hannah Ellenhorn Bloom was selected to the 2027 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars list. Jason Feld was recognized in the area of Construction Litigation. He is a founding partner of Kahana Feld and focuses his practice on the defense of homebuilders, contractors, developers, and real estate professionals primarily in construction defect, general liability, insurance defense, construction accident, and real estate matters. He also represents government entities handling construction, premises liability, general liability, and environmental claims. He serves as panel counsel for many prominent insurance carriers, as well as personal counsel to several national and regional homebuilders, developers, and general contractors. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    Best Lawyers Recognizes 33 White and Williams LLP Lawyers

    August 24, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP is pleased to congratulate our attorneys recognized among the 2027 Best Lawyers in America® rankings. Best Lawyers® has recognized Michael W. Horner, Chair of the Healthcare Group and Managing Partner of the Cherry Hill, NJ Office, as a 2027 "Lawyer of the Year” in the area of Litigation - Insurance for Cherry Hill. Michael Horner’s has extensive experience litigating, mediating and arbitrating complex catastrophic cases throughout multiple jurisdictions in the Northeast, with litigation and counseling experience that spans several decades in the areas of healthcare, catastrophic loss and employment matters in multiple state and federal jurisdictions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    Jonathan Aihie Named to The National Bar Association’s “Top 40 Under 40” List

    August 03, 2026 —
    Fort Lauderdale Partner Jonathan Aihie was recently named to The National Bar Association (NBA) “Top 40 Under 40” list. The NBA “Top 40 Under 40” recognizes the nation's top lawyers under the age of 40 who demonstrate professional excellence, leadership, and commitment to the community. Recipients represent a broad cross-section of the legal profession, including private practice, government, academia, the judiciary, corporate counsel, and public service. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Lienor Dealing With “Show Cause” Summons by Condominium Unit Owner

    September 01, 2026 —
    One of the statutory vehicles to shorten a construction lienor’s statute of limitations to foreclose on a construction lien is through a “show cause” summons that essentially requires the lienor to foreclose on the lien within 20 days from receipt of the “show cause” summons. This is a statutory procedure under Florida’s Lien Law in Fla. Stat. s. 713.21(4). If a lienor receives a “show cause” summons and lawsuit, the lienor should, without delay, counterclaim or file a separate lien foreclosure lawsuit within the 20-day period without exception. This is provided the lienor wants to move forward with its lien. If a lienor does not, the lien will be discharged of record. If you are a lienor and receive a “show cause” summons, please immediately consult with construction counsel that can best advise you and perfect your lien rights. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    $10.5M Settlement Ends George Washington Bridge Debris Liability Fight

    September 15, 2026 —
    A $10.5-million settlement that recently came to light has ended a six-year legal fight over whether a truck part that may have been lying on the George Washington Bridge roadway for more than 10 minutes was there long enough for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to have found and removed it before it caused a catastrophic accident. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Not Every Job Is Worth Winning: Contract Risk Questions Contractors Should Ask Before They Bid

    September 29, 2026 —
    Introduction Winning the work is not the same as winning the project, at least financially. Consider a contractor that commits to procure custom or long-lead materials before receiving complete construction documents. Depending on the language of the contract, if the final design is altered after those materials have been ordered, the contractor may be left responsible for replacement costs, procurement delays, or both. Alternatively, a subcontractor that accepts a pay-if-paid provision without investigating the owner’s financing, or prematurely waives lien rights, potentially risks nonpayment for properly performed work. Such concessions can quickly transform an apparently profitable project into a significant financial burden. A successful bid can therefore become an unsuccessful project if the contractor accepts contractual “red flags” without evaluating their consequences and the long-term financial impacts that they may have. The significance of each risk will depend on the project, the parties, the proposed contract, applicable law, and the contractor’s business objectives. Although not comprehensive, this article identifies several key considerations for that process to help mitigate certain risks. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jack Mayo, Jones Walker LLP
    Mr. Mayo may be contacted at jmayo@joneswalker.com