BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    mid-rise construction expert witness Joseph City Arizona landscaping construction expert witness Joseph City Arizona custom home expert witness Joseph City Arizona retail construction expert witness Joseph City Arizona multi family housing expert witness Joseph City Arizona industrial building expert witness Joseph City Arizona production housing expert witness Joseph City Arizona Medical building expert witness Joseph City Arizona Subterranean parking expert witness Joseph City Arizona institutional building expert witness Joseph City Arizona custom homes expert witness Joseph City Arizona high-rise construction expert witness Joseph City Arizona housing expert witness Joseph City Arizona hospital construction expert witness Joseph City Arizona office building expert witness Joseph City Arizona tract home expert witness Joseph City Arizona casino resort expert witness Joseph City Arizona structural steel construction expert witness Joseph City Arizona condominiums expert witness Joseph City Arizona low-income housing expert witness Joseph City Arizona condominium expert witness Joseph City Arizona townhome construction expert witness Joseph City Arizona
    Joseph City Arizona slope failure expert witnessJoseph City Arizona contractor expert witnessJoseph City Arizona structural concrete expertJoseph City Arizona construction scheduling expert witnessJoseph City Arizona stucco expert witnessJoseph City Arizona OSHA expert witness constructionJoseph City Arizona expert witness commercial buildings
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Joseph City, Arizona

    Arizona Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2620; ARS §12-1363, 1361, 1364) Current laws on the books require a purchaser of a home to provide written notice at least 90 days before commencing legal action. This gives the homebuilder time to inspect, repair or replace the defect if it falls within the specifications of the warranty. Homebuilder has 60 days to respond to written notice which may include offer to replace, repair or offer monetary compensationSB 1311 is a similar statute that covers multi-family dwellings. If no resolution is met through alternative dispute resolution procedures and a civil lawsuit is filed, the seller’s insurance company must treat a notice of a dwelling action as a notice of a claim subject to the insurance policy without affecting available coverage under the policy


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Joseph City Arizona

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License required to bid or contract.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Northern Arizona Builders Association
    Local # 0315
    1500 E Cedar Ave Suite 86
    Flagstaff, AZ 86004

    Joseph City Arizona Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Central Arizona
    Local # 0310
    16430 N Scottsdale Road Suite 150
    Scottsdale, AZ 85254

    Joseph City Arizona Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Southern Arizona Home Builders Association
    Local # 0335
    2840 N Country Club Rd Ste 100
    Tucson, AZ 85716

    Joseph City Arizona Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Joseph City Arizona


    Cross-Office Team Secures Defense Verdict in Favor of Client in Asbestos Case

    Certain Private Projects Now Fall Under Prevailing Wage Laws. Is Yours One of Them?

    New-Home Sales in U.S. Unexpectedly Fall to Four-Month Low

    Touchdown! – The Construction Industry’s Winning Audible to the COVID Blitz

    2024 Construction Law Update

    Unlicensed Contractors Caught in a Sting Operation

    Record Keeping—the Devil’s in the Details

    Governor Ducey Vetoes Water and Development Bills

    Nevada Bill Aims to Reduce Legal Fees For Construction Defect Practitioners

    Builders Beware: A New Class Of Defendants In Asbestos Lawsuits

    NYC Condo Skyscraper's Builder Wins a Round -- With a Catch

    Contractor’s Unwritten Contractual Claim Denied by Sovereign Immunity; Mandamus Does Not Help

    The Basics of Subcontractor Defaults – Key Considerations

    Cliff White Expands Insurance Litigation Team at Payne & Fears

    Colorado Senate Revives Construction Defects Reform Bill

    A Court-Side Seat: Appeals and Agency Developments at the Close of 2020

    Pacific Coast Highway to Reopen Near Malibu After January Fires

    Business Risk Exclusion Dooms Coverage for Construction Defect Claim

    Property Owners Sue San Francisco Over Sinking Sidewalks

    Four Kahana Feld Attorneys Selected to 2027 Southern California Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars Lists

    One Industry, One Goal: Construction Safety Week 2026

    Construction Demand Unsteady, Gains in Some Regions

    Ortega Outbids Pros to Build $10 Billion Property Empire

    Anthony Luckie Speaks With Columbia University On Receiving Graduate Degree in Construction Administration Alongside His Father

    Federal Court Dismisses Coverage Action in Favor of Pending State Proceeding

    Federal Court Upholds Privity Requirement in Additional Insured Endorsement; Finds No Equitable Estoppel

    Why a Challenge to Philadelphia’s Project Labor Agreement Would Be Successful

    Read Before You Sign: Claim Waivers in Project Documents

    Pass-Through Subcontractor Claims, Liquidating Agreements, and Avoiding a Two-Front War

    South Carolina Supreme Court Requires Transparency by Rejecting an Insurer’s “Cut-and-Paste” Reservation of Rights

    Newmeyer & Dillion Attorneys Listed in the Best Lawyers in America© 2017

    Hydrogen—A Key Element in the EU’s Green Planning

    Texas Federal Court Upholds Professional Services Exclusion to Preclude Duty to Defend

    Finding Plaintiff Intentionally Spoliated Evidence, the Northern District of Indiana Imposes Sanction

    Courts Are Ordering Remote Depositions as the COVID-19 Pandemic Continues

    Manhattan Condo Lists for Record $150 Million

    Dorian Lashes East Canada, Then Weakens Heading Out to Sea

    Insurer Must Defend Claims of Alleged Willful Coal Removal

    Top 10 Lessons Learned from a Construction Attorney

    Eight Things You Need to Know About the AAA’s New Construction Arbitration Rules

    Todd Ehrenreich Joins International Academy of Trial Lawyers

    Jonathan Aihie Named to The National Bar Association’s “Top 40 Under 40” List

    Court Clarifies Sequence in California’s SB800

    Understand and Define Key Substantive Contract Provisions

    Insurer’s Attempt to Shift Cost of Defense to Another Insurer Found Void as to Public Policy

    Intel's $20B Ohio 'Mega-Site' is Latest Development in Chip Makers' Rush to Boost US Production

    Modernist Houses Galore! [visual candy for architects]

    Traub Lieberman Partners Ryan Jones and Scot Samis Obtain Affirmation of Final Summary Judgment

    Existence of “Duty” in Negligence Action is Question of Law

    Limiting Liability: Three Clauses to Consider in your Next Construction Contract
    Corporate Profile

    JOSEPH CITY ARIZONA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Joseph City, Arizona Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Joseph City's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Joseph City, Arizona

    Modular Construction’s Big Boom: New Risks Outpacing Standard Contracts in Industrial Projects

    March 24, 2026 —
    Modular construction is revolutionizing the construction industry, tackling labor shortages, sustainability goals and supply-chain challenges, with the global market for modular and prefabricated construction projected to reach over $200 billion by 2030. While residential builders have embraced modular’s speed and affordability, the greatest risks—and opportunities—are emerging in the industrial sector, where project scale and complexity demand new legal strategies. In 2023, Chad Theriot explored industrial and infrastructure applications of modular construction, addressing risks like offsite fabrication and integration complexities in his article, “The Rise of Modular Construction—Impacts for Consideration.” Since that time, modular construction has continued to experience significant advancements and has been increasingly adopted by contractors across a broad spectrum of industrial and commercial projects. As modular construction continues to reshape the industrial landscape, contractors and owners alike must be mindful of the legal implications associated with its use, specifically as it relates to liability and risk allocation, regulatory compliance, quality control and upstream factors such as transportation and intellectual property concerns. Reprinted courtesy of Chad Theriot and Jack Mayo, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    California Enacts Change Order Fair Payment Act

    March 24, 2026 —
    For private works construction contracts entered on or after January 1, 2026, recent legislation establishes a claims and dispute resolution process for change orders. The law is codified at Civil Code § 8850. A synopsis of the pertinent provisions includes the following:
    1. Submitting a Claim. Contractors or subcontractors must submit a detailed, documented claim when requesting additional time or payment.
    2. Owner’s Response Time. The owner must meet and confer within thirty (30) days after receiving the claim. Within ten (10) days of meeting, the owner must provide a written statement identifying which portions of the claim are undisputed and which are disputed. An owner’s failure to respond is treated as disputing the entire claim.
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael J. Baker, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Baker may be contacted at mjbaker@swlaw.com

    Kahana Feld Obtains Favorable Result in High-Exposure NY Premises Liability Case

    June 15, 2026 —
    Kahana Feld partner Leigh Katz obtained a significant victory in a recent matter involving a videotaped alleged trip and fall on the sidewalk in front of the client’s commercial residence. The plaintiff claimed he suffered a knee injury that necessitated surgery, along with other assorted injuries that prevented him from continuing high-level athletic activities. Leigh was able to demonstrate that the fall was staged and received a voluntary discontinuance with prejudice. At mediation, Leigh emphasized that KF’s expert witness challenged the plaintiff’s claim that the fall was caused by a sidewalk height differential after reviewing the videotape footage and determining the plaintiff’s fall began before his feet made contact with the alleged defect. Based on this analysis, the expert concluded the reported height differential did not initiate the fall, which supported KF’s position that the incident depicted in the video was unrealistic and appeared staged. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Leigh Katz, Kahana Feld
    Ms. Katz may be contacted at lkatz@kahanafeld.com

    Insurer Granted Summary Judgment on Claim for Roof Damage Caused by Windstorm

    May 26, 2026 —
    The insurer successfully moved for summary judgment, eliminating the insured’s claim for roof damage due to windstorm. Mulas v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20537 (Jan. 30, 2026). The insureds’ commercial property sustained windstorm damage during Hurricane Ian. Westchester denied the claim. The insureds believed Westchester wrongfully denied coverage for roof damage and various interior damage to property. The insureds also argued that Westchester’s actual cash value (ACV) payment did not reflect the fully insured loss. The insureds sued and Westchester moved for summary judgment. Westchester argued the roof damage was not covered because Hurricane Ian did not cause the damage. Westchester hired an engineer who determined the roof damage was not caused by wind from Hurricane Ian. Westchester pointed out that the insureds’ expert also found no wind damage on the roof. The insureds offered no other evidence suggesting the hurricane caused roof damage. Therefore, the insureds could not show that Westchester breached the policy by denying coverage. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    A Customized Approach to Data Center Construction

    June 29, 2026 —
    Data center construction projects are, to put it mildly, distinct. They differ from traditional construction in a host of manners, and are particularly distinctive because the value of the facility depends on unique measures of performance. A center that cannot meet uptime, cooling, redundancy or connectivity standards will not achieve its mission, whether or not the structure itself meets standard industry contract-form “substantial completion” or “mechanical completion” definitions. Owners, developers, lenders, operators and hyperscalers—especially hyperscalers!—want it all. They seek favorable and stable pricing, accelerated delivery and sophisticated components, all of which are evolving in “real project time.” Standard construction contract forms deserve extensive modifications to align clauses with expectations, with a heightened focus on systems integration, commissioning, and allocation of special risks. This article details customized considerations for drafting, negotiating and administering data center design and construction agreements. Reprinted courtesy of James P. Bobotek, Pillsbury, Arielle L. Murphy, Pillsbury and Robert A. James, Pillsbury Mr. Bobotek may be contacted at james.bobotek@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Murphy may be contacted at arielle.murphy@pillsburylaw.com Mr. James may be contacted at rob.james@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Ball Janik LLP Welcomes Construction Defect Attorney and U.S. Air Force Veteran Jake Scott to its Fort Lauderdale Office

    June 02, 2026 —
    Ball Janik LLP, a leading construction defect and insurance recovery law firm, has welcomed Jake Scott as an associate in its Fort Lauderdale office. Scott joins the Construction Defect Practice Group, bringing experience across construction litigation that includes construction defect, contract dispute, and negligence matters, along with a track record of representing construction professionals through depositions, court appearances, and trial preparation to support the firm's steady growth and client service statewide. "We're excited to welcome Jake Scott to our Fort Lauderdale office and Construction Defect Practice Group," said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner at Ball Janik LLP. "We look forward to the fresh perspectives and legal solutions he will provide for community associations across South Florida." Scott is a results-driven attorney dedicated to providing strategic counsel for complex legal challenges. He has experience managing all phases of a case, from early investigation and discovery through trial preparation and settlement negotiations. Prior to joining Ball Janik, Scott served as an associate attorney in Fort Lauderdale, where he represented clients in construction litigation matters, handled depositions and court appearances, conducted legal research, and drafted pleadings, motions, and briefs. He also worked as an attorney in Tampa, where he represented contractors, subcontractors, and construction firms in defending claims involving construction defects, contractual disputes, and negligence, and worked closely with expert witnesses, engineers, and consultants to develop and present technical evidence. Scott's experience representing the development and building sides of construction disputes provides a valuable, contrast-driven perspective that supports the strategic evaluation of claims and practical approaches to resolution for Ball Janik's clients. A proud veteran, Scott served in the United States Air Force for eight years, including roles as an Airspace Control Officer and in Space Systems Operations, supporting safe space flight operations and satellite communications. Carrying the discipline of airborne operations, Scott worked in the aerospace sector as a Satellite Engineer and Orbital Analyst. He also held a role in the housing sector, supporting marketing and business development initiatives. Scott received his law degree from Stetson University College of Law. He attended American Military University, where he earned degrees in marketing, business management, and related support services. About Ball Janik LLP Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 50-plus attorneys and paralegals in 5 offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, and Corporate International. Read more here: https://www.balljanik.com.

    We Won’t Permit That Excuse!

    June 23, 2026 —
    A Texas appellate court recently ruled that a building permit wasn’t a condition precedent for a construction project. That caught our attention. Can you build a commercial project without a permit? But as we read the case, we see the court’s reasoning. And it reminds us of an important legal principle that should inform our contract drafting and negotiation. The case was a civil suit brought by the project owner against its tenant improvement contractor for work on a medical spa. The owner claimed that the contractor didn’t perform the work properly and didn’t finish construction. The contractor argued that delays and problems were caused by the owner, alleging numerous failures, including the owner’s failure to secure a building permit. Reprinted courtesy of Curt Martin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Richard Eiszner, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Martin may be contacted at cmartin@pecklaw.com Mr. Eiszner may be contacted at reiszner@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (7/8/26) – Data Centers Negotiate Flexibility for Speed, Hotel Deal Activities Focus on Luxury, and DC Sues Apartment Owners

    July 20, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, rail projects gain steam across the U.S., AI optimizes building operations, a modular approach speeds data center construction, and more!
    • Hyperscalers want their data centers online, and utilities want to provide interconnections, but both are still looking for common operating guidelines. (Herman K. Trabish, Construction Dive)
    • Contractors are taking advantage of multibillion-dollar train and transit contracts, even as funding challenges create hurdles for project execution. (Matthew Thibault, Construction Dive)
    • Although hospitality and leisure M&A deal volume was down 2.5% in the first half of 2026 compared to the prior six months, investors are concentrating on the upper end of the market, including luxury hotels, wellness resorts and gaming, or “data-rich,” platforms. (Noor Adatia, Hotel Dive)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team