BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    low-income housing expert witness Chandler Heights Arizona custom home expert witness Chandler Heights Arizona retail construction expert witness Chandler Heights Arizona landscaping construction expert witness Chandler Heights Arizona high-rise construction expert witness Chandler Heights Arizona production housing expert witness Chandler Heights Arizona Medical building expert witness Chandler Heights Arizona condominium expert witness Chandler Heights Arizona hospital construction expert witness Chandler Heights Arizona office building expert witness Chandler Heights Arizona multi family housing expert witness Chandler Heights Arizona custom homes expert witness Chandler Heights Arizona mid-rise construction expert witness Chandler Heights Arizona parking structure expert witness Chandler Heights Arizona townhome construction expert witness Chandler Heights Arizona tract home expert witness Chandler Heights Arizona institutional building expert witness Chandler Heights Arizona casino resort expert witness Chandler Heights Arizona housing expert witness Chandler Heights Arizona industrial building expert witness Chandler Heights Arizona condominiums expert witness Chandler Heights Arizona Subterranean parking expert witness Chandler Heights Arizona
    Chandler Heights Arizona building envelope expert witnessChandler Heights Arizona roofing construction expertChandler Heights Arizona soil failure expert witnessChandler Heights Arizona contractor expert witnessChandler Heights Arizona fenestration expert witnessChandler Heights Arizona consulting architect expert witnessChandler Heights Arizona expert witness roofing
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Chandler Heights, Arizona

    Arizona Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2620; ARS §12-1363, 1361, 1364) Current laws on the books require a purchaser of a home to provide written notice at least 90 days before commencing legal action. This gives the homebuilder time to inspect, repair or replace the defect if it falls within the specifications of the warranty. Homebuilder has 60 days to respond to written notice which may include offer to replace, repair or offer monetary compensationSB 1311 is a similar statute that covers multi-family dwellings. If no resolution is met through alternative dispute resolution procedures and a civil lawsuit is filed, the seller’s insurance company must treat a notice of a dwelling action as a notice of a claim subject to the insurance policy without affecting available coverage under the policy


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Chandler Heights Arizona

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License required to bid or contract.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Southern Arizona Home Builders Association
    Local # 0335
    2840 N Country Club Rd Ste 100
    Tucson, AZ 85716

    Chandler Heights Arizona Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Central Arizona
    Local # 0310
    16430 N Scottsdale Road Suite 150
    Scottsdale, AZ 85254

    Chandler Heights Arizona Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Northern Arizona Builders Association
    Local # 0315
    1500 E Cedar Ave Suite 86
    Flagstaff, AZ 86004

    Chandler Heights Arizona Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Chandler Heights Arizona


    The Housing Market Is Softening, But Home Depot and Lowe's Are Crushing It

    Contractual Warranty Agreements May Preclude Future Tort Recovery

    Estoppel Certificate? Estop and Check Your Lease

    The Connecticut Appellate Court Decides That Construction Contractor Was Not Obligated To Continue Accelerated Schedule to Mitigate Its Damages Following Late Delivery of Materials by Supplier

    Residential Construction: Shrinking Now, Growing Later?

    Vinny Testaverde Alleges $5 Million Mansion Riddled with Defects

    Few Homes Available to Reno Buyers, Plenty of Commercial Properties

    PCL Sues Big Bank for $30M in Claimed NJ Mall Unpaid Work

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Will Not Address Trigger for DEP Environmental Cleanup Action at This Time

    Pipeline Safety Violations Cause of Explosion that Killed 8

    Understanding the Real Estate and Tax Implications of Florida's Buyer Ban Law

    Prompt Payment More Likely on Residential Construction Jobs Than Commercial or Public Jobs

    7 Ways Technology is Changing Construction (guest post)

    Bailout for an Improperly Drafted Indemnification Provision

    Winning Attorney Fees in Litigation as a California Construction Contractor or Subcontractor

    Architects Should Not Make Initial Decisions on Construction Disputes

    Connecticut Federal District Court Again Finds "Collapse" Provisions Ambiguous

    Coverage Under Builder's Risk Policy Properly Excluded for Damage to Existing Structure Only

    Carroll Brock of Larchmont Homes Dies at Age 88

    Attorneys' Fees Awarded as Part of "Damages Because of Property Damage"

    Indictments Issued in Las Vegas HOA Scam

    Can You Really Be Liable For a Product You Didn’t Make? In New Jersey, the Answer is Yes

    U.K. High Court COVID-19 Victory for Policyholders May Set a Trend in the U.S.

    Parking Garage Collapse May Be Due to Construction Defect

    When Is a Project Delay Material and Actionable?

    Quick Note: Lis Pendens Bond When Lis Pendens Not Founded On Recorded Instrument Or Statute

    Word of the Day: “Contractor”

    Can’t Get a Written Change Order? Document, Document, Document

    Award Doubled in Retrial of New Jersey Elevator Injury Case

    Arbitration Denied: Third Appellate District Holds Arbitration Clause Procedurally and Substantively Unconscionable

    Withdrawal of an Admission in California May Shift Costs—Including Attorneys’ Fees—Incurred in Connection with the Withdrawal

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (4/17/24) – Travel & Tourism Reach All-Time High, President Biden Emphasizes Housing in SOTU Address, and State Transportation Projects Under Scrutiny

    A Court-Side Seat: Permit Shields, Hurricane Harvey and the Decriminalization of “Incidental Taking”

    NCCER Celebrates Construction Education Programs and Products in 2024

    Colorado Court of Appeals’ Ruling Highlights Dangers of Excessive Public Works Claims

    No Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Based Upon Exclusion for Contractual Assumption of Liability

    SDNY Ruling Highlights Privilege Risks in Client Use of Generative AI

    Congratulations to BWB&O for Ranking #4 in Orange County Business Journal’s 2023 Book of Lists for Law Firms!

    South Dakota Supreme Court Holds That Faulty Workmanship Constitutes an “Occurrence”

    New Homes in Palo Alto to Be Electric-Car Ready

    Federal Court Predicts Coverage In Nevada for Damage Caused by Faulty Workmanship

    Contractors Pay Heed: The Federal Circuit Clarifies Two Important Issues For Bid Protestors

    Building a Case: Document Management for Construction Litigation

    Sioux City Building Owners Sue Architect over Renovation Costs

    North Carolina Learns More Lessons From Latest Storm

    Unjust Enrichment and Express Contract Don’t Mix

    The Condominium Warranty Against Structural Defects in the District of Columbia

    When Construction Contracts Go Sideways in Bankruptcy

    Thinking About a Daubert Motion to Challenge an Expert Opinion?

    Risk Associated with Design-Build Project Delivery Method
    Corporate Profile

    CHANDLER HEIGHTS ARIZONA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Chandler Heights, Arizona Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Chandler Heights, Arizona

    New Executive Order Prohibits Federal Contractors from Engaging in DEI Through Employment and Procurement Activities

    April 27, 2026 —
    On March 26, 2026, President Trump signed Executive Order 14398, entitled Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors, requiring federal agencies to add contractual language in all federal contracts prohibiting contractors and subcontractors from engaging in any racially discriminatory DEI activities, as defined by the Executive Order (EO). While this EO includes language similar to prior DEI-related orders, it introduces a significant expansion in enforcement by subjecting non-compliant contractors to liability under the False Claims Act (FCA), including exposure to whistleblower actions and qui tam litigation. A qui tam claim is a civil action by a private individual on behalf of the government alleging fraud against federal programs and seeking to recover damages. The new EO states that involvement in any racially discriminatory DEI activities is not only unethical and illegal, but also deemed fraudulent against federal programs because it is material to the government’s payment decisions. The definition of DEI activities here matters, as this EO expands a contractor’s obligations beyond the management of its employment policies and includes prohibitions against funding or expending time or resources on DEI activities and contracting with subcontractors, vendors, or suppliers utilizing DEI programs. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Laura De Santos, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani
    Ms. De Santos may be contacted at ldesantos@grsm.com

    Late Notice Bars Insured’s Claim for Water Leak Damage

    August 11, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the insured’s claim due to late notice. Global Approach, Inc. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120183 (S. D. Fla. June 1, 2026). Global suffered water damage on September 3, 2021, which originated in the bathroom of one of its rental properties. Global reported the claim to its insurer, Scottsdale, on October 19, 2021. Prior to reporting the claim, Global hired a handyman to inspect the property and then demolished the damaged area and repaired the bathroom. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    A Win for Clarity: What a Recent Federal Court Decision Means for Davis-Bacon Compliance

    July 13, 2026 —
    Following the Department of Labor’s 2023 Davis-Bacon rule changes, federal construction contractors faced a pressing question: not whether paying prevailing wages is required, but how far those obligations could extend. Could they reach off-site material suppliers? Delivery drivers? Contracts that omitted Davis-Bacon clauses entirely? A recent federal court decision in AGC of America v. US Department of Labor answers these questions in important ways, vacating several disputed provisions and giving contractors greater certainty when pricing, bidding, and administering federal construction projects. The ruling addresses three aspects of the 2023 regulations that sought to extend Davis-Bacon obligations beyond their traditional scope. By vacating those provisions, the decision creates a more predictable compliance environment and reinforces an important principle: Davis-Bacon enforcement works best when contractors, workers, and regulators operate under clear, objective rules. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Stephen E. Irving, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Mr. Irving may be contacted at sirving@pecklaw.com

    White and Williams LLP Secures Trio of Cyber Coverage Wins

    May 12, 2026 —
    Three weeks, three jurisdictions, three cyber wins. White and Williams picked up the first victory on March 9, 2026, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, where the court granted summary judgment to their client enforcing a Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. See Perry & Perry Builders, Inc. v. Cowbell Cyber and Obsidian Specialty Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49409 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 9, 2026). In Perry, the insured was deceived into transferring money intended for a vendor to an unintended third party. The insurer acknowledged that the loss was covered and paid the insured the policy’s Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. Discontent with a single sublimit, the insured argued that because it wired the money to the fraudster in separate transfers, it was entitled to a second Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. Reprinted courtesy of Gabriel Darwick, White and Williams LLP and Sean Elman, White and Williams LLP Mr. Darwick may be contacted at darwickg@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Elman may be contacted at elmans@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    UPDATED: No Easy Fix for Potomac River Sewage Spill, Now Estimated at $20M

    April 08, 2026 —
    One month after a collapsed pipeline north of Washington, D.C., spilled about 240 million gallons of raw sewage into the Potomac River and possibly between 300 and 400 million—which could be the largest wastewater spill in U.S. history—efforts are progressing to clear the damaged section and begin repairs despite weather and other impacts. Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record and Debra K. Rubin, Engineering News-Record Ms. Rubin may be contacted at rubind@enr.com Read the full story...

    New York Enacts First-in-the-Nation Statewide Data Center Moratorium

    August 03, 2026 —
    As of May 2026, nearly 12 gigawatts of data center load requests were in the New York Independent System Operator interconnection queue, with more than two-thirds of capacity requests entering the queue in 2025 alone. On July 14, 2026, in response to concerns over this rapid growth, Governor Kathy Hochul issued Executive Order No. 62 (the “Order”) imposing a temporary moratorium on data centers in New York State. Among the concerns cited in the Order are the cost burden on ratepayers associated with transmission upgrades required to accommodate large loads, potential environmental impacts, and large-scale water use. The moratorium is intended to halt activities while the state government develops a comprehensive legal framework for data center development. While dozens of municipal and county-level moratoriums are in place throughout the U.S., and while the legislatures of several states, including Maine, have proposed moratoriums, the Order is the first statewide moratorium to be enacted nationally. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Joshua L. Sturtevant, Sheppard
    Mr. Sturtevant may be contacted at jsturtevant@sheppard.com

    GRSM Ranked Among Top 5 Construction Law Firms by Construction Executive

    September 21, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani has been ranked the No. 5 construction law firm in the nation by Construction Executive in the magazine’s 2026 ranking of The Top 50 Construction Law Firms™. “Being named in the top five underscores the talent, experience, and nationwide capabilities of our construction team,” said Allen Estes III and Angela Richie, Chairs of GRSM’s Construction practice. “We are honored to serve as trusted counsel to clients across the construction industry and remain committed to delivering strategic solutions that help them achieve their business and project objectives.” In addition to this ranking, GRSM Construction practice group Co-Chairs Allen Estes and Angela Richie were featured in “Executive Insights 2026: Leaders in Construction Law,” where they shared insights on key risks to consider before signing construction contracts and discussed strategies for managing material cost volatility, supply-chain disruptions, and project delays. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Federal Bid Protest Standard of Review and Disparate Treatment with Ratings

    August 16, 2026 —
    A recent decision out of the Federal Claims Court explains the post-award bid protest standard of review. In Massman Construction Co. v. U.S., 2026 WL 1971985 (Fed.Cl. 2026), a protestor brought a post-award bid protest after the Army Corps of Engineers awarded the contract to another contractor. The protestor argued that the Army Corps (government) acted irrational in its evaluation through disparate treatment. The Court of Federal Claims agreed and remanded for the Army Corps to “either justify this disparity or explain why [awardee’s] lower-priced, but technically inferior proposal provides the best value to the government.” Massman Construction, supra at *1. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com