BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    townhome construction expert witness Crooked Creek Alaska office building expert witness Crooked Creek Alaska housing expert witness Crooked Creek Alaska parking structure expert witness Crooked Creek Alaska multi family housing expert witness Crooked Creek Alaska production housing expert witness Crooked Creek Alaska concrete tilt-up expert witness Crooked Creek Alaska landscaping construction expert witness Crooked Creek Alaska mid-rise construction expert witness Crooked Creek Alaska tract home expert witness Crooked Creek Alaska retail construction expert witness Crooked Creek Alaska high-rise construction expert witness Crooked Creek Alaska industrial building expert witness Crooked Creek Alaska condominiums expert witness Crooked Creek Alaska low-income housing expert witness Crooked Creek Alaska institutional building expert witness Crooked Creek Alaska condominium expert witness Crooked Creek Alaska custom home expert witness Crooked Creek Alaska structural steel construction expert witness Crooked Creek Alaska Subterranean parking expert witness Crooked Creek Alaska Medical building expert witness Crooked Creek Alaska custom homes expert witness Crooked Creek Alaska
    Crooked Creek Alaska structural concrete expertCrooked Creek Alaska engineering consultantCrooked Creek Alaska building code expert witnessCrooked Creek Alaska structural engineering expert witnessesCrooked Creek Alaska construction scheduling expert witnessCrooked Creek Alaska construction defect expert witnessCrooked Creek Alaska ada design expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Crooked Creek, Alaska

    Alaska Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB151 limits the damages that can be awarded in a construction defect lawsuit to the actual cost of fixing the defect and other closely related costs such as reasonable temporary housing expenses during the repair of the defect, any reduction in market value cause by the defect, and reasonable and necessary attorney fees.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Crooked Creek Alaska

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Mat-Su Home Builders Association
    Local # 0230
    609 S KNIK GOOSE BAY RD STE G
    Wasilla, AK 99654

    Crooked Creek Alaska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Alaska
    Local # 0200
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518

    Crooked Creek Alaska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Anchorage
    Local # 0215
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518

    Crooked Creek Alaska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Kenai Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 0233
    PO Box 1753
    Kenai, AK 99611

    Crooked Creek Alaska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Interior Alaska Builders Association
    Local # 0235
    938 Aspen Street
    Fairbanks, AK 99709

    Crooked Creek Alaska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Northern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0225
    9085 Glacier Highway Ste 202
    Juneau, AK 99801

    Crooked Creek Alaska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Southern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0240
    PO Box 6291
    Ketchikan, AK 99901

    Crooked Creek Alaska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Crooked Creek Alaska

    Corporate Profile

    CROOKED CREEK ALASKA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Crooked Creek, Alaska Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Crooked Creek, Alaska

    Partner Bryan Stofferahn and Our Walnut Creek Team Secure Summary Judgment in a $28 Million Premises Liability Case!

    September 15, 2026 —
    BWB&O is proud to announce that Partner Bryan Stofferahn and the Walnut Creek Team secured a Summary Judgment on behalf of the firm’s clients, resulting in a complete dismissal of a negligence and premises liability claim. Plaintiff, a teenager, was riding his bicycle on private commercial property when he was struck by a vehicle. Plaintiff was in a coma for 6 weeks and developed major neurocognitive dysfunction from a traumatic brain injury. BWB&O’s clients are a commercial property owner and property management company, who Plaintiff contended were liable for his injuries based on the design, condition, operation, and management of the premises. Plaintiff had demanded $28 million in settlement of the claims against all defendants. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara, LLP

    Location, Location, Location — But Which One? The Few Words in Your Construction Contract that Pick Where You Fight

    June 29, 2026 —
    Most professionals know the old real estate line: location, location, location. It turns out to be just as true for construction contracts as it is for property. Consider a recent case involving a project owner that hired two design firms for a project. When issues arose during construction, the owner sued the design firms in state court in Brazoria County, Texas, pursuant to the forum selection clause in the parties’ contracts. The defendants then removed the case to the federal district court in Galveston, a courthouse in a different county. But the owner wanted the case back in Brazoria County state court. Whether it got its wish came down to two words in the contract: “situated in.” This article is about words like those. A construction contract’s forum selection clause names the place for the fight nobody plans to have, and where that fight happens can shape how it goes. This article explains why the wording in your forum selection clause deserves careful reading before you sign a construction contract. It is not a deep dive into the mechanics of federal removal jurisdiction, and it is not an academic comparison of the terms “forum” and “venue.” Instead, it is a practical look at how courts actually read these clauses, so the location of a future fight is the one you intended. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brad Sands, Jones Walker, LLP
    Mr. Sands may be contacted at bsands@joneswalker.com

    Builders Risk/Construction All Risks and Delay in Start-Up Coverage for Large Energy Projects: Protecting Revenue Before Operations Begin

    September 21, 2026 —
    The Most Significant Loss May Be the Delay, Not the Damage Power and energy projects are uniquely vulnerable to losses during construction. Whether the project involves a utility-scale solar facility, battery storage installation, a wind farm, transmission project, LNG terminal, or conventional generation facility, loss events in this sector often have consequences far more impactful than the actual cost of repairing damaged property. Any number of construction losses can delay commercial operation of the facility by months, triggering lost revenues, financing impacts, contractual penalties, and investor concerns. In many cases, those delay-related losses significantly exceed the underlying repair costs. Construction All Risk (“CAR”) insurance and Delay in Start-Up (“DSU”) coverage are designed to respond to these exposures. However, recovering delay-related losses is far more complicated than many insureds anticipate, particularly when projects involve international stakeholders, global supply chains, and London market insurance placements. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Will Bennett, SDV Fenchurch
    Mr. Bennett may be contacted at will.bennett@sdvfenchurch.us

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (6/24/26) – HUD to Fund AI Grants, Luxury Hotel Deal Investment Activity to Surge, ESPCs to Fund Energy and Infrastructure Improvements

    July 06, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, data centers are exposed to climate change, commercial tenant sues CoStar, cities see opportunities in emerging sports markets, and more!
    • With deferred maintenance growing and capital dollars stretched thin, local governments are using ESPCs to fund energy and infrastructure improvements through future operational savings. (Vicky Uhland, Construction Dive)
    • The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development is offering up to $3 million in grants for local governments to deploy automated permitting and building code systems. (Ryan Kushner, Construction Dive)
    • Luxury hotel deals are set to see a surge in investment activity due to strong fundamentals and strengthening capital markets. (Noor Adatia, Hotel Dive)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    Inaccurate Representations Can Lead to Differing Site Conditions Claim

    May 26, 2026 —
    In the prior posting, I discussed a case dealing with a differing site condition. In that case, the owner did not have an affirmative duty to make a representation and there was no inaccurate representation made by the owner that misled the contractor. Well, what about when there is an inaccurate misrepresentation regarding the site? This was the circumstance in an older Florida case where a dredging contractor had a successful differing site conditions claim. See Jacksonville Port Authority v. Parkhill-Goodloe, Co., Inc., 362 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The government provided inaccurate information as to the lack of rock that would be encountered during the dredging that was relied on by the dredging contractor. But the government had “superior knowledge” that there was rock in an adjacent location based on a prior claim from a contractor, yet the government did not disclose the possibility that rock could be encountered. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    The Grenfell & Champlain Towers: Risk Management Considerations in the Wake of Catastrophic Loss — A UK/US Comparison

    June 02, 2026 —
    1. Introduction As part of the multinational collaborative relationship between Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and Fenchurch Law, we continually find ourselves in conversations about the sometimes subtle but sometimes drastic differences between risk management and coverage considerations from one country to the next. These differences are often highlighted by the fallout from large catastrophic losses that are widely publicized and illuminate sometimes widespread risks and perils that many others may be facing in the coming years. The response of governments and their subdivisions to the needs of victims and/or commercial parties, and insurance markets’ evaluation of and reactions to catastrophic losses vary widely from country to country and jurisdiction. In this article, we discuss these responses and reactions in the cases of the Grenfell Tower Fire in London, England, and the Champlain Tower collapse in Surfside, Florida, within the United States. These two widely publicized losses involved different risk management and insurance considerations based on where they occurred. They also saw substantially different government responses and raised varied questions about what the next steps are for their respective commercial and insurance markets. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Eric M. Clarkson, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
    Mr. Clarkson may be contacted at EClarkson@sdvlaw.com

    Congratulations to Gianna Liddy on Her Promotion to Partner

    September 21, 2026 —
    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP is proud to announce that Gianna Liddy has been promoted to partner. Gianna’s dedication, leadership, and exceptional contributions to the firm have earned her this well-deserved recognition. Please join us in congratulating her on this exciting achievement! Meet Gianna Liddy! Gianna has been with BWB&O since 2019 and has been practicing law since 2017. Her practice focuses on complex civil defense litigation, including high-exposure personal injury, premises liability, transportation, construction defect, habitability, and general liability matters. As a Supervising Attorney in the firm’s Encinitas office, she oversees a team of attorneys, collaborates closely with clients and insurance professionals, and develops litigation strategy in complex matters. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP

    Chambers USA Recognizes GRSM as 2026 Industry Leader

    June 29, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani has once again been recognized by Chambers USA, a prestigious directory of the country’s top law firms. In addition to t
    New York Condominium Association Files Construction Defect Suit

    Appraisal Goes Forward Even Though Insurer Has Yet to Determine Coverage on Additional Claims

    Construction Litigation—Battles on Many Fronts

    CSLB Reminds California Public Works Contractors to Renew Their Public Works Registration

    Court of Appeals Finds Additional Insured Coverage Despite “Care, Custody or Control” Exclusion

    Discovery Requests in Bad Faith Litigation Considered by Court

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (4/10/24) – Hotels Integrate AI, Baby-Boomers Stay Put, and Insuranc
    Hanover, Germany Apple Store Delayed by Construction Defects

    PSA: Pay If Paid Ban Goes into Effect on January 1, 2023

    Preparing Your Business For Internal Transition

    Micropiles for bad soil: a Tarheel victory

    New 2021 ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey Standards Effective February 23, 2021

    Court Finds No Coverage for Workplace “Prank” With Nail Gun

    Quick Note: Lis Pendens Bond When Lis Pendens Not Founded On Recorded Instrument Or Statute

    NEHRP Recommendations Likely To Improve Seismic Design

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized in 2019 Edition of Who’s Who Legal

    Traub Lieberman Partner Jessica Kull Obtains Favorable Arbitration Award In Year-Long High-Stakes Construction Defect Case

    The Families First Coronavirus Response Act: What Every Employer Should Know

    Alaska Supreme Court Dismisses Claims of Uncooperative Pro Se Litigant in Defect Case

    Can Your Employee File a Personal Injury Claim if They’re Injured at Work?

    Florida Federal Court to Examine Issues of Alleged Arbitrator Conflicts of Interests in Panama Canal Case

    Fourth Circuit Confirms Scope of “Witness Litigation Privilege”

    US Supreme Court Orders All Mountain Valley Gas Line Work to Proceed

    Executive Order 14275: Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement

    Think Before you Execute that Release – the Language in the Release Matters!

    Why A.I. Isn’t Going to Replace Lawyers Anytime Soon

    U.S. Housing Starts Top Forecast on Single-Family Homes

    Improper Classification Under Davis Bacon Can Be Costly

    South African Building Industry in Line for More State Support

    Crisis Averted! Pennsylvania Supreme Court Joins Other Courts in Finding that Covid-19 Presents No Physical Loss or Damage for Businesses

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (05/11/22)

    Canada Housing Starts Increase on Multiple-Unit Projects

    Speeding up Infrastructure Projects with the Cloud

    David M. McLain, Esq. to Speak at the 2014 CLM Claims College

    Subcontractor’s Claim against City Barred by City’s Compliance with Georgia Payment Bond Statute

    Insurer Disposes of Bad Faith Claim on Summary Judgment

    Contracting Chaos? How Mid-America v. US Department of Transportation is Upending DBE Certifications

    Discussion of History of Construction Defect Litigation in California

    Project Labor Agreements Will Now Be Required for Large-Scale Federal Construction Projects

    Ohio Supreme Court Holds No Occurence Arises from Subcontractor's Faulty Workmanship

    New York State Legislature Passes Legislation Expanding Wrongful Death Litigation

    Defense Owed to Directors and Officers Despite Insured vs. Insured Exclusion

    The Dangers of an Unlicensed Contractor from Every Angle

    Texas Court of Appeals Conditionally Grant Petition for Writ of Mandamus to Anderson

    Tony Sonnett Secures Highly Favorable Verdict for Client in Admitted Liability Case in Which Plaintiff Sought $34.5M

    Intricacies of Business Interruption Claim Considered

    Avoiding Wage Claims in California Construction

    Cuba: Construction Boom Potential for U.S. Construction Companies and Equipment Manufacturers?

    Attorney’s Fees Entitlement And Application Under Subcontract Default Provision

    Congratulations to Nine Gibbs Giden Partners Selected to the 2023 Southern California Super Lawyers List

    ACS Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Recognized

    Congratulations to our 2019 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars

    The New Jersey Theme Park Where Kids’ Backhoe Dreams Come True

    An Uncharted Frontier: Nevada First State to Prohibit Defense-Within-Limits Provisions

    Court of Appeals Discusses Implied Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Public Works Contracting

    Commercial Real Estate in 2023: A Snapshot

    Women in Construction Aren’t Silent Anymore. They Are Using TikTok to Battle Discrimination